Sponsorship· HealthcareCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Kaine supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly to Central American countries, as a means to improve stability and reduce migration flows to the U.S. He has criticized cuts to foreign aid as detrimental to U.S. interests.
Kaine supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly to Central American countries, as a means to improve stability and reduce migration flows to the U.S. He has criticized cuts to foreign aid as detrimental to U.S. interests.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Tim Kaine supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for comprehensive immigration reform that includes protections for DREAMers and a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
Tim Kaine supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for comprehensive immigration reform that includes protections for DREAMers and a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
“Comprehensive immigration reform to protect DREAMers. (Oct 2018)”
Kaine emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense while advocating for the constitutional role of Congress in declaring war. He has been critical of military actions taken without congressional approval and supports efforts to limit presidential war powers.
Kaine emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense while advocating for the constitutional role of Congress in declaring war. He has been critical of military actions taken without congressional approval and supports efforts to limit presidential war powers.
Kaine supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for investments in infrastructure and workforce development. He has criticized tax policies that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
Kaine supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for investments in infrastructure and workforce development. He has criticized tax policies that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
Tim Kaine personally opposes abortion but supports legal access, stating he is a strong supporter of Roe v. Wade and believes government should not interfere in women's reproductive decisions. He does support some restrictions, such as parental consent for minors and bans on late-term abortions unless the woman's life is at risk.
Tim Kaine personally opposes abortion but supports legal access, stating he is a strong supporter of Roe v. Wade and believes government should not interfere in women's reproductive decisions. He does support some restrictions, such as parental consent for minors and bans on late-term abortions unless the woman's life is at risk.
“Personally opposes abortion, but keep government out of it. (Jun 2016)”
Tim Kaine acknowledges the scientific consensus on climate change and supports federal action to cut emissions. He has criticized climate change deniers and advocates for cleaner coal energy production, as well as investment in renewable energy sources like solar and wind.
Tim Kaine acknowledges the scientific consensus on climate change and supports federal action to cut emissions. He has criticized climate change deniers and advocates for cleaner coal energy production, as well as investment in renewable energy sources like solar and wind.
“Climate change imperils our planet's future. (Oct 2018)”
Tim Kaine supports stricter firearms regulation, including expanded background checks and restrictions on the sale of combat-style weapons and high-capacity magazines. He has a 100% rating from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.
Tim Kaine supports stricter firearms regulation, including expanded background checks and restrictions on the sale of combat-style weapons and high-capacity magazines. He has a 100% rating from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.
“Ban assault weapons, high-capacity ammo, & bump stocks. (Oct 2018)”
Kaine supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the Affordable Care Act and proposing a public health insurance option modeled after Medicare. He has also pushed for measures to lower prescription drug prices.
Kaine supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the Affordable Care Act and proposing a public health insurance option modeled after Medicare. He has also pushed for measures to lower prescription drug prices.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Kaine supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for fiscal policies that ensure economic stability and fairness in the tax system. He has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
Kaine supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for fiscal policies that ensure economic stability and fairness in the tax system. He has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
“We tried Trump tax plan in 2000s: it caused Great Recession. (Oct 2016)”
Kaine advocates for more federal funding for public schools and supports educational reforms that prioritize equitable access to quality education. He has opposed efforts to divert public funding to private schools.
Kaine advocates for more federal funding for public schools and supports educational reforms that prioritize equitable access to quality education. He has opposed efforts to divert public funding to private schools.
Kaine supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to protect voting rights, including opposing voter ID laws and promoting early voting. He emphasizes the need to combat voter suppression and ensure fair access to the electoral process.
Kaine supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to protect voting rights, including opposing voter ID laws and promoting early voting. He emphasizes the need to combat voter suppression and ensure fair access to the electoral process.
Kaine supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has expressed concerns about systemic racial inequities in the criminal justice system. He has advocated for smart sentencing and reducing incarceration rates for non-violent offenders.
Kaine supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has expressed concerns about systemic racial inequities in the criminal justice system. He has advocated for smart sentencing and reducing incarceration rates for non-violent offenders.
“Focus attention on the overuse of incarceration. (Oct 2012)”
Kaine advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, supporting the legalization of same-sex marriage and fighting for full LGBTQ equality. He has expressed commitment to social justice and equal rights for all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
Kaine advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, supporting the legalization of same-sex marriage and fighting for full LGBTQ equality. He has expressed commitment to social justice and equal rights for all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
Kaine supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in protecting communities and preventing disease outbreaks.
