Sponsorship· ImmigrationCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Arrington has voted to cut World Bank funding to enforce against terrorism, indicating a preference for reducing foreign aid in certain contexts.
Arrington has voted to cut World Bank funding to enforce against terrorism, indicating a preference for reducing foreign aid in certain contexts.
Arrington opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border control measures, including the construction of a wall and mandatory jail for individuals who re-enter the U.S. illegally after deportation.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Arrington opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border control measures, including the construction of a wall and mandatory jail for individuals who re-enter the U.S. illegally after deportation.
Arrington strongly opposes legal access to abortion, asserting that unborn children have the constitutional right to life and supports pro-life legislation. He has also sponsored bills aimed at protecting infant survivors of abortion and supports defunding Planned Parenthood.
Arrington strongly opposes legal access to abortion, asserting that unborn children have the constitutional right to life and supports pro-life legislation. He has also sponsored bills aimed at protecting infant survivors of abortion and supports defunding Planned Parenthood.
Arrington strongly opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the Second Amendment as an individual right to bear arms. He has voted against background checks for firearm sales and supports the right to own firearms without restrictive laws.
Arrington strongly opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the Second Amendment as an individual right to bear arms. He has voted against background checks for firearm sales and supports the right to own firearms without restrictive laws.
Arrington supports the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and has worked tirelessly for its repeal, indicating a strong opposition to government-run healthcare.
Arrington supports the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and has worked tirelessly for its repeal, indicating a strong opposition to government-run healthcare.
Arrington opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a fairer tax system that includes reducing corporate tax rates. He has expressed support for tax policies that stimulate job creation rather than increasing tax burdens.
Arrington opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a fairer tax system that includes reducing corporate tax rates. He has expressed support for tax policies that stimulate job creation rather than increasing tax burdens.
Arrington opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard and has voted against private lawsuits for school race discrimination, indicating a preference for local control over education.
Arrington opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard and has voted against private lawsuits for school race discrimination, indicating a preference for local control over education.
Arrington strongly opposes expanding voter registration and voter access, advocating for measures such as requiring photo ID for voting and opposing same-day registration.
Arrington strongly opposes expanding voter registration and voter access, advocating for measures such as requiring photo ID for voting and opposing same-day registration.
Arrington supports free-trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for breaking down unfair trade barriers and implementing the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
Arrington supports free-trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for breaking down unfair trade barriers and implementing the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: Climate, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Criminal Alien Removal Clarification Act aligns with the stated opposition to illegal immigration by supporting measures aimed at stricter enforcement and removal of undocumented individuals.
Oct 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Life Month Resolution aligns with the stated pro-life position by promoting the recognition of life and supporting related legislative efforts.
View source →Sep 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to stop issuing driver licenses to illegal immigrants directly supports the stated opposition to illegal immigration.
View source →Aug 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act aligns with the stated pro-life position by aiming to impose regulations on abortion access.
View source →Jun 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act directly supports the stated opposition to illegal immigration by targeting policies that protect undocumented immigrants.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to exempt overtime pay for border patrol agents from taxation aligns with the broader goal of creating a fairer tax system, even though it does not directly address corporate tax rates.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the act suggests support for tax reform that may align with the goal of creating a fairer tax system, although the specific provisions of the act are not detailed.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring the CFIUSMCA Act indicates support for trade improvements, aligning with the stated position on enhancing North American trade relations.
View source →Nov 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Sponsoring the Healthy Competition for Better Care Act suggests a move towards healthcare reform that aligns with the opposition to government-run healthcare, although the specifics of the bill would need further examination.
View source →Nov 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring the act indicates a commitment to addressing trade issues in North America, aligning with the support for improving trade relations under the USMCA.
View source →Sep 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring the Leveling the Playing Field 2.0 Act indicates support for trade fairness, which aligns with the stated position of improving trade relations.
View source →Jul 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring the USTRx Act indicates a proactive approach to trade issues, aligning with the support for improving trade relations under the USMCA.
View source →Jun 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring a digital trade enforcement act aligns with the position of supporting improved trade relations, even though it specifically targets U.S.-Korea trade rather than North America as a whole.
