Sponsorship· ClimateCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Wyden supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid and has voted against measures that would limit foreign assistance. He believes in the importance of U.S. engagement in global humanitarian efforts.
Wyden supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid and has voted against measures that would limit foreign assistance. He believes in the importance of U.S. engagement in global humanitarian efforts.
Wyden supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for protections for DACA recipients and comprehensive immigration reform. He has voted to continue federal funding for sanctuary cities.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Wyden supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for protections for DACA recipients and comprehensive immigration reform. He has voted to continue federal funding for sanctuary cities.
Ron Wyden supports legal access to abortion and has consistently maintained a high rating from pro-choice organizations. He has voted against various measures that would restrict access to abortion services.
Ron Wyden supports legal access to abortion and has consistently maintained a high rating from pro-choice organizations. He has voted against various measures that would restrict access to abortion services.
Wyden advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has voted against measures that would limit the EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. He has described climate change as the most important environmental challenge of our time.
Wyden advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has voted against measures that would limit the EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. He has described climate change as the most important environmental challenge of our time.
Wyden is an advocate for stricter firearms regulation, supporting measures such as universal background checks and bans on high-capacity magazines. He has consistently voted for gun control legislation.
Wyden is an advocate for stricter firearms regulation, supporting measures such as universal background checks and bans on high-capacity magazines. He has consistently voted for gun control legislation.
Wyden supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for increased funding for Medicare and efforts to lower prescription drug prices. He has introduced legislation aimed at expanding health care access.
Wyden supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for increased funding for Medicare and efforts to lower prescription drug prices. He has introduced legislation aimed at expanding health care access.
Wyden supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that increase fairness in the tax system. He has introduced legislation aimed at increasing transparency in presidential tax returns.
Wyden supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that increase fairness in the tax system. He has introduced legislation aimed at increasing transparency in presidential tax returns.
Wyden supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for various education funding initiatives. He has consistently opposed school vouchers and other measures that divert funds from public education.
Wyden supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for various education funding initiatives. He has consistently opposed school vouchers and other measures that divert funds from public education.
Wyden supports expanding ballot access, advocating for measures such as automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that restrict access to voting. He has consistently voted for legislation that enhances voting rights.
Wyden supports expanding ballot access, advocating for measures such as automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that restrict access to voting. He has consistently voted for legislation that enhances voting rights.
Ron Wyden has voted against increasing penalties for drug offenses and supports reducing criminal penalties for drug-related activities. He has a pro-drug-reform stance, advocating for legalization and regulation of cannabis.
Ron Wyden has voted against increasing penalties for drug offenses and supports reducing criminal penalties for drug-related activities. He has a pro-drug-reform stance, advocating for legalization and regulation of cannabis.
Wyden advocates for stronger regulation of major tech companies, emphasizing the need for privacy protections and accountability in the tech industry. He has been a vocal critic of legislation that undermines internet freedoms.
Wyden advocates for stronger regulation of major tech companies, emphasizing the need for privacy protections and accountability in the tech industry. He has been a vocal critic of legislation that undermines internet freedoms.
Position extraction pending on 2 issues: School Curriculum, Trade.
Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill focused on natural climate solutions directly supports the stated position of advocating for federal action to cut emissions.
Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Elementary and Secondary School Counseling Act directly supports increased funding for education and aligns with the advocacy for enhanced federal education resources.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Early Childhood Workforce Advancement Act directly supports increased funding for education and aligns with the commitment to enhance educational opportunities.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Loan Forgiveness for Educators Act directly supports increased funding for education and aids educators, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position of maintaining and expanding access to abortion services.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Mental Health of Educators and Staff Act directly supports increased funding and resources for education, aligning closely with the stated position on enhancing educational support.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the YouthBuild for the Future Act directly supports increased federal education funding and aligns with the commitment to enhance educational opportunities.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2055-2056)
Why: The resolution directly supports funding for public libraries, which aligns with the commitment to increased education funding and access to resources for communities.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1902; text: CR S1938-1939)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution celebrating Community College Month directly supports access to higher education, aligning with the commitment to increased education funding and advocacy for educational assistance.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports the stated position of expanding voting rights and improving access to voting.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act directly supports the stated position of increasing funding for education and opposing school vouchers.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to extend clean electricity credits directly supports the stated position on climate by promoting renewable energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The bill aims to study and report on the environmental impacts of AI data centers, which aligns with the broader goal of understanding and addressing emissions and environmental challenges.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to support whistleblowers reporting tax noncompliance aligns with the broader goal of tax transparency and accountability, even if it does not directly address the estate tax or corporate tax rates.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to tax buybacks from oil companies aligns with a broader tax policy aimed at corporate accountability, even if it does not directly address the estate tax or corporate tax rates.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Cosponsoring the Universal School Meals Program Act supports increased federal funding for education-related initiatives, aligning with the stated position on enhancing education funding.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the act suggests support for transparency in fuel markets, which aligns with broader climate goals, even if it does not directly address greenhouse gas emissions.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports renewable energy initiatives, which aligns with the stated commitment to addressing climate change through regulatory measures.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Drug Deal Disclosure Act aligns with the goal of negotiating lower prescription drug prices, though it does not directly address Medicare funding.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring legislation to end the carried interest loophole aligns with the position of promoting tax fairness and transparency, even though it does not directly address the estate tax or corporate tax rates.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1787)
Why: The resolution supports equal educational opportunities and civil rights protections in schools, aligning with the figure's advocacy for increased education funding and opposition to discrimination.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the Wildfire and Grid Reliability Act aligns with climate goals by addressing wildfire risks and grid reliability, which are related to climate change impacts.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action pertains to food safety rather than directly addressing health coverage or access, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated healthcare position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The SAFE for Survivors Act addresses healthcare issues but does not directly align with the specific goals of increasing Medicare funding or negotiating drug prices, leading to ambiguity in alignment.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses healthcare-related issues but does not directly advance the specific goals of increasing Medicare funding or negotiating drug prices.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action involves disapproving a Medicare-related rule, which could be seen as opposing efforts to improve Medicare, but the specifics of the rule and its implications for funding or access are unclear.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action relates to labor and employee rights rather than directly addressing education funding or school vouchers, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Fair Trusts for Fiscal Responsibility Act does not clearly align with the stated position on taxes, as the specifics of the bill's provisions are not detailed, leaving its impact on tax policy ambiguous.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action involves tax legislation but does not clearly align with the stated position on supporting the estate tax or corporate taxes, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Health Workforce Innovation Act aims to improve healthcare workforce capacity, which aligns with healthcare support, but does not directly address Medicare funding or drug price negotiation.
View source →Feb 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The BEACH Act focuses on water quality and public health rather than directly addressing greenhouse gas emissions or climate change, creating uncertainty about its alignment with the stated climate position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2177-2178)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
The motion to discharge fell when the point of order was well taken.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2351; text: CR S2379-2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2313; text: CR S2310)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S2131)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 371.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (consideration: CR S1743)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2266-2267)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.