Sponsorship· Gun PolicySponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Mullin has supported significant U.S. foreign aid, particularly in the context of military and humanitarian assistance to allies such as Ukraine and Israel. He has voted for aid packages that include substantial funding for these countries.
Mullin has supported significant U.S. foreign aid, particularly in the context of military and humanitarian assistance to allies such as Ukraine and Israel. He has voted for aid packages that include substantial funding for these countries.
“Supports billions to Ukraine for arms and humanitarian aid. (Aug 2022)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Mullin is considered an immigration hardliner, advocating for strict immigration policies. He has opposed amnesty proposals and supports increasing border security, including the completion of the border wall.
Mullin is considered an immigration hardliner, advocating for strict immigration policies. He has opposed amnesty proposals and supports increasing border security, including the completion of the border wall.
“Amnesty proposals should be rejected. (Nov 2012)”
Mullin emphasizes maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities. He supports significant defense spending and has expressed a commitment to U.S. military operations abroad.
Mullin emphasizes maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities. He supports significant defense spending and has expressed a commitment to U.S. military operations abroad.
“$515B for military plus $89B off sequester for wars. (Apr 2015)”
Mullin opposes government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating instead for free-market principles. He has criticized federal stimulus spending and supports balancing the budget.
Mullin opposes government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating instead for free-market principles. He has criticized federal stimulus spending and supports balancing the budget.
“Time to balance the budget and rein in federal spending. (Mar 2022)”
Markwayne Mullin has stated that he supports a federal ban on abortion without exceptions, emphasizing a pro-life stance that considers life sacred from conception until natural death. He has also sponsored legislation to prohibit federal funding for abortion and has expressed opposition to public abortion funding.
Markwayne Mullin has stated that he supports a federal ban on abortion without exceptions, emphasizing a pro-life stance that considers life sacred from conception until natural death. He has also sponsored legislation to prohibit federal funding for abortion and has expressed opposition to public abortion funding.
“I consider myself pro-life. (Sep 2012)”
Mullin is a strong advocate for gun rights, opposing any restrictions on gun purchases and supporting the Second Amendment. He has stated that there should be no restrictions on assault rifle ownership and has voted against background checks for firearm sales.
Mullin is a strong advocate for gun rights, opposing any restrictions on gun purchases and supporting the Second Amendment. He has stated that there should be no restrictions on assault rifle ownership and has voted against background checks for firearm sales.
“Opposes restricting the Second Amendment. (Oct 2012)”
Mullin has consistently opposed the Affordable Care Act and has called for its repeal. He supports market-based health insurance solutions and has expressed the need for religious exemptions from mandates under the ACA.
Mullin has consistently opposed the Affordable Care Act and has called for its repeal. He supports market-based health insurance solutions and has expressed the need for religious exemptions from mandates under the ACA.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Mullin opposes increasing tax rates and supports eliminating the inheritance tax. He has stated that Americans are already taxed enough and advocates for replacing the income tax with a sales tax.
Mullin opposes increasing tax rates and supports eliminating the inheritance tax. He has stated that Americans are already taxed enough and advocates for replacing the income tax with a sales tax.
“We are taxed enough. (Nov 2012)”
Mullin opposes federal grants for education reforms and believes that parents should have the primary role in deciding educational matters rather than the federal government. He has supported school choice initiatives, including vouchers.
Mullin opposes federal grants for education reforms and believes that parents should have the primary role in deciding educational matters rather than the federal government. He has supported school choice initiatives, including vouchers.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Mullin opposes expanding voter registration and access, advocating for stricter voter ID laws and opposing same-day registration.
Mullin opposes expanding voter registration and access, advocating for stricter voter ID laws and opposing same-day registration.
“No holiday on election day; no same-day registration. (Mar 2019)”
Mullin supports free trade agreements and has expressed opposition to tariffs, viewing them as detrimental to the economy. He has praised trade deals that prioritize American interests.
Mullin supports free trade agreements and has expressed opposition to tariffs, viewing them as detrimental to the economy. He has praised trade deals that prioritize American interests.
“Trump trade deal with Canada and Mexico puts America first. (Jun 2019)”
Mullin opposes stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly regarding LGBTQ rights. He has expressed support for traditional marriage and has opposed same-sex marriage, indicating a conservative stance on civil rights issues.
Mullin opposes stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly regarding LGBTQ rights. He has expressed support for traditional marriage and has opposed same-sex marriage, indicating a conservative stance on civil rights issues.
“Traditional marriage is a sacred institution. (Nov 2012)”
Position extraction pending on 9 issues: Climate, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Opposes restricting the Second Amendment. (Oct 2012)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that facilitates firearm access aligns directly with the stated opposition to gun control measures.
Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Amnesty proposals should be rejected. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Illegal Alien Cops Act directly supports measures to strengthen border security, aligning with the stated position on immigration.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Amnesty proposals should be rejected. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring the ICE Protection Act directly supports strengthening immigration enforcement and border security, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-35.
“Opposes restricting the Second Amendment. (Oct 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that protects Second Amendment rights directly aligns with the stated opposition to gun control measures.
View source →Oct 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 204.
“$515B for military plus $89B off sequester for wars. (Apr 2015)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Pay Our Military Act directly supports maintaining military funding and readiness, which aligns with the stated position on national defense.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 45. Record Vote Number: 12. (CR S286)
“I consider myself pro-life. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to protect pregnant students' rights suggests support for access to abortion, which directly contradicts the stated opposition to legal access.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“We are taxed enough. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on taxes.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“We are taxed enough. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The measure's content is unclear as it pertains to a specific tax credit, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated opposition to tax increases.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Amnesty proposals should be rejected. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The bill's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on immigration.
View source →Jul 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S4703)
“Traditional marriage is a sacred institution. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The resolution's content does not directly relate to civil rights or protections for transgender individuals, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 439.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S582)
“Supports billions to Ukraine for arms and humanitarian aid. (Aug 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S117)
“Supports billions to Ukraine for arms and humanitarian aid. (Aug 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 522.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Time to balance the budget and rein in federal spending. (Mar 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S8206)
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 501.
“Supports billions to Ukraine for arms and humanitarian aid. (Aug 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Time to balance the budget and rein in federal spending. (Mar 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Supports billions to Ukraine for arms and humanitarian aid. (Aug 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Time to balance the budget and rein in federal spending. (Mar 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Time to balance the budget and rein in federal spending. (Mar 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Time to balance the budget and rein in federal spending. (Mar 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Time to balance the budget and rein in federal spending. (Mar 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 503.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Parents should decide education, not Washington. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Time to balance the budget and rein in federal spending. (Mar 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Time to balance the budget and rein in federal spending. (Mar 2022)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“ObamaCare must be repealed. (Nov 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 314.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S263; text: CR S261)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S52; text: CR S51-52)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-86.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S7851-7852)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 205.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the bill.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 113.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3348-3349)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4308; text: CR S4271)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 31, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.