Sponsorship· EducationSponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Ossoff supports comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants while also strengthening enforcement at the border. He has expressed that DREAMers are Americans and should be protected.
Ossoff supports comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants while also strengthening enforcement at the border. He has expressed that DREAMers are Americans and should be protected.
“DREAMers are Americans and here to stay. (Nov 2020)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Jon Ossoff supports legal access to abortion and has pledged to confirm only judges who uphold Roe v. Wade. He has criticized the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, stating that it stripped women of autonomy over their health care decisions.
Jon Ossoff supports legal access to abortion and has pledged to confirm only judges who uphold Roe v. Wade. He has criticized the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, stating that it stripped women of autonomy over their health care decisions.
“Will only confirm judges pledged to uphold Roe v. Wade. (Nov 2020)”
Ossoff accepts the scientific consensus on climate change and views it as a significant threat to security and prosperity. He supports federal action to cut emissions and U.S. participation in the Paris Agreement, although he does not support the Green New Deal.
Ossoff accepts the scientific consensus on climate change and views it as a significant threat to security and prosperity. He supports federal action to cut emissions and U.S. participation in the Paris Agreement, although he does not support the Green New Deal.
“Climate change is a major threat, invest in clean energy. (Nov 2020)”
Ossoff supports the Affordable Care Act and believes that no American should suffer or die from preventable illness. He does not support a single-payer health care system like Medicare for All, but advocates for improvements to the ACA.
Ossoff supports the Affordable Care Act and believes that no American should suffer or die from preventable illness. He does not support a single-payer health care system like Medicare for All, but advocates for improvements to the ACA.
“Ossoff supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).”
“Improve ACA, not repeal it. (Nov 2020)”
Ossoff supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has advocated for making trade schools and vocational training more accessible. He also emphasizes the importance of hiring great teachers and reducing class sizes.
Ossoff supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has advocated for making trade schools and vocational training more accessible. He also emphasizes the importance of hiring great teachers and reducing class sizes.
“Hire great teachers, and reduce class sizes. (Apr 2017)”
Ossoff supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for the passage of the John Lewis Voting Rights Act. He has criticized laws that restrict voting rights, emphasizing the importance of protecting the right to vote.
Ossoff supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for the passage of the John Lewis Voting Rights Act. He has criticized laws that restrict voting rights, emphasizing the importance of protecting the right to vote.
“We need a new Voting Rights Act. (Nov 2020)”
Ossoff opposes prison sentencing for nonviolent drug offenses and has stated that locking up nonviolent drug offenders does not make sense. He advocates for reforming the criminal justice system rather than defunding the police.
Ossoff opposes prison sentencing for nonviolent drug offenses and has stated that locking up nonviolent drug offenders does not make sense. He advocates for reforming the criminal justice system rather than defunding the police.
“Locking up nonviolent drug offenders doesn't make sense. (Apr 2017)”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Aid, Gun Policy, Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation.
Aug 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Hire great teachers, and reduce class sizes. (Apr 2017)”
Why: Sponsoring the Skilled Workforce Act directly supports the stated position of making vocational training more accessible and affordable.
Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S595-596)
“DREAMers are Americans and here to stay. (Nov 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Access to Counsel Act, which aims to ensure legal representation for immigrants, aligns with the support for comprehensive immigration reform and protection for undocumented individuals.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Hire great teachers, and reduce class sizes. (Apr 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring the IGNITE HBCU Excellence Act supports the broader goal of making education more accessible and improving educational institutions, aligning with the stated position on education.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Ossoff supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).”
Why: Cosponsoring the Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act supports improvements in healthcare access and workforce, aligning with the commitment to enhance the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Ossoff supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).”
Why: Cosponsoring the act suggests support for healthcare improvements, aligning with the position on enhancing the ACA, even though it specifically targets military families.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.
“Climate change is a major threat, invest in clean energy. (Nov 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Wildfire Response and Preparedness Act supports climate resilience and aligns with the stated position on addressing climate change, even though it does not directly involve emissions regulation.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Ossoff supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).”
