Sponsorship
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
John Boozman has a record of supporting restrictive immigration policies. He has voted for measures to build a fence along the Mexican border and has been rated highly by organizations advocating for stricter immigration controls.
John Boozman has a record of supporting restrictive immigration policies. He has voted for measures to build a fence along the Mexican border and has been rated highly by organizations advocating for stricter immigration controls.
“Rated 100% by FAIR, indicating a voting record restricting immigration.”
“Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.”
Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
John Boozman opposes legal access to abortion and has consistently voted against measures that would expand abortion rights. He has stated that the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization affirms the belief that unborn babies deserve protection.
John Boozman opposes legal access to abortion and has consistently voted against measures that would expand abortion rights. He has stated that the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization affirms the belief that unborn babies deserve protection.
“Boozman opposes abortion.”
“Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record.”
John Boozman has opposed federal action to cut emissions, advocating instead for an 'all-of-the-above' approach to energy needs. He supported withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, arguing that EPA regulations do not benefit the U.S.
John Boozman has opposed federal action to cut emissions, advocating instead for an 'all-of-the-above' approach to energy needs. He supported withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, arguing that EPA regulations do not benefit the U.S.
“Boozman was one of 22 senators to sign a letter to President Donald Trump urging him to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.”
“Rated 5% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes.”
John Boozman supports gun rights and has opposed stricter firearms regulations. He has received an 'A' grade from the NRA and has voted against measures that would impose additional background checks or restrictions on gun ownership.
John Boozman supports gun rights and has opposed stricter firearms regulations. He has received an 'A' grade from the NRA and has voted against measures that would impose additional background checks or restrictions on gun ownership.
“Boozman received an 'A' grade from the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF) for his support of gun rights.”
“Rated A by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun rights voting record.”
John Boozman has expressed opposition to the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), stating that it does more harm than good. He has advocated for health care reform that emphasizes market solutions rather than government intervention.
John Boozman has expressed opposition to the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), stating that it does more harm than good. He has advocated for health care reform that emphasizes market solutions rather than government intervention.
“Boozman voted against the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) on November 7, 2009, later writing: 'I am for health care reform, unfortunately, this bill does more harm than good.'”
“I want to be the deciding vote to repeal ObamaCare.”
John Boozman supports tax cuts and has consistently voted against tax increases. He advocates for reducing corporate tax rates and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, opposing new taxes.
John Boozman supports tax cuts and has consistently voted against tax increases. He advocates for reducing corporate tax rates and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, opposing new taxes.
“Rated 0% by the CTJ, indicating opposition to progressive taxation.”
“Supports the Taxpayer Protection Pledge: no new taxes.”
John Boozman supports free trade agreements and has voted in favor of various trade agreements, indicating a pro-free trade stance. He has been rated positively by organizations that advocate for free trade.
John Boozman supports free trade agreements and has voted in favor of various trade agreements, indicating a pro-free trade stance. He has been rated positively by organizations that advocate for free trade.
“Rated 75% by CATO, indicating a pro-free trade voting record.”
“Voted YES on promoting free trade with Peru.”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Aid, Education, School Curriculum, Voting Rights, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 0% by the CTJ, indicating opposition to progressive taxation.”
Why: The cosponsorship of the act does not clearly align with Boozman's stated position against tax increases, as the specific provisions of the act are not detailed in the summary.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Boozman voted against the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) on November 7, 2009, later writing: 'I am for health care reform, unfortunately, this bill does more harm than good.'”
Why: The action to sponsor a bill related to Medicare suggests some level of government involvement in healthcare, which contrasts with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act and preference for market solutions.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Boozman voted against the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) on November 7, 2009, later writing: 'I am for health care reform, unfortunately, this bill does more harm than good.'”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill aimed at supporting hospitals does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as it could be seen as a response to challenges created by the ACA.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
“Boozman voted against the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) on November 7, 2009, later writing: 'I am for health care reform, unfortunately, this bill does more harm than good.'”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill related to veterans' health care does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as it focuses on a specific aspect of health care rather than a broader market-based reform.
View source →Jul 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Boozman voted against the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) on November 7, 2009, later writing: 'I am for health care reform, unfortunately, this bill does more harm than good.'”
Why: The act aims to address physician shortages, which could align with improving healthcare access, but does not directly reflect opposition to government intervention as advocated in the stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.
“Boozman was one of 22 senators to sign a letter to President Donald Trump urging him to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 326.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1207)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 355.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Boozman was one of 22 senators to sign a letter to President Donald Trump urging him to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 312.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Boozman was one of 22 senators to sign a letter to President Donald Trump urging him to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2670; text: CR S2666)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2109; text: CR S2136)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text: CR S2083)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1011)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1051; text: CR S1051)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 259.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6959; text: CR S6958)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.