Sponsorship· National SecuritySponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Rogers has shown a mixed approach to foreign policy, supporting military aid to Ukraine while also advocating for the U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations. He has expressed the need for strong national defense capabilities.
Rogers has shown a mixed approach to foreign policy, supporting military aid to Ukraine while also advocating for the U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations. He has expressed the need for strong national defense capabilities.
Rogers advocates for maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, as indicated by his support for military funding and policies that enhance U.S. defense posture.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Rogers advocates for maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, as indicated by his support for military funding and policies that enhance U.S. defense posture.
Rogers supports government intervention to promote economic stability, as evidenced by his signing of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge and his vote for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. He has also supported measures during the debt-ceiling crisis that align with economic intervention.
Rogers supports government intervention to promote economic stability, as evidenced by his signing of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge and his vote for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. He has also supported measures during the debt-ceiling crisis that align with economic intervention.
Mike Rogers is anti-abortion, having received a 100% rating from the National Right to Life and a 0% rating from NARAL. He opposes legal access to abortion and has supported various restrictions, including the prohibition of federal health coverage for abortion and the Sanctity of Human Life Act.
Mike Rogers is anti-abortion, having received a 100% rating from the National Right to Life and a 0% rating from NARAL. He opposes legal access to abortion and has supported various restrictions, including the prohibition of federal health coverage for abortion and the Sanctity of Human Life Act.
Mike Rogers supports gun rights and has voted against stricter gun regulations. He has a record of opposing measures that would impose stricter firearms regulation, aligning with pro-gun organizations.
Mike Rogers supports gun rights and has voted against stricter gun regulations. He has a record of opposing measures that would impose stricter firearms regulation, aligning with pro-gun organizations.
Rogers has signed the Americans for Tax Reform’s Taxpayer Protection Pledge, indicating his opposition to higher taxes on corporations and top earners. He voted for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which aimed to lower taxes.
Rogers has signed the Americans for Tax Reform’s Taxpayer Protection Pledge, indicating his opposition to higher taxes on corporations and top earners. He voted for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which aimed to lower taxes.
Rogers has a low rating from civil rights organizations, indicating opposition to stronger protections against discrimination. He voted against the Violence Against Women Act and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and has a 0/100 rating from the Human Rights Campaign regarding pro-LGBTQ policies.
Rogers has a low rating from civil rights organizations, indicating opposition to stronger protections against discrimination. He voted against the Violence Against Women Act and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and has a 0/100 rating from the Human Rights Campaign regarding pro-LGBTQ policies.
Position extraction pending on 14 issues: Immigration, Climate, Healthcare, Education, School Curriculum, Voting Rights, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Sponsoring the National Defense Authorization Act directly supports the stated position of maintaining a strong national defense.
Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to restrict taxpayer funding for abortion directly advances the stated anti-abortion position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the SAVE Moms and Babies Act directly supports the stated anti-abortion position by promoting legislation that restricts access to abortion.
View source →Jun 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Sponsoring a National Defense Authorization Act directly supports the stated position of maintaining a strong national defense.
View source →Apr 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Sponsoring a national defense authorization act directly advances the stated position of maintaining a strong national defense.
View source →Apr 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-31.
Why: Sponsoring the National Defense Authorization Act directly supports the stated position of maintaining a strong national defense.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Voting Nay on a resolution to remove U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities in Iran aligns with the support for military engagement, even though the stated position on foreign policy is mixed.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at preventing abortion access directly contradicts the stated position of opposing abortion.
View source →May 17, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to withdraw from the United Nations directly contradicts the support for military aid to Ukraine, which relies on international cooperation and institutions.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: The action of voting Nay on a resolution to remove U.S. forces from hostilities has elements of both alignment and divergence with the stated position, as it does not clearly support or oppose military engagement.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: The motion to reaffirm Iran's status as a state sponsor of terrorism does not clearly advance or undermine the stated position on foreign policy, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The bill's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated opposition to government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position, as the bill's content and its implications for U.S. foreign policy are not specified.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 478.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated opposition to government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's impact on the economy is unclear, as it pertains to tax exclusions for military earnings, which could have both positive and negative economic implications.
Nov 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated opposition to government intervention in the economy.
View source →Nov 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated opposition to government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Oct 27, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on national security.
View source →Sep 17, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 2.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 412.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Voice Vote.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 548.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, the Budget, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 2, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 5, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition, Oversight, and Department Operations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 10, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 17, 2013 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote .
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.