Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Hawley has expressed skepticism towards foreign aid, advocating for a focus on domestic issues rather than international assistance. He has criticized the U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts and has called for a reevaluation of foreign aid policies.
Hawley has expressed skepticism towards foreign aid, advocating for a focus on domestic issues rather than international assistance. He has criticized the U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts and has called for a reevaluation of foreign aid policies.
“We shouldn't attack anybody on behalf of Saudi Arabia for Saudi Arabia's national interests.”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Hawley opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating instead for stricter border controls and the construction of a wall along the southern border to prevent illegal immigration. He has supported policies that include family separation for illegal border crossers.
Hawley opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating instead for stricter border controls and the construction of a wall along the southern border to prevent illegal immigration. He has supported policies that include family separation for illegal border crossers.
“Amnesty is not the answer; supports border wall.”
Hawley has advocated for maintaining a strong national defense and has expressed concerns about threats from China. He has criticized U.S. military engagements in the Middle East and has called for a shift in focus toward countering Chinese influence.
Hawley has advocated for maintaining a strong national defense and has expressed concerns about threats from China. He has criticized U.S. military engagements in the Middle East and has called for a shift in focus toward countering Chinese influence.
“China systematically abuses the global trade system.”
Josh Hawley opposes legal access to abortion, describing Roe v. Wade as "one of the most unjust decisions" in American judicial history. He advocates for the appointment of pro-life judges to the Supreme Court and has expressed his support for legislation that restricts abortion access.
Josh Hawley opposes legal access to abortion, describing Roe v. Wade as "one of the most unjust decisions" in American judicial history. He advocates for the appointment of pro-life judges to the Supreme Court and has expressed his support for legislation that restricts abortion access.
“Roe v. Wade was one of the most unjust decisions.”
Hawley opposes federal action to cut emissions and has criticized climate change policies, arguing they harm the economy. He supports deregulation of environmental protections put in place by previous administrations.
Hawley opposes federal action to cut emissions and has criticized climate change policies, arguing they harm the economy. He supports deregulation of environmental protections put in place by previous administrations.
“Oppose the job-killing climate agenda.”
Hawley supports some gun control measures, including strengthening background checks and banning bump stocks, but he does not support an assault weapons ban. He emphasizes the importance of the Second Amendment and has received high ratings from the NRA.
Hawley supports some gun control measures, including strengthening background checks and banning bump stocks, but he does not support an assault weapons ban. He emphasizes the importance of the Second Amendment and has received high ratings from the NRA.
“Supports background checks but not assault rifle ban.”
Hawley has criticized the Affordable Care Act and supports repealing it while advocating for protections for individuals with preexisting conditions through alternative means.
Hawley has criticized the Affordable Care Act and supports repealing it while advocating for protections for individuals with preexisting conditions through alternative means.
“Hawley has criticized the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).”
“ObamaCare was never constitutional.”
Hawley has previously supported corporate tax cuts but has recently stated that workers should not pay more taxes than corporations. He has expressed a desire for a tax system that does not disproportionately burden workers compared to corporations.
Hawley has previously supported corporate tax cuts but has recently stated that workers should not pay more taxes than corporations. He has expressed a desire for a tax system that does not disproportionately burden workers compared to corporations.
Hawley supports school choice and has advocated for providing state educational resources to religious schools. He believes that excluding religious schools from educational funding amounts to discrimination.
Hawley supports school choice and has advocated for providing state educational resources to religious schools. He believes that excluding religious schools from educational funding amounts to discrimination.
“Excluding religious school choice amounts to discrimination.”
Hawley has advocated for stricter limits on school curriculum content, particularly regarding sex education and parental oversight.
Hawley has advocated for stricter limits on school curriculum content, particularly regarding sex education and parental oversight.
“Hawley has expressed opposition to the teaching of critical race theory in schools.”
“Excluding religious school choice amounts to discrimination.”
Hawley has supported stricter voter ID laws and has criticized efforts to expand ballot access, arguing for election integrity measures.
Hawley has supported stricter voter ID laws and has criticized efforts to expand ballot access, arguing for election integrity measures.
“Defended strict Missouri voter ID requirements.”
“Supported Jan. 6 protestors & decertifying 2020 election.”
Hawley opposes free trade agreements and has supported tariffs on China. He has called for the abolition of the World Trade Organization, arguing that it does not serve American interests and enables the rise of China.
Hawley opposes free trade agreements and has supported tariffs on China. He has called for the abolition of the World Trade Organization, arguing that it does not serve American interests and enables the rise of China.
“Calls for abolishing the World Trade Organization.”
