Sponsorship· Gun PolicySponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Scalise supports stringent immigration policies, having endorsed Trump's executive order banning citizens from several Muslim-majority countries to ensure U.S. security. He has advocated for careful vetting of individuals entering the country.
Scalise supports stringent immigration policies, having endorsed Trump's executive order banning citizens from several Muslim-majority countries to ensure U.S. security. He has advocated for careful vetting of individuals entering the country.
“Scalise supported President Donald Trump's 2017 executive order temporarily banning citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S.”
Most frequent employers self-reported by individual donors (FEC, current cycle).
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Scalise has consistently opposed abortion, voting against measures like the Women's Health Protection Act. He supports policies that restrict abortion access at both state and federal levels.
Scalise has consistently opposed abortion, voting against measures like the Women's Health Protection Act. He supports policies that restrict abortion access at both state and federal levels.
“Scalise voted against the Women's Health Protection Act.”
Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, implying skepticism about the urgency and severity of the issue. He has publicly questioned climate change discussions and their implications for policy.
Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, implying skepticism about the urgency and severity of the issue. He has publicly questioned climate change discussions and their implications for policy.
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Scalise is a strong opponent of gun control and has been vocal about his support for gun rights. He has stated that new laws do not address the problems of gun violence and believes they make it harder for law-abiding citizens to own guns. He has received an 'A+' rating from the NRA and described the Second Amendment as 'unlimited.'
Scalise is a strong opponent of gun control and has been vocal about his support for gun rights. He has stated that new laws do not address the problems of gun violence and believes they make it harder for law-abiding citizens to own guns. He has received an 'A+' rating from the NRA and described the Second Amendment as 'unlimited.'
“Scalise appeared to be referencing the chain’s “Never-Ending Pasta Pass,” which grants customers 13 weeks of unlimited pasta, breadsticks, soup and salad for $100. In order to redeem it, customers must present a photo ID that matches the name on the pass.”
Scalise opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and has called it unconstitutional. He has supported legislation aimed at repealing the ACA and replacing it with alternatives that align more closely with conservative values.
Scalise opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and has called it unconstitutional. He has supported legislation aimed at repealing the ACA and replacing it with alternatives that align more closely with conservative values.
“Scalise opposes the Affordable Care Act. He applauded Reed O'Connor ruling the Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional in its entirety.”
Scalise supports requiring voters to show photo identification to vote, arguing that it is a common-sense measure akin to needing ID for other activities, such as dining at Olive Garden. He has been involved in supporting legislation that mandates proof of citizenship for new voters.
Scalise supports requiring voters to show photo identification to vote, arguing that it is a common-sense measure akin to needing ID for other activities, such as dining at Olive Garden. He has been involved in supporting legislation that mandates proof of citizenship for new voters.
“Scalise: "For God’s sake, you can’t go get pasta at Olive Garden without a picture ID. Why not be able to show a picture ID to vote?"”
Position extraction pending on 15 issues: Foreign Policy, National Security, Economy & Jobs, Taxes, Education, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Civil Rights, Public Health, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Source: OpenFEC · FEC profile ↗ · Steve Scalise on OpenSecrets (deeper breakdown) ↗
May 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Scalise appeared to be referencing the chain’s “Never-Ending Pasta Pass,” which grants customers 13 weeks of unlimited pasta, breadsticks, soup and salad for $100. In order to redeem it, customers must present a photo ID that matches the name on the pass.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to reform firearms commerce directly supports the stated position of opposing gun control and promoting gun rights.
Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Rule H. Res. 712 failed passage of House.
“Scalise appeared to be referencing the chain’s “Never-Ending Pasta Pass,” which grants customers 13 weeks of unlimited pasta, breadsticks, soup and salad for $100. In order to redeem it, customers must present a photo ID that matches the name on the pass.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that condemns actions undermining the Second Amendment directly supports the stated opposition to gun control.
View source →May 1, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
“Scalise appeared to be referencing the chain’s “Never-Ending Pasta Pass,” which grants customers 13 weeks of unlimited pasta, breadsticks, soup and salad for $100. In order to redeem it, customers must present a photo ID that matches the name on the pass.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at reforming interstate commerce for firearms directly supports the stated position of opposing gun control and promoting gun rights.
View source →Oct 23, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
“Scalise appeared to be referencing the chain’s “Never-Ending Pasta Pass,” which grants customers 13 weeks of unlimited pasta, breadsticks, soup and salad for $100. In order to redeem it, customers must present a photo ID that matches the name on the pass.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that reforms interstate commerce related to firearms directly supports the stated position of opposing gun control, as it aims to facilitate gun ownership.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Apr 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 386.
“Scalise: "For God’s sake, you can’t go get pasta at Olive Garden without a picture ID. Why not be able to show a picture ID to vote?"”
Why: The content of the Equal Representation Act is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on voting rights.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Scalise supported President Donald Trump's 2017 executive order temporarily banning citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S.”
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Scalise voted against the Women's Health Protection Act.”
Why: Tagged to Abortion, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 600.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 398.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 624.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 250 - 180 (Roll no. 38).
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-273.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure rendered moot in Senate.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Scalise voted against the Women's Health Protection Act.”
Why: Tagged to Abortion, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 1.
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to School Curriculum, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 2.
“Scalise voted against the Women's Health Protection Act.”
Why: Tagged to Abortion, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 18, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 18, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 19, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Scalise opposes the Affordable Care Act. He applauded Reed O'Connor ruling the Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional in its entirety.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 26, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment and Climate Change.
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 26, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 20, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Worker and Family Support.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife.
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-55.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment and Climate Change.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 15, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment and Climate Change.
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 26, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 11, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife.
“Scalise rejects the scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 30, 2014 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-28.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 4, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 439.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 341.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-177.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 240.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 333.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 825.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 103.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 21, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 25, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 18, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 25, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 6, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 14, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 12, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 26, 2013 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.