Sponsorship· Voting RightsSponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Gaetz has expressed a preference for a strong national defense and has opposed measures that would limit U.S. military involvement abroad. He supports maintaining military aid to allies like Israel.
Gaetz has expressed a preference for a strong national defense and has opposed measures that would limit U.S. military involvement abroad. He supports maintaining military aid to allies like Israel.
Gaetz opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating instead for strict enforcement of immigration laws and the construction of a border wall. He has made statements suggesting that undocumented immigrants are a burden on society.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Gaetz opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating instead for strict enforcement of immigration laws and the construction of a border wall. He has made statements suggesting that undocumented immigrants are a burden on society.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
“Secure the border and enforce our laws. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz supports maintaining strong national defense capabilities and has opposed cuts to defense spending. He has advocated for a robust military presence and has been involved in legislation supporting defense initiatives.
Gaetz supports maintaining strong national defense capabilities and has opposed cuts to defense spending. He has advocated for a robust military presence and has been involved in legislation supporting defense initiatives.
“Gaetz supports maintaining a numerically superior nuclear arsenal.”
“Oppose any automatic cuts to defense spending. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz supports tax cuts and opposes government intervention to promote economic stability, advocating for a free-market approach to economic growth.
Gaetz supports tax cuts and opposes government intervention to promote economic stability, advocating for a free-market approach to economic growth.
Gaetz opposes legal access to abortion, advocating for pro-life legislation and expressing views that suggest he believes life begins at conception. He has made controversial remarks regarding women who support abortion rights, indicating a strong opposition to the practice.
Gaetz opposes legal access to abortion, advocating for pro-life legislation and expressing views that suggest he believes life begins at conception. He has made controversial remarks regarding women who support abortion rights, indicating a strong opposition to the practice.
Gaetz has expressed skepticism about climate change and opposes federal action to cut emissions. He has proposed legislation to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency, arguing that it imposes unnecessary regulations.
Gaetz has expressed skepticism about climate change and opposes federal action to cut emissions. He has proposed legislation to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency, arguing that it imposes unnecessary regulations.
“Gaetz proposed legislation to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency in January 2017.”
“Opposes regulation of greenhouse gas emission. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz is a strong supporter of gun rights and opposes stricter firearms regulation. He has been described as one of the most pro-gun members of Congress and has advocated for open carry laws and stand-your-ground legislation.
Gaetz is a strong supporter of gun rights and opposes stricter firearms regulation. He has been described as one of the most pro-gun members of Congress and has advocated for open carry laws and stand-your-ground legislation.
“Gaetz is a lifetime member of the NRA, and has an A+ rating from it.”
“Infringing on 2nd Amendment rights is an attack on freedom. (Apr 2021)”
Gaetz opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and promoting a fiscally responsible healthcare system.
Gaetz opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and promoting a fiscally responsible healthcare system.
“Gaetz supports repealing the 2010 affordable care act.”
“Replace ObamaCare with a fiscally responsible system. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and regulatory relief to promote economic growth.
Gaetz opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and regulatory relief to promote economic growth.
“Gaetz voted to repeal 4,000 regulations and to cut taxes 50 times.”
“Opposes tax increases, even to balance the budget. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz opposes more federal funding for public schools, advocating instead for school choice and the abolition of the Department of Education. He has criticized federal education standards like Common Core.
Gaetz opposes more federal funding for public schools, advocating instead for school choice and the abolition of the Department of Education. He has criticized federal education standards like Common Core.
“Gaetz opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard.”
“Allow opt-out of Common Core; abolish Dept. of Education. (Nov 2016)”
Gaetz opposes expanding ballot access, advocating for stricter voter registration requirements and opposing measures like same-day registration.
Gaetz opposes expanding ballot access, advocating for stricter voter registration requirements and opposing measures like same-day registration.
“Gaetz has expressed support for stricter voting regulations, including voter ID laws.”
“Reduce early voting; stricter third party registration. (Apr 2011)”
Gaetz has opposed stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. He has voted against measures aimed at banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Gaetz has opposed stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. He has voted against measures aimed at banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Gaetz has shown support for the legalization of marijuana at the federal level. He has introduced legislation to reclassify cannabis and has voted in favor of measures aimed at reducing federal restrictions on cannabis.