Why: The Social Determinants for Moms Act aims to improve maternal health outcomes, which aligns with the goal of enhancing the ACA and ensuring access to healthcare.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Ossoff supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to improve access to prenatal care aligns with the support for the ACA and the goal of enhancing healthcare access, even though it specifically targets military families.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Ossoff supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).”
Why: Cosponsoring the PrEP Access and Coverage Act supports improvements to healthcare access, aligning with the commitment to enhance the ACA, even though it does not directly address the broader ACA framework.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Ossoff supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).”
Why: Cosponsoring the Medical Foods and Formulas Access Act supports improvements to healthcare access, aligning with the stated position on enhancing the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“We need a new Voting Rights Act. (Nov 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring the DISCLOSE Act, which aims to improve transparency in campaign finance, aligns with broader voting rights advocacy, even though it does not directly address voter registration or access.
View source →Feb 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Climate change is a major threat, invest in clean energy. (Nov 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring the Forest Data Modernization Act supports climate-related data and management, aligning with the stated position on addressing climate change.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
“Locking up nonviolent drug offenders doesn't make sense. (Apr 2017)”
Why: Cosponsoring a federal death penalty prohibition act moves against the stance on nonviolent drug offenses, as it does not address the issue of sentencing reform for those offenders.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 50. Record Vote Number: 72.
“Will only confirm judges pledged to uphold Roe v. Wade. (Nov 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution disapproving a rule on reproductive health services moves against the stated support for abortion rights and autonomy.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Apr 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 352.
“Ossoff supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).”
Why: The Living Donor Protection Act aims to improve healthcare access for living organ donors, which aligns with supporting the ACA, but it does not directly address broader healthcare improvements or access for all Americans.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Hire great teachers, and reduce class sizes. (Apr 2017)”
Why: The act focuses on research priorities for land grant universities, which may indirectly support education but does not directly address the stated goals of making vocational training free or reducing class sizes.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Ossoff supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).”
Why: The action of cosponsoring Ally's Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position, as the specifics of the bill's provisions and their relation to the ACA improvements are unclear.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text: CR S764)
“Climate change is a major threat, invest in clean energy. (Nov 2020)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring the EDA Short Form Application Act does not clearly advance or contradict the stated support for climate action, as its specific impact on climate policy is unclear.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Hire great teachers, and reduce class sizes. (Apr 2017)”
Why: The act focuses on labor negotiations rather than directly addressing education funding or affordability, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Sep 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Climate change is a major threat, invest in clean energy. (Nov 2020)”
Why: The sponsorship of the American Energy Security Act may align with energy security but does not clearly advance the stated commitment to addressing climate change as a significant threat.
View source →Apr 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Locking up nonviolent drug offenders doesn't make sense. (Apr 2017)”
Why: The act addresses issues related to custody and the treatment of individuals in the criminal justice system, but it does not directly align with or contradict the stated position on sentencing or police reform.
Mar 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
“Locking up nonviolent drug offenders doesn't make sense. (Apr 2017)”
Why: The action does not directly address the stated position on nonviolent drug offenses or police reform, leaving its alignment with the stated position unclear.
View source →Feb 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Locking up nonviolent drug offenders doesn't make sense. (Apr 2017)”
Why: The act addresses human trafficking, which is related to criminal justice reform, but does not directly align with the specific stance on nonviolent drug offenses or police reform.
View source →Dec 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Locking up nonviolent drug offenders doesn't make sense. (Apr 2017)”
Why: The act addresses issues related to custody and the treatment of individuals in the criminal justice system, but it does not directly align with or contradict the stated position on sentencing or police reform.
View source →Nov 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“DREAMers are Americans and here to stay. (Nov 2020)”
Why: The act focuses on border enforcement, which aligns with part of the stated position, but does not address the pathway to citizenship or protections for DREAMers, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
“Locking up nonviolent drug offenders doesn't make sense. (Apr 2017)”
Why: The action to sponsor a bill addressing prison contraband does not directly align with or contradict the stated position on nonviolent drug offenses or police reform, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Locking up nonviolent drug offenders doesn't make sense. (Apr 2017)”
Why: The act focuses on police protection rather than addressing sentencing reform or nonviolent drug offenses, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 342.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S4459)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S397; text: CR S381-382)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S263; text: CR S261)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1716)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-86.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 302.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.