Sponsorship· National SecurityCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Warner has expressed the importance of maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, arguing that it plays a critical role in promoting national security and reducing migration by improving conditions in other countries.
Warner has expressed the importance of maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, arguing that it plays a critical role in promoting national security and reducing migration by improving conditions in other countries.
“Foreign aid cuts destroy 75 years of American soft power. (Jul 2025)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Warner supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has co-sponsored legislation aimed at providing a pathway to citizenship for 'DREAMers'. He has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform that addresses various aspects of the immigration system.
Warner supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has co-sponsored legislation aimed at providing a pathway to citizenship for 'DREAMers'. He has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform that addresses various aspects of the immigration system.
“Co-sponsored path to citizenship for 'DREAMers'. (Sep 2020)”
Warner supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for a robust military and intelligence community.
Warner supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for a robust military and intelligence community.
Warner supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth, emphasizing the need for policies that support job creation and economic recovery.
Warner supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth, emphasizing the need for policies that support job creation and economic recovery.
Mark Warner is pro-choice and supports legal access to abortion, advocating for the protection of Roe v. Wade and opposing restrictions on abortion services. He has expressed a commitment to ensuring safe and legal abortion access without limitations.
Mark Warner is pro-choice and supports legal access to abortion, advocating for the protection of Roe v. Wade and opposing restrictions on abortion services. He has expressed a commitment to ensuring safe and legal abortion access without limitations.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Mar 2017)”
Warner advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various initiatives aimed at addressing climate change and promoting sustainable energy practices.
Warner advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various initiatives aimed at addressing climate change and promoting sustainable energy practices.
“Drastically reduced emissions from VA coal power plants. (Mar 2008)”
Warner has supported measures for stricter firearms regulation, including voting for expanded background checks and co-sponsoring legislation to require background checks for all firearm sales. He has also expressed support for an assault weapons ban.
Warner has supported measures for stricter firearms regulation, including voting for expanded background checks and co-sponsoring legislation to require background checks for all firearm sales. He has also expressed support for an assault weapons ban.
“Support assault weapons ban plus background checks. (Oct 2018)”
Warner has advocated for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and initiatives to expand access to healthcare. He emphasizes the need for reforms that ensure coverage for all Americans.
Warner has advocated for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and initiatives to expand access to healthcare. He emphasizes the need for reforms that ensure coverage for all Americans.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Warner has shown support for higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that would roll back tax cuts for the wealthy and ensure fair contributions to federal revenue.
Warner has shown support for higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that would roll back tax cuts for the wealthy and ensure fair contributions to federal revenue.
“Undo tax cuts, according to CC survey. (Sep 2020)”
Warner supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has advocated for reforms that enhance educational opportunities and resources for students across Virginia.
Warner supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has advocated for reforms that enhance educational opportunities and resources for students across Virginia.
“Supports public schools. (Nov 2001)”
Warner has not taken a clear position on stricter limits on school curriculum content, such as sex education and library books, focusing instead on broader educational funding issues.
Warner has not taken a clear position on stricter limits on school curriculum content, such as sex education and library books, focusing instead on broader educational funding issues.
Warner has sponsored legislation aimed at expanding voter registration and access to the ballot, emphasizing the importance of protecting voting rights for all citizens.
Warner has sponsored legislation aimed at expanding voter registration and access to the ballot, emphasizing the importance of protecting voting rights for all citizens.
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Mar 2021)”
Warner supports free-trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for policies that promote international trade and economic cooperation.
Warner supports free-trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for policies that promote international trade and economic cooperation.
Warner supports stronger regulation of major tech companies, emphasizing the need for accountability and consumer protection in the tech industry.
Warner supports stronger regulation of major tech companies, emphasizing the need for accountability and consumer protection in the tech industry.
Warner supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including backing the Equality Act, which aims to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Warner supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including backing the Equality Act, which aims to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Warner supports government authority to mandate public health measures, including vaccinations, as part of a broader strategy to protect public health.
Warner supports government authority to mandate public health measures, including vaccinations, as part of a broader strategy to protect public health.
Warner has shown support for drug policy reform, including the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, advocating for a more lenient approach to drug offenses.
Warner has shown support for drug policy reform, including the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, advocating for a more lenient approach to drug offenses.
Warner advocates for increased federal spending on disaster preparedness and relief, recognizing the need for robust support in the face of natural disasters.
Warner advocates for increased federal spending on disaster preparedness and relief, recognizing the need for robust support in the face of natural disasters.
Position extraction pending on 3 issues: Criminal Justice, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life.
Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The bill aims to enhance national security by analyzing threats from foreign adversaries, directly supporting the stated position of maintaining strong defense and security capabilities.
Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Sponsoring the AI AGENT Act directly supports stronger regulation of tech companies, aligning with the emphasis on accountability and consumer protection in the stated position.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Sponsoring the Secure A.I. Development Act directly advances the stated position by promoting regulation and accountability in the tech industry.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at workforce transition directly supports government intervention for job creation and economic recovery, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 552.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: The INSULIN Act aims to expand access to affordable insulin, directly advancing the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at regulating AI directly advances the stated position of stronger regulation of major tech companies, focusing on accountability and consumer protection.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S709)
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Medical Nutrition Therapy Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the SAFER Health Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the AI Labeling Act directly supports stronger regulation of tech companies by promoting accountability and consumer protection in AI technologies.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at combating threats to critical infrastructure directly supports the stated position of maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Mar 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act directly supports legal access to abortion by ensuring individuals can seek reproductive health care across state lines.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at ensuring seniors' access to quality care directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Workforce Transparency Act directly supports job creation and economic recovery, aligning closely with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Mar 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding voter registration and access, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support assault weapons ban plus background checks. (Oct 2018)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Virginia Plan to Reduce Gun Violence Act directly supports the stated position on expanding background checks and addressing gun violence.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Sponsoring the Save Struggling Hospitals Act directly supports expanding healthcare access and aligns with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to create a commission focused on the economy directly supports the stated position of promoting economic stability and growth.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Mar 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring the DISCLOSE Act, which aims to enhance transparency in campaign finance, aligns with the broader goal of improving voter participation and access.
View source →Jul 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving patient-centered care in Medicare directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Co-sponsored path to citizenship for 'DREAMers'. (Sep 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that designates Haiti for temporary protected status supports the broader goal of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The bill addresses regulatory duties related to artificial intelligence, which aligns with the position of supporting stronger regulation of tech companies.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The bill aims to codify gender-neutral standards, which aligns with the support for stronger protections against discrimination based on gender identity.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Right to IVF Act supports expanding healthcare access, which aligns with the stated position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing the significance of equal pay aligns with the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination, as it addresses wage disparities related to gender and race.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at increasing transparency in Medicare Advantage benefits aligns with the position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act, which aims to improve healthcare access for individuals with congenital anomalies, aligns with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Supports public schools. (Nov 2001)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at financing educational outcomes aligns with the position of advocating for more federal funding for public schools.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the broader goal of stronger protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: The act aims to improve healthcare access for military families, which aligns with the position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: The act aims to enhance cybersecurity measures, which aligns with the broader goal of regulating tech companies for accountability and consumer protection.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at enhancing the preparedness of the discount window aligns with the position of promoting economic stability and recovery.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Clinical Trial Modernization Act supports the broader goal of improving healthcare access and reducing costs by enhancing clinical trial processes, aligning with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Drug Deal Disclosure Act aligns with the stated position by aiming to improve transparency in drug pricing, which can contribute to reducing healthcare costs.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1741-1742)
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Catching Up Family Caregivers Act supports the broader goal of improving access to care, aligning with the commitment to maintain health insurance access and reduce costs.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Sponsoring the Hospice CARE Act indicates support for expanding healthcare access, which aligns with the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 50. Record Vote Number: 199.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the stated support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 456.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to the Affordable Care Act directly contradicts the support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The act promotes domestic purchasing over international trade, which contradicts the support for free-trade agreements and lower tariffs.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the commitment to maintaining and improving access to healthcare, as it opposes a regulatory measure intended to enhance service efficiency.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on economic intervention.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on trade.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Foreign aid cuts destroy 75 years of American soft power. (Jul 2025)”
Why: The bill's content is unclear regarding its alignment with diplomatic engagement and multilateralism, making it difficult to determine its impact on the stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The bill addresses public health by studying suicide risk factors, but it does not directly advance the stated position on government authority to mandate public health measures.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: The bill aims to improve patient matching, which is relevant to healthcare access, but does not directly advance a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Foreign aid cuts destroy 75 years of American soft power. (Jul 2025)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Drastically reduced emissions from VA coal power plants. (Mar 2008)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate action.
Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Undo tax cuts, according to CC survey. (Sep 2020)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on taxes.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Drastically reduced emissions from VA coal power plants. (Mar 2008)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on climate.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Undo tax cuts, according to CC survey. (Sep 2020)”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on taxes.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Undo tax cuts, according to CC survey. (Sep 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 404.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Undo tax cuts, according to CC survey. (Sep 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Supports public schools. (Nov 2001)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 450.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-87.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2181-2182)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S2131)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2272)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1202; text: CR S1208-1209)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.