Sponsorship· Foreign PolicyCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Wicker has been a strong supporter of military aid to Ukraine and has criticized diplomatic negotiations with adversaries like Iran. He has called for decisive military actions to counter threats from countries like Iran and Russia.
Wicker has been a strong supporter of military aid to Ukraine and has criticized diplomatic negotiations with adversaries like Iran. He has called for decisive military actions to counter threats from countries like Iran and Russia.
Wicker has expressed strong opposition to comprehensive immigration reform and has supported measures to restrict immigration, including defunding programs for undocumented immigrants. He has been rated 100% by FAIR, indicating a strict stance on immigration enforcement.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Wicker has expressed strong opposition to comprehensive immigration reform and has supported measures to restrict immigration, including defunding programs for undocumented immigrants. He has been rated 100% by FAIR, indicating a strict stance on immigration enforcement.
Wicker advocates for maintaining a strong national defense and has supported increased defense spending, emphasizing military readiness and a robust response to threats.
Wicker advocates for maintaining a strong national defense and has supported increased defense spending, emphasizing military readiness and a robust response to threats.
Roger Wicker has a strong pro-life stance, advocating for legislation that declares human life begins at conception and opposing federal funding for abortion. He has been rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a consistent anti-abortion voting record.
Roger Wicker has a strong pro-life stance, advocating for legislation that declares human life begins at conception and opposing federal funding for abortion. He has been rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a consistent anti-abortion voting record.
Wicker has opposed federal action on climate change, being the only senator to vote against an amendment affirming that climate change is real. He also signed a letter urging President Trump to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and has received significant funding from the oil and gas industry.
Wicker has opposed federal action on climate change, being the only senator to vote against an amendment affirming that climate change is real. He also signed a letter urging President Trump to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and has received significant funding from the oil and gas industry.
Wicker is a strong advocate for gun rights, having received an 'A+' rating from the NRA. He has opposed stricter gun control measures, including mandatory background checks, and has stated that he will filibuster any bill that infringes on Second Amendment rights.
Wicker is a strong advocate for gun rights, having received an 'A+' rating from the NRA. He has opposed stricter gun control measures, including mandatory background checks, and has stated that he will filibuster any bill that infringes on Second Amendment rights.
Wicker opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, supporting tax cuts and measures that favor lower tax rates for businesses. He has been rated 0% by the Citizens for Tax Justice, indicating opposition to progressive taxation.
Wicker opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, supporting tax cuts and measures that favor lower tax rates for businesses. He has been rated 0% by the Citizens for Tax Justice, indicating opposition to progressive taxation.
Wicker supports free trade agreements and has expressed opposition to tariffs, advocating for trade policies that enhance economic opportunities for the U.S.
Wicker supports free trade agreements and has expressed opposition to tariffs, advocating for trade policies that enhance economic opportunities for the U.S.
Wicker has opposed stronger federal protections against discrimination, including supporting measures that would allow businesses to deny services to same-sex couples and opposing affirmative action policies.
Wicker has opposed stronger federal protections against discrimination, including supporting measures that would allow businesses to deny services to same-sex couples and opposing affirmative action policies.
Position extraction pending on 12 issues: Economy & Jobs, Healthcare, Education, School Curriculum, Voting Rights, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution celebrating Ukraine's independence directly supports the stated position of backing military aid and solidarity with Ukraine against adversaries.
Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring the Sanctioning Russia Act directly supports military aid and actions against Russia, aligning closely with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S4276)
Why: Sponsoring the National Defense Authorization Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for a strong national defense and increasing military capabilities.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-35.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that protects Second Amendment rights directly aligns with the stated position of opposing stricter gun regulations.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly advances the stated pro-life position by seeking to prohibit federal funding for abortion services.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Accountability Through Electronic Verification Act aligns with the stated opposition to comprehensive immigration reform and supports measures that restrict immigration.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1207)
Why: Cosponsoring the Baltic Security Assessment Act supports military aid and security interests in a region relevant to U.S. foreign policy, aligning with the stated position on foreign aid.
View source →Sep 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Sponsoring the Eastern Flank Strategic Partnership Act supports military partnerships and aid, aligning with the stated position of supporting military aid and strong U.S. foreign policy interests.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that likely promotes energy infrastructure contradicts the stated opposition to federal action on climate change.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4521)
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill to designate a building does not clearly advance or undermine the stated position on military aid and decisive actions in foreign policy.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title and summary provided, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2307-2308)
Why: The action of cosponsoring a study abroad program does not clearly advance or undermine the stated position on military aid and decisive actions in foreign policy, as it focuses on educational exchange rather than military engagement.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on foreign policy.
Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action involves transferring responsibilities related to foreign aid but does not directly advance military aid or address the specific support for Ukraine or opposition to Iran, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated opposition to federal climate action.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title and summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated opposition to federal climate action.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 452.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3214)
Why: Tagged to Abortion, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 352.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 552.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Abortion, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4480; text: CR S4478-4479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4365; text: CR S4392)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4365; text: CR S4392-4393)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3194; text: CR S3218)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1381-1382)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-80.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4492-4493; text: CR S4492-4493)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S7829)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
By Senator Cruz from Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation filed written report. Report No. 119-123. Minority views filed.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.