Sponsorship· HealthcareSponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Susan Collins has supported foreign aid initiatives, particularly in humanitarian contexts, and has advocated for U.S. involvement in international efforts to address crises.
Susan Collins has supported foreign aid initiatives, particularly in humanitarian contexts, and has advocated for U.S. involvement in international efforts to address crises.
Susan Collins has a mixed record on immigration, having voted against comprehensive reform proposals in the past but also supporting some bipartisan efforts that included pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. She has opposed executive actions that she deemed overly broad, such as Trump's travel ban.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Susan Collins has a mixed record on immigration, having voted against comprehensive reform proposals in the past but also supporting some bipartisan efforts that included pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. She has opposed executive actions that she deemed overly broad, such as Trump's travel ban.
Susan Collins supports legal access to abortion and has described herself as pro-choice. She has defended Roe v. Wade as the law of the land and has criticized extreme anti-abortion laws, such as the Texas law banning abortions after six weeks. However, she has also voted to confirm judges who oppose abortion rights, which has led to some criticism of her stance.
Susan Collins supports legal access to abortion and has described herself as pro-choice. She has defended Roe v. Wade as the law of the land and has criticized extreme anti-abortion laws, such as the Texas law banning abortions after six weeks. However, she has also voted to confirm judges who oppose abortion rights, which has led to some criticism of her stance.
Susan Collins has shown support for environmental initiatives, including voting against measures that would roll back environmental protections. She has been recognized for her bipartisan efforts on climate issues and has a relatively high score from environmental advocacy groups.
Susan Collins has shown support for environmental initiatives, including voting against measures that would roll back environmental protections. She has been recognized for her bipartisan efforts on climate issues and has a relatively high score from environmental advocacy groups.
Susan Collins has supported some measures for gun control, such as expanding background checks and co-sponsoring legislation to prevent firearm sales to individuals on the no-fly list. However, she has opposed stricter regulations like a ban on high-capacity magazines, indicating a mixed approach to gun policy.
Susan Collins has supported some measures for gun control, such as expanding background checks and co-sponsoring legislation to prevent firearm sales to individuals on the no-fly list. However, she has opposed stricter regulations like a ban on high-capacity magazines, indicating a mixed approach to gun policy.
Susan Collins has expressed support for expanding healthcare access, particularly in relation to opioid addiction treatment and mental health services. She has co-sponsored legislation aimed at improving Medicaid coverage for addiction recovery and has advocated for transparency in medical billing. However, she has also voted against the Affordable Care Act and its individual mandate.
Susan Collins has expressed support for expanding healthcare access, particularly in relation to opioid addiction treatment and mental health services. She has co-sponsored legislation aimed at improving Medicaid coverage for addiction recovery and has advocated for transparency in medical billing. However, she has also voted against the Affordable Care Act and its individual mandate.
Susan Collins has supported education reforms that focus on accountability and flexibility in K-12 funding. She has also advocated for measures to help students manage student debt.
Susan Collins has supported education reforms that focus on accountability and flexibility in K-12 funding. She has also advocated for measures to help students manage student debt.
Susan Collins has expressed support for measures that expand ballot access, such as opposing voter ID laws that she believes could disenfranchise voters. She has also shown a willingness to work across party lines on voting-related legislation.
Susan Collins has expressed support for measures that expand ballot access, such as opposing voter ID laws that she believes could disenfranchise voters. She has also shown a willingness to work across party lines on voting-related legislation.
Susan Collins has generally supported free trade agreements and has voted in favor of measures that promote trade engagement. She has expressed concerns about tariffs and their impact on American businesses and consumers, indicating a preference for lower tariffs and open trade policies.
Susan Collins has generally supported free trade agreements and has voted in favor of measures that promote trade engagement. She has expressed concerns about tariffs and their impact on American businesses and consumers, indicating a preference for lower tariffs and open trade policies.
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: Taxes, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act directly supports the stated position of improving healthcare access and aligns with efforts to enhance coverage options.
Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly supports improving access to mental health services, aligning with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: The bill aims to improve maternity care coordination, which aligns with the broader goal of enhancing healthcare access and services.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2448)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution supporting the Taiwan Relations Act aligns with the stated position by reinforcing U.S. involvement in international efforts and humanitarian contexts.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports healthcare access and aligns with the broader goal of improving health outcomes, even though it specifically targets diabetes screening.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Gateway to Careers Act aims to improve education and workforce development, which aligns with the stated support for K-12 funding reforms and student debt management.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports improving access to care for a specific health issue, aligning with the broader commitment to enhancing healthcare access.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1902; text: CR S1938-1939)
Why: The resolution supports access to higher education and workforce training, which aligns with the stated position on education reforms and student debt management.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at loan repayment for public health workforce aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and services.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring the Copay Fairness for Veterans Act aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and affordability, particularly for veterans, which is consistent with the stated support for extending ACA tax credits and lowering drug prices.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the INSULIN Act, which aims to lower insulin costs, aligns with the stated support for extending ACA tax credits and improving access to healthcare.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1207)
Why: Cosponsoring the Baltic Security Assessment Act indicates support for U.S. involvement in international security efforts, which aligns with the stated position on foreign aid.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the National Plan for Epilepsy Act aligns with the stated position by supporting healthcare access and treatment options, particularly for a specific health condition.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring Ellie’s Law, which aims to improve access to mental health services, aligns with the stated support for extending ACA tax credits and enhancing healthcare access.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the RAYS Act, which aims to improve mental health services, aligns with the stated support for extending ACA tax credits and improving access to healthcare.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Diabetes Act aligns with the stated support for improving healthcare access and affordability, as it addresses a specific health issue related to treatment and management.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Essential Caregivers Act aligns with the stated position by promoting access to care, which is consistent with efforts to improve healthcare access and affordability.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring Ally’s Act, which aims to improve access to mental health services, aligns with the stated support for extending ACA tax credits and improving healthcare access.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2418-2419)
Why: The action relates to education through workforce development but does not directly address K-12 funding or student debt management, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill related to professional degrees does not directly advance the stated position on K-12 funding and student debt, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1741-1742)
Why: The action focuses on family caregivers, which relates to healthcare access but does not directly address the stated support for extending ACA tax credits or lowering drug prices.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses a health-related issue but does not directly align with the stated position on extending ACA tax credits or lowering drug prices.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 416.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2670; text: CR S2666)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S231-232)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2452; text: CR S2446)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2420)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2295)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1827; text: CR S1826)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1581-1582)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1202; text: CR S1208-1209)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1051; text: CR S1051)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1049-1050)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1011)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.