Sponsorship· ImmigrationCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Wyden supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid and has voted against measures that would limit foreign assistance. He believes in the importance of U.S. engagement in global humanitarian efforts.
Wyden supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid and has voted against measures that would limit foreign assistance. He believes in the importance of U.S. engagement in global humanitarian efforts.
Wyden supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for protections for DACA recipients and comprehensive immigration reform. He has voted to continue federal funding for sanctuary cities.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Wyden supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for protections for DACA recipients and comprehensive immigration reform. He has voted to continue federal funding for sanctuary cities.
Wyden supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth. He has voted for stimulus packages and measures aimed at supporting job creation and economic recovery.
Wyden supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth. He has voted for stimulus packages and measures aimed at supporting job creation and economic recovery.
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Ron Wyden supports legal access to abortion and has consistently maintained a high rating from pro-choice organizations. He has voted against various measures that would restrict access to abortion services.
Ron Wyden supports legal access to abortion and has consistently maintained a high rating from pro-choice organizations. He has voted against various measures that would restrict access to abortion services.
Wyden advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has voted against measures that would limit the EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. He has described climate change as the most important environmental challenge of our time.
Wyden advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has voted against measures that would limit the EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. He has described climate change as the most important environmental challenge of our time.
Wyden is an advocate for stricter firearms regulation, supporting measures such as universal background checks and bans on high-capacity magazines. He has consistently voted for gun control legislation.
Wyden is an advocate for stricter firearms regulation, supporting measures such as universal background checks and bans on high-capacity magazines. He has consistently voted for gun control legislation.
Wyden supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for increased funding for Medicare and efforts to lower prescription drug prices. He has introduced legislation aimed at expanding health care access.
Wyden supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for increased funding for Medicare and efforts to lower prescription drug prices. He has introduced legislation aimed at expanding health care access.
Wyden supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that increase fairness in the tax system. He has introduced legislation aimed at increasing transparency in presidential tax returns.
Wyden supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that increase fairness in the tax system. He has introduced legislation aimed at increasing transparency in presidential tax returns.
Wyden supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for various education funding initiatives. He has consistently opposed school vouchers and other measures that divert funds from public education.
Wyden supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for various education funding initiatives. He has consistently opposed school vouchers and other measures that divert funds from public education.
Wyden supports expanding ballot access, advocating for measures such as automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that restrict access to voting. He has consistently voted for legislation that enhances voting rights.
Wyden supports expanding ballot access, advocating for measures such as automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that restrict access to voting. He has consistently voted for legislation that enhances voting rights.
Ron Wyden has voted against increasing penalties for drug offenses and supports reducing criminal penalties for drug-related activities. He has a pro-drug-reform stance, advocating for legalization and regulation of cannabis.
Ron Wyden has voted against increasing penalties for drug offenses and supports reducing criminal penalties for drug-related activities. He has a pro-drug-reform stance, advocating for legalization and regulation of cannabis.
Wyden advocates for stronger regulation of major tech companies, emphasizing the need for privacy protections and accountability in the tech industry. He has been a vocal critic of legislation that undermines internet freedoms.
Wyden advocates for stronger regulation of major tech companies, emphasizing the need for privacy protections and accountability in the tech industry. He has been a vocal critic of legislation that undermines internet freedoms.
Wyden has been a strong advocate for civil rights, supporting legislation to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and voting against measures that would restrict LGBTQ rights. He has a high rating from the Human Rights Campaign, indicating his pro-gay-rights stance.
Wyden has been a strong advocate for civil rights, supporting legislation to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and voting against measures that would restrict LGBTQ rights. He has a high rating from the Human Rights Campaign, indicating his pro-gay-rights stance.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance.”
Wyden supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, advocating for strong public health responses to crises.
Wyden supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, advocating for strong public health responses to crises.
Wyden supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has co-sponsored multiple bills aimed at reforming cannabis laws. He has also advocated for measures to reduce penalties for drug offenses.
Wyden supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has co-sponsored multiple bills aimed at reforming cannabis laws. He has also advocated for measures to reduce penalties for drug offenses.
“Rated B+ by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance.”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: National Security, School Curriculum, Trade, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The bill aims to prevent the use of federal funds for a rule that undermines immigration pathways, directly advancing the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum options.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that establishes the right to counsel for individuals facing removal directly supports the position of expanding legal protections and pathways for immigrants.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the Tracking Plastic Act directly supports federal action to address environmental issues, including emissions, aligning with the stated position on climate.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance.”
