Sponsorship· Gun PolicyCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Blackburn supports strict immigration policies, including the expansion of the Mexico–United States border barrier and opposing amnesty for undocumented immigrants. She has expressed concerns about illegal immigration and has supported Trump's immigration policies.
Blackburn supports strict immigration policies, including the expansion of the Mexico–United States border barrier and opposing amnesty for undocumented immigrants. She has expressed concerns about illegal immigration and has supported Trump's immigration policies.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Blackburn advocates for a strong national defense and has supported military spending increases. She emphasizes the need to confront foreign adversaries, particularly China, and has been vocal about national security threats.
Blackburn advocates for a strong national defense and has supported military spending increases. She emphasizes the need to confront foreign adversaries, particularly China, and has been vocal about national security threats.
Marsha Blackburn staunchly opposes abortion and has actively sought to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has supported legislation to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks and has been involved in efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and restrict federal funding for abortion services.
Marsha Blackburn staunchly opposes abortion and has actively sought to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has supported legislation to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks and has been involved in efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and restrict federal funding for abortion services.
Blackburn rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, claiming there is 'no consensus' in the scientific community about its causes. She has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has criticized initiatives like the Paris Accord.
Blackburn rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, claiming there is 'no consensus' in the scientific community about its causes. She has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has criticized initiatives like the Paris Accord.
Blackburn has a strong pro-gun rights stance, advocating for the Second Amendment and opposing stricter gun regulations. She has received an 'A' rating from the NRA and has stated that she supports getting background checks working without additional regulations.
Blackburn has a strong pro-gun rights stance, advocating for the Second Amendment and opposing stricter gun regulations. She has received an 'A' rating from the NRA and has stated that she supports getting background checks working without additional regulations.
Blackburn has consistently opposed the Affordable Care Act and has advocated for its repeal. She supports health savings accounts and has criticized government involvement in healthcare.
Blackburn has consistently opposed the Affordable Care Act and has advocated for its repeal. She supports health savings accounts and has criticized government involvement in healthcare.
Blackburn supports tax cuts and has pledged to oppose any new taxes. She has endorsed President Trump's tax cuts and has a pro-business voting record, advocating for lower corporate tax rates.
Blackburn supports tax cuts and has pledged to oppose any new taxes. She has endorsed President Trump's tax cuts and has a pro-business voting record, advocating for lower corporate tax rates.
Blackburn supports school choice and vouchers for private schools, opposing increased federal funding for public schools. She has criticized educational policies that she views as indoctrination, particularly regarding critical race theory.
Blackburn supports school choice and vouchers for private schools, opposing increased federal funding for public schools. She has criticized educational policies that she views as indoctrination, particularly regarding critical race theory.
Blackburn has criticized the teaching of Critical Race Theory in schools, labeling it as indoctrination. She supports parental rights in education and has advocated for school choice, including vouchers for private schools.
Blackburn has criticized the teaching of Critical Race Theory in schools, labeling it as indoctrination. She supports parental rights in education and has advocated for school choice, including vouchers for private schools.
Blackburn has supported measures that would restrict voting access, including legislation aimed at cleaning up voter rolls and expressing concerns about election integrity. She has aligned with efforts to limit mail-in voting and other voting reforms.
Blackburn has supported measures that would restrict voting access, including legislation aimed at cleaning up voter rolls and expressing concerns about election integrity. She has aligned with efforts to limit mail-in voting and other voting reforms.
Blackburn has opposed stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. She has voted against measures that would expand protections for sexual orientation and gender identity.
Blackburn has opposed stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. She has voted against measures that would expand protections for sexual orientation and gender identity.
Blackburn has opposed government mandates for vaccines and public health measures, arguing against the authority of the government to impose such mandates. She has criticized public health policies that she views as overreach.
Blackburn has opposed government mandates for vaccines and public health measures, arguing against the authority of the government to impose such mandates. She has criticized public health policies that she views as overreach.
Position extraction pending on 9 issues: Foreign Policy, Economy & Jobs, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that supports firearm access aligns directly with the stated position of opposing stricter firearms regulations.
Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Forced Abortion Prevention and Accountability Act directly supports the stated position of opposing abortion by seeking to impose restrictions.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 452.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting American Taxpayers Act directly supports the stated position of keeping taxes low and reducing unnecessary spending.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to ban birth tourism directly supports the stated position of advocating for strict immigration policies.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that seeks to protect gun rights directly aligns with the stated position of opposing stricter firearms regulations.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that bans dismemberment abortions directly supports the stated position of opposing abortion.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that enhances penalties for firearm theft aligns with a pro-gun rights stance by reinforcing the protection of firearms.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the 287(g) Expansion Act directly supports stricter immigration enforcement and border security, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that prohibits funding for abortion providers directly advances the stated opposition to abortion.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill focused on reporting crimes committed by migrants directly supports the stated position of advocating for strict immigration policies and increased enforcement.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring the act aligns with the emphasis on national security and addressing threats, particularly in the context of emerging technologies like AI.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to establish and mandate E-Verify aligns with strict immigration policies by enhancing enforcement of employment eligibility, supporting the stated position on immigration.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Mined in America Act suggests support for domestic mining, which aligns with opposition to regulations aimed at reducing emissions, even if it does not directly address climate change.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to allow health coverage across state lines aligns with the opposition to the ACA by promoting a more market-driven approach to healthcare.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at energy infrastructure suggests support for federal action related to energy, which contradicts the stated opposition to addressing climate change.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The Citizenship Act of 2026 aims to provide pathways to citizenship, which directly contradicts the support for strict immigration policies and increased enforcement.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving Medicaid care contradicts the stated opposition to federal healthcare programs like the ACA.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4390)
Why: The resolution addresses human rights abuses but does not directly relate to the stated position on federal protections against discrimination, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on taxes.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill related to prescription digital therapeutics does not directly align with the opposition to government involvement in healthcare, but it also does not clearly contradict it, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 433.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a veterans' healthcare bill does not clearly align with the opposition to government involvement in healthcare, as it suggests support for a government program specifically for veterans.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The Detention Authority Clarification Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns or diverges from the stated support for strict immigration policies.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill aimed at supporting hospitals does not directly align with the opposition to the ACA, but it also does not contradict it, as it could be seen as a response to challenges posed by the ACA.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action to cosponsor a healthcare-related bill does not directly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, but it does not clearly contradict it either, as the specifics of the bill's provisions are not detailed.
Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1057)
Why: The resolution's intent to raise awareness about detransitioning does not clearly advance or undermine the stated opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: The action pertains to healthcare provider credentialing, which is relevant to healthcare but does not directly align with the opposition to the ACA or its provisions.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The ANCHOR Act aims to provide a pathway to legal status for certain undocumented immigrants, which contrasts with the stated opposition to amnesty, creating tension in alignment.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S4390)
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 517.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 106.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 410.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1545-1546)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 414.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S6836-6838)
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 372.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2239-2240)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1011)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2701)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2670; text: CR S2666)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 424.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S231-232)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.