Sponsorship· Gun PolicyCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Blackburn supports strict immigration policies, including the expansion of the Mexico–United States border barrier and opposing amnesty for undocumented immigrants. She has expressed concerns about illegal immigration and has supported Trump's immigration policies.
Blackburn supports strict immigration policies, including the expansion of the Mexico–United States border barrier and opposing amnesty for undocumented immigrants. She has expressed concerns about illegal immigration and has supported Trump's immigration policies.
Marsha Blackburn staunchly opposes abortion and has actively sought to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has supported legislation to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks and has been involved in efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and restrict federal funding for abortion services.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Marsha Blackburn staunchly opposes abortion and has actively sought to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has supported legislation to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks and has been involved in efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and restrict federal funding for abortion services.
Blackburn rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, claiming there is 'no consensus' in the scientific community about its causes. She has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has criticized initiatives like the Paris Accord.
Blackburn rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, claiming there is 'no consensus' in the scientific community about its causes. She has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has criticized initiatives like the Paris Accord.
Blackburn has a strong pro-gun rights stance, advocating for the Second Amendment and opposing stricter gun regulations. She has received an 'A' rating from the NRA and has stated that she supports getting background checks working without additional regulations.
Blackburn has a strong pro-gun rights stance, advocating for the Second Amendment and opposing stricter gun regulations. She has received an 'A' rating from the NRA and has stated that she supports getting background checks working without additional regulations.
Blackburn opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and has called for its repeal, arguing that it represents a federal takeover of healthcare. She has also criticized provisions of the ACA that protect individuals with preexisting conditions, claiming they were Republican provisions.
Blackburn opposes the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and has called for its repeal, arguing that it represents a federal takeover of healthcare. She has also criticized provisions of the ACA that protect individuals with preexisting conditions, claiming they were Republican provisions.
Blackburn supports tax cuts and has pledged to oppose any new taxes. She has endorsed President Trump's tax cuts and has a pro-business voting record, advocating for lower corporate tax rates.
Blackburn supports tax cuts and has pledged to oppose any new taxes. She has endorsed President Trump's tax cuts and has a pro-business voting record, advocating for lower corporate tax rates.
Blackburn has criticized the teaching of Critical Race Theory in schools, labeling it as indoctrination. She supports parental rights in education and has advocated for school choice, including vouchers for private schools.
Blackburn has criticized the teaching of Critical Race Theory in schools, labeling it as indoctrination. She supports parental rights in education and has advocated for school choice, including vouchers for private schools.
Blackburn has expressed support for measures that would require voter identification and has opposed mail-in voting initiatives. She has been involved in efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election, citing allegations of widespread fraud.
Blackburn has expressed support for measures that would require voter identification and has opposed mail-in voting initiatives. She has been involved in efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election, citing allegations of widespread fraud.
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Aid, Education, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that enhances penalties for firearm theft aligns with a pro-gun rights stance by reinforcing the protection of firearms.
Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The SEED Act aims to promote energy development without stringent regulations, aligning with the opposition to climate change regulations and the rejection of international agreements.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the 287(g) Expansion Act directly supports strict immigration enforcement by enhancing local law enforcement's ability to enforce immigration laws, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly advances the stated position by seeking to restrict abortion access and defund providers like Planned Parenthood.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to establish and mandate E-Verify aligns with strict immigration policies by enhancing enforcement of employment eligibility, supporting the stated position on immigration.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Mined in America Act suggests support for domestic mining, which aligns with opposition to regulations aimed at reducing emissions, even if it does not directly address climate change.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the Migrant Crime Reporting Act aligns with strict immigration policies by focusing on crime related to immigration, though it does not directly address border wall expansion or amnesty opposition.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to allow health coverage across state lines aligns with the opposition to the ACA by promoting a more market-driven approach to healthcare.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to ensure access to Medicaid buy-in programs contradicts the stated opposition to federal healthcare programs like the ACA.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving Medicaid care contradicts the stated opposition to federal healthcare programs like the ACA.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: The action to sponsor election security funding does not directly align with the stated support for voting rights, as it could imply a focus on security measures that may restrict access rather than enhance voter participation.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The Detention Authority Clarification Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns or diverges from the stated support for strict immigration policies.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action to cosponsor a healthcare-related bill does not directly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, but it does not clearly contradict it either, as the specifics of the bill's provisions are not detailed.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill aimed at supporting hospitals does not directly align with the opposition to the ACA, but it also does not contradict it, as it could be seen as a response to challenges posed by the ACA.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Rural Health Innovation Act may aim to improve healthcare access in rural areas, which could align with some healthcare goals, but it does not directly address the opposition to the ACA or its repeal.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action to sponsor a health initiative does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, as it may include elements that could be seen as supportive of healthcare access, but the specifics of the bill are unclear.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: The action aims to improve healthcare access for women veterans, which aligns with healthcare access goals but does not directly address the opposition to the ACA or its provisions.
Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: The action pertains to healthcare provider credentialing, which is relevant to healthcare but does not directly align with the opposition to the ACA or its provisions.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The ANCHOR Act aims to provide a pathway to legal status for certain undocumented immigrants, which contrasts with the stated opposition to amnesty, creating tension in alignment.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 106.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1545-1546)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 410.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 414.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 372.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S6836-6838)
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2701)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2670; text: CR S2666)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 424.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S231-232)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1057)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.