Sponsorship· Gun PolicyCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Wicker has been a strong supporter of military aid to Ukraine and has criticized any peace deals with Iran that he believes would undermine U.S. interests. He has stated that a ceasefire with Iran would be a disaster and has advocated for strong military action against Iran.
Wicker has been a strong supporter of military aid to Ukraine and has criticized any peace deals with Iran that he believes would undermine U.S. interests. He has stated that a ceasefire with Iran would be a disaster and has advocated for strong military action against Iran.
“The rumored 60-day ceasefire... would be a disaster.”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Wicker has expressed strong opposition to comprehensive immigration reform and has supported measures to restrict immigration, including defunding programs for undocumented immigrants. He has been rated 100% by FAIR, indicating a strict stance on immigration enforcement.
Wicker has expressed strong opposition to comprehensive immigration reform and has supported measures to restrict immigration, including defunding programs for undocumented immigrants. He has been rated 100% by FAIR, indicating a strict stance on immigration enforcement.
Roger Wicker has a strong pro-life stance, advocating for legislation that declares human life begins at conception and opposing federal funding for abortion. He has been rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a consistent anti-abortion voting record.
Roger Wicker has a strong pro-life stance, advocating for legislation that declares human life begins at conception and opposing federal funding for abortion. He has been rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a consistent anti-abortion voting record.
Wicker has opposed federal action on climate change, being the only senator to vote against an amendment affirming that climate change is real. He also signed a letter urging President Trump to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and has received significant funding from the oil and gas industry.
Wicker has opposed federal action on climate change, being the only senator to vote against an amendment affirming that climate change is real. He also signed a letter urging President Trump to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and has received significant funding from the oil and gas industry.
Wicker is a strong advocate for gun rights, having received an 'A+' rating from the NRA. He has opposed stricter gun control measures, including mandatory background checks, and has stated that he will filibuster any bill that infringes on Second Amendment rights.
Wicker is a strong advocate for gun rights, having received an 'A+' rating from the NRA. He has opposed stricter gun control measures, including mandatory background checks, and has stated that he will filibuster any bill that infringes on Second Amendment rights.
Wicker opposes higher taxes on the wealthy and supports the Taxpayer Protection Pledge. He has advocated for making federal income tax cuts permanent and has a mixed record on tax votes, indicating a preference for lower taxes overall.
Wicker opposes higher taxes on the wealthy and supports the Taxpayer Protection Pledge. He has advocated for making federal income tax cuts permanent and has a mixed record on tax votes, indicating a preference for lower taxes overall.
Wicker has a mixed record on trade issues, having supported some free trade agreements while also expressing concerns about tariffs. He has indicated that tariffs can hurt businesses but believes the end results may lead to greater opportunities.
Wicker has a mixed record on trade issues, having supported some free trade agreements while also expressing concerns about tariffs. He has indicated that tariffs can hurt businesses but believes the end results may lead to greater opportunities.
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Healthcare, Education, School Curriculum, Voting Rights, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that protects Second Amendment rights directly aligns with the stated position of supporting gun rights.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly advances the stated pro-life position by seeking to prohibit federal funding for abortion services.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Forced Abortion Prevention and Accountability Act directly supports the stated pro-life position by aiming to prevent abortions.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Accountability Through Electronic Verification Act aligns with the stated opposition to comprehensive immigration reform and supports measures that restrict immigration.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1207)
“The rumored 60-day ceasefire... would be a disaster.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Baltic Security Assessment Act supports military aid and security interests in a region relevant to U.S. foreign policy, aligning with the stated position on foreign aid.
View source →Sep 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“The rumored 60-day ceasefire... would be a disaster.”
Why: Sponsoring the Eastern Flank Strategic Partnership Act supports military partnerships and aid, aligning with the stated position of supporting military aid and strong U.S. foreign policy interests.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2307-2308)
“The rumored 60-day ceasefire... would be a disaster.”
Why: The cosponsorship of a study abroad program does not directly align with military aid or strong military action, creating ambiguity in its relationship to the stated position on foreign aid.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“The rumored 60-day ceasefire... would be a disaster.”
Why: The NOPE Act's specifics are unclear, and while it may relate to foreign aid, it does not clearly advance or contradict the stated support for military aid to Ukraine or opposition to peace deals with Iran.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“The rumored 60-day ceasefire... would be a disaster.”
Why: The action involves transferring responsibilities related to foreign aid but does not directly advance military aid or address the specific support for Ukraine or opposition to Iran, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Sponsoring the act suggests some engagement with ocean policy, but it does not clearly align with the stated opposition to climate change measures, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“The rumored 60-day ceasefire... would be a disaster.”
Why: The action pertains to adoption services rather than military aid or foreign policy, making the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1381-1382)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-80.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S7829)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
By Senator Cruz from Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation filed written report. Report No. 119-123. Minority views filed.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.