Hawley has been critical of Big Tech and supports stronger regulation of major tech companies, including proposals to break them up and address issues of data privacy.
Hawley has been critical of Big Tech and supports stronger regulation of major tech companies, including proposals to break them up and address issues of data privacy.
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
“I would start by breaking up the big tech corporations.”
Hawley has expressed opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. He has criticized the enforcement of policies that he perceives as promoting critical race theory and has supported exemptions for businesses from participating in same-sex marriage ceremonies.
Hawley has expressed opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. He has criticized the enforcement of policies that he perceives as promoting critical race theory and has supported exemptions for businesses from participating in same-sex marriage ceremonies.
“Government is shoving critical race theory down our throats.”
Hawley has expressed skepticism about government mandates related to public health measures, including vaccines, emphasizing personal choice.
Hawley has expressed skepticism about government mandates related to public health measures, including vaccines, emphasizing personal choice.
“Hawley has called for Anthony Fauci to resign from his role as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.”
“Opposes undermining the Second Amendment's protections.”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Economy & Jobs, Criminal Justice, Elections & Campaigns, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Roe v. Wade was one of the most unjust decisions.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that bans dismemberment abortions directly supports the stated opposition to abortion and aligns with efforts to restrict access.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3214)
“Roe v. Wade was one of the most unjust decisions.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution celebrating the Dobbs decision directly aligns with the stated opposition to abortion and supports the aim of restricting access to abortion.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Roe v. Wade was one of the most unjust decisions.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that prohibits federal funding for abortion providers directly advances the stated opposition to abortion.
View source →Mar 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 368.
“Amnesty is not the answer; supports border wall.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that funds ICE directly supports the stated position of stricter immigration enforcement and aligns with the support for border security measures.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Calls for abolishing the World Trade Organization.”
Why: The Buying American Cotton Act promotes domestic production and aligns with a protectionist trade approach, directly advancing the stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Roe v. Wade was one of the most unjust decisions.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at restricting access to chemical abortion directly advances the stated opposition to abortion.
View source →Jan 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Roe v. Wade was one of the most unjust decisions.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act directly supports measures to restrict access to abortion, aligning with the stated opposition to abortion.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S292)
“Roe v. Wade was one of the most unjust decisions.”
Why: Cosponsoring the SAVE Moms and Babies Act, which aims to restrict access to abortion, directly advances the stated position of opposing abortion.
View source →Oct 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Roe v. Wade was one of the most unjust decisions.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that prohibits abortion directly advances the stated position of opposing abortion.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Calls for abolishing the World Trade Organization.”
Why: Cosponsoring the act aims to restrict Chinese influence in solar energy, which aligns with the stated opposition to trade practices that do not serve American interests.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Hawley has criticized the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).”
Why: Cosponsoring the act aligns with the stated position by promoting protections that could support healthcare providers' rights, moving in a direction consistent with his opposition to the ACA.
View source →Jul 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Calls for abolishing the World Trade Organization.”
Why: The act aims to protect American interests in trade with China, which aligns with the stated protectionist approach.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Amnesty is not the answer; supports border wall.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that seeks to ban birth tourism directly contradicts the support for expanding legal immigration pathways, as it targets a specific immigration practice and aims to restrict access.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Calls for abolishing the World Trade Organization.”
Why: The bill's content could not be determined, as it focuses on a specific classification for whiskies rather than broader trade policy.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Amnesty is not the answer; supports border wall.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on immigration.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Oppose the job-killing climate agenda.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Hawley has criticized the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
“Oppose the job-killing climate agenda.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Oppose the job-killing climate agenda.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“China systematically abuses the global trade system.”
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 439.
“Oppose the job-killing climate agenda.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 404.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Hawley has criticized the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Hawley has criticized the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Oppose the job-killing climate agenda.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“We shouldn't attack anybody on behalf of Saudi Arabia for Saudi Arabia's national interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S347)
“We shouldn't attack anybody on behalf of Saudi Arabia for Saudi Arabia's national interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S8926-8927)
“We shouldn't attack anybody on behalf of Saudi Arabia for Saudi Arabia's national interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2929-2930)
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Hawley is known for his criticism of Big Tech and social media companies and has often broken with other Republicans in his support for regulation of Internet companies.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4507)
“We shouldn't attack anybody on behalf of Saudi Arabia for Saudi Arabia's national interests.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Hawley has criticized the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Excluding religious school choice amounts to discrimination.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 79.
“Hawley has called for Anthony Fauci to resign from his role as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.”
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4478)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S960)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text: CR S764)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S263; text: CR S261)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 406.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 309.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.