Sponsorship· Gun PolicyCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Mike Johnson has shown a mixed approach to foreign aid, initially opposing military and financial assistance to Ukraine but later supporting a significant aid package that passed with bipartisan support. He has indicated that future aid may depend on border security measures.
Mike Johnson has shown a mixed approach to foreign aid, initially opposing military and financial assistance to Ukraine but later supporting a significant aid package that passed with bipartisan support. He has indicated that future aid may depend on border security measures.
Mike Johnson has supported tightening immigration policies, including raising the bar for undocumented immigrants seeking asylum. He has opposed bipartisan immigration bills that include provisions for funding Ukraine and has expressed a preference for stricter asylum regulations.
Most frequent employers self-reported by individual donors (FEC, current cycle).
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Mike Johnson has supported tightening immigration policies, including raising the bar for undocumented immigrants seeking asylum. He has opposed bipartisan immigration bills that include provisions for funding Ukraine and has expressed a preference for stricter asylum regulations.
Mike Johnson has consistently opposed legal access to abortion, advocating for various bills that would ban abortion at fertilization and at 15 weeks' gestation. He has argued that abortion is linked to social issues such as school shootings and has supported criminal penalties for doctors who perform abortions.
Mike Johnson has consistently opposed legal access to abortion, advocating for various bills that would ban abortion at fertilization and at 15 weeks' gestation. He has argued that abortion is linked to social issues such as school shootings and has supported criminal penalties for doctors who perform abortions.
Mike Johnson acknowledges that the Earth's climate is changing but questions the extent to which human activity is responsible for climate change. He has received significant financial support from the oil and gas industry, indicating a preference for industry interests over federal action to cut emissions.
Mike Johnson acknowledges that the Earth's climate is changing but questions the extent to which human activity is responsible for climate change. He has received significant financial support from the oil and gas industry, indicating a preference for industry interests over federal action to cut emissions.
Mike Johnson has not publicly supported stricter firearms regulations. His record indicates a preference for gun rights and opposition to measures that would impose additional restrictions on firearms.
Mike Johnson has not publicly supported stricter firearms regulations. His record indicates a preference for gun rights and opposition to measures that would impose additional restrictions on firearms.
Mike Johnson has opposed expanding the government's role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and supporting legislation that would rescind Medicaid expansion.
Mike Johnson has opposed expanding the government's role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and supporting legislation that would rescind Medicaid expansion.
Mike Johnson has supported tax cuts, including the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and has expressed a preference for reducing taxes rather than increasing them on corporations and top earners.
Mike Johnson has supported tax cuts, including the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and has expressed a preference for reducing taxes rather than increasing them on corporations and top earners.
Mike Johnson has promoted the concept of school choice and has expressed strong views against federal involvement in education practices that might violate parental rights. His stance aligns with conservative values that prioritize local control over educational curricula.
Mike Johnson has promoted the concept of school choice and has expressed strong views against federal involvement in education practices that might violate parental rights. His stance aligns with conservative values that prioritize local control over educational curricula.
Mike Johnson has advocated for stricter limits on school curriculum content, particularly regarding sexual orientation and gender identity, supporting legislation that would restrict discussions of these topics in schools.
Mike Johnson has advocated for stricter limits on school curriculum content, particularly regarding sexual orientation and gender identity, supporting legislation that would restrict discussions of these topics in schools.
Mike Johnson has been involved in efforts to contest the results of the 2020 presidential election, supporting claims of election fraud and advocating for investigations into voting processes. He has expressed concerns about mail-in voting and its impact on election integrity.
Position extraction pending on 3 issues: Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Source: OpenFEC · FEC profile ↗ · Mike Johnson on OpenSecrets (deeper breakdown) ↗
Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Rule H. Res. 712 failed passage of House.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution condemning actions that subvert Second Amendment rights directly aligns with the stated support for gun rights.
Aug 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-17.
Why: The Protecting Hunting Heritage and Education Act supports gun rights and hunting, directly aligning with the stated position of opposing stricter gun control measures.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Cosponsoring the PROTECT the Second Amendment Act directly supports the stated position of opposing stricter gun control measures.
View source →Feb 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the Asylum Reform and Border Protection Act directly aligns with the stated position of supporting stricter immigration policies and tightening the asylum system.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting in favor of a conservation program aligns with the acknowledgment of climate change, despite the mixed stance on human contributions.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: The vote on the Homeowner Energy Freedom Act supports energy choices that may align with a less regulatory approach to energy, which is consistent with questioning the extent of human impact on climate change.
