Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Khanna supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He advocates for giving DREAMers a pathway to citizenship and opposes deportation of undocumented immigrants.
Khanna supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He advocates for giving DREAMers a pathway to citizenship and opposes deportation of undocumented immigrants.
“Give DREAMers a pathway to citizenship. (Nov 2016)”
Ro Khanna supports legal access to abortion and believes all women should have access to birth control and abortion services without restrictions. He has consistently advocated for pro-choice legislation and has opposed anti-abortion limitations.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Ro Khanna supports legal access to abortion and believes all women should have access to birth control and abortion services without restrictions. He has consistently advocated for pro-choice legislation and has opposed anti-abortion limitations.
“All women should have access to birth control and abortion. (Nov 2016)”
Khanna advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has been a proponent of the Green New Deal, which aims for a 100% renewable energy economy. He has criticized the fossil fuel industry for spreading disinformation about climate change and has worked on legislation to promote renewable energy investments.
Khanna advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has been a proponent of the Green New Deal, which aims for a 100% renewable energy economy. He has criticized the fossil fuel industry for spreading disinformation about climate change and has worked on legislation to promote renewable energy investments.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Khanna supports stricter firearms regulation, including requiring background checks for every firearm sale and transfer. He has sponsored legislation aimed at enhancing gun control measures.
Khanna supports stricter firearms regulation, including requiring background checks for every firearm sale and transfer. He has sponsored legislation aimed at enhancing gun control measures.
“Require background check for every firearm sale and transfer. (Jan 2019)”
Khanna advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and improvements to it. He has expressed support for Medicare for All and believes in expanding access to healthcare for all Americans.
Khanna advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and improvements to it. He has expressed support for Medicare for All and believes in expanding access to healthcare for all Americans.
“ACA is a good start; improve ObamaCare. (Nov 2016)”
Khanna supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax increases to balance the budget and close loopholes that allow companies to avoid paying taxes. He believes the current tax policy disproportionately benefits the top 1% of Americans.
Khanna supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax increases to balance the budget and close loopholes that allow companies to avoid paying taxes. He believes the current tax policy disproportionately benefits the top 1% of Americans.
“Our tax policy benefits the top 1% of Americans. (Nov 2016)”
Khanna supports increasing federal funding for public schools and advocates for more funding for K-12 education, pre-K, and STEM programs. He believes in making college affordable and preparing students for the 21st century.
Khanna supports increasing federal funding for public schools and advocates for more funding for K-12 education, pre-K, and STEM programs. He believes in making college affordable and preparing students for the 21st century.
“More funding for K-12, pre-K, STEM & STEAM. (Nov 2016)”
Khanna supports expanding ballot access and has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter registration and access to voting. He advocates for automatic voter registration and making election day a holiday.
Khanna supports expanding ballot access and has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter registration and access to voting. He advocates for automatic voter registration and making election day a holiday.
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Feb 2021)”
Khanna supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has opposed jail sentences for non-violent drug offenders. He advocates for alternatives to prison and has called for reforms to address mass incarceration.
Khanna supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has opposed jail sentences for non-violent drug offenders. He advocates for alternatives to prison and has called for reforms to address mass incarceration.
“Opposes jail sentences for non-violent drug offenders. (Nov 2016)”
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation.
May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, the Budget, Transportation and Infrastructure, Rules, Foreign Affairs, Ways and Means, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Feb 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting Our Democracy Act directly supports the stated position by aiming to enhance voting access and integrity, aligning with the commitment to easier voting measures.
May 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Our tax policy benefits the top 1% of Americans. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act directly advances the stated position of supporting tax increases to address inequality and ensure fairness in the tax code.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“ACA is a good start; improve ObamaCare. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring the Stop Deadly Denials Act directly supports the goal of expanding healthcare access and improving the ACA, aligning with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Sponsoring the act directly targets subsidies for oil recovery, aligning with the commitment to climate action and transitioning away from fossil fuels.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Our tax policy benefits the top 1% of Americans. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring the Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act directly aligns with the stated position of advocating for tax increases to promote fairness and balance the budget.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Financial Services, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Our tax policy benefits the top 1% of Americans. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring the Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Act directly advances the stated position of increasing taxes on the wealthy to achieve a fairer tax system.
