Sponsorship· ImmigrationCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Mullin has supported significant U.S. foreign aid, particularly in the context of military and humanitarian assistance to allies such as Ukraine and Israel. He has voted for aid packages that include substantial funding for these countries.
Mullin has supported significant U.S. foreign aid, particularly in the context of military and humanitarian assistance to allies such as Ukraine and Israel. He has voted for aid packages that include substantial funding for these countries.
“Supports billions to Ukraine for arms and humanitarian aid. (Aug 2022)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Mullin is known as an immigration hardliner, opposing amnesty proposals and advocating for stricter immigration enforcement. He has criticized the Biden administration's immigration policies and supports increasing both high-skill and family-based visa caps, while also calling for the completion of the border wall.
Mullin is known as an immigration hardliner, opposing amnesty proposals and advocating for stricter immigration enforcement. He has criticized the Biden administration's immigration policies and supports increasing both high-skill and family-based visa caps, while also calling for the completion of the border wall.
“Amnesty proposals should be rejected. (Nov 2012)”
Markwayne Mullin has stated that he supports a federal ban on abortion without exceptions, emphasizing a pro-life stance that considers life sacred from conception until natural death. He has also sponsored legislation to prohibit federal funding for abortion and has expressed opposition to public abortion funding.
Markwayne Mullin has stated that he supports a federal ban on abortion without exceptions, emphasizing a pro-life stance that considers life sacred from conception until natural death. He has also sponsored legislation to prohibit federal funding for abortion and has expressed opposition to public abortion funding.
“I consider myself pro-life. (Sep 2012)”
Mullin is a strong advocate for gun rights, opposing any restrictions on gun purchases and supporting the Second Amendment. He has stated that there should be no restrictions on assault rifle ownership and has voted against background checks for firearm sales.
Mullin is a strong advocate for gun rights, opposing any restrictions on gun purchases and supporting the Second Amendment. He has stated that there should be no restrictions on assault rifle ownership and has voted against background checks for firearm sales.
“Opposes restricting the Second Amendment. (Oct 2012)”
Mullin has consistently opposed the Affordable Care Act and has called for its repeal. He supports market-based health insurance solutions and has expressed the need for religious exemptions from mandates under the ACA.
Mullin has consistently opposed the Affordable Care Act and has called for its repeal. He supports market-based health insurance solutions and has expressed the need for religious exemptions from mandates under the ACA.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Mullin opposes increasing tax rates and supports eliminating the inheritance tax. He has stated that Americans are already taxed enough and advocates for replacing the income tax with a sales tax.
Mullin opposes increasing tax rates and supports eliminating the inheritance tax. He has stated that Americans are already taxed enough and advocates for replacing the income tax with a sales tax.
“We are taxed enough. (Nov 2012)”
Mullin opposes federal grants for education reforms and believes that parents should have the primary role in deciding educational matters rather than the federal government. He has supported school choice initiatives, including vouchers.
Mullin opposes federal grants for education reforms and believes that parents should have the primary role in deciding educational matters rather than the federal government. He has supported school choice initiatives, including vouchers.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Mullin opposes expanding voter registration and access, advocating for stricter voter ID laws and opposing same-day registration.
Mullin opposes expanding voter registration and access, advocating for stricter voter ID laws and opposing same-day registration.
“No holiday on election day; no same-day registration. (Mar 2019)”
Mullin supports free trade agreements and has expressed that Trump's tariffs are not a trade war but rather a necessary balancing of the economy. He has advocated for the implementation of the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
Mullin supports free trade agreements and has expressed that Trump's tariffs are not a trade war but rather a necessary balancing of the economy. He has advocated for the implementation of the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
“Trump trade deal with Canada and Mexico puts America first. (Jun 2019)”
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: Climate, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Amnesty proposals should be rejected. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Illegal Alien Cops Act aligns directly with the stated position of supporting stricter enforcement and increased border security.
Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Amnesty proposals should be rejected. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring the ICE Protection Act aligns with the stated position by advocating for stricter enforcement and increased border security.
View source →Jan 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 314.
“We are taxed enough. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution disapproving a tax conformity act aligns with the opposition to increasing tax rates, as it reflects a stance against local income tax adjustments.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Amnesty proposals should be rejected. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at preventing illegal aliens from driving under the influence aligns with the stated position of supporting stricter enforcement and border security.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Patients Deserve Price Tags Act aligns with the stated position by promoting market-based solutions and transparency in healthcare pricing, which is consistent with opposition to federal mandates.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
“Opposes restricting the Second Amendment. (Oct 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act aligns with the stated position of supporting gun rights, as it promotes protections related to firearm ownership.
View source →Nov 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports access to long-term care pharmacies, which aligns with a market-based approach to healthcare, even if it does not directly address the ACA.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Opposes restricting the Second Amendment. (Oct 2012)”
Why: Sponsoring the Tribal Firearm Access Act suggests an expansion of firearm access, which contradicts the stated opposition to any restrictions on gun ownership.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 45. Record Vote Number: 12. (CR S286)
“I consider myself pro-life. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at protecting pregnant students' rights does not align with the stated position of supporting a federal ban on abortion without exceptions, as it implies support for abortion access in educational settings.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S117)
“Supports billions to Ukraine for arms and humanitarian aid. (Aug 2022)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution commending military action in Venezuela moves against the stated support for foreign aid, as it implies endorsement of intervention rather than aid without military involvement.
View source →Nov 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Supports billions to Ukraine for arms and humanitarian aid. (Aug 2022)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to repeal sanctions on Syria moves against the stated support for U.S. aid, as it undermines the position on intervention and support in conflict areas.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“We are taxed enough. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a tax reform bill does not clearly align with the stated opposition to increasing tax rates, as the specifics of the bill's provisions are not detailed.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S582)
“Supports billions to Ukraine for arms and humanitarian aid. (Aug 2022)”
Why: The action addresses human rights issues related to Iran, which aligns with a broader foreign policy stance, but does not directly relate to supporting aid to Ukraine, Israel, or Taiwan.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“We are taxed enough. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The action involves modifying a tax credit, which does not clearly align with or oppose the stated position on tax rates, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Jun 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The action of sponsoring a bill related to prescription information does not clearly align with or contradict the opposition to the ACA, as it does not directly address federal mandates or market-based solutions.
View source →Mar 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The action relates to cybersecurity in healthcare but does not directly address the ACA or federal mandates, leaving the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →Jul 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 503.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The sponsorship of a program reauthorization could align with healthcare support but does not directly address the opposition to federal mandates or the ACA, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The act focuses on behavioral health technology coordination, which does not directly align with the opposition to the ACA or federal mandates, but it does not contradict the stated position either.
Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S8206)
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S263; text: CR S261)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S52; text: CR S51-52)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-86.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S7851-7852)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 412.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 204.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 205.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the bill.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 113.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3348-3349)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4308; text: CR S4271)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 31, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.