Kaine supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in protecting communities and preventing disease outbreaks.
Kaine supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, advocating for descheduling it and allowing states to decide their own policies. He has received an A+ rating from NORML for his stance on marijuana reform.
Kaine supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, advocating for descheduling it and allowing states to decide their own policies. He has received an A+ rating from NORML for his stance on marijuana reform.
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: The bill aims to improve maternal health outcomes, which aligns with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage and addressing health disparities.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: The bill aims to expand Medicaid services and support for caregivers, directly advancing the stated position of increasing government involvement in health coverage.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at amending the drug discount program directly supports the stated position of advocating for lower prescription drug prices and a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Ban assault weapons, high-capacity ammo, & bump stocks. (Oct 2018)”
Why: The bill aims to prevent abusers from possessing firearms, directly advancing the stated position of supporting stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S2766-2768)
Why: Sponsoring a resolution that acknowledges discrimination against LGBTQ individuals and commits to equal rights directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Personally opposes abortion, but keep government out of it. (Jun 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly supports the stated position of ensuring legal access to abortion.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding access to voting, aligning closely with the stated position on voting rights.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Ban assault weapons, high-capacity ammo, & bump stocks. (Oct 2018)”
Why: Sponsoring the Virginia Plan to Reduce Gun Violence Act directly supports expanded background checks and restrictions on firearms, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Comprehensive immigration reform to protect DREAMers. (Oct 2018)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that restricts the use of federal funds for a rule that could negatively impact immigration pathways aligns with the stated position of supporting expanded legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Comprehensive immigration reform to protect DREAMers. (Oct 2018)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to designate Haiti for temporary protected status supports the broader goal of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
Why: The resolution supports the rights of individuals with disabilities, which aligns with the broader goal of promoting equality and protecting individuals from discrimination.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing wage disparities aligns with the broader goal of promoting equality and protecting individuals from discrimination.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at preventing discrimination in jury service aligns with the broader goal of stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the commitment to LGBTQ equality and social justice, moving in the same direction as the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: Sponsoring the act supports the healthcare workforce and caregivers, which aligns with advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring the INSULIN Act, which aims to regulate insulin prices, aligns with the stated support for regulating drug prices and improving healthcare access.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Comprehensive immigration reform to protect DREAMers. (Oct 2018)”
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act aligns with the support for comprehensive immigration reform and protections for vulnerable populations, although it does not directly address the broader pathway to citizenship.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
“Ban assault weapons, high-capacity ammo, & bump stocks. (Oct 2018)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish the Anti-Weaponization Fund directly contradicts the stated support for stricter firearms regulation and gun control measures.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The bill addresses mental health and suicide prevention, which are relevant to public health, but it does not directly advance the stated position on vaccine mandates or public-health measures.
View source →Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on public health.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill related to chronic pain relief does not directly advance the stated position on expanding government health coverage, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1716-1717)
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: The resolution addresses arms control in Sudan, which is related to foreign aid indirectly, but does not directly support maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid.
Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: The action relates to defense exports rather than direct foreign aid, creating ambiguity about its alignment with the stated support for maintaining or expanding foreign aid.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 48. Record Vote Number: 173. (consideration: CR S2816)
“Comprehensive immigration reform to protect DREAMers. (Oct 2018)”
Why: The action involves a procedural motion related to immigration appeals, but its specific impact on the stated position of expanding legal immigration pathways is unclear.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Let Medicare negotiate rates for prescription drug prices. (Oct 2012)”
Why: The PCTEC Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to assess its alignment with the support for the ACA and a public option, leading to a mixed rating.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Religion & Public Life, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4436)
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 216. (consideration: CR S4357)
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 541.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 544.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 45 - 52. Record Vote Number: 190. (CR S3193)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
“Focus attention on the overuse of incarceration. (Oct 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 118. (consideration: CR S2250-2255)
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2177-2178)
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 192. (CR S3194)
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 113. (consideration: CR S2156-2158)
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 51. Record Vote Number: 88. (consideration: CR S1889-1890)
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Investments in international development is important to US. (May 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4365; text: CR S4392)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 543.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 530.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 540.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S3942-3946; text: CR S3943-3946)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 424.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2351; text: CR S2379-2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 327.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2181-2182)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.