Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Maria Cantwell supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has voted for comprehensive immigration reform that includes provisions for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and has advocated for humane treatment of immigrants.
Maria Cantwell supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has voted for comprehensive immigration reform that includes provisions for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and has advocated for humane treatment of immigrants.
“Cover child resident aliens under Medicaid and SCHIP. (May 2005)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Maria Cantwell is a strong advocate for reproductive rights and identifies as "100% pro-choice." She supports legal access to abortion without restrictions and has consistently voted against measures that would limit abortion rights. Cantwell has also co-sponsored legislation to expand access to contraceptives and family planning services.
Maria Cantwell is a strong advocate for reproductive rights and identifies as "100% pro-choice." She supports legal access to abortion without restrictions and has consistently voted against measures that would limit abortion rights. Cantwell has also co-sponsored legislation to expand access to contraceptives and family planning services.
“100% pro choice. (Oct 2000) Strongly supports "Abortion is a woman's right". (Sep 2000) Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record. (Dec 2003)”
Maria Cantwell has been a strong proponent of federal action to address climate change. She has supported legislation aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and has advocated for renewable energy initiatives. Cantwell has a high rating from environmental organizations, reflecting her commitment to environmental protection and climate action.
Maria Cantwell has been a strong proponent of federal action to address climate change. She has supported legislation aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and has advocated for renewable energy initiatives. Cantwell has a high rating from environmental organizations, reflecting her commitment to environmental protection and climate action.
“Supports spending resources to stop Global Warming. (Sep 2000)”
Maria Cantwell advocates for stricter firearms regulations, including closing background check loopholes and implementing measures to prevent unauthorized firearm use. She has consistently supported legislation aimed at enhancing gun control and safety measures.
Maria Cantwell advocates for stricter firearms regulations, including closing background check loopholes and implementing measures to prevent unauthorized firearm use. She has consistently supported legislation aimed at enhancing gun control and safety measures.
“Close the background loophole and deal with mental health. (Feb 2018)”
Maria Cantwell supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for health care reforms that expand access and affordability. She has backed legislation aimed at improving public health and has been rated highly by public health organizations.
Maria Cantwell supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for health care reforms that expand access and affordability. She has backed legislation aimed at improving public health and has been rated highly by public health organizations.
“Supports More Federal Funding for Health Coverage. (Sep 2000)”
Maria Cantwell supports increased federal funding for public schools and has been rated highly by education advocacy groups. She opposes school vouchers and promotes public education funding as a priority to ensure quality education for all students.
Maria Cantwell supports increased federal funding for public schools and has been rated highly by education advocacy groups. She opposes school vouchers and promotes public education funding as a priority to ensure quality education for all students.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes. (Dec 2003)”
Maria Cantwell has sponsored legislation aimed at expanding voter registration and access to the ballot. She supports measures that facilitate voting and protect the integrity of elections, reflecting her commitment to voting rights.
Maria Cantwell has sponsored legislation aimed at expanding voter registration and access to the ballot. She supports measures that facilitate voting and protect the integrity of elections, reflecting her commitment to voting rights.
“Sponsored bill for election holiday & easier voting access. (Mar 2019)”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Aid, Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“100% pro choice. (Oct 2000) Strongly supports "Abortion is a woman's right". (Sep 2000) Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect freedom of travel and reproductive rights directly advances the stated commitment to legal access to abortion without restrictions.
Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Supports spending resources to stop Global Warming. (Sep 2000)”
Why: Sponsoring the Transportation Fuel Market Transparency Act aligns with the stated position by promoting regulation in the fuel market, which supports environmental goals and alternative energy initiatives.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“Sponsored bill for election holiday & easier voting access. (Mar 2019)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding access to voting, aligning closely with the stated position on voting rights.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
“Supports spending resources to stop Global Warming. (Sep 2000)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Regional Ocean Partnerships Reauthorization Act directly supports environmental protection and regulation, aligning with the stated commitment to increased regulation and alternative energy.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Supports More Federal Funding for Health Coverage. (Sep 2000)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Access to General Surgery Act aligns with the stated position by promoting access to health care services, although it does not directly address the broader reforms or public option.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Supports More Federal Funding for Health Coverage. (Sep 2000)”
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports health care reform and access improvements, aligning with the stated position on increasing health coverage.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Supports spending resources to stop Global Warming. (Sep 2000)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Energy Consumer Protection Act suggests support for regulations that align with her advocacy for increased regulation of oil markets and alternative energy research.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Supports More Federal Funding for Health Coverage. (Sep 2000)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Drug Deal Disclosure Act aligns with the stated position by promoting transparency in drug pricing, which can improve access to healthcare services.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“Supports More Federal Funding for Health Coverage. (Sep 2000)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Safe Step Act, which aims to improve access to healthcare by addressing step therapy protocols, aligns with the stated support for healthcare reform and increased access.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Supports More Federal Funding for Health Coverage. (Sep 2000)”
Why: Cosponsoring the AADAPT Act indicates support for health care reform and improving access, aligning with the stated position on increasing federal funding and establishing a public option.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“Sponsored bill for election holiday & easier voting access. (Mar 2019)”
Why: The DISCLOSE Act aims to improve transparency in campaign finance, which aligns with broader voting rights and access initiatives, even if it does not directly expand voter registration.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports More Federal Funding for Health Coverage. (Sep 2000)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to Medicare undermines the stated support for health care reform and increased access to health care services.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Supports spending resources to stop Global Warming. (Sep 2000)”
Why: The bill relates to environmental management but does not directly address climate change or fossil fuel regulation, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2241; text: CR S2240-2241)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1827; text: CR S1826)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1202; text: CR S1208-1209)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 362.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1051; text: CR S1051)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 342.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.