Sponsorship· HealthcareCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Tina Smith supports maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly to Central American countries, as a means to address root causes of migration and promote stability. She has criticized cuts to foreign assistance that undermine U.S. national security interests.
Tina Smith supports maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly to Central American countries, as a means to address root causes of migration and promote stability. She has criticized cuts to foreign assistance that undermine U.S. national security interests.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Tina Smith supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has advocated for protections for DACA recipients and has opposed policies that would increase deportations of families and vulnerable individuals.
Tina Smith supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has advocated for protections for DACA recipients and has opposed policies that would increase deportations of families and vulnerable individuals.
Tina Smith advocates for government intervention to support economic stability and growth. She has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives and has voted in favor of significant relief packages during economic crises.
Tina Smith advocates for government intervention to support economic stability and growth. She has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives and has voted in favor of significant relief packages during economic crises.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package.”
Tina Smith supports legal access to abortion and has a history of advocating for reproductive rights. She has opposed legislation that would restrict abortion access and has expressed strong disapproval of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, calling for action to protect reproductive health services.
Tina Smith supports legal access to abortion and has a history of advocating for reproductive rights. She has opposed legislation that would restrict abortion access and has expressed strong disapproval of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, calling for action to protect reproductive health services.
Tina Smith advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various initiatives to address climate change. She was a member of the Senate Democrats' Special Committee on the Climate Crisis and has cosponsored resolutions affirming the need for bold action on climate issues.
Tina Smith advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various initiatives to address climate change. She was a member of the Senate Democrats' Special Committee on the Climate Crisis and has cosponsored resolutions affirming the need for bold action on climate issues.
Tina Smith advocates for stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales. She has been endorsed by gun safety organizations and has a voting record that reflects her support for common-sense gun laws.
Tina Smith advocates for stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales. She has been endorsed by gun safety organizations and has a voting record that reflects her support for common-sense gun laws.
Tina Smith supports a larger government role in health coverage and has endorsed single-payer healthcare. She has advocated for lowering prescription drug costs and ensuring access to affordable healthcare for all Americans.
Tina Smith supports a larger government role in health coverage and has endorsed single-payer healthcare. She has advocated for lowering prescription drug costs and ensuring access to affordable healthcare for all Americans.
Tina Smith supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for eliminating corporate tax loopholes and ensuring that wealthier individuals contribute their fair share to fund public services.
Tina Smith supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for eliminating corporate tax loopholes and ensuring that wealthier individuals contribute their fair share to fund public services.
Tina Smith supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has opposed school voucher programs, which she believes create a two-tiered education system. She advocates for equitable access to quality education for all students.
Tina Smith supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has opposed school voucher programs, which she believes create a two-tiered education system. She advocates for equitable access to quality education for all students.
Tina Smith advocates for expanding ballot access, including automatic voter registration and restoring voting rights to ex-felons. She has sponsored legislation aimed at making voting more accessible to all citizens.
Tina Smith advocates for expanding ballot access, including automatic voter registration and restoring voting rights to ex-felons. She has sponsored legislation aimed at making voting more accessible to all citizens.
Tina Smith has called for reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has introduced legislation to legalize cannabis at the federal level. She argues that the current drug policies contribute to mass incarceration and disproportionately affect communities of color.
Tina Smith has called for reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has introduced legislation to legalize cannabis at the federal level. She argues that the current drug policies contribute to mass incarceration and disproportionately affect communities of color.
Tina Smith advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. She has supported measures to maintain health information for LGBTQ individuals on federal websites and has opposed discriminatory practices.
Tina Smith advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. She has supported measures to maintain health information for LGBTQ individuals on federal websites and has opposed discriminatory practices.
Tina Smith supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures. She has emphasized the importance of public health initiatives in response to disease outbreaks.
Tina Smith supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures. She has emphasized the importance of public health initiatives in response to disease outbreaks.
“Smith has emphasized the importance of public health initiatives in response to disease outbreaks.”
“Pushed state subsidy for the expansion of the Mayo Clinic.”
Tina Smith supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level. She has introduced legislation aimed at regulating cannabis and has called for an end to the prohibition of marijuana, citing its negative impact on communities of color.
Tina Smith supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level. She has introduced legislation aimed at regulating cannabis and has called for an end to the prohibition of marijuana, citing its negative impact on communities of color.
