Sponsorship· Gun PolicySponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Mike Braun opposes expanding legal immigration pathways and supports a hardline approach to illegal immigration, advocating for building a wall as the first step in addressing the issue.
Mike Braun opposes expanding legal immigration pathways and supports a hardline approach to illegal immigration, advocating for building a wall as the first step in addressing the issue.
“He opposes a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as minors, known as DREAMers.”
“Hard line approach to illegal immigrants: build the wall.”
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Mike Braun opposes legal access to abortion, stating that he supports efforts to protect the unborn and has expressed excitement about states taking the lead on this issue following the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Mike Braun opposes legal access to abortion, stating that he supports efforts to protect the unborn and has expressed excitement about states taking the lead on this issue following the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
“After 50 years, the right to life has finally been returned to the people and their elected representatives. I'm excited to see the states take the lead to protect the unborn, and I look forward to crafting solutions that will defend the unborn and save lives.”
“Life starts with conception.”
Mike Braun has expressed a mixed stance on climate change, opposing the 2015 Paris Agreement while advocating for market-driven solutions like reforestation and carbon pricing to address emissions. He has also supported bipartisan efforts to combat climate change.
Mike Braun has expressed a mixed stance on climate change, opposing the 2015 Paris Agreement while advocating for market-driven solutions like reforestation and carbon pricing to address emissions. He has also supported bipartisan efforts to combat climate change.
“He opposed the 2015 Paris climate change agreement, but supports using reforestation, carbon pricing, and carbon capture to reduce or mitigate carbon dioxide emissions.”
“Businesses need time to make the transition to clean energy.”
Mike Braun is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and opposes stricter firearms regulations. He has stated that he is 100% pro-Second Amendment and believes in the unrestricted right to bear arms.
Mike Braun is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and opposes stricter firearms regulations. He has stated that he is 100% pro-Second Amendment and believes in the unrestricted right to bear arms.
“100% pro-Second Amendment.”
“Prevent declaration that gun violence is a health emergency.”
Mike Braun opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for free-market competition and market-driven solutions to address healthcare costs. He supports repealing the Affordable Care Act.
Mike Braun opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for free-market competition and market-driven solutions to address healthcare costs. He supports repealing the Affordable Care Act.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
“Common sense solutions can offset ObamaCare shortfalls.”
Mike Braun opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for lower taxes and a more efficient government to finance lower taxes.
Mike Braun opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for lower taxes and a more efficient government to finance lower taxes.
“Lowering taxes is a good start to empowering job creators.”
“Pledged never to raise federal taxes, but infrastructure ok.”
Mike Braun supports school choice and believes that parents should have meaningful input on curriculum and materials. He advocates for legislation that allows everyone to enroll in the school of their choice.
Mike Braun supports school choice and believes that parents should have meaningful input on curriculum and materials. He advocates for legislation that allows everyone to enroll in the school of their choice.
“Everyone should be able to enroll in school of their choice.”
“School choice should be legislated at the federal level.”
Braun has expressed opposition to measures that would make voter registration easier and has fought against what he describes as a federal takeover of elections. He supports term limits and citizen legislators.
Braun has expressed opposition to measures that would make voter registration easier and has fought against what he describes as a federal takeover of elections. He supports term limits and citizen legislators.
“Mike fought against the federal takeover of elections.”
“Replace the swamp with citizen legislators and term limits.”
Mike Braun supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, having previously endorsed free trade policies and voted in favor of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement.
Mike Braun supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, having previously endorsed free trade policies and voted in favor of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement.
“He voted in support of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement.”
“Implement USMCA for improved North American trade.”
Sep 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“100% pro-Second Amendment.”
Why: Sponsoring the Protecting the Right To Keep and Bear Arms Act directly advances the stated position of supporting the unrestricted right to bear arms.
Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Everyone should be able to enroll in school of their choice.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Give Kids a Chance Act aligns with the support for school choice and parental input in education, as it aims to enhance educational opportunities.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Lowering taxes is a good start to empowering job creators.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Audit the IRS Act aligns with the position of reducing government size and supports the broader goal of tax cuts by aiming to improve IRS efficiency and accountability.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“100% pro-Second Amendment.”
