Maxine Waters

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at preventing deaths in ICE custody directly supports the position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways by addressing human rights concerns within the immigration enforcement system.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at providing deportation relief directly supports the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, Ways and Means, Veterans' Affairs, Armed Services, Natural Resources, Financial Services, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the PrEP Access and Coverage Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare, aligning with the advocacy for a larger government role in health coverage.

Committee Hearings Held

Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Freedom for Veterans Act directly supports legal access to abortion, aligning with the stated position on women's rights to make decisions about their own bodies.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Cosponsoring the Assault Weapons Ban of 2025 directly advances the stated position of supporting stricter firearms regulation.

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Why: Cosponsoring the grant program directly supports economic stability and growth by providing assistance to food workers, aligning closely with the stated position on government intervention.

Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the College for All Act directly supports the stated position of increasing federal funding for public schools and education initiatives.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Cosponsoring the Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act directly supports the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why: Cosponsoring the Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act directly advances the stated position by promoting protections against discrimination and harassment in educational settings.

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the Global Respect Act directly supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, aligning with the stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: Cosponsoring the Pride In Mental Health Act directly supports stronger protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation, aligning closely with the stated position.

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the John Lewis Every Child Deserves a Family Act directly supports stronger federal protections against discrimination in adoption and foster care, aligning closely with the stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: Cosponsoring the 988 LGBTQ+ Youth Access Act directly supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ+ youth, aligning closely with the stated position.

2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed

Why: Voting in favor of the Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act directly supports the stated position on enforcing limits on pollution and promoting renewable energy initiatives.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: Cosponsoring the PrEP Assistance Program Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare and aligns with the commitment to negotiate for better healthcare options.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the Lowering Drug Costs for American Families Act directly supports the stated position of expanding access to healthcare and negotiating prescription drug prices.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.

Why: Cosponsoring the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act directly supports more lenient immigration policies and aligns with the stated position against restrictive immigration measures.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at enhancing public health initiatives through prevention measures directly advances the stated position on government authority in public health.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Shackling and Detaining Pregnant Women Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for the rights and dignity of pregnant women, aligning with the commitment to legal access to abortion.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to expand Medicaid access for breast cancer treatment directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at restoring fair housing protections directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving healthcare access for mothers and babies directly advances the stated position of expanding access to healthcare.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at protecting employee paychecks and supporting small businesses directly advances the stated position of government intervention for economic stability and growth.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at expanding financial access directly supports economic stability and growth for underserved communities, aligning closely with the stated position on government intervention.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why: The Fairness for Farm Workers Act aims to improve labor conditions and support for farm workers, which aligns with the broader goal of government intervention to support economic stability and growth.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: Cosponsoring the Public Health Nursing Act supports public health initiatives, aligning with the stated position on government authority in public health measures.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Cosponsoring the Supplemental Security Income Restoration Act indicates support for government intervention aimed at economic stability, aligning with the stated position on economic growth.

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the act supports government intervention through social security expansion, which aligns with the stated position on economic stability and growth.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why: Cosponsoring the Fair Wages for Home Care Workers Act supports economic stability by advocating for fair wages, aligning with the position on government intervention for economic growth.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why: Cosponsoring the Restoring Overtime Pay Act aligns with the support for government intervention to enhance economic stability by potentially increasing workers' earnings.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Cosponsoring the Social Security Survivor Benefits Equity Act supports economic stability by addressing financial security for survivors, aligning with the broader position on government intervention for economic growth.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Cosponsoring the reparations commission aligns with the commitment to stronger federal protections against discrimination, as it seeks to address historical injustices faced by African Americans.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Price Gouging in Grocery Stores Act aims to address economic stability by preventing price gouging, which aligns with the support for government intervention to promote economic growth.

ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Ocasio-Cortez asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 5658, a bill originally introduced by Representative Sherrill, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.

Why: The Child Care for Every Community Act aims to improve access to child care, which indirectly supports educational outcomes, aligning with the advocacy for increased funding in education.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: Cosponsoring the act supports expanded access to healthcare services by addressing a specific health issue, aligning with the broader stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why: Cosponsoring the act aims to increase wages, which aligns with the broader goal of government intervention to support economic stability and growth.

