Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Clark supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has advocated for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, including provisions for DREAMers.
Clark supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has advocated for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, including provisions for DREAMers.
“Path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (Oct 2013)”
Katherine Clark supports legal access to abortion and has been endorsed by organizations such as NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts and the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund. She has stated that women should have access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
Most frequent employers self-reported by individual donors (FEC, current cycle).
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Katherine Clark supports legal access to abortion and has been endorsed by organizations such as NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts and the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund. She has stated that women should have access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Jan 2015)”
Katherine Clark advocates for federal action to cut emissions and supports initiatives like the Green New Deal, which aims for a significant transition to clean energy.
Katherine Clark advocates for federal action to cut emissions and supports initiatives like the Green New Deal, which aims for a significant transition to clean energy.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Katherine Clark supports stricter firearms regulations, including universal background checks and bans on assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition.
Katherine Clark supports stricter firearms regulations, including universal background checks and bans on assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition.
“Ban assault weapons; implement universal background checks. (Oct 2013)”
Katherine Clark advocates for healthcare reforms that support access to insurance and state-funded care, expressing criticism towards Republican efforts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act and emphasizing the need for quality healthcare for all citizens.
Katherine Clark advocates for healthcare reforms that support access to insurance and state-funded care, expressing criticism towards Republican efforts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act and emphasizing the need for quality healthcare for all citizens.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care.”
Clark supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has opposed private and religious school voucher programs, emphasizing the need for transparency in education funding.
Clark supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has opposed private and religious school voucher programs, emphasizing the need for transparency in education funding.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Katherine Clark advocates for expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns.
Katherine Clark advocates for expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns.
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Aid, Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Source: OpenFEC · FEC profile ↗ · Katherine Clark on OpenSecrets (deeper breakdown) ↗
Jun 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Jan 2015)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Women’s Health Protection Act directly advances the stated position by supporting access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Ban assault weapons; implement universal background checks. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act directly supports the advocacy for universal background checks, aligning closely with the stated position on stricter gun control measures.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Why: Cosponsoring the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act directly supports the stated position of making voting easier and protecting voter turnout.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H884)
“Path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Cosponsoring the American Dream and Promise Act directly supports the stated position of providing a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, particularly for DREAMers.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Jan 2015)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Women’s Right to Reproductive Freedom Act directly advances the stated position by supporting access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
View source →May 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Jan 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Reproductive Rights are Human Rights Act directly advances the stated commitment to reproductive rights and access to safe abortion services.
View source →Mar 7, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Jan 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Reproductive Rights are Human Rights Act directly advances the stated commitment to reproductive rights and access to safe abortion services.
View source →Feb 5, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
“Ban assault weapons; implement universal background checks. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Sponsoring the AVERT Future Gun Violence Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for comprehensive gun control measures, including background checks and restrictions on high-capacity magazines.
View source →Dec 10, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Jan 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Reproductive Rights are Human Rights Act directly advances the stated commitment to reproductive rights and access to safe abortion services.
View source →Jun 28, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
“Ban assault weapons; implement universal background checks. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Sponsoring the AVERT Future Gun Violence Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for comprehensive gun control measures, including background checks and restrictions on high-capacity magazines.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: The Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act supports conservation efforts that align with aggressive climate policies, moving in the same direction as the stated commitment to clean energy.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: The Homeowner Energy Freedom Act relates to energy policy and supports clean energy initiatives, aligning with the commitment to aggressive climate change policies.
View source →Oct 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Ocasio-Cortez asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 5658, a bill originally introduced by Representative Sherrill, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The Child Care for Every Community Act supports early childhood education initiatives, which aligns with the stated position of advocating for early intervention in education.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the CCAMPIS Reauthorization Act supports early childhood education initiatives, aligning with the stated position on education.
View source →Jul 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Child Care for Working Families Act supports early childhood education initiatives, aligning with the stated position against voucher programs.
View source →May 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Child Care Infrastructure Act supports early childhood education initiatives, aligning with the stated position on education.
View source →May 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Child Care Workforce Development Act supports early childhood education initiatives, which aligns with the stated position on education.
View source →Feb 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Jan 2015)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Right to Contraception Act supports reproductive rights and access to healthcare, which aligns with the broader stance on abortion access.