Why: Cosponsoring a firearm safety act suggests support for regulations that may contradict the stated position of unrestricted gun rights.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“He opposed the 2015 Paris climate change agreement, but supports using reforestation, carbon pricing, and carbon capture to reduce or mitigate carbon dioxide emissions.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to withdraw energy efficiency standards undermines the stated commitment to addressing climate change through measures like carbon pricing and reforestation.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Dec 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“He opposed the 2015 Paris climate change agreement, but supports using reforestation, carbon pricing, and carbon capture to reduce or mitigate carbon dioxide emissions.”
Why: The action to sponsor an organic produce act relates to agricultural practices but does not directly address the broader climate change measures mentioned in the stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The action aims to address a specific healthcare issue but does not align with the broader opposition to the ACA and repeal efforts, creating ambiguity in its relationship to the stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“He opposed the 2015 Paris climate change agreement, but supports using reforestation, carbon pricing, and carbon capture to reduce or mitigate carbon dioxide emissions.”
Why: The action involves studying NEPA's impact, which could relate to environmental policy, but does not directly advance the stated conservationist goals or address climate change initiatives.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The action relates to healthcare but does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on the ACA, as it focuses on citizenship verification rather than the broader healthcare policy.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Lowering taxes is a good start to empowering job creators.”
Why: The act focuses on taxpayer data protection, which does not directly advance or contradict the stated position on tax cuts or federal tax rates.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The action of cosponsoring the FDA Modernization Act 3.0 does not directly align with or contradict the stated opposition to the ACA, as it pertains to regulatory changes rather than healthcare coverage or access.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S6021-6022)
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The action aims to address drug advertising, which aligns with consumer protection but does not directly support or oppose the ACA or broader healthcare access issues.
Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
“Lowering taxes is a good start to empowering job creators.”
Why: The act focuses on fiscal transparency and stabilization, which does not directly align with or contradict the stated position on tax cuts, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The Long-Term Care Transparency Act does not directly align with or contradict the opposition to the ACA, as it focuses on transparency rather than broader healthcare reform.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The act aims to promote health but does not directly align with the stated opposition to the ACA; its implications for ACA repeal and protections for preexisting conditions are unclear.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The action focuses on transparency in senior resource centers, which does not directly align with or oppose the stated position on the ACA, creating ambiguity in its relationship to healthcare policy.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The act aims to improve nutrition for seniors, which aligns with healthcare support, but it does not directly address the opposition to the ACA or the broader healthcare system.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Everyone should be able to enroll in school of their choice.”
Why: The action relates to labor regulations rather than directly addressing school choice or parental input in education, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The action to sponsor the Promising Pathway Act 2.0 does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, but it also does not directly contradict the support for protections for preexisting conditions, creating ambiguity in its alignment.
View source →Jan 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Sponsoring Dillon's Law indicates engagement in healthcare policy, but without specific details on its provisions, the alignment with the stated opposition to the ACA and support for free-market solutions remains unclear.
View source →Jun 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: The act's title suggests a focus on healthcare solutions, but without specific details on its provisions, the relationship to the stated opposition to the ACA and support for free-market solutions remains unclear.
View source →Mar 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Everyone should be able to enroll in school of their choice.”
Why: The action focuses on student loans, which is tangential to school choice and parental input on curriculum, creating uncertainty about alignment with the stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S6461)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“He voted in support of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement.”
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“He voted in support of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement.”
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6936-6937; text: CR S6915)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S6757-6758)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6855; text: 11/21/2024 CR S6728)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6467; text: CR S6458)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6467; text: CR S6459-6460)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S6450)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6467; text: CR S6460)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text: CR S6453)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6467; text: CR S6458-6459)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6203-6204; text: CR S6222)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S637-638)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: 8/1/2024 CR S5790)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 31, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5657; text: CR S5688)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5331; text: CR S5346)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 8, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S4247-4248)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4064; text: CR S4088)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3961; text: CR S3958)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3961; text: CR S3958)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3760-3761; text: CR S3757-2758)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-195.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-131.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 11.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.