View source →Apr 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring sanctions against Iran aligns with a stance that reduces foreign aid in contexts perceived as supporting terrorism, reflecting a preference for limiting assistance.
View source →Jan 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring a tax parity act for small business investors aligns with the position of advocating for a fairer tax system, even if it does not directly address corporate tax rates.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-333, Part I.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that expands Medicare coverage for cancer screening directly contradicts the stated opposition to government-run healthcare.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Voting against a resolution to remove U.S. forces from hostilities may imply support for military engagement, which can be seen as a form of foreign aid, contradicting the stated opposition to foreign aid.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Voting against appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security contradicts the stated opposition to illegal immigration and support for border control measures.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Voting against a resolution to remove U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities suggests support for military engagement, which can be seen as an indirect endorsement of foreign aid in military contexts, contradicting the stated opposition to foreign aid.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring a Medicaid fairness act suggests support for government healthcare programs, which contradicts the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Sponsoring a bill related to Medicare Advantage suggests support for a government healthcare program, which contradicts the stated opposition to government-run healthcare.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for border security measures, aligning with opposition to illegal immigration, but without specific details, the overall impact on immigration policy is unclear.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The action involves applying tax rules to digital assets, which could have implications for tax policy, but does not directly align with the stated opposition to higher taxes.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action pertains to healthcare but does not directly address the repeal of the Affordable Care Act or government-run healthcare, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: The action involves sponsoring a bill related to education but does not clearly align with or contradict the stated opposition to Common Core or preference for local control.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The action to cosponsor a health-related bill does not clearly align with the stated opposition to government-run healthcare, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: The action expresses support for tax policies benefiting working families, but does not directly align with the specific advocacy for corporate tax rate reduction or repeal of the death tax.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The act's specifics are unclear, and while it may align with a preference for accountability in foreign aid, it does not directly reflect a stance against foreign aid overall.
Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The action relates to health and welfare checks for military members, which does not directly align with the stated opposition to government-run healthcare, but it does not contradict it either.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action of sponsoring a bill related to Medicare Advantage plans does not clearly align with the stated opposition to government-run healthcare, but it also does not directly contradict it, creating ambiguity.
View source →Oct 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill related to Medicare coverage does not directly align with the stated opposition to government-run healthcare, but it does not outright contradict it either, as it may focus on specific provisions rather than a broader healthcare system.
View source →Oct 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Give Kids a Chance Act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to Common Core, as the specifics of the act are unclear and may involve federal education standards.
View source →Jul 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The PBM Reform Act addresses drug pricing, which can align with healthcare concerns, but does not directly advance the stated opposition to government-run healthcare.
View source →May 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to care for seniors does not directly contradict the opposition to government-run healthcare, but it does not clearly align with a repeal agenda either.
View source →May 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action of sponsoring the Emergency Care Improvement Act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to government-run healthcare, as the specifics of the bill's provisions are not detailed.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The action of sponsoring a bill related to cord blood banking does not directly align with or contradict the stated opposition to government-run healthcare, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Mar 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The action addresses foreign relations and trade indirectly by targeting Chinese influence, but it does not directly advance the stated support for improving North American trade relations.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The CRUDE Act's specifics are unclear, but sponsoring a bill related to foreign affairs could align with or diverge from the stated opposition to foreign aid, depending on its provisions.
View source →Mar 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The sponsorship of the act aims to support rural hospitals, which could imply a focus on healthcare access, but does not directly align with a clear opposition to government-run healthcare.
View source →Feb 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring a telehealth expansion bill does not directly contradict the opposition to government-run healthcare, but it does not clearly align with a repeal stance either, as it could be seen as an enhancement of existing healthcare services.
View source →Feb 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The action addresses tax deductions for a specific industry, which does not clearly align with the broader goals of reducing corporate tax rates or repealing the death tax.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 412.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 25.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2588-2589)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced further proceedings on H.R. 8872 is postponed.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 597.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 35 - 1.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 409.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 431.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 499, H. Res. 492 is considered passed House. (consideration: CR H2647; text: CR H2647)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-21.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Energy and Commerce, Armed Services, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the reported concurrent resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 374.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.