Sponsorship· Gun PolicyCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Gaetz has expressed opposition to maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid, advocating for a focus on domestic issues instead.
Gaetz has expressed opposition to maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid, advocating for a focus on domestic issues instead.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
“Strongly opposes Islamic Sharia as threat to the US. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating instead for strict enforcement of immigration laws and the construction of a border wall. He has made statements suggesting that undocumented immigrants are a burden on society.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Gaetz opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating instead for strict enforcement of immigration laws and the construction of a border wall. He has made statements suggesting that undocumented immigrants are a burden on society.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
“Secure the border and enforce our laws. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz opposes legal access to abortion and has made derogatory comments about women who support abortion rights. He has expressed support for pro-life legislation and has advocated for the inclusion of pre-born human beings in the 14th Amendment's protections.
Gaetz opposes legal access to abortion and has made derogatory comments about women who support abortion rights. He has expressed support for pro-life legislation and has advocated for the inclusion of pre-born human beings in the 14th Amendment's protections.
“Gaetz opposes abortion.”
“Supports human life begins at conception. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz has expressed skepticism about climate change and opposes federal action to cut emissions. He has proposed legislation to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency, arguing that it imposes unnecessary regulations.
Gaetz has expressed skepticism about climate change and opposes federal action to cut emissions. He has proposed legislation to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency, arguing that it imposes unnecessary regulations.
“Gaetz proposed legislation to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency in January 2017.”
“Opposes regulation of greenhouse gas emission. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz is a strong proponent of gun rights, opposing stricter firearms regulation and advocating for the Second Amendment. He has expressed support for open carry laws and has a lifetime membership with the NRA.
Gaetz is a strong proponent of gun rights, opposing stricter firearms regulation and advocating for the Second Amendment. He has expressed support for open carry laws and has a lifetime membership with the NRA.
“Gaetz supports Florida's stand-your-ground law and supported legislation that strengthened it against legal challenges.”
“Strongly opposes restrictive gun laws. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and promoting a fiscally responsible healthcare system.
Gaetz opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and promoting a fiscally responsible healthcare system.
“Gaetz supports repealing the 2010 affordable care act.”
“Replace ObamaCare with a fiscally responsible system. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and regulatory relief to promote economic growth.
Gaetz opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and regulatory relief to promote economic growth.
“Gaetz voted to repeal 4,000 regulations and to cut taxes 50 times.”
“Opposes tax increases, even to balance the budget. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz opposes more federal funding for public schools, advocating instead for school choice and the abolition of the Department of Education. He has criticized federal education standards like Common Core.
Gaetz opposes more federal funding for public schools, advocating instead for school choice and the abolition of the Department of Education. He has criticized federal education standards like Common Core.
“Gaetz opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard.”
“Allow opt-out of Common Core; abolish Dept. of Education. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz opposes expanding ballot access, advocating for stricter voter registration requirements and opposing measures like same-day registration.
Gaetz opposes expanding ballot access, advocating for stricter voter registration requirements and opposing measures like same-day registration.
“Gaetz has expressed support for stricter voting regulations, including voter ID laws.”
“Reduce early voting; stricter third party registration. (Apr 2011)”
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Sep 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz supports Florida's stand-your-ground law and supported legislation that strengthened it against legal challenges.”
Why: Cosponsoring the National Constitutional Carry Act directly advances the stated position of supporting gun rights and Second Amendment freedoms.
Aug 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Sponsoring the ALIEN Act aligns with the stated opposition to sanctuary cities and supports stricter immigration enforcement, directly advancing the stated position.
View source →Mar 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Immigration Detainer Enforcement Act directly supports stricter immigration enforcement, aligning closely with the stated opposition to sanctuary cities and the call for border control.
View source →Feb 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Sponsoring the State Border Security Act directly supports stricter immigration enforcement and aligns with the stated opposition to sanctuary cities and undocumented immigrants.
View source →Jan 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly supports stricter immigration enforcement and aligns with the stated opposition to sanctuary cities and undocumented immigrants.
View source →Jan 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Cosponsoring the REMAIN in Mexico Act directly supports stricter immigration enforcement and aligns with the stated opposition to sanctuary cities.
View source →Sep 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz opposes abortion.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Protect Children’s Innocence Act aligns with the stated opposition to abortion, as it reflects a commitment to restricting access to abortion services.
View source →Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz supports Florida's stand-your-ground law and supported legislation that strengthened it against legal challenges.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Federal Firearms Licensee Protection Act directly supports gun rights and aligns with the stated position of protecting Second Amendment freedoms.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSPORSHIP - Mr. Strong asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 4864, a bill originally introduced by Representative Gaetz, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at ending birthright citizenship aligns directly with the stated opposition to undocumented immigrants and supports stricter immigration enforcement.
View source →May 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz supports Florida's stand-your-ground law and supported legislation that strengthened it against legal challenges.”
Why: Sponsoring the Stand Your Ground Act directly advances the stated position of supporting gun rights and Second Amendment protections.
View source →Jan 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Burlison asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 374, a bill originally introduced by Representative Gaetz, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
“Gaetz supports Florida's stand-your-ground law and supported legislation that strengthened it against legal challenges.”
Why: Sponsoring the Abolish the ATF Act directly aligns with the stated position of supporting gun rights and opposing federal regulation of firearms.
View source →Feb 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Gaetz supports repealing the 2010 affordable care act.”
Why: Sponsoring the Medicaid Work Requirements Act aligns with the opposition to Medicaid expansion by promoting stricter eligibility criteria, which reflects a move towards a fiscally responsible healthcare system.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Gaetz supports repealing the 2010 affordable care act.”
Why: The action to cosponsor the End the Vaccine Carveout Act does not directly address the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act or Medicaid expansion, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 629.
“Gaetz supports repealing the 2010 affordable care act.”
Why: The action supports funding for children's hospitals, which can be seen as a healthcare improvement, but does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act or Medicaid expansion.
View source →Oct 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz has expressed support for stricter voting regulations, including voter ID laws.”
Why: Tagged to Voting Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
“Gaetz has expressed support for stricter voting regulations, including voter ID laws.”
Why: Tagged to Voting Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz has expressed support for stricter voting regulations, including voter ID laws.”
Why: Tagged to Voting Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 624.
“Gaetz opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Jun 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Gaetz voted to repeal 4,000 regulations and to cut taxes 50 times.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.
“Gaetz voted to repeal 4,000 regulations and to cut taxes 50 times.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Gaetz voted to repeal 4,000 regulations and to cut taxes 50 times.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency Management and Technology.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Gaetz voted to repeal 4,000 regulations and to cut taxes 50 times.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
“Gaetz has expressed support for stricter voting regulations, including voter ID laws.”
Why: Tagged to Voting Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Gaetz opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Gaetz opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Gaetz opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 479.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
“Gaetz has been critical of U.S. foreign aid policies, suggesting a need to prioritize American interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 27, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committees on Appropriations, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-247.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-161.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.