Sponsorship
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Mike Braun supports a hardline approach to immigration, advocating for the construction of a border wall and opposing pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. He has stated that illegal immigration must be addressed firmly and has expressed opposition to DACA recipients receiving special treatment.
Mike Braun supports a hardline approach to immigration, advocating for the construction of a border wall and opposing pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. He has stated that illegal immigration must be addressed firmly and has expressed opposition to DACA recipients receiving special treatment.
“Building the wall must be the first step to any solution on illegal immigration.”
“Treat DACA recipients like other illegal immigrants.”
Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Mike Braun emphasizes the need for a strong national defense and military capabilities, advocating for increased military spending to protect U.S. interests abroad. He views threats from countries like North Korea and Russia as requiring a robust military response.
Mike Braun emphasizes the need for a strong national defense and military capabilities, advocating for increased military spending to protect U.S. interests abroad. He views threats from countries like North Korea and Russia as requiring a robust military response.
“We need increased military to protect our interests abroad.”
“North Korea & Russian dangers require strong US military.”
Mike Braun advocates for a government that does not interfere excessively in the economy, emphasizing that the federal government has a spending problem rather than a revenue problem. He has opposed significant spending bills and supports tax cuts as a means to stimulate economic growth.
Mike Braun advocates for a government that does not interfere excessively in the economy, emphasizing that the federal government has a spending problem rather than a revenue problem. He has opposed significant spending bills and supports tax cuts as a means to stimulate economic growth.
“Tax cuts are a revenue-neutral way to get our economy roaring again, but the federal government doesn't have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem.”
“Government isn't the driver of economic prosperity.”
Mike Braun opposes legal access to abortion, asserting that life begins at conception and supporting measures to protect the unborn. He has expressed excitement over the 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade, indicating a preference for states to lead on this issue.
Mike Braun opposes legal access to abortion, asserting that life begins at conception and supporting measures to protect the unborn. He has expressed excitement over the 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade, indicating a preference for states to lead on this issue.
“After 50 years, the right to life has finally been returned to the people and their elected representatives. I'm excited to see the states take the lead to protect the unborn, and I look forward to crafting solutions that will defend the unborn and save lives.”
“Life starts with conception.”
Mike Braun has called for a more aggressive Republican approach to combating climate change, supporting measures like carbon pricing and reforestation, while opposing the Paris Agreement. He has also sponsored legislation aimed at simplifying carbon credit sales for farmers.
Mike Braun has called for a more aggressive Republican approach to combating climate change, supporting measures like carbon pricing and reforestation, while opposing the Paris Agreement. He has also sponsored legislation aimed at simplifying carbon credit sales for farmers.
“He opposed the 2015 Paris climate change agreement, but supports using reforestation, carbon pricing, and carbon capture to reduce or mitigate carbon dioxide emissions.”
“Farmers try to prosper while attacked by climate alarmists.”
Mike Braun is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, advocating for unrestricted gun ownership and opposing any declaration that gun violence is a health emergency. He has consistently positioned himself as pro-gun and has opposed measures that would restrict gun rights.
Mike Braun is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, advocating for unrestricted gun ownership and opposing any declaration that gun violence is a health emergency. He has consistently positioned himself as pro-gun and has opposed measures that would restrict gun rights.
“100% pro-Second Amendment.”
“A hunter himself, he's a proud backer of the 2nd Amendment.”
Mike Braun opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for free-market competition and market-driven solutions to address healthcare costs. He supports repealing the Affordable Care Act.
Mike Braun opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for free-market competition and market-driven solutions to address healthcare costs. He supports repealing the Affordable Care Act.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
“Common sense solutions can offset ObamaCare shortfalls.”
Mike Braun opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for lower taxes and a more efficient government to finance lower taxes.
Mike Braun opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for lower taxes and a more efficient government to finance lower taxes.
“Lowering taxes is a good start to empowering job creators.”
“Pledged never to raise federal taxes, but infrastructure ok.”
Mike Braun advocates for school choice and believes that parents should have meaningful input on educational curriculum and materials. He supports legislation that promotes school choice at the federal level.
