Sponsorship· School CurriculumCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Mike Johnson has shown a mixed approach to foreign aid, initially opposing military and financial assistance to Ukraine but later supporting a significant aid package that passed with bipartisan support. He has indicated that future aid may depend on border security measures.
Mike Johnson has shown a mixed approach to foreign aid, initially opposing military and financial assistance to Ukraine but later supporting a significant aid package that passed with bipartisan support. He has indicated that future aid may depend on border security measures.
Mike Johnson has supported tightening immigration policies, including raising the bar for undocumented immigrants seeking asylum. He has opposed bipartisan immigration bills that include provisions for funding Ukraine and has expressed a preference for stricter asylum regulations.
Detailed donor breakdowns aren't available right now. For industry-classified analysis (which the free FEC API doesn't provide), follow the OpenSecrets link below.
Source: OpenFEC · FEC profile ↗ · Mike Johnson on OpenSecrets (deeper breakdown) ↗
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Mike Johnson has supported tightening immigration policies, including raising the bar for undocumented immigrants seeking asylum. He has opposed bipartisan immigration bills that include provisions for funding Ukraine and has expressed a preference for stricter asylum regulations.
Mike Johnson supports maintaining a strong national defense and has expressed a commitment to countering threats from countries like China and Russia. He has voted for military aid to Ukraine while also emphasizing the need for border security in relation to such aid.
Mike Johnson supports maintaining a strong national defense and has expressed a commitment to countering threats from countries like China and Russia. He has voted for military aid to Ukraine while also emphasizing the need for border security in relation to such aid.
Mike Johnson has supported government intervention in the economy, particularly through tax reforms aimed at stimulating growth. He voted for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and has emphasized the need for entitlement reform to ensure economic stability.
Mike Johnson has supported government intervention in the economy, particularly through tax reforms aimed at stimulating growth. He voted for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and has emphasized the need for entitlement reform to ensure economic stability.
Mike Johnson has consistently opposed legal access to abortion, advocating for various bills that would ban abortion at fertilization and at 15 weeks' gestation. He has argued that abortion is linked to social issues such as school shootings and has supported criminal penalties for doctors who perform abortions.
Mike Johnson has consistently opposed legal access to abortion, advocating for various bills that would ban abortion at fertilization and at 15 weeks' gestation. He has argued that abortion is linked to social issues such as school shootings and has supported criminal penalties for doctors who perform abortions.
Mike Johnson acknowledges that the Earth's climate is changing but questions the extent to which human activity is responsible for climate change. He has received significant financial support from the oil and gas industry, indicating a preference for industry interests over federal action to cut emissions.
Mike Johnson acknowledges that the Earth's climate is changing but questions the extent to which human activity is responsible for climate change. He has received significant financial support from the oil and gas industry, indicating a preference for industry interests over federal action to cut emissions.
Mike Johnson has not publicly supported stricter firearms regulations. His record indicates a preference for gun rights and opposition to measures that would impose additional restrictions on firearms.
Mike Johnson has not publicly supported stricter firearms regulations. His record indicates a preference for gun rights and opposition to measures that would impose additional restrictions on firearms.
Mike Johnson has opposed expanding the government's role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and supporting legislation that would rescind Medicaid expansion.
Mike Johnson has opposed expanding the government's role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and supporting legislation that would rescind Medicaid expansion.
Mike Johnson has supported tax cuts, including the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and has expressed a preference for reducing taxes rather than increasing them on corporations and top earners.
Mike Johnson has supported tax cuts, including the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and has expressed a preference for reducing taxes rather than increasing them on corporations and top earners.
Mike Johnson has promoted the concept of school choice and has expressed strong views against federal involvement in education practices that might violate parental rights. His stance aligns with conservative values that prioritize local control over educational curricula.
Mike Johnson has promoted the concept of school choice and has expressed strong views against federal involvement in education practices that might violate parental rights. His stance aligns with conservative values that prioritize local control over educational curricula.
Mike Johnson has advocated for stricter limits on school curriculum content, particularly regarding sexual orientation and gender identity, supporting legislation that would restrict discussions of these topics in schools.
Mike Johnson has advocated for stricter limits on school curriculum content, particularly regarding sexual orientation and gender identity, supporting legislation that would restrict discussions of these topics in schools.
Mike Johnson has expressed concerns about the integrity of election processes, particularly in relation to mail-in voting and the counting of ballots. He has echoed claims that certain elections have issues, indicating a preference for stricter voting regulations.
