Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Rick Scott has expressed a strong stance against the Chinese Communist Party and supports legislation that would restrict U.S. financial transactions involving Chinese digital currencies. He has also been critical of foreign aid that does not align with U.S. interests.
Rick Scott has expressed a strong stance against the Chinese Communist Party and supports legislation that would restrict U.S. financial transactions involving Chinese digital currencies. He has also been critical of foreign aid that does not align with U.S. interests.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Rick Scott opposes expanding legal immigration pathways and supports strict enforcement of immigration laws. He has expressed support for measures like the Arizona immigration law and has urged for a national ID card.
Rick Scott opposes expanding legal immigration pathways and supports strict enforcement of immigration laws. He has expressed support for measures like the Arizona immigration law and has urged for a national ID card.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Rick Scott emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong national defense and has been vocal about holding adversarial nations accountable, particularly in the context of Russia's actions in Ukraine. He advocates for increased military support for allies and sanctions against aggressors.
Rick Scott emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong national defense and has been vocal about holding adversarial nations accountable, particularly in the context of Russia's actions in Ukraine. He advocates for increased military support for allies and sanctions against aggressors.
“If you support what Russia is doing, then you should be sanctioned. There's no question about it.”
Rick Scott advocates for limited government intervention in the economy, emphasizing tax cuts and balancing budgets. He has proposed a plan to create jobs and has opposed significant government spending increases, arguing that the government should not provide assistance unless individuals are disabled or seeking work.
Rick Scott advocates for limited government intervention in the economy, emphasizing tax cuts and balancing budgets. He has proposed a plan to create jobs and has opposed significant government spending increases, arguing that the government should not provide assistance unless individuals are disabled or seeking work.
“I cut taxes and balanced budget; you can do both. (Oct 2021)”
Rick Scott opposes legal access to abortion, stating that abortion takes a human life and advocating for the overturning of Roe v. Wade. He has supported measures such as a 24-hour waiting period for abortions and opposes federal funding for abortion services.
Rick Scott opposes legal access to abortion, stating that abortion takes a human life and advocating for the overturning of Roe v. Wade. He has supported measures such as a 24-hour waiting period for abortions and opposes federal funding for abortion services.
“Abortion takes a human life: to deny that is to deny science. (Jun 2022)”
Rick Scott rejects the scientific consensus on climate change and has stated, "I'm not a scientist," indicating a lack of commitment to federal action to cut emissions. He has also cut funding for environmental agencies during his tenure as governor.
Rick Scott rejects the scientific consensus on climate change and has stated, "I'm not a scientist," indicating a lack of commitment to federal action to cut emissions. He has also cut funding for environmental agencies during his tenure as governor.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Rick Scott has a strong pro-gun rights stance, holding an A+ rating from the NRA. He has supported legislation that allows for the arming of teachers and has opposed restrictions on gun ownership, although he did support raising the minimum age to purchase firearms to 21 after the Parkland shooting.
Rick Scott has a strong pro-gun rights stance, holding an A+ rating from the NRA. He has supported legislation that allows for the arming of teachers and has opposed restrictions on gun ownership, although he did support raising the minimum age to purchase firearms to 21 after the Parkland shooting.
“A-rating from the NRA: Strongly Favors topic 10”
Rick Scott opposes government-run healthcare and has been a vocal critic of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). He supports repealing and replacing it with free-market solutions and has advocated for lowering drug prices in the U.S. to be comparable to those in Europe.
Rick Scott opposes government-run healthcare and has been a vocal critic of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). He supports repealing and replacing it with free-market solutions and has advocated for lowering drug prices in the U.S. to be comparable to those in Europe.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Rick Scott opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and a single-rate tax system. He has consistently supported measures that would lower taxes for businesses and individuals.
Rick Scott opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and a single-rate tax system. He has consistently supported measures that would lower taxes for businesses and individuals.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Rick Scott has advocated for school choice and has pushed for legislation that expands charter schools and voucher programs for private education. He has also expressed a desire to eliminate teacher tenure.
