Vote· ClimateYea
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Aguilar supports comprehensive immigration reform and has opposed the deportation of undocumented individuals. He advocates for increasing both high-skill and family-based visa caps and has voted to legalize certain undocumented immigrants through military service.
Aguilar supports comprehensive immigration reform and has opposed the deportation of undocumented individuals. He advocates for increasing both high-skill and family-based visa caps and has voted to legalize certain undocumented immigrants through military service.
Pete Aguilar supports legal access to abortion and has opposed efforts to restrict it, calling the overturning of Roe v. Wade a "devastating decision." He advocates for safe and legal abortion without restrictions and believes that funding abortion services is necessary to avoid discrimination against poor women.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Pete Aguilar supports legal access to abortion and has opposed efforts to restrict it, calling the overturning of Roe v. Wade a "devastating decision." He advocates for safe and legal abortion without restrictions and believes that funding abortion services is necessary to avoid discrimination against poor women.
Aguilar supports federal action to cut emissions and has endorsed policies aimed at encouraging green building and climate-friendly practices. He has also expressed opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline and supports regulating CO2 emissions.
Aguilar supports federal action to cut emissions and has endorsed policies aimed at encouraging green building and climate-friendly practices. He has also expressed opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline and supports regulating CO2 emissions.
Aguilar supports stricter firearms regulation, including requiring background checks for every firearm sale and transfer. He has consistently voted in favor of measures aimed at restricting gun access.
Aguilar supports stricter firearms regulation, including requiring background checks for every firearm sale and transfer. He has consistently voted in favor of measures aimed at restricting gun access.
Pete Aguilar opposes repealing the Affordable Care Act and supports expanding government involvement in health coverage. He has criticized efforts to undermine Obamacare and advocates for maintaining and improving healthcare access.
Pete Aguilar opposes repealing the Affordable Care Act and supports expanding government involvement in health coverage. He has criticized efforts to undermine Obamacare and advocates for maintaining and improving healthcare access.
Pete Aguilar supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for raising the estate tax to levels seen in the 1990s to generate additional revenue.
Pete Aguilar supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for raising the estate tax to levels seen in the 1990s to generate additional revenue.
Pete Aguilar advocates for improving public education at all levels and supports federal funding for public schools. He opposes private and religious school voucher programs and has expressed support for the Common Core educational standards.
Pete Aguilar advocates for improving public education at all levels and supports federal funding for public schools. He opposes private and religious school voucher programs and has expressed support for the Common Core educational standards.
Aguilar is in favor of expanding ballot access and has supported measures such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns to enhance voter participation.
Aguilar is in favor of expanding ballot access and has supported measures such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns to enhance voter participation.
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Yea on the Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act directly supports regulating emissions and aligns with the advocacy for climate-friendly initiatives.
Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Momnibus Act, which aims to expand healthcare access for mothers and infants, directly supports the stated position of expanding healthcare access.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the Metastatic Breast Cancer Access to Care Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, aligning closely with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Pride In Mental Health Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, particularly in mental health, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Women’s Health Protection Act directly supports the stated position of protecting and expanding access to safe, legal abortion.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act directly advances the stated position by promoting comprehensive background checks for firearm sales and transfers.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Sickle Cell Disease Comprehensive Care Act supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position on increasing government involvement in health coverage.
View source →Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The DISCLOSE Act aims to improve transparency in campaign finance, which aligns with the support for public financing of federal campaigns, even if it does not directly address voter registration.
View source →Mar 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act aligns with the support for comprehensive immigration reform by aiming to protect vulnerable populations from deportation in sensitive areas.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The Homeowner Energy Freedom Act relates to energy efficiency and supports climate-friendly initiatives, aligning with the stated position on regulating emissions and promoting green practices.
View source →Jan 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the act aims to address physician shortages, which supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Redistricting Reform Act moves toward improving voting rights through fairer districting, aligning with the support for automatic voter registration and campaign financing.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the FAMILY Act, which aims to expand access to family and medical leave, aligns with the broader goal of increasing healthcare access.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the EACH Act, which aims to expand healthcare access, aligns with the stated position of supporting the Affordable Care Act and increasing healthcare access.
View source →Jun 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act supports expanding healthcare access for seniors, which aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Feb 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-21.
Why: Sponsoring the Wounded Warrior Access Act supports expanding healthcare access for veterans, which aligns with the stated position of supporting healthcare access.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act, which likely includes funding for immigration enforcement, contradicts the support for comprehensive reform and opposition to deportation.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy contradicts the stated support for regulating emissions and advancing climate-friendly initiatives.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for various immigration-related programs, but without specific provisions for comprehensive reform or protections for undocumented individuals, the alignment with the stated position is unclear.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The Humane Cosmetics Act is related to animal testing and does not directly address CO2 emissions or climate policy, creating uncertainty about its alignment with the stated climate position.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: The act addresses heat illness prevention, which relates to climate impacts, but does not directly advance CO2 emissions regulation or oppose fossil fuel projects like the Keystone XL pipeline.
View source →Jun 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: While cosponsoring the Equal Rights Amendment relates to civil rights, it does not directly advance the specific voting rights initiatives mentioned in the stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the National Intelligence Enterprise.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 29, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 26, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.