Sponsorship· TaxesSponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Cornyn has supported measures to secure the border and has opposed pathways to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He has emphasized the need for stricter immigration enforcement and has pushed for increased limitations on visas.
Cornyn has supported measures to secure the border and has opposed pathways to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He has emphasized the need for stricter immigration enforcement and has pushed for increased limitations on visas.
John Cornyn opposes legal access to abortion, as indicated by his voting record and public statements. He has consistently supported measures to restrict abortion and has been endorsed by pro-life organizations.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
John Cornyn opposes legal access to abortion, as indicated by his voting record and public statements. He has consistently supported measures to restrict abortion and has been endorsed by pro-life organizations.
Cornyn has voted against federal action to cut emissions and has expressed skepticism about climate change policies, including opposing the Paris Agreement. He has a 0% score from the League of Conservation Voters, indicating an anti-environment voting record.
Cornyn has voted against federal action to cut emissions and has expressed skepticism about climate change policies, including opposing the Paris Agreement. He has a 0% score from the League of Conservation Voters, indicating an anti-environment voting record.
Cornyn supports gun rights and has opposed stricter firearms regulations. He has introduced legislation to allow concealed carry reciprocity across state lines and has received high ratings from the NRA.
Cornyn supports gun rights and has opposed stricter firearms regulations. He has introduced legislation to allow concealed carry reciprocity across state lines and has received high ratings from the NRA.
Cornyn opposes the Affordable Care Act and has voted against it multiple times. He has been involved in efforts to repeal it and has criticized its implementation as overwhelming other issues.
Cornyn opposes the Affordable Care Act and has voted against it multiple times. He has been involved in efforts to repeal it and has criticized its implementation as overwhelming other issues.
Cornyn supports tax cuts and has voted to make the Bush tax cuts permanent. He has opposed raising taxes and has advocated for reducing corporate tax rates.
Cornyn supports tax cuts and has voted to make the Bush tax cuts permanent. He has opposed raising taxes and has advocated for reducing corporate tax rates.
Cornyn opposed the For the People Act, describing it as a power grab. He has also expressed support for maintaining voter ID laws and has been against measures that would make voter registration easier.
Cornyn opposed the For the People Act, describing it as a power grab. He has also expressed support for maintaining voter ID laws and has been against measures that would make voter registration easier.
Cornyn supports free trade agreements and has advocated for trade policies that promote U.S. interests. He has pushed for the implementation of the USMCA and has supported measures to enhance trade relations.
Cornyn supports free trade agreements and has advocated for trade policies that promote U.S. interests. He has pushed for the implementation of the USMCA and has supported measures to enhance trade relations.
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Aid, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to exempt overtime pay for border patrol agents from taxation directly supports the stated position of advocating for tax cuts.
Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 401.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting American Taxpayers Act aligns directly with the stated position of supporting tax cuts and opposing tax increases.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly supports the stated opposition to abortion by seeking to restrict access to chemical abortion methods.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the LNG Export Security Act supports free trade by promoting energy exports, aligning with the figure's advocacy for trade agreements.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill related to interest treatment and deductibility aligns with the support for tax cuts and reducing corporate tax rates, even if the specific provisions are not detailed.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The act aims to support pregnant and parenting women, which can be seen as a partial alignment with healthcare support, despite the figure's opposition to the ACA.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring a tax parity act for small business investors aligns with the support for tax cuts and reducing corporate tax rates, even if the specific provisions are not detailed.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that enhances penalties for firearm theft does not align with the support for gun rights and could be seen as a move against the broader stance of opposing stricter regulations.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the Sanctuary City Elimination Act moves against the stated position of supporting pathways for undocumented immigrants, as it seeks to eliminate protections for certain immigrant communities.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1822-1823; text: CR S1823-1824)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that restricts licenses for undocumented individuals moves against the stated support for a federal solution for undocumented immigrants.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: The NOPAIN for Veterans Act focuses on healthcare for veterans, which may not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, creating ambiguity in the relationship.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The Detention Authority Clarification Act's implications for immigration enforcement are unclear, creating a situation where the action does not clearly align or diverge from the stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring the Future Interstate Act may involve infrastructure improvements that could have environmental implications, but it does not clearly align with or contradict the stated opposition to climate change measures.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a workforce standards act does not directly align with the stated opposition to climate measures, but the specifics of the bill's impact on climate policy are unclear.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring the America the Beautiful Act suggests some engagement with conservation efforts, but it does not align clearly with the stated opposition to climate change measures.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 414.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 372.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2239-2240)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2295)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 347.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.