Gaetz has shown support for the legalization of marijuana at the federal level. He has introduced legislation to reclassify cannabis and has voted in favor of measures aimed at reducing federal restrictions on cannabis.
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Oct 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz has expressed support for stricter voting regulations, including voter ID laws.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at penalizing non-citizen voting directly supports the stated position of opposing measures that expand ballot access.
Sep 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz is a lifetime member of the NRA, and has an A+ rating from it.”
Why: Cosponsoring the National Constitutional Carry Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for gun rights and opposing stricter regulations.
View source →Aug 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Sponsoring the ALIEN Act aligns with the stated position by advocating for stricter enforcement of immigration laws and opposing the expansion of legal immigration.
View source →Mar 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Immigration Detainer Enforcement Act directly supports stricter enforcement of immigration laws, aligning with the stated position against expanding legal immigration.
View source →Feb 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Sponsoring a border security act directly supports stricter enforcement of immigration laws, aligning with the stated position against expanding legal immigration.
View source →Jan 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: The REMAIN in Mexico Act aims to enforce stricter immigration policies, aligning directly with the stated opposition to expanding legal immigration.
View source →Jan 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
“Gaetz has expressed support for stricter voting regulations, including voter ID laws.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that emphasizes counting only citizens aligns with the stated position of opposing measures that expand ballot access.
View source →Jan 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that criminalizes fleeing from immigration enforcement directly supports stricter enforcement of immigration laws, aligning with the stated opposition to expanding legal immigration.
View source →Nov 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Gaetz opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Educational Choice for Children Act directly supports the stated position of opposing federal funding for public schools and advocating for school choice.
View source →Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz is a lifetime member of the NRA, and has an A+ rating from it.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at protecting federal firearms licensees directly supports the stated position of advocating for gun rights and opposing stricter regulations.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSPORSHIP - Mr. Strong asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 4864, a bill originally introduced by Representative Gaetz, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
“Gaetz opposes sanctuary cities, which limit or deny their cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at ending birthright citizenship aligns directly with the stated opposition to expanding legal immigration and stricter enforcement of immigration laws.
View source →May 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Gaetz is a lifetime member of the NRA, and has an A+ rating from it.”
Why: Sponsoring the Stand Your Ground Act directly advances the stated position of supporting gun rights and opposing stricter regulations.
View source →Feb 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Gaetz supports repealing the 2010 affordable care act.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that imposes work requirements for Medicaid aligns with the position of opposing a larger government role in health coverage, as it seeks to limit access to government-funded healthcare.
View source →Jan 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Burlison asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 374, a bill originally introduced by Representative Gaetz, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
“Gaetz is a lifetime member of the NRA, and has an A+ rating from it.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to abolish the ATF directly aligns with the stated position of opposing stricter firearms regulations and advocating for gun rights.
View source →Oct 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
“Gaetz has expressed support for stricter voting regulations, including voter ID laws.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at clarifying motor voter registration directly contradicts the stated position of opposing measures that expand ballot access.
View source →Jul 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 624.
“Gaetz opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at reducing college costs directly contradicts the stated position of opposing federal funding for education and the Department of Education.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish the Federal Reserve directly undermines the stated position of opposing government intervention for economic stability, as the Federal Reserve plays a crucial role in managing the economy.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jun 3, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
“Gaetz proposed legislation to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency in January 2017.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the summary does not clarify its implications for climate action or emissions regulation.
View source →Feb 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Feb 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency Management and Technology.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill related to fentanyl does not clearly advance or undermine the stated position on cannabis, as it addresses a different aspect of drug policy.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Gaetz opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the summary does not clarify how it relates to federal funding for public schools or education standards.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 629.
“Gaetz supports repealing the 2010 affordable care act.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 479.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on civil rights.
Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its relationship to the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Apr 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: The content of the NO FEAR for Whistleblowers Act is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Oct 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Gaetz voted to repeal 4,000 regulations and to cut taxes 50 times.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Gaetz voted to repeal 4,000 regulations and to cut taxes 50 times.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Gaetz voted to repeal 4,000 regulations and to cut taxes 50 times.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to School Curriculum, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to School Curriculum, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Religion & Public Life, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
“Gaetz supports maintaining a numerically superior nuclear arsenal.”
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
“Gaetz supports maintaining a numerically superior nuclear arsenal.”
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 27, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committees on Appropriations, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-247.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-161.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.