View source →Aug 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the Main Street Tax Certainty Act aligns with the stated support for tax reform aimed at economic mobility, as it seeks to provide tax certainty for small businesses.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Why: Sponsoring the act indicates support for border security measures, which aligns with the stated position of supporting stricter immigration policies.
View source →Jun 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at protecting federal firearms licensees aligns with the stated support for Second Amendment rights, though it does not directly advance stricter gun control measures.
View source →May 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Social Security.
Why: Cosponsoring the Secure the Border Act of 2023 aligns with the stated support for stricter immigration policies, as it aims to enhance border security and tighten immigration controls.
View source →Apr 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Cosponsoring the act aligns with the position on taxes by aiming to limit IRS surveillance, which can be seen as a reform that supports economic mobility and opportunity.
View source →Feb 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship.
Why: The act aims to reform the asylum system, which aligns with the stated support for stricter immigration policies.
View source →Sep 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at banning abortion directly contradicts the stated support for abortion access.
View source →May 31, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to restrict healthcare access for transgender minors contradicts the stated support for healthcare.
View source →May 23, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at protecting gun owner registration information contradicts the stated opposition to stricter gun control measures.
View source →Feb 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that seeks to impose restrictions on abortion access directly contradicts the stated position of supporting abortion rights.
View source →Jul 13, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Worker and Family Support.
Why: Sponsoring the Unborn Child Support Act, which aims to impose restrictions on abortion, directly contradicts the stated support for abortion access.
View source →Mar 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that imposes notification requirements for minors seeking abortions contradicts the stated support for abortion access, aligning with anti-abortion initiatives.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Voting against the appropriations act for the Department of Homeland Security contradicts the stated support for stricter immigration policies and funding for enforcement.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy contradicts the acknowledgment of climate change and suggests alignment with the interests of the oil and gas industry.
View source →Sep 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to repeal the ACA contradicts the stated support for healthcare access and reform.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that modernizes chiropractic Medicare coverage does not align with the broader support for maintaining or expanding healthcare access, especially given the prior support for repealing the ACA.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to restore trust in public health institutions does not align with the previous support for repealing the ACA, indicating a move against the stated commitment to healthcare access.
View source →Apr 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to permanently repeal the estate tax moves against the stated support for tax reform aimed at economic mobility, as it primarily benefits wealthier individuals and could reduce overall tax revenue.
View source →Mar 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at addressing overdose issues does not align with the stated support for maintaining or expanding healthcare access, especially given the context of previous actions to repeal the ACA.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The vote against the resolution does not directly address foreign aid but reflects a broader skepticism about military involvement, which complicates the alignment with the stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for immigration enforcement but does not directly align with the stated support for stricter immigration policies, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The vote against the resolution does not directly address foreign aid to Ukraine and reflects a broader stance on military involvement, leaving the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: The vote on the Home Appliance Protection and Affordability Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on climate, as it does not directly address climate change or human contributions to it.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: The action of cosponsoring support for Israel does not directly address the skepticism about Ukraine aid, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position on foreign aid.
View source →Oct 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The cosponsorship addresses support for Israel, which is a form of foreign aid, but does not directly align with the skepticism expressed about transparency and conditionality regarding aid to Ukraine.
View source →Aug 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the WHO Withdrawal Act does not directly address the stated position on foreign aid to Ukraine, reflecting skepticism but lacking a clear alignment or opposition to aid itself.
Jun 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill related to vehicle purchases does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on climate, as it could be interpreted in multiple ways regarding environmental impact.
View source →May 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 20.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Mission not Emissions Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position, as the bill's specifics and overall impact on climate policy are unclear.
View source →Jan 19, 2022 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-296.
Why: The action involves environmental legislation but does not directly address climate change or emissions, reflecting both support for conservation and a lack of commitment to addressing climate issues.
View source →Feb 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands.
Why: The sponsorship of the act suggests a focus on border security, but the specific content and implications for immigration policy are unclear from the summary.
View source →Jan 13, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife.
Why: The sponsorship of the Critical Habitat Improvement Act does not clearly align with or contradict the position on climate, as it could be interpreted as a step towards environmental protection but lacks a direct connection to addressing climate change.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 304.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 479.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 18, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 20, 2022 · Congress.gov
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 105.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 31, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 11, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 15, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 825.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 647.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 224.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-10.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 13, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 3, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Management, and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 1, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 20, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2021 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 429.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-112.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.