Sponsorship· ClimateCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Murkowski has supported a strong national defense and has voted for measures that reinforce U.S. alliances and military capabilities. She has also shown a willingness to engage diplomatically with other nations.
Murkowski has supported a strong national defense and has voted for measures that reinforce U.S. alliances and military capabilities. She has also shown a willingness to engage diplomatically with other nations.
“Voted YES on cooperating with India as a nuclear power. (Oct 2008)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Murkowski has supported some immigration reforms, including a path to citizenship for guest workers, but has also voted for measures that restrict immigration, indicating a mixed stance on the issue.
Murkowski has supported some immigration reforms, including a path to citizenship for guest workers, but has also voted for measures that restrict immigration, indicating a mixed stance on the issue.
“Voted YES on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship. (May 2006) Voted NO on comprehensive immigration reform. (Jun 2007)”
Murkowski has consistently supported maintaining strong national defense capabilities and has voted for measures that enhance military readiness and support for veterans.
Murkowski has consistently supported maintaining strong national defense capabilities and has voted for measures that enhance military readiness and support for veterans.
“Ensure military has resources needed to accomplish missions. (Jan 2011)”
Murkowski has shown support for government intervention to stimulate economic growth, having voted for COVID relief packages and other economic stimulus measures. She believes in the importance of federal support for economic stability.
Murkowski has shown support for government intervention to stimulate economic growth, having voted for COVID relief packages and other economic stimulus measures. She believes in the importance of federal support for economic stability.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Murkowski has expressed support for legal access to abortion, having joined Democrats to fund Planned Parenthood and opposing cuts to federal funds for the organization. She has also stated that exceptions are needed for late-term abortions, indicating a mixed stance on the issue.
Murkowski has expressed support for legal access to abortion, having joined Democrats to fund Planned Parenthood and opposing cuts to federal funds for the organization. She has also stated that exceptions are needed for late-term abortions, indicating a mixed stance on the issue.
Murkowski has advocated for reasonable policies to address climate change, emphasizing the need for innovation and a balanced approach rather than extreme measures. She supports federal action to cut emissions while promoting economic growth.
Murkowski has advocated for reasonable policies to address climate change, emphasizing the need for innovation and a balanced approach rather than extreme measures. She supports federal action to cut emissions while promoting economic growth.
Murkowski has consistently opposed stricter firearms regulations, voting against measures such as banning high-capacity magazines and reauthorizing the federal assault weapons ban, indicating a strong support for gun rights.
Murkowski has consistently opposed stricter firearms regulations, voting against measures such as banning high-capacity magazines and reauthorizing the federal assault weapons ban, indicating a strong support for gun rights.
Murkowski has supported measures to expand healthcare access, including voting for the expansion of the Children's Health Insurance Program. However, she has also voted against some healthcare reforms, indicating a mixed record.
Murkowski has supported measures to expand healthcare access, including voting for the expansion of the Children's Health Insurance Program. However, she has also voted against some healthcare reforms, indicating a mixed record.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Murkowski has generally opposed increasing taxes, supporting tax cuts and maintaining lower tax rates for individuals and corporations. She has a record of voting against tax increases.
Murkowski has generally opposed increasing taxes, supporting tax cuts and maintaining lower tax rates for individuals and corporations. She has a record of voting against tax increases.
“Opposes increasing income tax rates. (Nov 2016)”
Murkowski has a mixed record on education funding, having voted for additional federal funding for education projects but also against certain funding initiatives. She supports adapting federal education standards to local needs.
Murkowski has a mixed record on education funding, having voted for additional federal funding for education projects but also against certain funding initiatives. She supports adapting federal education standards to local needs.
Murkowski has voted against measures that would require photo ID for voting, indicating support for expanding ballot access.
Murkowski has voted against measures that would require photo ID for voting, indicating support for expanding ballot access.
“Voted NO on requiring photo ID to vote in federal elections. (Jul 2007)”
Murkowski has supported free trade agreements and has voted in favor of measures that promote trade engagement, indicating a pro-free trade stance.
Murkowski has supported free trade agreements and has voted in favor of measures that promote trade engagement, indicating a pro-free trade stance.
“Voted YES on promoting free trade with Peru. (Dec 2007)”
Murkowski has shown a mixed record on drug offenses, supporting some reforms while also advocating for community safety. She has indicated a cautious approach to reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses, reflecting a moderate stance.
Murkowski has shown a mixed record on drug offenses, supporting some reforms while also advocating for community safety. She has indicated a cautious approach to reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses, reflecting a moderate stance.
Murkowski has supported civil rights initiatives, including voting for the Respect for Marriage Act, which aimed to protect same-sex marriage. However, her past voting record includes support for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, indicating a mixed stance on LGBTQ rights.
