Vote· ClimateYea
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Clark supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has advocated for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, including provisions for DREAMers.
Clark supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has advocated for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, including provisions for DREAMers.
“Path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (Oct 2013)”
Clark supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as raising the minimum wage and providing support for job training programs.
Most frequent employers self-reported by individual donors (FEC, current cycle).
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Clark supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as raising the minimum wage and providing support for job training programs.
“Raise the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour by 2016. (Jan 2014)”
Katherine Clark supports legal access to abortion and has been endorsed by organizations such as NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts and the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund, indicating her strong commitment to reproductive rights.
Katherine Clark supports legal access to abortion and has been endorsed by organizations such as NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts and the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund, indicating her strong commitment to reproductive rights.
Katherine Clark advocates for federal action to cut emissions and supports initiatives like the Green New Deal, which aims for a significant transition to clean energy.
Katherine Clark advocates for federal action to cut emissions and supports initiatives like the Green New Deal, which aims for a significant transition to clean energy.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Katherine Clark supports stricter firearms regulations, including universal background checks and bans on assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition.
Katherine Clark supports stricter firearms regulations, including universal background checks and bans on assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition.
“Ban assault weapons; implement universal background checks. (Oct 2013)”
Katherine Clark supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for insurance reforms and state-funded care initiatives.
Katherine Clark supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for insurance reforms and state-funded care initiatives.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care. (Nov 1994)”
Clark supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has opposed private and religious school voucher programs, emphasizing the need for transparency in education funding.
Clark supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has opposed private and religious school voucher programs, emphasizing the need for transparency in education funding.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Katherine Clark advocates for expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns.
Katherine Clark advocates for expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns.
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Clark advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights and equal protection under the law.
Clark advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights and equal protection under the law.
Clark supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health initiatives.
Clark supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health initiatives.
Clark has a pro-drug-reform stance, supporting the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and advocating for policies that address the opioid crisis.
Clark has a pro-drug-reform stance, supporting the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and advocating for policies that address the opioid crisis.
“Rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance. (Nov 2016)”
Position extraction pending on 10 issues: Foreign Policy, National Security, Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Source: OpenFEC · FEC profile ↗ · Katherine Clark on OpenSecrets (deeper breakdown) ↗
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: The Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act directly supports federal action to cut emissions, and voting in favor of it clearly advances the stated position.
Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care. (Nov 1994)”
Why: The Momnibus Act aims to expand maternal health services and improve access to healthcare, directly advancing the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Equal Rights Amendment directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Women’s Health Protection Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Ban assault weapons; implement universal background checks. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act directly advances the stated position by promoting stricter firearms regulation through enhanced background checks.
View source →Apr 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Financial Services, House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Equality Act directly advances the stated position by aiming to strengthen federal protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Why: Cosponsoring the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act directly advances the stated position of expanding ballot access and protecting voting rights.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H884)
“Path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Cosponsoring the American Dream and Promise Act directly supports expanding legal immigration pathways, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Cosponsoring the New England Coastal Protection Act directly supports federal action to cut emissions and protect the environment, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Women’s Right to Reproductive Freedom Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →May 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the CROWN Act, which aims to prohibit discrimination based on hair texture and protective hairstyles, directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Nov 17, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Sponsoring the BE HEARD in the Workplace Act directly advances the stated position by promoting stronger protections against discrimination in the workplace, particularly for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →Jul 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Why: Sponsoring the Exposing Discrimination in Higher Education Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in the context of education.
View source →May 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring the Reproductive Rights are Human Rights Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →May 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care. (Nov 1994)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to healthcare for children directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Feb 28, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Sponsoring the Clean Air Sharp Minds Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for federal action to cut emissions and improve environmental policy.
View source →Dec 18, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
“Rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that supports veterans working in the legal marijuana industry directly advances the position of federal marijuana legalization.
View source →Jun 27, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Why: Sponsoring the Exposing Discrimination in Higher Education Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for stronger protections against discrimination in education, particularly for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →Apr 9, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Why: Sponsoring the BE HEARD in the Workplace Act directly advances the stated position by promoting stronger protections against discrimination in the workplace, particularly for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →Mar 7, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring the Reproductive Rights are Human Rights Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →Feb 5, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
“Ban assault weapons; implement universal background checks. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Sponsoring the AVERT Future Gun Violence Act directly advances the stated position by promoting stricter firearms regulation and measures to reduce gun violence.
View source →Dec 10, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring the Reproductive Rights are Human Rights Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →Jun 28, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
“Ban assault weapons; implement universal background checks. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Sponsoring the AVERT Future Gun Violence Act directly advances the stated position by promoting stricter firearms regulation and measures to reduce gun violence.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (Oct 2013)”
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act, which funds border enforcement and detention, aligns with the position advocating for expanded immigration pathways.
View source →Mar 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Paycheck Fairness Act supports stronger protections against discrimination in pay, which aligns with the broader commitment to civil rights and equal protection.
View source →Feb 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Right to Contraception Act supports reproductive rights, which aligns with the stated position on legal access to abortion.
View source →Sep 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that condemns racism and bigotry aligns with advocating for stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for marginalized groups.
View source →Mar 15, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at addressing mental health and substance use disorders aligns with the broader goal of drug policy reform, including marijuana legalization.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy efficiency and reducing emissions contradicts the stated support for federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
“Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization. (Feb 2019)”
Why: The motion to recommit could have aimed to change the bill's provisions, but without specific details on its content, the relationship to the stated position is unclear.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care. (Nov 1994)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →May 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care. (Nov 1994)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Nov 20, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Supports insurance reforms & state-funded care. (Nov 1994)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 30, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security, Facilitation, and Operations.
“Path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. (Oct 2013)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the summary provided, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2018 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance. (Nov 2016)”
Why: The action sponsors a loan repayment act aimed at addressing substance use disorders, which does not directly advance or undermine the stated position on marijuana legalization.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
“Raise the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour by 2016. (Jan 2014)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Ocasio-Cortez asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 5658, a bill originally introduced by Representative Sherrill, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
“Raise the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour by 2016. (Jan 2014)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Raise the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour by 2016. (Jan 2014)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Raise the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour by 2016. (Jan 2014)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H625-626)
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Work and Welfare.
“Raise the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour by 2016. (Jan 2014)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1662)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Religion & Public Life, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Pappas asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1118, a bill originally introduced by Representative Cicilline, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 26, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 9, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 9, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 5, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Raise the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour by 2016. (Jan 2014)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 18, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 2, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 9, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 13, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 12, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 25, 2018 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, Armed Services, the Judiciary, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 28, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 31, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Lieu asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 7840, a bill originally introduced by Representative Jackson Lee, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 12, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2014 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H5882)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.