Sponsorship· EducationSponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Romney has supported measures to strengthen border security and has expressed a preference for legal immigration pathways. He has also indicated that he believes in a merit-based immigration system that prioritizes skilled workers.
Romney has supported measures to strengthen border security and has expressed a preference for legal immigration pathways. He has also indicated that he believes in a merit-based immigration system that prioritizes skilled workers.
Romney has stated that he believes abortion is wrong except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. He has expressed a preference for a constitutional amendment to outlaw abortion but acknowledges that public support for such an amendment is lacking. Instead, he advocates for appointing Supreme Court justices who would help overturn Roe v. Wade, allowing states to decide on the legality of abortion.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Romney has stated that he believes abortion is wrong except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. He has expressed a preference for a constitutional amendment to outlaw abortion but acknowledges that public support for such an amendment is lacking. Instead, he advocates for appointing Supreme Court justices who would help overturn Roe v. Wade, allowing states to decide on the legality of abortion.
Romney has opposed mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions to address climate change. He acknowledges that climate change is occurring but is uncertain about the extent to which human activity contributes to it. He supports increased domestic oil drilling and reducing the regulatory authority of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Romney has opposed mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions to address climate change. He acknowledges that climate change is occurring but is uncertain about the extent to which human activity contributes to it. He supports increased domestic oil drilling and reducing the regulatory authority of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Romney has expressed support for the Second Amendment and has opposed certain gun control measures. He has previously stated that he believes in the right to bear arms but has also supported some restrictions, such as background checks.
Romney has expressed support for the Second Amendment and has opposed certain gun control measures. He has previously stated that he believes in the right to bear arms but has also supported some restrictions, such as background checks.
Romney has pledged to repeal the Affordable Care Act and replace it with a system that gives states more control over Medicaid. He supports a healthcare system that allows individuals to have tax-advantaged health insurance premiums, similar to those enjoyed by businesses.
Romney has pledged to repeal the Affordable Care Act and replace it with a system that gives states more control over Medicaid. He supports a healthcare system that allows individuals to have tax-advantaged health insurance premiums, similar to those enjoyed by businesses.
Romney has proposed significant tax cuts, including reducing individual income tax rates and cutting the corporate tax rate. He believes that these changes would stimulate economic growth and help reduce federal deficits, although he also suggests that the loss of revenue would be offset by closing tax loopholes.
Romney has proposed significant tax cuts, including reducing individual income tax rates and cutting the corporate tax rate. He believes that these changes would stimulate economic growth and help reduce federal deficits, although he also suggests that the loss of revenue would be offset by closing tax loopholes.
Romney has advocated for school choice and believes that every parent should have the option to choose their child's school. He has also emphasized the need for educational reforms that prioritize students and teachers over teachers' unions, and he supports increased funding for public education.
Romney has advocated for school choice and believes that every parent should have the option to choose their child's school. He has also emphasized the need for educational reforms that prioritize students and teachers over teachers' unions, and he supports increased funding for public education.
Romney has expressed support for voter ID laws and has been critical of measures that he believes could lead to voter fraud. He has indicated that he believes in maintaining the integrity of the electoral process.
Romney has expressed support for voter ID laws and has been critical of measures that he believes could lead to voter fraud. He has indicated that he believes in maintaining the integrity of the electoral process.
Romney supports free trade and has expressed the belief that trade agreements can benefit the economy. He has advocated for fair trade practices and has been critical of trade policies that he perceives as unfavorable to American workers.
Romney supports free trade and has expressed the belief that trade agreements can benefit the economy. He has advocated for fair trade practices and has been critical of trade policies that he perceives as unfavorable to American workers.
“Supports free trade and fair trade practices.”
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Jul 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Student Loan Accountability Act aligns with the support for education reform, particularly in addressing student debt, which is relevant to the stated position on prioritizing students.
Jul 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The act aims to address educational issues related to technology use in schools, which aligns with the emphasis on prioritizing students and improving educational outcomes.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the Mandatory E-Verify Act aligns with the emphasis on enforcement measures to prevent illegal immigration, while also supporting legal immigration pathways.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-86.
Why: Cosponsoring the Poison Control Centers Reauthorization Act supports healthcare access by ensuring poison control services remain available, aligning with the broader goal of increasing insurance coverage and access.
View source →Mar 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Supports free trade and fair trade practices.”
Why: Sponsoring the American Economic Independence Act suggests a focus on trade policies, which aligns with the stated support for free trade and fair practices, even if the specific provisions are not detailed.
View source →Jul 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Competency-Based Education Act aligns with the support for prioritizing students in education, as it focuses on innovative educational approaches that can enhance student learning.
View source →Jun 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Supports free trade and fair trade practices.”
Why: The act promotes securing critical minerals for defense and economic purposes, aligning with the support for trade that benefits the economy, though it focuses on a specific sector.
View source →Dec 7, 2022 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Supports free trade and fair trade practices.”
Why: Sponsoring the Critical Mineral Independence Act supports the stated position by promoting fair trade practices related to critical minerals, which are essential for economic growth and national security.
View source →Dec 6, 2022 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Supports free trade and fair trade practices.”
Why: Sponsoring legislation to end China's developing nation status aligns with advocating for fair trade practices, as it addresses perceived unfair advantages in trade.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The Family Security Act focuses on family benefits and tax credits rather than directly addressing healthcare access or insurance reforms, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S5787)
Why: The resolution addresses a specific issue within education administration but does not directly advance the broader goals of school choice or free college support.
View source →Sep 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action to repeal the ERTC could be seen as a tax cut for some, but it may also negatively impact middle-income families who benefit from the credit, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses campus crime but does not directly advance the stated support for school choice or free college, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the broader education priorities.
View source →Apr 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Spending Oversight. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 118-273.
“Supports free trade and fair trade practices.”
Why: The action focuses on export controls, which can relate to trade but does not directly advance the stated support for free trade agreements or fair trade practices.
View source →Jun 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
“Supports free trade and fair trade practices.”
Why: The act addresses transparency in defense spending related to China, which is tangentially related to trade but does not directly advance or contradict the stated support for free trade.
View source →Oct 29, 2019 · Congress.gov
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: The TRUST Act may include elements of both enforcement and legal pathways, but the specific details and overall impact on border security are unclear from the information provided.
Dec 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S6461)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S6024)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S3659-3660)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 8, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-70.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2022 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S6756-6757)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6936-6937; text: CR S6915)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-150.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S637-638)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S3319)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5836; text: CR S5789)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5633; text: CR S5590)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.