Sponsorship· Voting RightsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Pelosi has opposed measures to build a border wall and has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform that includes pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. She has criticized the treatment of migrants and supported protections for DACA recipients.
Pelosi has opposed measures to build a border wall and has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform that includes pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. She has criticized the treatment of migrants and supported protections for DACA recipients.
Pelosi has consistently supported legal access to abortion, voting against various restrictions and bans on abortion. She opposed the overturning of Roe v. Wade, calling it "cruel" and "outrageous."
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Pelosi has consistently supported legal access to abortion, voting against various restrictions and bans on abortion. She opposed the overturning of Roe v. Wade, calling it "cruel" and "outrageous."
Pelosi has described climate change as "the existential threat of our time" and has called for federal action to cut emissions, supporting conservation programs and energy research. She has opposed offshore drilling in protected areas.
Pelosi has described climate change as "the existential threat of our time" and has called for federal action to cut emissions, supporting conservation programs and energy research. She has opposed offshore drilling in protected areas.
Pelosi supports stricter firearms regulations, including increased background checks and a ban on assault weapons. She has criticized the influence of the gun lobby and called for legislative action to address gun violence.
Pelosi supports stricter firearms regulations, including increased background checks and a ban on assault weapons. She has criticized the influence of the gun lobby and called for legislative action to address gun violence.
Pelosi has been a strong advocate for expanding health coverage and was instrumental in passing the Affordable Care Act. She supports increasing Medicare and Medicaid benefits but does not endorse a single-payer healthcare system.
Pelosi has been a strong advocate for expanding health coverage and was instrumental in passing the Affordable Care Act. She supports increasing Medicare and Medicaid benefits but does not endorse a single-payer healthcare system.
Pelosi supports higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy, opposing tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the rich. She has criticized tax reforms that she believes harm middle-class families and increase the national debt.
Pelosi supports higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy, opposing tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the rich. She has criticized tax reforms that she believes harm middle-class families and increase the national debt.
Pelosi has advocated for increased federal funding for public schools and has opposed school voucher programs, viewing them as a means to privatize education. She has supported initiatives to reduce class sizes and increase overall education spending.
Pelosi has advocated for increased federal funding for public schools and has opposed school voucher programs, viewing them as a means to privatize education. She has supported initiatives to reduce class sizes and increase overall education spending.
Pelosi has advocated for expanding ballot access and has opposed voter ID laws that she believes suppress voter turnout. She supports automatic voter registration and measures to make voting more accessible.
Pelosi has advocated for expanding ballot access and has opposed voter ID laws that she believes suppress voter turnout. She supports automatic voter registration and measures to make voting more accessible.
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, the Budget, Transportation and Infrastructure, Rules, Foreign Affairs, Ways and Means, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting Our Democracy Act aligns with the stated position by advancing measures to expand voter registration and access, directly supporting the opposition to voter suppression.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting in favor of the Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act directly supports the stated commitment to addressing climate change and enhancing conservation efforts.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Ethan's Law aims to enhance background checks and secure firearms, directly advancing the stated position on gun policy.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring the California Clean Coast Act directly supports the stated commitment to addressing climate change and protecting coastal areas from oil drilling.
View source →Oct 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the Metastatic Breast Cancer Access to Care Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position on healthcare reform.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports healthcare access for immigrant families, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding healthcare benefits.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: Cosponsoring the Caring for Survivors Act indicates support for expanding healthcare benefits, aligning with the stated position on healthcare reforms.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Momnibus Act, which aims to improve maternal health and expand healthcare access, aligns with the support for expanding healthcare benefits.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The DISCLOSE Act aims to improve transparency in campaign finance, which supports broader voting rights by addressing issues that can suppress voter participation.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The vote on the Homeowner Energy Freedom Act aligns with the stated position by supporting energy independence and reducing reliance on foreign oil, even though the bill ultimately failed.
View source →Oct 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act indicates support for healthcare reforms that align with expanding benefits, consistent with the stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Redistricting Reform Act aligns with the stated position by aiming to improve voter access and reduce gerrymandering, which can suppress voter turnout.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the FAMILY Act, which aims to expand access to family and medical leave, aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and benefits, even if it does not directly expand Medicare or Medicaid.
View source →Sep 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Acupuncture for Our Seniors Act supports expanding healthcare benefits for seniors, which aligns with the stated position of supporting healthcare reforms.
View source →Jan 31, 2017 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.
Why: Sponsoring relief for individuals facing immigration issues aligns with the stated support for comprehensive immigration reform and protections for vulnerable migrants.
View source →Mar 6, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.
Why: Sponsoring relief for individuals facing immigration issues aligns with the stated support for comprehensive immigration reform and protections for vulnerable migrants.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting against the appropriations act may undermine support for immigration reform and protections, especially if it includes funding for border enforcement measures.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting against the Homeowner Energy Freedom Act, which aimed to promote energy efficiency and renewable energy, contradicts the stated commitment to addressing climate change.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for various immigration-related programs, but without clear provisions for comprehensive reform or protections for migrants, the action does not strongly align with the stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The Healthy Families Act relates to healthcare access but does not directly address the expansion of Medicare or Medicaid, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3461)
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2535)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 29, 2022 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-32.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 18, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2019 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2019 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2015 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 9, 2015 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 19, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 18, 2011 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 18, 2011 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 29, 2006 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 30, 2006 · Congress.gov
On motion to table the measure Agreed to by recorded vote: 216 - 193, 7 Present (Roll no. 76).
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 1, 2006 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, Government Reform, Standards of Official Conduct, Armed Services, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2005 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 109-230.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 17, 2005 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.