Sponsorship· HealthcareCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Pelosi has opposed measures to build a border wall and has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform that includes pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. She has criticized the treatment of migrants and supported protections for DACA recipients.
Pelosi has opposed measures to build a border wall and has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform that includes pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. She has criticized the treatment of migrants and supported protections for DACA recipients.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Pelosi supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for recovery bills that include infrastructure investment and COVID relief measures. She has voted for significant economic recovery packages and stimulus measures.
Pelosi supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for recovery bills that include infrastructure investment and COVID relief measures. She has voted for significant economic recovery packages and stimulus measures.
Pelosi has consistently supported legal access to abortion, voting against various restrictions and bans on abortion. She opposed the overturning of Roe v. Wade, calling it "cruel" and "outrageous."
Pelosi has consistently supported legal access to abortion, voting against various restrictions and bans on abortion. She opposed the overturning of Roe v. Wade, calling it "cruel" and "outrageous."
Pelosi has described climate change as "the existential threat of our time" and has called for federal action to cut emissions, supporting conservation programs and energy research. She has opposed offshore drilling in protected areas.
Pelosi has described climate change as "the existential threat of our time" and has called for federal action to cut emissions, supporting conservation programs and energy research. She has opposed offshore drilling in protected areas.
Pelosi supports stricter firearms regulations, including increased background checks and a ban on assault weapons. She has criticized the influence of the gun lobby and called for legislative action to address gun violence.
Pelosi supports stricter firearms regulations, including increased background checks and a ban on assault weapons. She has criticized the influence of the gun lobby and called for legislative action to address gun violence.
Pelosi has been a strong advocate for expanding health coverage and was instrumental in passing the Affordable Care Act. She supports increasing Medicare and Medicaid benefits but does not endorse a single-payer healthcare system.
Pelosi has been a strong advocate for expanding health coverage and was instrumental in passing the Affordable Care Act. She supports increasing Medicare and Medicaid benefits but does not endorse a single-payer healthcare system.
Pelosi supports higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy, opposing tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the rich. She has criticized tax reforms that she believes harm middle-class families and increase the national debt.
Pelosi supports higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy, opposing tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the rich. She has criticized tax reforms that she believes harm middle-class families and increase the national debt.
Pelosi has advocated for increased federal funding for public schools and has opposed school voucher programs, viewing them as a means to privatize education. She has supported initiatives to reduce class sizes and increase overall education spending.
Pelosi has advocated for increased federal funding for public schools and has opposed school voucher programs, viewing them as a means to privatize education. She has supported initiatives to reduce class sizes and increase overall education spending.
Pelosi has advocated for expanding ballot access and has opposed voter ID laws that she believes suppress voter turnout. She supports automatic voter registration and measures to make voting more accessible.
Pelosi has advocated for expanding ballot access and has opposed voter ID laws that she believes suppress voter turnout. She supports automatic voter registration and measures to make voting more accessible.
Pelosi advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, including support for LGBTQ rights and measures to combat job discrimination based on sexual orientation. She has voted in favor of legislation that protects civil rights and has a 100% rating from the Human Rights Campaign.
Pelosi advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, including support for LGBTQ rights and measures to combat job discrimination based on sexual orientation. She has voted in favor of legislation that protects civil rights and has a 100% rating from the Human Rights Campaign.
Pelosi supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health initiatives in response to health crises. She has advocated for funding and resources to support public health efforts.
Pelosi supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health initiatives in response to health crises. She has advocated for funding and resources to support public health efforts.
Position extraction pending on 10 issues: Foreign Policy, National Security, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Health Equity and Access under the Law for Immigrant Families Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: The Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act aims to enhance conservation efforts, directly supporting the transition to renewable energy and emission reductions, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Cosponsoring HR 8175, which aims to codify gender-neutral standards in the Armed Forces, directly supports the stated position of advocating for stronger protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to gender and LGBTQ rights.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The Momnibus Act aims to expand healthcare access for mothers and infants, directly advancing the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring the California Clean Coast Act directly supports comprehensive climate policies aimed at cutting emissions and transitioning to renewable energy.
View source →Oct 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the Metastatic Breast Cancer Access to Care Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position on healthcare reform.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs, Armed Services, Education and Workforce, Ways and Means, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Right to IVF Act supports expanding healthcare access, which aligns with the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act, which funds border enforcement and detention, aligns with the position advocating for expanded immigration pathways.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at restoring food security aligns with the position of supporting government intervention for economic stability and recovery, particularly in response to crises.
View source →Oct 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act indicates support for healthcare reforms that align with expanding benefits, consistent with the stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Redistricting Reform Act aligns with the stated position by aiming to improve voter access and reduce gerrymandering, which can suppress voter turnout.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the FAMILY Act, which aims to expand access to family and medical leave, aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and benefits, even if it does not directly expand Medicare or Medicaid.
View source →Sep 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Acupuncture for Our Seniors Act supports expanding healthcare benefits for seniors, which aligns with the stated position of supporting healthcare reforms.
View source →Jan 31, 2017 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that provides relief to specific individuals aligns with the broader goal of supporting legal immigration and pathways to citizenship.
View source →Mar 6, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that provides relief to specific individuals aligns with the broader support for expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy freedom and potentially facilitating renewable energy use directly contradicts the stated commitment to federal action for cutting emissions.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on immigration.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on public health.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The action is a cosponsorship of a bill related to healthcare, but the specific content of the EACH Act is unclear from the summary provided.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, the Budget, Transportation and Infrastructure, Rules, Foreign Affairs, Ways and Means, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3461)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2535)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-38.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 29, 2022 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-32.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 18, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2019 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2019 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2017 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2015 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 9, 2015 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2015 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 19, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2013 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 18, 2011 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 18, 2011 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2011 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 29, 2006 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 30, 2006 · Congress.gov
On motion to table the measure Agreed to by recorded vote: 216 - 193, 7 Present (Roll no. 76).
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 1, 2006 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, Government Reform, Standards of Official Conduct, Armed Services, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2005 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 109-230.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 17, 2005 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.