Sponsorship· HealthcareCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Heinrich supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for a fair path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, including DACA recipients. He emphasizes the need for humane immigration policies.
Heinrich supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for a fair path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, including DACA recipients. He emphasizes the need for humane immigration policies.
“Tough but fair path to earned citizenship, including DACA.”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Heinrich supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as raising the minimum wage and funding for COVID relief packages.
Heinrich supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as raising the minimum wage and funding for COVID relief packages.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package.”
Heinrich supports legal access to abortion without restrictions, advocating for federal funding for family planning clinics and opposing limitations on abortion services. He has been endorsed by NARAL Pro-Choice America and has consistently received high scores from them, indicating his strong pro-choice stance.
Heinrich supports legal access to abortion without restrictions, advocating for federal funding for family planning clinics and opposing limitations on abortion services. He has been endorsed by NARAL Pro-Choice America and has consistently received high scores from them, indicating his strong pro-choice stance.
“Legal without restrictions, including Planned Parenthood.”
Heinrich advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported the Green New Deal, which aims for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. He emphasizes the moral obligation to prevent climate change and has a history of supporting renewable energy initiatives.
Heinrich advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported the Green New Deal, which aims for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. He emphasizes the moral obligation to prevent climate change and has a history of supporting renewable energy initiatives.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Heinrich supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales and banning bump stocks. He has shifted away from his previous NRA endorsement to advocate for measures aimed at reducing gun violence.
Heinrich supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales and banning bump stocks. He has shifted away from his previous NRA endorsement to advocate for measures aimed at reducing gun violence.
“Ban bump stocks; ban sales to federal no-fly list.”
Heinrich supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the Affordable Care Act and co-sponsoring Medicare for All legislation. He emphasizes the need for expanded healthcare access and funding.
Heinrich supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the Affordable Care Act and co-sponsoring Medicare for All legislation. He emphasizes the need for expanded healthcare access and funding.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Heinrich supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, opposing tax cuts that primarily benefit the wealthy and advocating for measures that ensure fair tax distribution.
Heinrich supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, opposing tax cuts that primarily benefit the wealthy and advocating for measures that ensure fair tax distribution.
“Trump tax cuts do little for working families.”
Heinrich supports increasing federal funding for public schools and opposes privatization efforts that could harm rural education. He has advocated for making community college free and addressing the loss in value of Pell Grants.
Heinrich supports increasing federal funding for public schools and opposes privatization efforts that could harm rural education. He has advocated for making community college free and addressing the loss in value of Pell Grants.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Heinrich advocates for expanding ballot access, supporting measures to make voter registration easier and opposing voter ID laws that disproportionately affect minority communities.
Heinrich advocates for expanding ballot access, supporting measures to make voter registration easier and opposing voter ID laws that disproportionately affect minority communities.
“Voter ID disproportionately affects minority communities.”
Heinrich supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses, advocating for drug reform and a shift away from punitive measures. He has been rated positively by NORML, indicating a pro-drug reform stance.
Heinrich supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses, advocating for drug reform and a shift away from punitive measures. He has been rated positively by NORML, indicating a pro-drug reform stance.
“Rated A- by NORML: the War on Drugs has not made us safer.”
Heinrich advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, supporting legislation to prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. He has a history of endorsing measures that promote equality and protect civil rights.
Heinrich advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, supporting legislation to prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. He has a history of endorsing measures that promote equality and protect civil rights.
“Supports marriage equality; opposes DOMA.”
Heinrich supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in combating disease outbreaks.
Heinrich supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in combating disease outbreaks.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Heinrich supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, arguing that the War on Drugs has not made society safer and advocating for drug reform.
Heinrich supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, arguing that the War on Drugs has not made society safer and advocating for drug reform.
“It's time to legalize marijuana.”
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: Foreign Policy, National Security, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at addressing maternal health disparities directly advances the stated position of expanding access to healthcare for all Americans.
Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Tough but fair path to earned citizenship, including DACA.”
