Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Rick Scott has expressed a strong stance against the Chinese Communist Party and supports legislation that would restrict U.S. financial transactions involving Chinese digital currencies. He has also been critical of foreign aid that does not align with U.S. interests.
Rick Scott has expressed a strong stance against the Chinese Communist Party and supports legislation that would restrict U.S. financial transactions involving Chinese digital currencies. He has also been critical of foreign aid that does not align with U.S. interests.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Rick Scott opposes expanding legal immigration pathways and supports strict enforcement of immigration laws. He has expressed support for measures like the Arizona immigration law and has urged for a national ID card.
Position extraction pending on 3 issues: School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Rick Scott opposes expanding legal immigration pathways and supports strict enforcement of immigration laws. He has expressed support for measures like the Arizona immigration law and has urged for a national ID card.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Rick Scott opposes legal access to abortion, stating that abortion takes a human life and advocating for the overturning of Roe v. Wade. He has supported measures such as a 24-hour waiting period for abortions and opposes federal funding for abortion services.
Rick Scott opposes legal access to abortion, stating that abortion takes a human life and advocating for the overturning of Roe v. Wade. He has supported measures such as a 24-hour waiting period for abortions and opposes federal funding for abortion services.
“Abortion takes a human life: to deny that is to deny science. (Jun 2022)”
Rick Scott rejects the scientific consensus on climate change and has stated, "I'm not a scientist," indicating a lack of commitment to federal action to cut emissions. He has also cut funding for environmental agencies during his tenure as governor.
Rick Scott rejects the scientific consensus on climate change and has stated, "I'm not a scientist," indicating a lack of commitment to federal action to cut emissions. He has also cut funding for environmental agencies during his tenure as governor.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Rick Scott has a strong pro-gun rights stance, holding an A+ rating from the NRA. He has supported legislation that allows for the arming of teachers and has opposed restrictions on gun ownership, although he did support raising the minimum age to purchase firearms to 21 after the Parkland shooting.
Rick Scott has a strong pro-gun rights stance, holding an A+ rating from the NRA. He has supported legislation that allows for the arming of teachers and has opposed restrictions on gun ownership, although he did support raising the minimum age to purchase firearms to 21 after the Parkland shooting.
“A-rating from the NRA: Strongly Favors topic 10”
Rick Scott opposes government-run healthcare and has been a vocal critic of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). He supports repealing and replacing it with free-market solutions and has advocated for lowering drug prices in the U.S. to be comparable to those in Europe.
Rick Scott opposes government-run healthcare and has been a vocal critic of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). He supports repealing and replacing it with free-market solutions and has advocated for lowering drug prices in the U.S. to be comparable to those in Europe.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Rick Scott opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and a single-rate tax system. He has consistently supported measures that would lower taxes for businesses and individuals.
Rick Scott opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and a single-rate tax system. He has consistently supported measures that would lower taxes for businesses and individuals.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Rick Scott has advocated for school choice and has pushed for legislation that expands charter schools and voucher programs for private education. He has also expressed a desire to eliminate teacher tenure.
Rick Scott has advocated for school choice and has pushed for legislation that expands charter schools and voucher programs for private education. He has also expressed a desire to eliminate teacher tenure.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Rick Scott has expressed opposition to measures that would expand ballot access, supporting stricter voter ID laws and purging voter rolls. He has been critical of mail-in voting practices.
Rick Scott has expressed opposition to measures that would expand ballot access, supporting stricter voter ID laws and purging voter rolls. He has been critical of mail-in voting practices.
“Election rigging "voting rights" institutionalize fraud: Strongly Opposes topic 16”
Rick Scott supports strict penalties for crime and has signed legislation that emphasizes capital punishment. He has expressed opposition to efforts aimed at reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses.
Rick Scott supports strict penalties for crime and has signed legislation that emphasizes capital punishment. He has expressed opposition to efforts aimed at reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Abortion takes a human life: to deny that is to deny science. (Jun 2022)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly supports the stated opposition to abortion by aiming to restrict funding for abortion providers.
Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: Cosponsoring the High-Quality Charter Schools Act directly supports the stated position of expanding school choice and increasing charter schools.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Sponsoring the Stop Support for UNRWA Act directly aligns with the opposition to foreign aid that does not serve U.S. interests, as it seeks to cut funding to an organization Scott views as problematic.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Local Data for Better Conservation Act suggests a partial movement towards addressing environmental issues, even if it does not align with a strong commitment to climate action.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that designates a group as a terrorist organization aligns with a stance against foreign aid that does not serve U.S. interests, as it reflects a focus on national security.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: The American Dream Accounts Act aims to enhance educational opportunities, which aligns with the support for expanding school choice and reducing barriers to education.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Illegal Alien Cops Act aligns with the support for strict immigration policies, as it aims to enforce immigration laws, despite the mixed stance on DACA.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Why: Sponsoring a balanced budget amendment aligns with the stated position of supporting tax cuts and fiscal responsibility, as it aims to limit government spending and prevent tax increases.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that prohibits certain higher education institutions from receiving funding contradicts the support for expanding educational access and choice.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1545-1546)
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution commending Taiwan, while supportive of democracy, does not align with the stated opposition to foreign aid, as it implies endorsement of U.S. support for another country.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill related to energy affordability and investment in disaster zones contradicts the stated opposition to climate change initiatives and funding for environmental agencies.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 314.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution disapproving a tax conformity act suggests opposition to tax measures that could align with his stated support for tax cuts, indicating a move against his stated position.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring the NOPE Act suggests a focus on restricting certain foreign aid, but the specifics of the bill and its alignment with the stated opposition to foreign aid are unclear.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Sponsoring the act addresses human rights concerns in Tibet, which may align with U.S. interests, but it does not directly reflect a clear opposition to foreign aid as a broader concept.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: The bill focuses on research and development criteria for higher education institutions, which does not directly align with the stated support for expanding school choice and parental control.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: The SAT Streamlining Act does not directly align with the stated position on expanding school choice or reducing tuition, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: The bill focuses on veterans' educational assistance, which aligns with supporting education but does not directly address school choice or K-12 policies.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: The act focuses on employment for seniors, which does not directly align with or contradict the stated opposition to government-run healthcare, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: The action relates to education funding and research but does not directly advance the stated position on school choice or tuition reduction.
Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: The resolution expresses support for an alliance that may involve strategic interests, but does not directly align with the opposition to foreign aid as it pertains to U.S. interests.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Why: The act aims to protect taxpayer funds but does not directly align with the stated position of advocating for tax cuts or eliminating specific taxes.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: The act aims to enhance security related to sanctuary jurisdictions, which aligns with strict immigration enforcement, but does not directly address the broader immigration policies or support for DREAMers.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S582)
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: The action of condemning Iran's government aligns with a stance against foreign aid that does not serve U.S. interests, but it does not directly address the opposition to foreign aid itself.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: The One Nation, One Visa Policy Act suggests a shift towards a more streamlined immigration process, which may conflict with strict enforcement policies, but does not directly oppose the stated support for DREAMers.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: The CLEAR LABELS Act may align with lowering drug prices but does not directly address government-run healthcare or the ACA, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: The action to sponsor a bill related to border agents' pay does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on strict immigration policies, as it focuses on funding rather than policy enforcement.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S117)
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution commending military action in Venezuela does not directly align with the opposition to foreign aid, as it could imply support for military involvement, which may involve aid considerations.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Why: The action involves sponsoring a bill related to tax exemptions, but it does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on tax cuts or increases, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 250.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2452; text: CR S2446)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2351; text: CR S2379-2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2179)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2085-2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 371.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1609; text: CR S1617-1618)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1381-1382)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-80.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S612)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8893; text: CR S8925-8926)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.