Murkowski has supported civil rights initiatives, including voting for the Respect for Marriage Act, which aimed to protect same-sex marriage. However, her past voting record includes support for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, indicating a mixed stance on LGBTQ rights.
“Voted YES on reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act. (Feb 2013) Voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006)”
Murkowski has shown support for public health measures, including funding for healthcare programs, but has also voted against certain public health initiatives, indicating a mixed record.
Murkowski has shown support for public health measures, including funding for healthcare programs, but has also voted against certain public health initiatives, indicating a mixed record.
“Voted YES on regulating tobacco as a drug. (Jun 2009) Voted NO on expanding enrollment period for Medicare Part D. (Feb 2006)”
Murkowski has expressed concerns about the legalization of recreational marijuana, viewing it as a public health risk. However, she has a mixed record on drug policy, indicating some support for drug reform.
Murkowski has expressed concerns about the legalization of recreational marijuana, viewing it as a public health risk. However, she has a mixed record on drug policy, indicating some support for drug reform.
“Legalizing recreational marijuana is public health risk. (Oct 2014) Rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance. (Nov 2016)”
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: School Curriculum, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring the Next-Generation Geothermal Research and Development Act directly supports innovative climate change policies, aligning with the stated position of promoting reasonable efforts in addressing climate issues.
Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring the Hydropower Licensing Affordability Act supports innovation in renewable energy, which aligns with the stated position of advocating for reasonable climate policies.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Voted YES on cooperating with India as a nuclear power. (Oct 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the sanctions act aligns with supporting a strong national defense and reinforcing U.S. alliances, as it addresses foreign policy concerns regarding Russia.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Welcome Back to the Health Care Workforce Act supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position despite the mixed record.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the Earth MRI Reauthorization Act indicates support for federal action related to climate, aligning with the emphasis on innovation and balanced measures in the stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Legalizing Premium Health Care Act suggests support for expanding healthcare access, which aligns with her mixed record on healthcare issues.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports healthcare access for mid-life women, aligning with the figure's mixed record on expanding healthcare services.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to therapies for ALS aligns with the stated position of supporting healthcare access, despite the mixed overall record.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Sponsoring the PHS ACCESS Act indicates support for healthcare access, aligning with her previous actions to expand programs like CHIP, despite her mixed overall record.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Essential Caregivers Act suggests support for healthcare access and funding, aligning with her previous actions to expand programs like CHIP.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Lowering Costs for Caregivers Act suggests support for healthcare access and affordability, aligning with the figure's mixed stance on healthcare issues.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to expedite disability insurance payments for terminally ill individuals aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and support for vulnerable populations.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Voted YES on promoting free trade with Peru. (Dec 2007)”
Why: Sponsoring the American Seafood Competitiveness Act supports trade engagement in the seafood industry, aligning with the stated position on free trade agreements.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Rural America Health Corps Act supports healthcare access in rural areas, aligning with the figure's mixed stance on expanding healthcare access.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the INSULIN Act indicates support for healthcare access, particularly in addressing insulin affordability, which aligns with her mixed stance on expanding healthcare access.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring the SECURE Grid Act, which aims to enhance energy infrastructure and promote innovation, aligns with the stated support for reasonable climate change policies.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1093)
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Cosponsoring the EMPOWER for Health Act suggests support for healthcare access initiatives, aligning with the figure's mixed record on healthcare issues.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Voted YES on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship. (May 2006) Voted NO on comprehensive immigration reform. (Jun 2007)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to exempt public school employees from H-1B visa fees supports a more accessible immigration process, aligning with the stated position of supporting guest worker programs.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The Remote Waste Storage Act's focus on waste management does not clearly align with or contradict the stated support for balanced federal action to cut emissions, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Ensuring Seniors’ Access to Quality Care Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position, as it may support some aspects of healthcare access without indicating a strong government role.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2702)
“Voted YES on cooperating with India as a nuclear power. (Oct 2008)”
Why: The resolution acknowledges the importance of international cooperation but does not directly address the maintenance or expansion of foreign aid.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: The Credit for Caring Act aims to support family caregivers, which relates to healthcare access but does not directly address broader healthcare funding or access issues, reflecting a complex stance.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: The action addresses domestic violence, which relates to healthcare access, but does not directly align with the broader healthcare funding and access issues indicated in the stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: The action addresses a specific health issue (youth vaping) but does not directly align with broader healthcare access or funding concerns, reflecting the complexity of the figure's overall healthcare stance.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: The action of sponsoring the AI/AN CAPTA bill does not clearly align or contradict the stated mixed position on healthcare, as the bill's specific provisions and impacts on healthcare access and funding are not detailed.
Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009) Voted NO on allowing tribal Indians to opt out of federal healthcare. (Feb 2008)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Opposes increasing income tax rates. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S231-232)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S2667)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 342.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2518)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2241; text: CR S2240-2241)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text: CR S2083)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1202; text: CR S1208-1209)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1011)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.