Why: The bill aims to codify gender-neutral standards in the Armed Forces, directly advancing the stated position of stronger protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ rights.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The Children's Safe Welcome Act aims to enhance protections for vulnerable immigrant children, directly advancing the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that imposes limitations on high-income taxpayers directly advances the stated position of advocating for higher taxes on corporations and top earners.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the CDC Tribal Public Health Security and Preparedness Act directly supports the stated position by enhancing public health infrastructure and preparedness, aligning with the call for strong public health responses.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated B+ by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act directly advances the stated position of legalizing marijuana at the federal level.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the Health and Location Data Protection Act directly advances the stated position by promoting privacy protections and regulating tech companies.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly supports legal access to abortion, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Medicare Cost Cap Act directly supports the stated position of expanding access to healthcare and lowering prescription drug costs.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month directly supports the stated commitment to civil rights and non-discrimination for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Air Carrier Access Amendments Act directly supports civil rights by enhancing accessibility for individuals with disabilities, aligning with the commitment to prohibit discrimination.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S2766-2768)
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that acknowledges discrimination against LGBTQ individuals and commits to equal rights directly advances the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill focused on natural climate solutions directly supports the stated position of advocating for federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Elementary and Secondary School Counseling Act directly supports increased funding for education and aligns with the advocacy for enhanced federal education resources.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Early Childhood Workforce Advancement Act directly supports increased funding for education and aligns with the commitment to enhance educational opportunities.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to tax buybacks from big oil windfalls directly advances the stated position of advocating for higher taxes on corporations.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Loan Forgiveness for Educators Act directly supports increased funding for education and aids educators, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position of maintaining and expanding access to abortion services.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Mental Health of Educators and Staff Act directly supports increased funding and resources for education, aligning closely with the stated position on enhancing educational support.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the YouthBuild for the Future Act directly supports increased federal education funding and aligns with the commitment to enhance educational opportunities.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2055-2056)
Why: The resolution directly supports funding for public libraries, which aligns with the commitment to increased education funding and access to resources for communities.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports the stated position of expanding voting rights and improving access to voting.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1902; text: CR S1938-1939)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution celebrating Community College Month directly supports access to higher education, aligning with the commitment to increased education funding and advocacy for educational assistance.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to end the carried interest loophole directly advances the position of advocating for higher taxes on corporations and top earners, promoting fairness in the tax system.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act directly supports the stated position of increasing funding for education and opposing school vouchers.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to extend clean electricity credits directly supports the stated position on climate by promoting renewable energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Billionaires Income Tax Act directly advances the position of advocating for higher taxes on corporations and top earners.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The bill aims to enhance career opportunities in health professions, which aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and support, consistent with advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The bill aims to provide temporary protected status for Haitians, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance.”
Why: The resolution supports the rights of individuals with disabilities, which aligns with the broader goal of stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance.”
Why: The concurrent resolution addresses wage disparity, which aligns with the broader goal of stronger federal protections against discrimination, including for marginalized groups.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Agricultural Worker Justice Act aims to provide legal pathways for agricultural workers, which aligns with the stated position of expanding legal immigration.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the SAFER Health Act suggests support for expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports the broader goal of enhancing healthcare access and support for caregivers, aligning with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3219)
Why: The resolution reaffirms commitment to immigrant communities, which aligns with the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The bill aims to study and report on the environmental impacts of AI data centers, which aligns with the broader goal of understanding and addressing emissions and environmental challenges.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to support whistleblowers reporting tax noncompliance aligns with the broader goal of tax transparency and accountability, even if it does not directly address the estate tax or corporate tax rates.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Cosponsoring the Universal School Meals Program Act supports increased federal funding for education-related initiatives, aligning with the stated position on enhancing education funding.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the act suggests support for transparency in fuel markets, which aligns with broader climate goals, even if it does not directly address greenhouse gas emissions.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports renewable energy initiatives, which aligns with the stated commitment to addressing climate change through regulatory measures.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1787)
Why: The resolution supports equal educational opportunities and civil rights protections in schools, aligning with the figure's advocacy for increased education funding and opposition to discrimination.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the Wildfire and Grid Reliability Act aligns with climate goals by addressing wildfire risks and grid reliability, which are related to climate change impacts.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 50. Record Vote Number: 199.
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule contradicts the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage and increased Medicare funding.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 431.
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage and increased Medicare funding.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to the Affordable Care Act undermines the support for expanding healthcare access and government involvement in health coverage.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The bill addresses public health by targeting youth e-cigarette use, but it does not directly relate to vaccine mandates or broader public health measures, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The bill focuses on program integrity oversight rather than directly advancing the stated position of increasing government involvement in health coverage or negotiating drug prices.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The bill's content is unclear in terms of its direct impact on tax rates or reforms, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on public health.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on public health.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action relates to child care and development rather than directly addressing healthcare access or funding, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The cosponsorship of the Freedom Act indicates support for healthcare reform, but without specific details on its provisions, the alignment with the stated position on expanding government involvement in health coverage is unclear.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the PFAS Alternatives Act does not directly address healthcare access or funding, making the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance.”
Why: The action addresses labor protections, which can relate to civil rights, but it does not directly advance the stated position on discrimination based on sexual orientation.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action pertains to food safety rather than directly addressing health coverage or access, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated healthcare position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The SAFE for Survivors Act addresses healthcare issues but does not directly align with the specific goals of increasing Medicare funding or negotiating drug prices, leading to ambiguity in alignment.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses healthcare-related issues but does not directly advance the specific goals of increasing Medicare funding or negotiating drug prices.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action relates to labor and employee rights rather than directly addressing education funding or school vouchers, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Fair Trusts for Fiscal Responsibility Act does not clearly align with the stated position on taxes, as the specifics of the bill's provisions are not detailed, leaving its impact on tax policy ambiguous.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated B+ by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title and summary provided, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on marijuana legalization.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on taxes.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Health Workforce Innovation Act aims to improve healthcare workforce capacity, which aligns with healthcare support, but does not directly address Medicare funding or drug price negotiation.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance.”
Why: The resolution addresses human rights violations but does not directly advance or undermine the stated position on federal protections against discrimination within the U.S.
View source →Feb 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on climate action.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 504.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4519-4520)
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 506.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S2821)
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2177-2178)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
The motion to discharge fell when the point of order was well taken.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4519)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4519)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4365; text: CR S4391-4392)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3216-3217)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2351; text: CR S2379-2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2313; text: CR S2310)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S2131)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 371.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (consideration: CR S1743)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2266-2267)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.