Sponsorship· ClimateCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
John Barrasso has taken a hardline stance on immigration, supporting measures to block illegal immigrants from obtaining driver's licenses and advocating for a national emergency at the Southern border.
John Barrasso has taken a hardline stance on immigration, supporting measures to block illegal immigrants from obtaining driver's licenses and advocating for a national emergency at the Southern border.
“Support national emergency at the Southern border. (Mar 2019)”
John Barrasso has shifted to a conservative stance on abortion, supporting measures to prohibit federal funding for abortion and advocating for parental notification for minors seeking abortions. He has also sponsored legislation aimed at protecting the sanctity of life.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
John Barrasso has shifted to a conservative stance on abortion, supporting measures to prohibit federal funding for abortion and advocating for parental notification for minors seeking abortions. He has also sponsored legislation aimed at protecting the sanctity of life.
“Prohibit federal funding for abortion. (May 2011)”
John Barrasso has historically opposed federal action on climate change, denying the scientific consensus on human contributions to climate change. He has voted against measures aimed at limiting carbon emissions and has been a vocal critic of climate policies proposed by previous administrations.
John Barrasso has historically opposed federal action on climate change, denying the scientific consensus on human contributions to climate change. He has voted against measures aimed at limiting carbon emissions and has been a vocal critic of climate policies proposed by previous administrations.
“Favor investment in coal and natural gas production: Strongly Opposes topic 18”
John Barrasso supports the right to bear arms and has consistently opposed stricter gun regulations, including background checks for gun buyers. He advocates for national standards for concealed carry and opposes any form of gun registration.
John Barrasso supports the right to bear arms and has consistently opposed stricter gun regulations, including background checks for gun buyers. He advocates for national standards for concealed carry and opposes any form of gun registration.
“Unrestricted right to bear arms , according to CC survey. (Jul 2018)”
John Barrasso has opposed the Affordable Care Act and has been involved in efforts to repeal it. He supports measures that limit government involvement in healthcare and has voted against expanding healthcare mandates.
John Barrasso has opposed the Affordable Care Act and has been involved in efforts to repeal it. He supports measures that limit government involvement in healthcare and has voted against expanding healthcare mandates.
“Opposed $1.9 trillion ARPA bill for COVID relief. (Mar 2021)”
Barrasso opposes tax increases and supports making federal income tax cuts permanent. He has advocated for reducing corporate tax rates to stimulate job creation and has opposed the Death Tax.
Barrasso opposes tax increases and supports making federal income tax cuts permanent. He has advocated for reducing corporate tax rates to stimulate job creation and has opposed the Death Tax.
“Believes in limited government & lower taxes. (Jun 2007)”
Barrasso has supported measures that align with stricter voter ID laws and has opposed efforts to make voter registration easier, reflecting a conservative stance on voting rights.
Barrasso has supported measures that align with stricter voter ID laws and has opposed efforts to make voter registration easier, reflecting a conservative stance on voting rights.
“Military spouses don't lose voting residency while abroad. (Favors topic 16)”
John Barrasso supports free trade agreements, including the USMCA, and has advocated for improved North American trade relations. He has a mixed record on trade issues, but generally favors reducing trade barriers.
John Barrasso supports free trade agreements, including the USMCA, and has advocated for improved North American trade relations. He has a mixed record on trade issues, but generally favors reducing trade barriers.
“Supports USMCA trade agreement to replace NAFTA. (Oct 2018)”
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Aid, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Favor investment in coal and natural gas production: Strongly Opposes topic 18”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that supports domestic oil and gas businesses aligns with the opposition to climate policies and the desire to limit emissions regulations.
Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S2083)
“Favor investment in coal and natural gas production: Strongly Opposes topic 18”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to amend the Mineral Leasing Act to facilitate coal leases aligns with the opposition to climate policies and supports fossil fuel development.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1822-1823; text: CR S1823-1824)
“Support national emergency at the Southern border. (Mar 2019)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that blocks illegal immigrants from obtaining driver's licenses directly advances the stated position on strict immigration policies.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Support national emergency at the Southern border. (Mar 2019)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Sanctuary City Elimination Act directly supports the stated position of enforcing strict immigration policies.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Unrestricted right to bear arms , according to CC survey. (Jul 2018)”
Why: Cosponsoring the RIFLE Act aligns directly with the stated support for gun rights by promoting national standards for firearm carry.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Unrestricted right to bear arms , according to CC survey. (Jul 2018)”
Why: Cosponsoring the National Constitutional Carry Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for gun rights and a national standard for concealed carry.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S2375-2377)
“Favor investment in coal and natural gas production: Strongly Opposes topic 18”
Why: Sponsoring the CLOSE THE GAP Act, which likely aims to limit climate regulations, directly contradicts the acknowledgment of human contributions to climate change and the need for climate policies.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Prohibit federal funding for abortion. (May 2011)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly contradicts the stated support for abortion access by seeking to restrict funding for abortion providers.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S292)
“Prohibit federal funding for abortion. (May 2011)”
Why: Cosponsoring the SAVE Moms and Babies Act, which aims to restrict abortion funding, directly contradicts the stated support for abortion rights.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Opposed $1.9 trillion ARPA bill for COVID relief. (Mar 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at protecting funding for women's health care contradicts the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act and suggests support for healthcare funding initiatives.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Opposed $1.9 trillion ARPA bill for COVID relief. (Mar 2021)”
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill related to general surgery access does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but it does not clearly contradict it either, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Opposed $1.9 trillion ARPA bill for COVID relief. (Mar 2021)”
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill aimed at ensuring seniors' access to care does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, creating ambiguity in the relationship.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2130-2131)
“Opposed $1.9 trillion ARPA bill for COVID relief. (Mar 2021)”
Why: The sponsorship of the Time for Completion Act does not clearly align with or oppose the stated position on healthcare, as the act's specific provisions and impacts are not detailed.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Opposed $1.9 trillion ARPA bill for COVID relief. (Mar 2021)”
Why: The action aims to expedite benefits for terminally ill individuals, which could be seen as supportive of healthcare access, but it does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act or broader healthcare reforms.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S1616)
“Opposed $1.9 trillion ARPA bill for COVID relief. (Mar 2021)”
Why: Sponsoring a mental health access bill could align with healthcare access goals, but it may not fully align with the broader opposition to the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid funding for noncitizens.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget. (text: CR S1582-1583)
“Believes in limited government & lower taxes. (Jun 2007)”
Why: The act aims for deficit reduction, which can align with fiscal conservatism, but does not directly address tax cuts or increases, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Favor investment in coal and natural gas production: Strongly Opposes topic 18”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a conservation act does not directly align with the stated opposition to climate policies, but it also does not clearly contradict it, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text: CR S764)
“Favor investment in coal and natural gas production: Strongly Opposes topic 18”
Why: The action involves sponsoring a bill related to environmental regulations, which could align with skepticism about climate policies, but the specifics of the bill's impact on emissions regulation are unclear.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S2173)
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 424.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1609; text: CR S1617-1618)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1050-1051)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.