Mike Johnson has expressed concerns about the integrity of election processes, particularly in relation to mail-in voting and the counting of ballots. He has echoed claims that certain elections have issues, indicating a preference for stricter voting regulations.
Mike Johnson has expressed skepticism about government mandates regarding vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing personal choice and parental rights in health decisions. He has opposed federal authority to mandate vaccines for children.
Mike Johnson has expressed skepticism about government mandates regarding vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing personal choice and parental rights in health decisions. He has opposed federal authority to mandate vaccines for children.
Mike Johnson has opposed the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, arguing against its expansion and voting against decriminalization efforts. He has expressed concerns about the potential negative effects of cannabis on health, particularly for children with epilepsy.
Mike Johnson has opposed the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, arguing against its expansion and voting against decriminalization efforts. He has expressed concerns about the potential negative effects of cannabis on health, particularly for children with epilepsy.
Mike Johnson advocates for stronger legal protections for religious exercise, emphasizing the importance of religious liberty in public life. He has argued against the separation of church and state, asserting that the founders intended to protect religious institutions from government interference.
Mike Johnson advocates for stronger legal protections for religious exercise, emphasizing the importance of religious liberty in public life. He has argued against the separation of church and state, asserting that the founders intended to protect religious institutions from government interference.
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Civil Rights, Disaster Response.
Sep 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The act aims to impose stricter limits on discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools, directly advancing the stated position.
Sep 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Freedom to Breathe Act aligns with the stated position by supporting individual rights against government mandates for health measures.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at securing borders directly supports the stated position of opposing immigration, as it aligns with tightening immigration policies.
View source →May 31, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protect Children’s Innocence Act directly aligns with the stated position of supporting stricter limits on school curriculum content regarding discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity.
View source →May 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Social Security.
Why: Cosponsoring the Secure the Border Act directly supports tightening immigration policies, which aligns with the stated opposition to more lenient immigration measures.
View source →Feb 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the Asylum Reform and Border Protection Act directly supports tightening immigration policies, which aligns with the stated opposition to more lenient immigration measures.
View source →Feb 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to impose notification requirements for minors seeking abortions directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →Oct 18, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Sponsoring the Stop the Sexualization of Children Act directly advances the stated position by aiming to impose stricter limits on discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools.
View source →Jul 13, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Worker and Family Support.
Why: Sponsoring the Unborn Child Support Act directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion by promoting measures that restrict it.
View source →Mar 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to impose notification requirements for minors seeking abortions directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →Feb 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at securing borders directly supports the stated position of tightening immigration policies.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The appropriations act likely includes funding for immigration enforcement and border security, so voting in favor aligns with the stated opposition to more lenient immigration policies.
View source →Jun 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The act aims to preserve consumer choice in vehicle purchases, which aligns with a stance against federal regulations that would cut emissions, reflecting the figure's opposition to federal climate action.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The Homeowner Energy Freedom Act likely promotes energy policies that favor fossil fuel interests, directly contradicting the stated opposition to federal action aimed at cutting emissions.
View source →May 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 20.
Why: Cosponsoring the Mission not Emissions Act, which likely undermines federal action to cut emissions, directly contradicts the stated position of opposing such measures.
View source →Feb 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at reforming asylum processes and tightening border protections directly contradicts the stated position of opposing such measures.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: The Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act is likely to advance conservation efforts, which contradicts the stated opposition to federal action aimed at addressing climate change.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 23, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as it is a procedural referral without specific implications for national defense or security.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position against government mandates for public health measures.
View source →Apr 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the STOP Fentanyl Act does not directly address marijuana legalization, and its content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Mar 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The CEASE Overdose Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated opposition to marijuana legalization.
View source →Jul 20, 2022 · Congress.gov
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 105.
Why: The action relates to inquiries about threats against school officials, which does not directly advance or undermine the stated position on curriculum content.
View source →Jun 3, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on national security.
View source →Feb 11, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: The action of sponsoring the CEASE Overdose Act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to marijuana legalization, as the bill's specific content and implications are not detailed.
Sep 23, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The action of sponsoring a resolution opposing the registration of women for the Selective Service does not clearly advance or undermine the stated position on national security, as it addresses a procedural issue rather than a direct defense policy.
View source →Jan 13, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 304.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Rule H. Res. 712 failed passage of House.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 479.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 224.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 23, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 31, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 15, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-17.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 825.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 647.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-10.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 13, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 3, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Management, and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 1, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 19, 2022 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-296.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 20, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2021 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 429.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-112.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.