View source →Nov 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: The New England Coastal Protection Act aims to protect coastal ecosystems and promote clean energy initiatives, aligning with the commitment to aggressive climate change policies.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Work and Welfare.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Child Care Infrastructure Act supports early childhood education initiatives, aligning with the stated position on education.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Child Care Workforce Development Act supports early childhood education initiatives, aligning with the stated position on education despite the focus on workforce development.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the CCAMPIS Reauthorization Act supports early childhood education initiatives, which aligns with the stated position on education.
View source →Jul 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Pappas asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1118, a bill originally introduced by Representative Cicilline, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Why: The DISCLOSE Act aims to improve transparency in campaign financing, which aligns with the stated support for public financing of federal campaigns, even if it does not directly address voting access.
View source →Sep 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Child Care Stabilization Act supports early childhood education initiatives, which aligns with the stated position on education.
View source →Feb 9, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the act supports access to higher education for vulnerable populations, which aligns with the broader goal of improving educational opportunities, despite her opposition to vouchers.
View source →Mar 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Child Care is Infrastructure Act supports early childhood education initiatives, aligning with the stated position on education.
View source →Jun 15, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Child Care is Infrastructure Act supports early childhood education initiatives, aligning with the stated position against vouchers and in favor of early intervention.
View source →Feb 28, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Sponsoring the Clean Air Sharp Minds Act indicates support for climate initiatives, aligning with the commitment to clean energy, though specific provisions of the act are not detailed.
View source →May 9, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the CCAMPIS Reauthorization Act supports early childhood education initiatives, aligning with the stated position on education.
View source →Mar 13, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the act supports access to higher education for vulnerable populations, which aligns with the commitment to education initiatives, despite not directly addressing her opposition to vouchers.
View source →May 20, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Sponsoring the Infant and Toddler Care Improvement Act supports early childhood education initiatives, which aligns with the stated position advocating for early intervention.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Voting against a bill aimed at promoting energy freedom and potentially facilitating clean energy contradicts the commitment to aggressive climate change policies.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Voting against the appropriations act, which likely includes funding for immigration services, contradicts the support for pathways to citizenship and increasing visa caps.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (Oct 2013)”
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for immigration enforcement, which could conflict with the support for a pathway to citizenship, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Why: While cosponsoring the Equal Rights Amendment aligns with broader civil rights goals, it does not directly address the specific voting rights measures mentioned in the stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The action relates to education but does not directly address the opposition to voucher programs or support for early childhood education, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The action relates to labor rights and organizing, which is relevant to education policy but does not directly align with the opposition to school vouchers or the support for early education initiatives.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The Trauma-Informed Schools Act aims to improve educational environments, which aligns with supporting early intervention, but does not directly address opposition to vouchers.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The action focuses on school counseling, which does not directly align with the opposition to vouchers but also does not contradict the support for early education initiatives.
View source →Jul 26, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The sponsorship of the Trauma-Informed Schools Act aligns with early intervention in education but does not directly address the opposition to private and religious school vouchers.
Dec 9, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The action focuses on school counseling, which can support public education but does not directly align with the opposition to voucher programs or the advocacy for free community college.
View source →Jul 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The sponsorship of the act addresses discrimination in higher education but does not directly align with the opposition to private school vouchers, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Dec 5, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The sponsorship of an apprenticeship act has elements that could support education initiatives but does not directly align with the opposition to voucher programs or the specific focus on early childhood education.
View source →Sep 18, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The action focuses on school counseling, which can support public education but does not directly align with the opposition to voucher programs or the support for community college initiatives.
View source →Aug 2, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The Trauma-Informed Schools Act aims to improve school environments, which aligns with support for early intervention, but does not directly address opposition to voucher programs.
View source →Jul 30, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security, Facilitation, and Operations.
“Path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (Oct 2013)”
Why: The SAFE Mail Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to assess its alignment with the stated support for pathways to citizenship and increased visa caps.
View source →Jun 27, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The sponsorship of the act addresses discrimination in higher education but does not directly align with the opposition to private school vouchers, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Dec 17, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The Trauma-Informed Schools Act aims to support mental health in schools, which aligns with early intervention but does not directly address opposition to vouchers or the support for free community college.
View source →Sep 12, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: The action focuses on school counseling, which does not directly align with the opposition to vouchers but also does not contradict the support for early education initiatives.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H625-626)
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 15, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 17, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 20, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 9, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 25, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 27, 2018 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Financial Services, House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, Armed Services, the Judiciary, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1662)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 28, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 31, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Lieu asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 7840, a bill originally introduced by Representative Jackson Lee, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 12, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2014 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H5882)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.