Why: The Children's Safe Welcome Act aims to enhance protections for unaccompanied minors and improve immigration processes, directly advancing the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Cosponsoring the CDC Tribal Public Health Security and Preparedness Act directly supports the stated position by enhancing public health measures and preparedness.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Legal without restrictions, including Planned Parenthood.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Legal without restrictions, including Planned Parenthood.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act directly supports legal access to abortion by ensuring individuals can travel for reproductive health services.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Legal without restrictions, including Planned Parenthood.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position of ensuring access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Extinction Prevention Act directly supports climate change policies and aligns with the advocacy for renewable energy and environmental protection.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“Voter ID disproportionately affects minority communities.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports the stated position by aiming to expand voter access.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Cosponsoring the PrEP Access and Coverage Act directly supports expanding healthcare access by ensuring coverage for preventive services, aligning closely with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The bill aims to improve healthcare outcomes through innovative models, which aligns with the position of expanding access to healthcare.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The bill aims to expand opportunities in health professions, which aligns with the position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage and expanding access to healthcare.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The bill aims to improve healthcare quality, which aligns with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at increasing mental health options aligns with the broader public health goals of enhancing health measures and responses to crises.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: The Grid Connection and Congestion Management Act aims to improve energy infrastructure, which supports the broader goal of reducing emissions, aligning with the stated position on climate action.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 439.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: The America the Beautiful Act aims to enhance conservation efforts and address climate change, which aligns with the stated position of supporting federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at improving healthcare access for diabetes management aligns with the broader support for expanding healthcare access.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act supports the broader goal of expanding healthcare access, particularly for specific health services, aligning with the stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports healthcare access by preventing interruptions in physical therapy, which aligns with the broader commitment to expanding healthcare services.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: Sponsoring the Caja del Rio Protection Act indicates support for environmental protection and aligns with the broader goals of transitioning to renewable energy and opposing fossil fuel projects.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Mammography Access for Veterans Act supports expanding healthcare access for veterans, which aligns with the broader commitment to increasing healthcare access.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Sponsoring legislation aimed at improving patient access to healthcare aligns with the stated position of expanding healthcare access.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Tough but fair path to earned citizenship, including DACA.”
Why: The FAIR Act aims to provide a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, aligning with the stated support for immigration reform.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Copays Act aligns with the stated position by promoting healthcare access and potentially increasing funding for health services.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
“Ban bump stocks; ban sales to federal no-fly list.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish a fund aimed at combating weaponization directly contradicts the stated support for measures to combat gun violence and expand background checks.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Tough but fair path to earned citizenship, including DACA.”
Why: The FENCE Act likely focuses on border security measures, which contradicts the stated support for expanding legal immigration and pathways to citizenship.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on climate action.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4520)
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: The bill relates to environmental practices but does not directly address emissions reduction, making its alignment with the stated position unclear.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: The bill's content is unclear in terms of its direct impact on emissions reduction, making it difficult to assess alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on climate action.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on public health.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 352.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on public health.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: The act addresses environmental concerns related to glyphosate, but it does not directly advance the broader climate change policies or renewable energy transition emphasized in the stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“No Medicare work rules; support ObamaCare.”
Why: The action focuses on addressing senior hunger, which is related to healthcare access but does not directly advance the stated position on expanding healthcare services.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Moral obligation to prevent devastating climate change.”
Why: The FLAP Reauthorization Act is related to environmental policy but does not directly advance the specific climate change initiatives or renewable energy transition emphasized in the stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Trump tax cuts do little for working families.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
“Supports marriage equality; opposes DOMA.”
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
“Supports marriage equality; opposes DOMA.”
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
“Supports marriage equality; opposes DOMA.”
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1902; text: CR S1938-1939)
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Privatization especially hurts rural schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Trump tax cuts do little for working families.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3194; text: CR S3218)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2313; text: CR S2310)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 412.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2241; text: CR S2240-2241)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1619)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1202; text: CR S1208-1209)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1058)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.