Sponsorship· HealthcareCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Aguilar supports comprehensive immigration reform and has opposed the deportation of undocumented individuals. He advocates for increasing both high-skill and family-based visa caps and has voted to legalize certain undocumented immigrants through military service.
Aguilar supports comprehensive immigration reform and has opposed the deportation of undocumented individuals. He advocates for increasing both high-skill and family-based visa caps and has voted to legalize certain undocumented immigrants through military service.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Aguilar supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for policies that benefit the middle class and small businesses.
Aguilar supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for policies that benefit the middle class and small businesses.
“Build economy that's fair to middle-class & small business. (Nov 2014)”
Pete Aguilar supports legal access to abortion and has opposed efforts to restrict it, calling the overturning of Roe v. Wade a "devastating decision." He advocates for safe and legal abortion without restrictions and believes that funding abortion services is necessary to avoid discrimination against poor women.
Pete Aguilar supports legal access to abortion and has opposed efforts to restrict it, calling the overturning of Roe v. Wade a "devastating decision." He advocates for safe and legal abortion without restrictions and believes that funding abortion services is necessary to avoid discrimination against poor women.
Aguilar supports federal action to cut emissions and has endorsed policies aimed at encouraging green building and climate-friendly practices. He has also expressed opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline and supports regulating CO2 emissions.
Aguilar supports federal action to cut emissions and has endorsed policies aimed at encouraging green building and climate-friendly practices. He has also expressed opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline and supports regulating CO2 emissions.
Aguilar supports stricter firearms regulation, including requiring background checks for every firearm sale and transfer. He has consistently voted in favor of measures aimed at restricting gun access.
Aguilar supports stricter firearms regulation, including requiring background checks for every firearm sale and transfer. He has consistently voted in favor of measures aimed at restricting gun access.
Pete Aguilar opposes repealing the Affordable Care Act and supports expanding government involvement in health coverage. He has criticized efforts to undermine Obamacare and advocates for maintaining and improving healthcare access.
Pete Aguilar opposes repealing the Affordable Care Act and supports expanding government involvement in health coverage. He has criticized efforts to undermine Obamacare and advocates for maintaining and improving healthcare access.
Pete Aguilar supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for raising the estate tax to levels seen in the 1990s to generate additional revenue.
Pete Aguilar supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for raising the estate tax to levels seen in the 1990s to generate additional revenue.
Pete Aguilar advocates for improving public education at all levels and supports federal funding for public schools. He opposes private and religious school voucher programs and has expressed support for the Common Core educational standards.
Pete Aguilar advocates for improving public education at all levels and supports federal funding for public schools. He opposes private and religious school voucher programs and has expressed support for the Common Core educational standards.
Aguilar is in favor of expanding ballot access and has supported measures such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns to enhance voter participation.
Aguilar is in favor of expanding ballot access and has supported measures such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns to enhance voter participation.
Aguilar advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, supporting same-sex marriage and opposing measures that would limit protections for transgender individuals.
Aguilar advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, supporting same-sex marriage and opposing measures that would limit protections for transgender individuals.
“Supports same-sex marriage, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Aguilar supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in managing disease outbreaks.
Aguilar supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in managing disease outbreaks.
“Supports public health measures to manage disease outbreaks. (date not specified)”
Aguilar is rated as pro-drug-reform and supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, indicating a shift towards more progressive drug policies.
Aguilar is rated as pro-drug-reform and supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, indicating a shift towards more progressive drug policies.
“Rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance. (Nov 2016)”
Position extraction pending on 9 issues: Foreign Policy, National Security, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Sep 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, Ways and Means, Veterans' Affairs, Armed Services, Natural Resources, Financial Services, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the PrEP Access and Coverage Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare, aligning with the stated position for a larger government role in health coverage.
Aug 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee Hearings Held
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Freedom for Veterans Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for legal access to abortion without restrictions.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Agriculture, Oversight and Government Reform, Education and Workforce, the Judiciary, the Budget, Veterans' Affairs, Natural Resources, Armed Services, Homeland Security, Financial Services, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Health Equity and Accountability Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare and aligns with the stated position of favoring a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Sickle Cell Disease Comprehensive Care Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare, aligning with the stated position of favoring a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Yea on the Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act directly supports regulating emissions and aligns with the advocacy for climate-friendly initiatives.