Rick Scott has advocated for school choice and has pushed for legislation that expands charter schools and voucher programs for private education. He has also expressed a desire to eliminate teacher tenure.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Rick Scott has expressed opposition to measures that would expand ballot access, supporting stricter voter ID laws and purging voter rolls. He has been critical of mail-in voting practices.
Rick Scott has expressed opposition to measures that would expand ballot access, supporting stricter voter ID laws and purging voter rolls. He has been critical of mail-in voting practices.
“Election rigging "voting rights" institutionalize fraud: Strongly Opposes topic 16”
Rick Scott supports strict penalties for crime and has signed legislation that emphasizes capital punishment. He has expressed opposition to efforts aimed at reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses.
Rick Scott supports strict penalties for crime and has signed legislation that emphasizes capital punishment. He has expressed opposition to efforts aimed at reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
Rick Scott has expressed opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, supporting measures that enforce court decisions ending college affirmative action and advocating for traditional marriage. He has also signed legislation that protects religious organizations from being compelled to recognize same-sex marriages.
Rick Scott has expressed opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, supporting measures that enforce court decisions ending college affirmative action and advocating for traditional marriage. He has also signed legislation that protects religious organizations from being compelled to recognize same-sex marriages.
“Urged NCAA to ban transgender athletes from women's sports. (Aug 2024)”
Rick Scott has been critical of public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly regarding vaccine mandates. He has expressed skepticism about the efficacy of vaccines and has criticized public health officials for their guidance during the pandemic.
Rick Scott has been critical of public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly regarding vaccine mandates. He has expressed skepticism about the efficacy of vaccines and has criticized public health officials for their guidance during the pandemic.
“Anthony Fauci killed people with his lies about the vaccine.”
Rick Scott opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, having been rated negatively by NORML and supporting strict drug testing measures.
Rick Scott opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, having been rated negatively by NORML and supporting strict drug testing measures.
“Rated F by NORML: no medical marijuana. (Aug 2024)”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3214)
“Abortion takes a human life: to deny that is to deny science. (Jun 2022)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution celebrating the Dobbs decision directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion.
May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
“If you support what Russia is doing, then you should be sanctioned. There's no question about it.”
Why: Sponsoring the Blocking CCP Spy Tech Act directly supports the stated position by enhancing national security measures against adversarial nations, aligning with the emphasis on a strong defense.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“If you support what Russia is doing, then you should be sanctioned. There's no question about it.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at strengthening cyber resilience against state-sponsored threats directly advances the stated position of maintaining a strong national defense and holding adversarial nations accountable.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Abortion takes a human life: to deny that is to deny science. (Jun 2022)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly supports the stated opposition to abortion by aiming to restrict funding for abortion providers.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: Cosponsoring the High-Quality Charter Schools Act directly supports the stated position of expanding school choice and increasing charter schools.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: The bill aims to close loopholes that incentivize unlawful entry, which aligns with the stated position of advocating for stricter immigration policies.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Local Data for Better Conservation Act suggests a partial movement towards addressing environmental issues, even if it does not align with a strong commitment to climate action.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that designates a group as a terrorist organization aligns with a stance against foreign aid that does not serve U.S. interests, as it reflects a focus on national security.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: The American Dream Accounts Act aims to enhance educational opportunities, which aligns with the support for expanding school choice and reducing barriers to education.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Illegal Alien Cops Act aligns with the support for strict immigration policies, as it aims to enforce immigration laws, despite the mixed stance on DACA.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Why: Sponsoring a balanced budget amendment aligns with the stated position of supporting tax cuts and fiscal responsibility, as it aims to limit government spending and prevent tax increases.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that bans birth tourism directly contradicts the stated position of supporting stricter immigration policies that prioritize American workers, as it targets a specific immigration practice rather than addressing broader immigration reform.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that prioritizes American workers while imposing fees on employers sponsoring foreign workers directly contradicts the stated position of supporting immigration.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the FEAT Act, which likely involves federal action on climate initiatives, directly contradicts the stated position of opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at protecting asylum integrity contradicts the stated position of advocating for stricter immigration policies that prioritize American workers over foreign workers.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at recovering costs associated with illegal immigration directly contradicts the stated support for stricter immigration policies that prioritize American workers.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1545-1546)