“In July 2020, Smith introduced the Substance Regulation and Safety Act to legalize cannabis at the federal level.”
“Remove marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act.”
Position extraction pending on 7 issues: National Security, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at addressing maternal health disparities directly supports the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage and improving access.
Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion and reproductive rights.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Health Over Wealth Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage and addressing high drug prices.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The Children's Safe Welcome Act aims to enhance protections for vulnerable populations, directly advancing the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“In July 2020, Smith introduced the Substance Regulation and Safety Act to legalize cannabis at the federal level.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act directly advances the stated position of legalizing marijuana at the federal level.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that designates Haiti for temporary protected status directly supports the position of expanding legal immigration and protecting vulnerable populations seeking asylum.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act directly supports access to reproductive health services, aligning with the stated position on abortion rights.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Elder Pride Act aims to enhance protections for LGBTQ individuals, directly advancing the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for abortion rights and protecting reproductive health services.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act directly supports the stated position of expanding legal immigration and protecting vulnerable populations, particularly in reuniting migrant families.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the PrEP Access and Coverage Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare, aligning with the advocacy for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jan 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring the Addressing Climate Financial Risk Act directly supports federal action to cut emissions, aligning with the stated position on climate change.
View source →Jul 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Restoring Essential Healthcare Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage and improving access to healthcare.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that supports rural residency planning aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access, even if it does not directly address the single-payer aspect.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing wage disparities aligns with the broader goal of stronger protections against discrimination, particularly in the context of equal pay.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Cancer Drug Parity Act, which aims to improve access to cancer treatments, aligns with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage and lowering healthcare costs.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Cosponsoring the Domestic Organic Investment Act supports federal action to cut emissions by promoting organic farming practices, which aligns with the stated position on climate.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Sponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the stated position of advocating for stronger protections against discrimination for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at supporting caregivers and the direct care workforce aligns with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage and improving access.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2435; text: CR S2445)
Why: The resolution supports renewable fuels, which contribute to cutting emissions and aligns with the stated position on climate action.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Maternal Health Pandemic Response Act supports healthcare access and aligns with the broader goals of expanding healthcare services, even if it does not directly address single-payer or drug pricing.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Copays Act indicates support for expanding healthcare access and lowering costs, aligning with the stated position, though it may not fully encompass the single-payer aspect.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports healthcare access for a specific demographic, aligning with the broader goal of expanding healthcare access.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Drug Deal Disclosure Act aims to increase transparency in drug pricing, which aligns with the stated goal of lowering prescription drug costs.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1824-1825)
Why: The resolution cosponsored addresses reproductive health issues, aligning with the stated support for reproductive rights and advocating for maternal health, particularly among marginalized communities.
View source →Jul 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Sponsoring a bill focused on agricultural soil health contributes to climate action by promoting practices that can reduce emissions and enhance carbon sequestration, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Medicaid Bump Act supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position, even if it does not fully encompass single-payer healthcare.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the act supports expanding healthcare access, which aligns with the stated position, even though it focuses specifically on family planning rather than a broader healthcare agenda.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Sponsoring the Boundary Waters Wilderness Protection Act supports environmental protection and aligns with the broader goal of addressing climate change, even if it is not a direct climate action bill.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the support for expanding healthcare access and protecting individuals, as it opposes a regulatory measure related to Medicare services.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The bill focuses on improving stroke care quality, which aligns with healthcare improvement goals but does not directly advance the stated position for a larger government role in health coverage or single-payer healthcare.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“In July 2020, Smith introduced the Substance Regulation and Safety Act to legalize cannabis at the federal level.”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill related to opioid treatment does not directly advance or undermine the stated position on marijuana legalization, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 50. Record Vote Number: 199.
Why: The action involves disapproving a Medicare rule related to prior authorization, which could have both positive and negative implications for healthcare access, making the relationship to the stated position unclear.
Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Smith has emphasized the importance of public health initiatives in response to disease outbreaks.”
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
“Smith has emphasized the importance of public health initiatives in response to disease outbreaks.”
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S1786)
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S1380)
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-592.
“Smith has supported measures aimed at strengthening the economy through development initiatives.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2241; text: CR S2240-2241)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2134)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S2131)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8487; text: CR S8486-8487)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.