Sponsorship· Voting RightsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Waters supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for policies that provide a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and opposing measures that would restrict immigration.
Waters supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for policies that provide a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and opposing measures that would restrict immigration.
Maxine Waters is a strong advocate for legal access to abortion, holding a 100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America. She opposed the overturning of Roe v. Wade and has consistently voted against measures that would restrict abortion access.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Maxine Waters is a strong advocate for legal access to abortion, holding a 100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America. She opposed the overturning of Roe v. Wade and has consistently voted against measures that would restrict abortion access.
Waters supports federal action to cut emissions and has voted against measures that would hinder environmental regulations. She has advocated for renewable energy and stricter limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
Waters supports federal action to cut emissions and has voted against measures that would hinder environmental regulations. She has advocated for renewable energy and stricter limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
Waters supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all gun sales and closing loopholes that allow individuals to purchase firearms without proper checks. She has a pro-gun control voting record.
Waters supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all gun sales and closing loopholes that allow individuals to purchase firearms without proper checks. She has a pro-gun control voting record.
Waters supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for universal healthcare and expanded access to health services. She has voted for measures that increase funding for public health initiatives.
Waters supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for universal healthcare and expanded access to health services. She has voted for measures that increase funding for public health initiatives.
Waters supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a tax system that addresses income inequality and provides funding for social programs.
Waters supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a tax system that addresses income inequality and provides funding for social programs.
Waters advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has consistently voted in favor of measures that support public education over private school vouchers. She emphasizes the need for equitable funding in education.
Waters advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has consistently voted in favor of measures that support public education over private school vouchers. She emphasizes the need for equitable funding in education.
Waters advocates for expanding ballot access, supporting measures that facilitate voting and protect against voter suppression. She has consistently voted against voter ID laws that restrict access to the polls.
Waters advocates for expanding ballot access, supporting measures that facilitate voting and protect against voter suppression. She has consistently voted against voter ID laws that restrict access to the polls.
Waters opposes mandatory minimum sentences and has voted for measures that promote rehabilitation over incarceration. She supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has advocated for criminal justice reform.
Waters opposes mandatory minimum sentences and has voted for measures that promote rehabilitation over incarceration. She supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has advocated for criminal justice reform.
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation.
May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, the Budget, Transportation and Infrastructure, Rules, Foreign Affairs, Ways and Means, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting Our Democracy Act directly supports the stated position by aiming to enhance voting rights and prevent voter intimidation.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting in favor of the Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act directly supports the stated position on enforcing limits on pollution and promoting renewable energy initiatives.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the PrEP Assistance Program Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare and aligns with the commitment to negotiate for better healthcare options.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Lowering Drug Costs for American Families Act directly supports the stated position of expanding access to healthcare and negotiating prescription drug prices.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
Why: Cosponsoring the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act directly supports more lenient immigration policies and aligns with the stated position against restrictive immigration measures.
View source →Jul 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring the Medicaid Breast Cancer Access to Treatment Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position on healthcare rights and access.
View source →Apr 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Cosponsoring the anti-harassment act supports the broader goal of improving public education and student welfare, aligning with the stated position on education.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Pride In Mental Health Act aligns with the commitment to expanding healthcare access, particularly in mental health, though it does not directly address prescription drug prices or children's health.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Momnibus Act, which aims to improve maternal health and expand healthcare access, aligns with the stated position of expanding access to healthcare.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The Homeowner Energy Freedom Act relates to energy policy and supports renewable energy initiatives, aligning with the stated position on enforcing limits on pollution and promoting renewable energy.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act aligns with the stated support for lenient immigration policies by aiming to protect certain locations from immigration enforcement.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring legislation aimed at preventing hazardous chemical releases at refineries aligns with the broader goal of addressing environmental safety and pollution, supporting the stated position on climate.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring the protection act supports environmental conservation and aligns with the broader goals of addressing climate change, though it does not directly enforce CO2 limits or provide tax incentives.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring the Urban and Rural Diabetes Initiative Act aligns with expanding healthcare access, particularly for diabetes management, which supports the broader goal of healthcare as a right.
View source →Oct 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Sponsoring the Head Start Shutdown Protection Act supports public education initiatives by protecting early childhood education programs, aligning with the stated position on education funding.
View source →Sep 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the Justice for Exonerees Act aligns with the position of supporting alternative sentencing and reducing mass incarceration by addressing wrongful convictions and supporting those wrongfully imprisoned.
View source →Sep 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Sponsoring the HIV Prevention Now Act aligns with expanding healthcare access, particularly for vulnerable populations, though it focuses specifically on HIV prevention rather than broader healthcare measures.
View source →Sep 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Sponsoring the PrEP and PEP are Prevention Act supports expanding access to healthcare by promoting preventive measures, which aligns with the stated position on healthcare access.
View source →Jul 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Sponsoring the Medicare Breast Reconstruction Access and Information Act supports expanding access to healthcare, particularly for Medicare beneficiaries, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Mar 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring the act aims to improve healthcare access for mothers and babies in underserved communities, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding healthcare access.
View source →Feb 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving repayment options for parents aligns with the broader goal of supporting education funding and access, even if it does not directly address public school funding.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act, which likely includes funding for border security measures, contradicts the stated support for lenient immigration policies.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting against the Homeowner Energy Freedom Act contradicts the support for renewable energy and climate action, as the act likely includes provisions that align with those goals.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The appropriations act may contain funding for various immigration-related programs, but without specific details on its provisions, the overall alignment with the stated support for lenient immigration policies is unclear.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The vote on the Home Appliance Protection and Affordability Act does not directly align with the stated climate position, as it focuses on appliance affordability rather than enforcing CO2 limits or promoting renewable energy.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The act aims to improve access to mental health services for LGBTQ+ youth, which aligns with expanding healthcare access, but it does not directly address the broader healthcare access or prescription drug pricing issues outlined in the stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The act focuses on child welfare and family rights, which aligns with education support but does not directly address funding or policies for public education.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: The action is related to education but does not directly advance or oppose the stated position on public education funding or voucher programs.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Ways and Means, Natural Resources, Financial Services, Transportation and Infrastructure, Education and Workforce, Oversight and Government Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The Energy Bills Relief Act's specific provisions and overall impact on climate policy are unclear, making it difficult to determine alignment with the stated support for enforcing CO2 limits and renewable energy incentives.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The appropriations act may include various provisions related to immigration, but without specific details on its impact, the alignment with the stated support for lenient immigration policies is unclear.
Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The Healthy Families Act focuses on paid sick leave and family leave, which relates to healthcare access but does not directly address the stated support for expanding healthcare access or negotiating drug prices.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the LET’S Protect Workers Act does not directly address education funding or policies, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Find It Early Act does not clearly align with the stated position on expanding healthcare access, as the specifics of the bill's impact on access and affordability are unclear.
View source →Nov 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action pertains to worker protections, which may relate to education in terms of workforce development, but does not directly advance the stated position on public education funding or opposition to vouchers.
View source →Jun 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The CLASS Act of 2025's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to assess its alignment with the stated support for public education funding and opposition to private school vouchers.
View source →Jan 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: The action focuses on wildfire insurance, which relates to climate impacts but does not directly advance the stated position on enforcing CO2 limits or renewable energy incentives.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, Agriculture, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Randall asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1522, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate amendment.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.