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the Gun Safety Incentive Act indicates support for stricter firearms regulation, aligning with the stated position on background checks.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Ways and Means, the Judiciary, House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the Long-Term Care Workforce Support Act aligns with the position advocating for expanded access to healthcare services by supporting workforce initiatives in long-term care.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Oversight and Government Reform, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the HCBS Access Act indicates support for expanded access to healthcare services, aligning with the stated position on a larger government role in health coverage.

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Cosponsoring the Save MEDICARE Act indicates support for expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position for a larger government role in health coverage.

Received in the Senate.

Why: Cosponsoring the Faster Labor Contracts Act indicates support for measures that can enhance economic stability and growth, aligning with the stated position on government intervention.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Why: Cosponsoring the Momnibus Act, which aims to improve maternal health and expand healthcare access, aligns with the stated position of expanding access to healthcare.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at holding failed bank executives accountable aligns with the position of supporting government intervention for economic stability and growth.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Sponsoring a resolution that supports awareness for HIV/AIDS aligns with the emphasis on public health initiatives, even though it does not directly mandate vaccines.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act aligns with the stated support for lenient immigration policies by aiming to protect certain locations from immigration enforcement.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: Sponsoring a resolution that supports awareness for HIV/AIDS aligns with the emphasis on public health initiatives and government authority in health matters.

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Why: Cosponsoring the protection act supports environmental conservation and aligns with the broader goals of addressing climate change, though it does not directly enforce CO2 limits or provide tax incentives.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at fair competition for small businesses supports the position of government intervention to promote economic stability and growth.

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Sponsoring a housing crisis response act aligns with the position of supporting government intervention to promote economic stability and growth, as housing stability is a key component of economic health.

Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.

Why: Sponsoring the HIV Prevention Now Act supports public health initiatives, aligning with the stated position on government authority to mandate health measures.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at strengthening housing supply supports economic stability and growth, aligning with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Sponsoring the Ending Homelessness Act supports economic stability and growth by addressing homelessness, which aligns with the stated position on government intervention.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Why: Cosponsoring the EACH Act, which aims to expand healthcare access, aligns with the stated position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to improve access to Medicare services aligns with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at providing down payment assistance aligns with the position of supporting government intervention for economic stability and growth.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Why: The act aims to promote capital formation, which aligns with supporting economic stability and growth through government intervention.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Sponsoring a resolution that supports awareness for HIV/AIDS aligns with the emphasis on public health initiatives and government action in health matters.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving repayment options for parents indirectly supports the goal of enhancing educational funding and access, aligning with the position on federal support for public schools.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on public school funding.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: The Humane Cosmetics Act is related to environmental concerns but does not directly address federal action to cut emissions or renewable energy investment.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: The Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act addresses health-related issues but does not directly relate to vaccine mandates or public health measures, creating uncertainty in alignment with the stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on civil rights.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Ways and Means, Natural Resources, Financial Services, Transportation and Infrastructure, Education and Workforce, Oversight and Government Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: The Energy Bills Relief Act's specific provisions and overall impact on climate policy are unclear, making it difficult to determine alignment with the stated support for enforcing CO2 limits and renewable energy incentives.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on economic intervention.

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: The appropriations act may include various provisions related to immigration, but without specific details on its impact, the alignment with the stated support for lenient immigration policies is unclear.

Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: The Healthy Families Act focuses on paid sick leave and family leave, which relates to healthcare access but does not directly address the stated support for expanding healthcare access or negotiating drug prices.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: The measure's content is unclear regarding its direct impact on public health mandates, making it difficult to determine alignment with the stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.

Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: The action of cosponsoring the LET’S Protect Workers Act does not directly address education funding or policies, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Why: The action of cosponsoring the Find It Early Act does not clearly align with the stated position on expanding healthcare access, as the specifics of the bill's impact on access and affordability are unclear.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why: The measure's content focuses on diabetes initiatives, which may relate to public health but does not directly address vaccine mandates or public health measures, making the relationship unclear.

Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: The action pertains to worker protections, which may relate to education in terms of workforce development, but does not directly advance the stated position on public education funding or opposition to vouchers.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on education funding.

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.

Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on education funding.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed

Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed

Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed

Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Concur in the Senate Amendments — Result: Passed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Recorded Vote — Result: Passed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

On Passage — Result: Passed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Financial Services, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, the Budget, Transportation and Infrastructure, Rules, Foreign Affairs, Ways and Means, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, Agriculture, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Randall asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1522, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate amendment.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.