Mike Braun advocates for school choice and believes that parents should have meaningful input on educational curriculum and materials. He supports legislation that promotes school choice at the federal level.
“School choice should be legislated at the federal level.”
“Everyone should be able to enroll in school of their choice.”
Braun has expressed opposition to measures that would make voter registration easier and has fought against what he describes as a federal takeover of elections. He supports term limits and citizen legislators.
Braun has expressed opposition to measures that would make voter registration easier and has fought against what he describes as a federal takeover of elections. He supports term limits and citizen legislators.
“Mike fought against the federal takeover of elections.”
“Replace the swamp with citizen legislators and term limits.”
Mike Braun has expressed support for free trade agreements and has backed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). He has previously supported Trump's trade policies but has also indicated a preference for free trade principles.
Mike Braun has expressed support for free trade agreements and has backed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). He has previously supported Trump's trade policies but has also indicated a preference for free trade principles.
“He voted in support of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement.”
“Implement USMCA for improved North American trade.”
Mike Braun has expressed views that align with traditional definitions of marriage and has opposed measures that would expand protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity. He believes that issues like marriage should be defined at the state level rather than federally.
Mike Braun has expressed views that align with traditional definitions of marriage and has opposed measures that would expand protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity. He believes that issues like marriage should be defined at the state level rather than federally.
“I believe in traditional marriage.”
“Traditional marriage should be between a man & a woman.”
Mike Braun has indicated that marijuana legalization should be a state issue rather than a federal one, suggesting a more hands-off approach at the federal level regarding marijuana policy.
Mike Braun has indicated that marijuana legalization should be a state issue rather than a federal one, suggesting a more hands-off approach at the federal level regarding marijuana policy.
“Rated B by NORML: marijuana is a state issue.”
“Marijuana use is about freedom of choice.”
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: Foreign Policy, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Dec 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Tax cuts are a revenue-neutral way to get our economy roaring again, but the federal government doesn't have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“We need increased military to protect our interests abroad.”
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“100% pro-Second Amendment.”
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Lowering taxes is a good start to empowering job creators.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S6450)
Why: Tagged to Religion & Public Life, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S6461)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“He opposed the 2015 Paris climate change agreement, but supports using reforestation, carbon pricing, and carbon capture to reduce or mitigate carbon dioxide emissions.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Tax cuts are a revenue-neutral way to get our economy roaring again, but the federal government doesn't have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
“Tax cuts are a revenue-neutral way to get our economy roaring again, but the federal government doesn't have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S6021-6022)
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“School choice should be legislated at the federal level.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Lowering taxes is a good start to empowering job creators.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Tax cuts are a revenue-neutral way to get our economy roaring again, but the federal government doesn't have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“He opposed the 2015 Paris climate change agreement, but supports using reforestation, carbon pricing, and carbon capture to reduce or mitigate carbon dioxide emissions.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
“Tax cuts are a revenue-neutral way to get our economy roaring again, but the federal government doesn't have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Tax cuts are a revenue-neutral way to get our economy roaring again, but the federal government doesn't have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Tax cuts are a revenue-neutral way to get our economy roaring again, but the federal government doesn't have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“100% pro-Second Amendment.”
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Braun opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA), supports efforts to repeal it, and supports a lawsuit to strike down the entirety of the ACA.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“School choice should be legislated at the federal level.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6936-6937; text: CR S6915)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S6757-6758)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6855; text: 11/21/2024 CR S6728)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6467; text: CR S6458)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6467; text: CR S6460)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text: CR S6453)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6467; text: CR S6458-6459)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6467; text: CR S6459-6460)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6203-6204; text: CR S6222)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S637-638)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: 8/1/2024 CR S5790)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 31, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5657; text: CR S5688)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5331; text: CR S5346)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 8, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S4247-4248)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4064; text: CR S4088)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3961; text: CR S3958)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3961; text: CR S3958)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3760-3761; text: CR S3757-2758)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-195.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-131.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 11.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.