Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Boebert opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border policies and the construction of a border wall. She has introduced legislation to codify previous immigration policies and eliminate programs that facilitate immigration.
Boebert opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border policies and the construction of a border wall. She has introduced legislation to codify previous immigration policies and eliminate programs that facilitate immigration.
Boebert supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for increased defense spending and opposing military intervention in certain conflicts.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Boebert supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for increased defense spending and opposing military intervention in certain conflicts.
Boebert opposes government intervention to support economic stability and growth, pledging not to support any federal budget that results in additional debt and opposing tax increases.
Boebert opposes government intervention to support economic stability and growth, pledging not to support any federal budget that results in additional debt and opposing tax increases.
Boebert opposes legal access to abortion, advocating against comprehensive sex education and federal funding for Planned Parenthood. She has consistently expressed her pro-life stance throughout her political career.
Boebert opposes legal access to abortion, advocating against comprehensive sex education and federal funding for Planned Parenthood. She has consistently expressed her pro-life stance throughout her political career.
Boebert opposes federal action to cut emissions, arguing that sustainable energy initiatives are unreliable and that fossil fuel extraction is essential for economic stability in her district. She has criticized the Green New Deal and the Paris Agreement as harmful to jobs.
Boebert opposes federal action to cut emissions, arguing that sustainable energy initiatives are unreliable and that fossil fuel extraction is essential for economic stability in her district. She has criticized the Green New Deal and the Paris Agreement as harmful to jobs.
Boebert is a strong advocate for gun rights, opposing stricter firearms regulation and supporting the right to carry firearms in various settings, including Congress. She has publicly expressed her intention to carry a gun while working in the Capitol.
Boebert is a strong advocate for gun rights, opposing stricter firearms regulation and supporting the right to carry firearms in various settings, including Congress. She has publicly expressed her intention to carry a gun while working in the Capitol.
Boebert opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and opposing single-payer healthcare systems. She argues that such systems would negatively impact small businesses.
Boebert opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and opposing single-payer healthcare systems. She argues that such systems would negatively impact small businesses.
Boebert opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, pledging not to support any tax increases during her campaign.
Boebert opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, pledging not to support any tax increases during her campaign.
Boebert supports eliminating the U.S. Department of Education and opposes sex education in schools. She has made it a priority to eliminate critical race theory from educational curricula, asserting that it is harmful and divisive.
Boebert supports eliminating the U.S. Department of Education and opposes sex education in schools. She has made it a priority to eliminate critical race theory from educational curricula, asserting that it is harmful and divisive.
Boebert supports stricter limits on school curriculum content, particularly opposing sex education and critical race theory. She believes these subjects are inappropriate and harmful to students.
Boebert supports stricter limits on school curriculum content, particularly opposing sex education and critical race theory. She believes these subjects are inappropriate and harmful to students.
Boebert opposes expanding ballot access, advocating for stricter voter ID laws and opposing measures that would facilitate mail-in voting.
Boebert opposes expanding ballot access, advocating for stricter voter ID laws and opposing measures that would facilitate mail-in voting.
Boebert opposes stronger regulation of major tech companies, advocating for less government intervention in the tech sector.
Boebert opposes stronger regulation of major tech companies, advocating for less government intervention in the tech sector.
Boebert opposes stronger federal protections against discrimination, arguing that such measures infringe on individual liberties and religious freedoms.
Boebert opposes stronger federal protections against discrimination, arguing that such measures infringe on individual liberties and religious freedoms.
Boebert opposes government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures, arguing against mandates and restrictions related to COVID-19.
Boebert opposes government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures, arguing against mandates and restrictions related to COVID-19.
Boebert opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, aligning with her stance against drug policy reform.
Boebert opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, aligning with her stance against drug policy reform.
Boebert advocates for stronger legal protections for religious exercise, promoting the idea that the church should direct the government.
Boebert advocates for stronger legal protections for religious exercise, promoting the idea that the church should direct the government.
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Policy, Trade, Criminal Justice, Elections & Campaigns, Disaster Response.
Jan 3, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the SAVE Moms and Babies Act, which aims to restrict abortion access, directly advances the stated position opposing legal access to abortion.
Dec 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to restrict taxpayer funding for abortion directly supports the stated opposition to legal access to abortion.
View source →Oct 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The act aims to protect gun owners' privacy, directly advancing the stated position of supporting gun rights and opposing stricter regulations.
View source →Oct 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that prohibits federal tax dollars from funding health insurance for illegal aliens directly supports the stated position of opposing expanded immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Sep 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 734.
Why: Cosponsoring the FOCA Act, which aims to restrict abortion access, directly aligns with the stated position opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →Sep 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Life.Gov Act directly supports federal anti-abortion legislation, which aligns with the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →Sep 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 0.
Why: Cosponsoring the Countering Chinese Espionage Reporting Act directly supports national security by addressing espionage threats, aligning with the stated position of maintaining strong defense capabilities.
View source →Jul 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Life at Conception Act directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion and advocating for federal anti-abortion legislation.
View source →Jun 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that explicitly defines abortion as not being health care directly supports the stated position opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →May 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at protecting life on college campuses directly supports the stated opposition to legal access to abortion.
View source →May 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that protects gun owner registration information directly supports the stated position of opposing stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Jul 20, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that prohibits federal tax dollars from funding health insurance for illegal immigrants directly supports stricter immigration policies, aligning with the stated opposition to expanding legal immigration pathways.
View source →Jun 22, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at combating dangerous drugs aligns with the opposition to marijuana legalization, as it reflects a commitment to stricter drug policies.
View source →Feb 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to prevent illegal immigrants from obtaining driver licenses directly supports the stated position of opposing expanded legal immigration and advocating for stricter immigration policies.
View source →Sep 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a repeal of the FACE Act, which protects access to abortion clinics, directly contradicts the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →Jun 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure promotes renewable energy, which contradicts the stated opposition to federal action aimed at cutting emissions.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Feb 28, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as it is unclear how it relates to federal action on emissions or fossil fuel extraction.
View source →Jan 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1898)
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Oct 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4416-4417)
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Sep 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment, Manufacturing, and Critical Materials.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the summary does not clarify whether it promotes or undermines federal action on emissions.
View source →Aug 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jul 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the summary does not clarify how it relates to civil rights or discrimination protections.
View source →Jun 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Caraveo asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 4213, a bill originally introduced by Representative Buck, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jun 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Joyce (OH) asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 4105, a bill originally introduced by Representative Buck, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: The action of sponsoring a bill related to drug policy does not clearly indicate a stance on marijuana legalization, as the measure's specific content and implications are not detailed.
View source →Jun 16, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as it is unclear how it aligns with the stated position on education.
View source →Oct 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the summary does not clarify whether it advances or undermines the stated position on federal climate action.
View source →Jun 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on education.
View source →Sep 17, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, as it is referred to a committee without specifying its provisions, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Feb 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 2.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Lopez asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 3954, a bill originally introduced by Representative Buck, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Joyce (OH) asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 895, a bill originally introduced by Representative Buck, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the National Intelligence Enterprise.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 14, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 29, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 9, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 20, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2021 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 376.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 4, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 2, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 10, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 2, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 28, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-161.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 240.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 545.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 0.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 20, 2022 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 433.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 4, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 25, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 17, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.