View source →Jul 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, Ways and Means, Oversight and Government Reform, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“ACA is a good start; improve ObamaCare. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring the State-Based Universal Health Care Act directly supports the goal of expanding healthcare access, aligning with the advocacy for broader improvements to the ACA and a Medicare for All system.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Cosponsoring the PFAS Alternatives Act supports the broader goal of reducing environmental harm, which aligns with the commitment to cut emissions and promote renewable energy.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“More funding for K-12, pre-K, STEM & STEAM. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the All Students Count Act suggests support for educational initiatives, aligning with the advocacy for increased funding and federal education standards.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“More funding for K-12, pre-K, STEM & STEAM. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Universal School Meals Program Act supports increased funding for K-12 education and aligns with the goal of making education more accessible.
View source →Apr 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“ACA is a good start; improve ObamaCare. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Hazard Pay for Health Care Heroes Act supports healthcare workers, aligning with the broader goal of improving access and support within the healthcare system.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“All women should have access to birth control and abortion. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to designate Black Maternal Health Week aligns with advocating for reproductive health and addressing disparities, even though it does not directly address abortion access.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: The Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act supports conservation efforts, which aligns with the broader goals of climate action and renewable energy transition.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: The Homeowner Energy Freedom Act relates to energy policy and supports renewable energy initiatives, aligning with the stated advocacy for climate action.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Give DREAMers a pathway to citizenship. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to end ICE abuse aligns with the stated position by addressing concerns about deportation and the treatment of undocumented immigrants.
View source →May 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“ACA is a good start; improve ObamaCare. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring the Prescription Drug Price Relief Act aligns with the goal of improving healthcare access and affordability, which supports the broader objectives of expanding the ACA and advancing towards 'Medicare for All'.
View source →May 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“ACA is a good start; improve ObamaCare. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring the Global Fairness in Drug Pricing Act aligns with the goal of improving healthcare access by addressing drug pricing, which is a key issue in expanding the ACA and moving towards broader healthcare solutions.
View source →Mar 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“ACA is a good start; improve ObamaCare. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring the Telehealth Coverage Act supports expanding healthcare access through telehealth services, which aligns with the goal of improving the ACA and increasing overall healthcare access.
View source →Dec 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Our tax policy benefits the top 1% of Americans. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring a tax credit for small businesses aligns with the position of advocating for a fairer tax code, even though it does not directly address tax increases.
View source →Oct 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Agriculture, Energy and Commerce, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“More funding for K-12, pre-K, STEM & STEAM. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring the Child Care for America Act supports increased funding for early childhood education, aligning with the advocacy for K-12 and pre-K funding.
View source →Sep 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Our tax policy benefits the top 1% of Americans. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to eliminate a tax contradicts the stated support for tax increases aimed at fairness and balancing the budget.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill related to LNG (liquefied natural gas) contradicts the strong advocacy for a transition to a 100% renewable energy economy, as it supports fossil fuel infrastructure.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Give DREAMers a pathway to citizenship. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act contradicts the stated support for pathways to citizenship and opposing deportations, as such funding typically supports immigration enforcement.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Voting against a bill aimed at promoting energy freedom and potentially renewable energy contradicts the stated commitment to significant investments in renewable energy and climate action.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Give DREAMers a pathway to citizenship. (Nov 2016)”
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for immigration enforcement, which could conflict with the support for a pathway to citizenship and opposition to deportations, but the overall impact of the bill is unclear.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Our tax policy benefits the top 1% of Americans. (Nov 2016)”
Why: The action involves tax code amendments but does not directly address higher taxes on corporations or top earners, leaving the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Our tax policy benefits the top 1% of Americans. (Nov 2016)”
Why: The action does not directly address tax increases or fairness in the tax code, leaving the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →May 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“ACA is a good start; improve ObamaCare. (Nov 2016)”
Why: The action cosponsoring a bill related to acupuncture for seniors does not directly advance the broader goals of expanding the ACA or implementing Medicare for All, but it does align with improving healthcare access for a specific group.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Ways and Means, Natural Resources, Financial Services, Transportation and Infrastructure, Education and Workforce, Oversight and Government Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Energy Bills Relief Act does not clearly align with the strong advocacy for a 100% renewable energy economy, as the specifics of the bill's provisions are unclear and may not directly support significant climate action.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Our tax policy benefits the top 1% of Americans. (Nov 2016)”
Why: The act aims to establish a living wage, which could imply a need for tax adjustments, but it does not directly address tax increases or reforming the tax code as stated.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Require background check for every firearm sale and transfer. (Jan 2019)”
Why: The action commemorates a mass shooting, which aligns with the figure's concern for gun violence, but does not directly advance specific gun control measures.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 2.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, Agriculture, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Small Business, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 0.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, House Administration, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Small Business, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, House Administration, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-38.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 4, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.