Sponsorship· HealthcareCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Sinema has expressed that mass deportation of undocumented immigrants is not an option and supports the DREAM Act, advocating for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented workers. She has also voted against abolishing ICE and has called for a tough but fair immigration system.
Sinema has expressed that mass deportation of undocumented immigrants is not an option and supports the DREAM Act, advocating for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented workers. She has also voted against abolishing ICE and has called for a tough but fair immigration system.
“Mass deportations are not an option; support the DREAM Act. (Nov 2012)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Kyrsten Sinema supports legal access to abortion and has stated that the ruling of Roe v. Wade should not be overturned. She has a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood and has expressed that the overturning of Roe v. Wade endangers women's health and well-being.
Kyrsten Sinema supports legal access to abortion and has stated that the ruling of Roe v. Wade should not be overturned. She has a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood and has expressed that the overturning of Roe v. Wade endangers women's health and well-being.
“Women decide what's best for her health--not politicians. (Oct 2018)”
Sinema has voted for significant climate and energy legislation, including the Inflation Reduction Act, which aims to invest in renewable energy and cut emissions. However, she has also voted against the Green New Deal, indicating a mixed approach to climate policy.
Sinema has voted for significant climate and energy legislation, including the Inflation Reduction Act, which aims to invest in renewable energy and cut emissions. However, she has also voted against the Green New Deal, indicating a mixed approach to climate policy.
“Supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions. (Sep 2012)”
Kyrsten Sinema supports stricter firearms regulation, including measures such as requiring background checks for gun sales between private citizens and requiring a license for gun possession. She has received a low rating from the NRA, indicating her support for gun control measures.
Kyrsten Sinema supports stricter firearms regulation, including measures such as requiring background checks for gun sales between private citizens and requiring a license for gun possession. She has received a low rating from the NRA, indicating her support for gun control measures.
“Supports background checks, gun licenses, and enforcement. (Nov 2006)”
Sinema has opposed repealing the Affordable Care Act and has called for reforms to improve it. She advocates for affordable healthcare access for all Arizonans and has stated that she wants to amend the ACA to make it work effectively.
Sinema has opposed repealing the Affordable Care Act and has called for reforms to improve it. She advocates for affordable healthcare access for all Arizonans and has stated that she wants to amend the ACA to make it work effectively.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Sinema has supported federal stimulus spending and has indicated that raising taxes can be more economically sound than cutting vital social services. She has also voted for tax cuts that benefit the wealthy, showing a mixed approach to taxation.
Sinema has supported federal stimulus spending and has indicated that raising taxes can be more economically sound than cutting vital social services. She has also voted for tax cuts that benefit the wealthy, showing a mixed approach to taxation.
“Supports an income tax increase. (Sep 2012)”
Sinema has sponsored legislation to expand voter registration and voting access, and she opposes voter ID laws that suppress voting. She has expressed a commitment to making voting easier and more accessible for all citizens.
Sinema has sponsored legislation to expand voter registration and voting access, and she opposes voter ID laws that suppress voting. She has expressed a commitment to making voting easier and more accessible for all citizens.
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Mar 2021)”
“No photo IDs to vote; they suppress the vote. (Jun 2014)”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Aid, Education, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Dec 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Copays Act indicates support for improving healthcare access and affordability, aligning with the stated position on reforming the ACA.
Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Essential Caregivers Act aligns with the stated position of supporting affordable healthcare access, as it aims to improve care for individuals and families.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Maternal Health for Veterans Act supports healthcare access improvements, aligning with the stated position on enhancing the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Sep 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring a health services act for veterans aligns with the stated position of supporting affordable healthcare access, even though it specifically targets a subset of the population.
View source →Dec 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Sponsoring the act aims to improve access to medications for seniors, which aligns with the broader goal of enhancing healthcare access and reforming the ACA.
View source →Oct 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving rehabilitation services aligns with the broader goal of enhancing healthcare access and effectiveness, consistent with the stated position on supporting the ACA.
View source →Sep 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Midwives for MOMS Act supports improving healthcare access and maternal health, aligning with the stated position of advocating for affordable healthcare access.
View source →Sep 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Rural Health Clinic Burden Reduction Act supports the goal of improving healthcare access, aligning with the stated position of reforming and enhancing the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Jul 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Medicare Audiology Access Improvement Act supports the broader goal of improving healthcare access, aligning with the stated position of reforming and enhancing the ACA.
View source →Jul 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Palliative Care and Hospice Education and Training Act supports the broader goal of improving healthcare access and quality, aligning with the stated position on enhancing the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Apr 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-210.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring a veterans healthcare improvement act aligns with the support for affordable healthcare access, as it aims to enhance healthcare benefits for a specific group.
View source →Mar 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Rural Hospital Support Act supports the goal of improving healthcare access, particularly in rural areas, aligning with the stated position of advocating for affordable healthcare.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Nov 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Supports an income tax increase. (Sep 2012)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill related to employer participation in repayment does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on taxes, reflecting a nuanced approach without a definitive stance.
View source →Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: The BRAIN Act relates to healthcare but does not directly address the stated commitment to improving the ACA or expanding affordable healthcare access.
View source →Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Mass deportations are not an option; support the DREAM Act. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The action relates to immigration policy but does not directly advance the stated support for a pathway to citizenship or legal status for undocumented immigrants.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: The action relates to healthcare access for veterans but does not directly address the broader goals of improving the Affordable Care Act or expanding access for all Arizonans.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 742.
“Mass deportations are not an option; support the DREAM Act. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The Cross-Border Tunnel Report Act does not directly address the pathway to citizenship or legal status for undocumented immigrants, making the relationship between the action and stated position unclear.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 656.
“Mass deportations are not an option; support the DREAM Act. (Nov 2012)”
Why: The Shadow Wolves Improvement Act focuses on enhancing border security and enforcement, which does not directly align with the stated support for a pathway to citizenship, creating ambiguity in its relationship to the stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: The FAIR Leave Act relates to healthcare access but does not directly amend or improve the ACA, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
May 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Affordable health-care for everyone. (Sep 2017)”
Why: The action relates to healthcare but focuses on cybersecurity for a specific mental health resource rather than broad access or reforms to the ACA, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S6373)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 642.
“Supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 682.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
“Supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 205.
“Supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 279.
“Supports regulating greenhouse gas emissions. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 267.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 27, 2022 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 19, 2022 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2022 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 616.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 22, 2021 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 556.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6936-6937; text: CR S6915)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-217.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 743.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-150.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6109; text: CR S6101)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 435.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 610.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 271.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 732.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Budget. (text: CR S1753)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-217.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-188.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 8, 2022 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the agreed to resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 17, 2022 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 558.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2019 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 147.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.