View source →Mar 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for protections against deportations in sensitive areas, aligning with the support for pathways to legal status.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The Momnibus Act aims to expand maternal health care access and support, directly advancing the stated position of expanding access to healthcare.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the Metastatic Breast Cancer Access to Care Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare, aligning with the stated position of favoring a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Supports same-sex marriage, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Pride In Mental Health Act directly supports stronger federal protections for LGBTQ individuals, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Supports same-sex marriage, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act directly advances the stated position by promoting protections against discrimination and harassment, particularly for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Supports same-sex marriage, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the John Lewis Every Child Deserves a Family Act directly supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ individuals, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Women’s Health Protection Act directly supports the stated position of protecting and expanding access to safe, legal abortion.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act directly advances the stated position by promoting comprehensive background checks for firearm sales and transfers.
View source →Nov 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
“Build economy that's fair to middle-class & small business. (Nov 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring the GDP Act directly supports government intervention aimed at economic growth and stability, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Oct 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Supports same-sex marriage, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring the Protecting Students’ Civil Rights Act directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →Jul 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
“Build economy that's fair to middle-class & small business. (Nov 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at expanding supportive services for disadvantaged businesses directly aligns with the position of supporting government intervention to benefit small businesses and promote economic growth.
View source →Mar 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Sponsoring the American Dream Employment Act directly supports pathways to legal status for certain undocumented individuals, aligning closely with the stated position on immigration reform.
View source →Apr 26, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
“Build economy that's fair to middle-class & small business. (Nov 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring the GDP Act directly supports government intervention aimed at economic growth and stability, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
“Build economy that's fair to middle-class & small business. (Nov 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at expanding supportive services for disadvantaged businesses directly aligns with the position of supporting government intervention to benefit small businesses and promote economic growth.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act supports expanding access to healthcare by addressing specific healthcare needs, aligning with the stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Universal School Meals Program Act supports the goal of improving public education by addressing student nutrition, which is a critical component of educational success.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at improving child care for working families aligns with the broader goal of enhancing public education and support for families, even though it focuses specifically on child care.
View source →Jan 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at reducing physician shortages supports the broader goal of expanding access to healthcare, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
“Build economy that's fair to middle-class & small business. (Nov 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at restoring food security aligns with supporting economic stability and growth, particularly for middle-class families and small businesses.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Redistricting Reform Act moves toward improving voting rights through fairer districting, aligning with the support for automatic voter registration and campaign financing.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the FAMILY Act, which aims to expand access to family and medical leave, aligns with the broader goal of increasing healthcare access.
View source →Aug 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
“Build economy that's fair to middle-class & small business. (Nov 2014)”
Why: The Affordable Housing Resident Services Act aims to support economic stability by addressing housing needs, which aligns with the position advocating for government intervention to benefit the middle class.
View source →Jun 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act supports expanding healthcare access for seniors, which aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Mar 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving school meal programs aligns with the broader goal of enhancing public education and support for schools.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
“Build economy that's fair to middle-class & small business. (Nov 2014)”
Why: The Affordable Housing Resident Services Act aims to support economic stability by addressing housing needs, which aligns with the position advocating for government intervention to benefit the middle class.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act, which likely includes funding for immigration enforcement, contradicts the support for comprehensive reform and opposition to deportation.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy freedom and potentially reducing emissions contradicts the stated support for federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for various immigration-related programs, but without specific provisions for comprehensive reform or protections for undocumented individuals, the alignment with the stated position is unclear.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: The motion to recommit could have aimed to change the bill's provisions, but without specific details on its content, the relationship to the stated position on climate action is unclear.
View source →Apr 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
“Build economy that's fair to middle-class & small business. (Nov 2014)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jun 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: While cosponsoring the Equal Rights Amendment relates to civil rights, it does not directly advance the specific voting rights initiatives mentioned in the stated position.
View source →Sep 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 31, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 1, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Concur in the Senate Amendments — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 31, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Recorded Vote — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Supports public health measures to manage disease outbreaks. (date not specified)”
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 31, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the National Intelligence Enterprise.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-21.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 29, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.