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution commending Taiwan, while supportive of democracy, does not align with the stated opposition to foreign aid, as it implies endorsement of U.S. support for another country.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill related to energy affordability and investment in disaster zones contradicts the stated opposition to climate change initiatives and funding for environmental agencies.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 314.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution disapproving a tax conformity act suggests opposition to tax measures that could align with his stated support for tax cuts, indicating a move against his stated position.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Why: The measure's content is unclear regarding its impact on emissions or climate action, making it difficult to determine alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on immigration.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on climate.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“I'm not a scientist, so I have no proposal on climate change. (Jul 2014)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“If you support what Russia is doing, then you should be sanctioned. There's no question about it.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on national security.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“If you support what Russia is doing, then you should be sanctioned. There's no question about it.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on national security.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Urged NCAA to ban transgender athletes from women's sports. (Aug 2024)”
Why: The action's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on civil rights.
May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2351; text: CR S2379-2380)
“Urged NCAA to ban transgender athletes from women's sports. (Aug 2024)”
Why: The resolution addresses antisemitism, which is a civil rights issue, but does not directly advance or undermine the stated position on LGBTQ rights or broader civil rights protections.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: The SAT Streamlining Act does not directly align with the stated position on expanding school choice or reducing tuition, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: The action relates to education funding and research but does not directly advance the stated position on school choice or tuition reduction.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: The resolution expresses support for an alliance that may involve strategic interests, but does not directly align with the opposition to foreign aid as it pertains to U.S. interests.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Why: The act aims to protect taxpayer funds but does not directly align with the stated position of advocating for tax cuts or eliminating specific taxes.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: The act aims to enhance security related to sanctuary jurisdictions, which aligns with strict immigration enforcement, but does not directly address the broader immigration policies or support for DREAMers.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S582)
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: The action of condemning Iran's government aligns with a stance against foreign aid that does not serve U.S. interests, but it does not directly address the opposition to foreign aid itself.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: The One Nation, One Visa Policy Act suggests a shift towards a more streamlined immigration process, which may conflict with strict enforcement policies, but does not directly oppose the stated support for DREAMers.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: The CLEAR LABELS Act may align with lowering drug prices but does not directly address government-run healthcare or the ACA, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Support Arizona immigrant law & national ID card: Strongly Opposes topic 12”
Why: The action to sponsor a bill related to border agents' pay does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on strict immigration policies, as it focuses on funding rather than policy enforcement.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S117)
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution commending military action in Venezuela does not directly align with the opposition to foreign aid, as it could imply support for military involvement, which may involve aid considerations.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Permanently enact Trump's tax cuts: Strongly Opposes topic 11”
Why: The action involves sponsoring a bill related to tax exemptions, but it does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on tax cuts or increases, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4436)
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“I cut taxes and balanced budget; you can do both. (Oct 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“I cut taxes and balanced budget; you can do both. (Oct 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to School Curriculum, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S3746)
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 517.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“I cut taxes and balanced budget; you can do both. (Oct 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Opposes government-run healthcare. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
“I cut taxes and balanced budget; you can do both. (Oct 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports capital punishment for certain crimes. (Aug 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Ban imports from Xinjiang made by Uyghur forced labor. (Jan 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
“Increase the number of charter schools: Favors topic 7”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“I cut taxes and balanced budget; you can do both. (Oct 2021)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4365; text: CR S4392)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3194; text: CR S3218)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 446.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2768)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2452; text: CR S2446)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 250.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 546.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2179)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2085-2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 371.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1609; text: CR S1617-1618)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1381-1382)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-80.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S612)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8893; text: CR S8925-8926)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.