Vote· ImmigrationYea
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Emmer supported President Trump's executive order to temporarily curtail immigration from certain predominantly Muslim countries, indicating a restrictive stance on immigration.
Emmer supported President Trump's executive order to temporarily curtail immigration from certain predominantly Muslim countries, indicating a restrictive stance on immigration.
Emmer has consistently supported maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, aligning with a hawkish stance on national security issues.
Emmer has consistently supported maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, aligning with a hawkish stance on national security issues.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Emmer strongly opposes tax increases and has proposed reducing the state corporate tax with the goal of repealing it altogether, indicating a preference for less government intervention in the economy.
Emmer strongly opposes tax increases and has proposed reducing the state corporate tax with the goal of repealing it altogether, indicating a preference for less government intervention in the economy.
Emmer is anti-abortion and has an A+ rating from Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America. He opposes the use of taxpayer dollars for abortion purposes.
Emmer is anti-abortion and has an A+ rating from Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America. He opposes the use of taxpayer dollars for abortion purposes.
Emmer has been critical of climate science, referring to it as 'Al Gore's climate porn', and he has a low lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters, indicating opposition to federal action on climate change.
Emmer has been critical of climate science, referring to it as 'Al Gore's climate porn', and he has a low lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters, indicating opposition to federal action on climate change.
Emmer favors repealing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and has supported legislation aimed at this goal, indicating a preference for less government involvement in healthcare.
Emmer favors repealing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and has supported legislation aimed at this goal, indicating a preference for less government involvement in healthcare.
Emmer strongly opposes tax increases and has proposed gradually reducing the state corporate tax, indicating a preference for lower taxes overall.
Emmer strongly opposes tax increases and has proposed gradually reducing the state corporate tax, indicating a preference for lower taxes overall.
Emmer has opposed legislation aimed at combating school bullying against LGBTQ individuals, suggesting that more understanding is needed rather than more laws. He has also supported a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.
Emmer has opposed legislation aimed at combating school bullying against LGBTQ individuals, suggesting that more understanding is needed rather than more laws. He has also supported a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.
Emmer has not supported the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, aligning with a more conservative stance on drug policy.
Emmer has not supported the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, aligning with a more conservative stance on drug policy.
Position extraction pending on 12 issues: Foreign Policy, Gun Policy, Education, School Curriculum, Voting Rights, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Yea on the appropriations act aligns with supporting stricter immigration policies, as it typically includes funding for border enforcement and immigration control measures.
Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The Homeowner Energy Freedom Act promotes energy independence and fossil fuel use, aligning directly with the figure's stated opposition to federal action on climate change.
View source →Feb 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to repeal the death tax directly supports the stated opposition to tax increases and aligns with the goal of reducing taxes.
View source →Jan 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act directly aligns with the stated anti-abortion position by supporting legislation aimed at protecting infants who survive abortion attempts.
View source →Nov 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that promotes consumer choice in fuel retailing aligns with the stated position of opposing federal action to cut emissions, as it supports fossil fuel development.
View source →Mar 2, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that supports recovery and potentially expands access to treatment contradicts the stated opposition to federal marijuana legalization, as it aligns with broader drug policy reform.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the action description alone, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The bill's content could not be determined, making it unclear how the vote aligns with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →May 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 315.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases.
View source →May 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Apr 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the summary does not clarify whether it includes tax increases or decreases, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
Mar 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Mar 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention and taxes.
View source →Jan 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Jan 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on taxes.
View source →Jan 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on economic intervention and taxes.
View source →Sep 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Aug 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The action relates to small business filing requirements, which does not directly align with or contradict the stated position on tax increases, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on tax increases.
View source →Jan 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Dec 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →May 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Apr 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Apr 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention and taxes.
View source →Jul 19, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Biotechnology, Horticulture, and Research.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →May 3, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Apr 6, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases.
View source →Jan 18, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content is unclear regarding its impact on government intervention in the economy, making it difficult to determine alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jan 13, 2022 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H979)
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Nov 17, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, as it focuses on mental health research related to pregnancy loss, which does not directly address the stated position on government involvement in health coverage.
View source →Nov 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Oct 25, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the summary does not clarify how it relates to tax policy or government intervention.
View source →Sep 21, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Jul 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the summary does not clarify how it relates to tax policy or government intervention.
View source →May 17, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title and summary provided, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on taxes.
View source →Feb 24, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Feb 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on tax increases and government intervention.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Tagged to Voting Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 290.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 17.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 8, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 22, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 8, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 16 - 7.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 68.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 330.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-53.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-70.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 611.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 787.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 28, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 439.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 403.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 12, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 17, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 9, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.