Sponsorship· HealthcareCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Baldwin supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has voted against measures that would restrict immigration and has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform.
Baldwin supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has voted against measures that would restrict immigration and has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform.
Baldwin supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth. She has opposed tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy and has advocated for policies aimed at reducing income inequality.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Baldwin supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth. She has opposed tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy and has advocated for policies aimed at reducing income inequality.
Tammy Baldwin supports legal access to abortion and has consistently advocated for reproductive rights. She has been rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a strong pro-choice voting record, and has called for access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
Tammy Baldwin supports legal access to abortion and has consistently advocated for reproductive rights. She has been rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a strong pro-choice voting record, and has called for access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
Baldwin supports federal action to cut emissions and has been involved in climate change initiatives, including co-sponsoring a resolution in response to climate change reports. She advocates for policies that address climate change and promote sustainability.
Baldwin supports federal action to cut emissions and has been involved in climate change initiatives, including co-sponsoring a resolution in response to climate change reports. She advocates for policies that address climate change and promote sustainability.
Baldwin supports stricter firearms regulation and has been a proponent of various gun control measures, including enhanced background checks and restrictions on high-capacity magazines. She has been rated F by the NRA, indicating her pro-gun control stance.
Baldwin supports stricter firearms regulation and has been a proponent of various gun control measures, including enhanced background checks and restrictions on high-capacity magazines. She has been rated F by the NRA, indicating her pro-gun control stance.
Baldwin advocates for a larger government role in health coverage and has been a long-time supporter of single-payer healthcare. She has introduced legislation aimed at expanding access to healthcare and has consistently pushed for improvements to the Affordable Care Act.
Baldwin advocates for a larger government role in health coverage and has been a long-time supporter of single-payer healthcare. She has introduced legislation aimed at expanding access to healthcare and has consistently pushed for improvements to the Affordable Care Act.
Baldwin supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a tax system that addresses income inequality. She has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
Baldwin supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a tax system that addresses income inequality. She has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
Baldwin supports more federal funding for public schools and has opposed school vouchers. She has been rated 92% by the National Education Association, indicating her pro-public education voting record.
Baldwin supports more federal funding for public schools and has opposed school vouchers. She has been rated 92% by the National Education Association, indicating her pro-public education voting record.
Baldwin supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to improve voter registration and participation. She opposes voter ID laws that she believes hinder access to the polls.
Baldwin supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to improve voter registration and participation. She opposes voter ID laws that she believes hinder access to the polls.
Baldwin has called for reforms in the criminal justice system, including reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses. She has expressed a need for a review to ensure fairness in the system and has supported measures to address issues like mass incarceration.
Baldwin has called for reforms in the criminal justice system, including reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses. She has expressed a need for a review to ensure fairness in the system and has supported measures to address issues like mass incarceration.
Baldwin advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ individuals. She has been rated 100% by the Human Rights Campaign, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance, and has supported legislation to prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Baldwin advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ individuals. She has been rated 100% by the Human Rights Campaign, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance, and has supported legislation to prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Baldwin supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has been rated A+ by NORML, indicating her long-time advocacy for cannabis reform. She has expressed support for allowing states to decide on medical marijuana legalization.
Baldwin supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has been rated A+ by NORML, indicating her long-time advocacy for cannabis reform. She has expressed support for allowing states to decide on medical marijuana legalization.
Position extraction pending on 9 issues: Foreign Policy, National Security, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that expands Medicaid services and supports the direct care workforce directly advances the stated position of increasing government involvement in health coverage.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at addressing maternal health disparities directly supports the position advocating for expanded access to health care.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that expands benefits under Medicaid and Medicare directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Restoring Justice for Workers Act directly supports government intervention aimed at economic stability and growth, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring the MRRRI Act indicates a direct commitment to federal action on emissions reduction, aligning closely with the stated position on climate.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Health Over Wealth Act directly supports the stated position of expanding access to health care and advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the SHIELD Our Elections Act directly supports measures to protect voting rights and expand ballot access, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the CEO Act directly supports the stated position by addressing income inequality through curtailing excessive executive compensation.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Good Jobs for Good Airports Act directly supports economic stability and growth by promoting job creation and worker support, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act directly supports economic stability and growth by protecting workers' rights and ensuring fair wages, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Reproductive Health Travel Fund Act directly advances the stated position by promoting access to abortion services and supporting women's health care choices.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion and protecting reproductive rights.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Training Act directly advances the stated position by promoting access to reproductive health care and training.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protect Our Polls Act directly advances the stated position of expanding ballot access and protecting voting rights.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Sponsoring the Air Carrier Access Amendments Act directly advances federal protections against discrimination in air travel, aligning with the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S2766-2768)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that acknowledges discrimination against LGBTQ individuals and commits to equal rights directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position of ensuring legal access to abortion.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding voting access, aligning with the advocacy for same-day registration and opposition to disenfranchising voter ID laws.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The bill aims to amend the drug discount program, which aligns with the position of expanding access to health care and lowering drug prices.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The bill aims to codify gender-neutral standards in the Armed Forces, which aligns with the advocacy for stronger protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing wage disparities aligns with the broader goal of advancing civil rights and protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the stated position of advocating for stronger protections against discrimination for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports women's health initiatives, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding healthcare access, even though it does not directly establish a single-payer system.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act aligns with the support for protections for vulnerable immigrant populations, though it does not directly address the broader immigration reform goals.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring the Build America, Buy America Compliance Act supports economic stability and growth by promoting domestic production and job creation, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text: CR S1938)
Why: Sponsoring a resolution that recognizes Earth Day aligns with the stated position of supporting federal action to cut emissions and promote environmental sustainability.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Drug Deal Disclosure Act aligns with the goal of lowering prescription drug prices, even if it does not directly establish a single-payer system.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the INSULIN Act, which aims to lower prescription drug prices, aligns with the commitment to expand access to healthcare and reduce costs.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Perinatal Workforce Act aims to improve maternal and infant health care access, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding health coverage and access.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 50. Record Vote Number: 199.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the stated position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 456.
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to the Affordable Care Act undermines the stated support for expanding access to health care and a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the support for expanding access to healthcare, particularly through a program like Medicare.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on expanding healthcare access.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
Why: The resolution supports rights related to independent living for individuals with disabilities, which aligns with civil rights broadly, but does not specifically advance protections for LGBTQ individuals as stated in the position.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability and growth.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on civil rights.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses healthcare-related issues through outreach and inclusion but does not directly advance the stated position of establishing a single-payer system or lowering drug prices.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The SAFE for Survivors Act addresses healthcare access for survivors but does not directly advance the single-payer system or broader drug pricing reforms, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses a health-related issue but does not directly advance the stated support for a single-payer system or expanding access to healthcare.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The act addresses healthcare fairness for military families, which aligns with expanding access, but does not directly advance the single-payer system or broader drug pricing reforms.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S1369-1370)
Why: The Fertilizer Transparency Act may have implications for agricultural practices related to climate, but it does not directly address broader climate action or emissions reduction, leading to unclear alignment with the stated position.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 216. (consideration: CR S4357)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 541.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S3061)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 118. (consideration: CR S2250-2255)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 415.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 113. (consideration: CR S2156-2158)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 69.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 58.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 51. Record Vote Number: 88. (consideration: CR S1889-1890)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2670; text: CR S2666)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2351; text: CR S2379-2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2241; text: CR S2240-2241)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2132-2133)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1619)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1202; text: CR S1208-1209)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.