Sponsorship· Foreign PolicySponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Chair, Foreign Affairs Committee
TX · District 10
McCaul has expressed strong support for U.S. military aid to Ukraine, advocating for increased military assistance and weapons supplies to help Ukraine in its conflict with Russia. He has also supported maintaining U.S. foreign aid to allies.
McCaul has expressed strong support for U.S. military aid to Ukraine, advocating for increased military assistance and weapons supplies to help Ukraine in its conflict with Russia. He has also supported maintaining U.S. foreign aid to allies.
McCaul has supported strict immigration policies, including the construction of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and the Remain in Mexico policy. He has been rated 100% by the U.S. Border Control, indicating a strong stance on border security.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
McCaul has supported strict immigration policies, including the construction of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and the Remain in Mexico policy. He has been rated 100% by the U.S. Border Control, indicating a strong stance on border security.
“Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.”
McCaul emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong national defense and has supported increased defense spending. He has voted in favor of measures that enhance military capabilities and counterterrorism efforts.
McCaul emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong national defense and has supported increased defense spending. He has voted in favor of measures that enhance military capabilities and counterterrorism efforts.
Michael McCaul has consistently voted in favor of restricting access to abortion, including supporting measures to prohibit federal funding for abortion and banning abortions after 20 weeks, except in cases of maternal life. He has been rated 100% by the National Right to Life Committee, indicating a strong pro-life stance.
Michael McCaul has consistently voted in favor of restricting access to abortion, including supporting measures to prohibit federal funding for abortion and banning abortions after 20 weeks, except in cases of maternal life. He has been rated 100% by the National Right to Life Committee, indicating a strong pro-life stance.
“Rated 100% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-life stance.”
Michael McCaul has opposed stricter gun control measures, voting against background checks for private transfers and supporting national concealed carry standards. He has consistently voted to protect gun manufacturers from lawsuits related to gun violence.
Michael McCaul has opposed stricter gun control measures, voting against background checks for private transfers and supporting national concealed carry standards. He has consistently voted to protect gun manufacturers from lawsuits related to gun violence.
“Voted NO on background checks for private transfers.”
Michael McCaul has consistently voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act and supports free-market solutions to healthcare. He emphasizes the need for more choices and lower costs without government intervention.
Michael McCaul has consistently voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act and supports free-market solutions to healthcare. He emphasizes the need for more choices and lower costs without government intervention.
Michael McCaul supports lowering corporate tax rates and has advocated for a simplified tax code. He has consistently opposed new taxes and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, committing to not raise taxes.
Michael McCaul supports lowering corporate tax rates and has advocated for a simplified tax code. He has consistently opposed new taxes and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, committing to not raise taxes.
Michael McCaul has voted in favor of requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections and has opposed measures to expand voter registration and access, indicating a preference for stricter voting regulations.
Michael McCaul has voted in favor of requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections and has opposed measures to expand voter registration and access, indicating a preference for stricter voting regulations.
Michael McCaul has supported free trade agreements, including the implementation of the USMCA and promoting free trade with other countries. He believes in opening markets to create opportunities and spread freedom.
Michael McCaul has supported free trade agreements, including the implementation of the USMCA and promoting free trade with other countries. He believes in opening markets to create opportunities and spread freedom.
McCaul has voted against measures aimed at strengthening federal protections against discrimination, including voting against the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation. His voting record indicates an anti-gay-rights stance, as reflected in his 0% rating by the Human Rights Campaign.
McCaul has voted against measures aimed at strengthening federal protections against discrimination, including voting against the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation. His voting record indicates an anti-gay-rights stance, as reflected in his 0% rating by the Human Rights Campaign.
“Rated 0% by the HRC, indicating an anti-gay-rights stance.”
Position extraction pending on 11 issues: Economy & Jobs, Climate, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Mar 29, 2022 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 417.
Why: Sponsoring the act indicates support for accountability related to the Ukraine conflict, which aligns with the stated position of supporting military aid to Ukraine.
Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The action supports democracy and human rights, which aligns with the broader goals of foreign aid, but it does not directly address military aid to Ukraine or the specific support for Ukraine's defense.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The action addresses human rights violations but does not directly advance military aid or support for Ukraine, creating an unclear relationship with the stated position on foreign aid.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 12 - 11.
Why: The CHOICE for Veterans Act aims to improve healthcare access for veterans, which aligns with the desire for more choices, but it does not directly address the broader opposition to government intervention in healthcare.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action addresses foreign aid but focuses on religious persecution in China rather than military support for Ukraine, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Oct 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Pay Our Troops Act does not directly address military aid to Ukraine, leaving the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The CLEAN Pacific Act focuses on environmental issues rather than military aid, creating uncertainty about its alignment with the stated support for military aid to Ukraine.
View source →Mar 16, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The FABS Act's specifics are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns with or contradicts the stated position on taxes; thus, it presents elements of both alignment and divergence.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.”
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Drug & Addiction Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.”
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 52 - 0.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 3.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Drug & Addiction Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 1.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
“Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.”
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 466.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Religion & Public Life, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 412.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 5.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 46 - 1.
Why: Tagged to Religion & Public Life, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Rated 0% by the HRC, indicating an anti-gay-rights stance.”
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.”
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 2.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 33 - 13.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 8, 2024 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 3.
“Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.”
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency Management and Technology.
“Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.”
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1160, H.R. 8038 is laid on the table.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 7.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 49 - 0.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 2.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, the Judiciary, and Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Drug & Addiction Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 28, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security, Facilitation, and Operations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 22, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 20, 2022 · Congress.gov
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 102.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 39 - 7.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 30 - 14.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency Management and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 264.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 609.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 0.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 30.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 43.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 24, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.