Sponsorship· ImmigrationSponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Arrington has voted to cut World Bank funding to enforce against terrorism, indicating a preference for reducing foreign aid in certain contexts.
Arrington has voted to cut World Bank funding to enforce against terrorism, indicating a preference for reducing foreign aid in certain contexts.
Arrington opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border control measures, including the construction of a wall and mandatory jail for individuals who re-enter the U.S. illegally after deportation.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Arrington opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border control measures, including the construction of a wall and mandatory jail for individuals who re-enter the U.S. illegally after deportation.
Arrington supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, emphasizing the importance of a robust military and expressing support for military actions that project American power.
Arrington supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, emphasizing the importance of a robust military and expressing support for military actions that project American power.
“World is safer when America's military projects power. (Nov 2016)”
Arrington has expressed the need for government intervention to address the unsustainable fiscal trajectory of the nation, indicating a belief in some level of government action to support economic stability and growth.
Arrington has expressed the need for government intervention to address the unsustainable fiscal trajectory of the nation, indicating a belief in some level of government action to support economic stability and growth.
Arrington strongly opposes legal access to abortion, asserting that unborn children have the constitutional right to life and supports pro-life legislation. He has also sponsored bills aimed at protecting infant survivors of abortion and supports defunding Planned Parenthood.
Arrington strongly opposes legal access to abortion, asserting that unborn children have the constitutional right to life and supports pro-life legislation. He has also sponsored bills aimed at protecting infant survivors of abortion and supports defunding Planned Parenthood.
Arrington strongly opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the Second Amendment as an individual right to bear arms. He has voted against background checks for firearm sales and supports the right to own firearms without restrictive laws.
Arrington strongly opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the Second Amendment as an individual right to bear arms. He has voted against background checks for firearm sales and supports the right to own firearms without restrictive laws.
Arrington supports the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and has worked tirelessly for its repeal, indicating a strong opposition to government-run healthcare.
Arrington supports the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and has worked tirelessly for its repeal, indicating a strong opposition to government-run healthcare.
Arrington opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a fairer tax system that includes reducing corporate tax rates. He has expressed support for tax policies that stimulate job creation rather than increasing tax burdens.
Arrington opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a fairer tax system that includes reducing corporate tax rates. He has expressed support for tax policies that stimulate job creation rather than increasing tax burdens.
Arrington opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard and has voted against private lawsuits for school race discrimination, indicating a preference for local control over education.
Arrington opposes Common Core as a nationwide academic standard and has voted against private lawsuits for school race discrimination, indicating a preference for local control over education.
Arrington strongly opposes expanding voter registration and voter access, advocating for measures such as requiring photo ID for voting and opposing same-day registration.
Arrington strongly opposes expanding voter registration and voter access, advocating for measures such as requiring photo ID for voting and opposing same-day registration.
Arrington supports free-trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for breaking down unfair trade barriers and implementing the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
Arrington supports free-trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for breaking down unfair trade barriers and implementing the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
Arrington opposes stronger federal protections against discrimination, having stated that marriage is a sacred union of one man and one woman and opposing same-sex marriage. He has also voted against measures aimed at combating discrimination.
Arrington opposes stronger federal protections against discrimination, having stated that marriage is a sacred union of one man and one woman and opposing same-sex marriage. He has also voted against measures aimed at combating discrimination.
“Marriage is sacred union of one man and one woman. (Nov 2016)”
Arrington strongly opposes the legalization of marijuana and has received a low rating from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws based on his public statements and voting record.
Arrington strongly opposes the legalization of marijuana and has received a low rating from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws based on his public statements and voting record.
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: Climate, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Sep 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to restrict access to driver licenses for illegal immigrants directly aligns with a restrictive stance on immigration policy.
Jun 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act directly supports a restrictive immigration policy, aligning with the stated opposition to measures that would increase immigration.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to prevent taxation on overtime pay for border patrol agents aligns with a cautious approach to tax increases and supports fiscal responsibility.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Yea on the appropriations act supports funding for the Department of Homeland Security, which aligns with a restrictive stance on immigration enforcement.
View source →Aug 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
“World is safer when America's military projects power. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill related to military infrastructure supports the broader goal of national defense, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Energy and Commerce, Armed Services, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“World is safer when America's military projects power. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at protecting military installations supports the stated position of enhancing national security through strong defense measures.
View source →Apr 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring sanctions against Iran aligns with a stance that reduces foreign aid in contexts perceived as supporting terrorism, reflecting a preference for limiting assistance.
View source →Feb 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the reported concurrent resolution.
Why: Sponsoring a budget resolution indicates support for government intervention in fiscal matters, aligning with the stated position on economic stability and growth.
View source →Jan 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring a tax parity act for small business investors aligns with the position of advocating for a fairer tax system, even if it does not directly address corporate tax rates.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that clarifies the removal of criminal aliens directly contradicts the stated position of opposing measures that would increase immigration and limit ICE's enforcement capabilities.
View source →Feb 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that disallows tax deductions for marijuana businesses directly contradicts the stated opposition to marijuana legalization.
View source →Feb 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a resolution for a Fiscal Responsibility Amendment suggests a focus on limiting government intervention rather than supporting it, which contradicts the stated position advocating for government action to ensure economic stability.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on taxes.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, as it expresses support for tax policies without specifying whether they involve increases or decreases, making it difficult to determine alignment with the stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on taxes.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 431.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.
May 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to care for seniors does not directly contradict the opposition to government-run healthcare, but it does not clearly align with a repeal agenda either.
View source →Mar 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.
“Marriage is sacred union of one man and one woman. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 412.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Abortion, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
“Marriage is sacred union of one man and one woman. (Nov 2016)”
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Abortion, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-333, Part I.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 468.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2588-2589)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced further proceedings on H.R. 8872 is postponed.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 548.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 609.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 499, H. Res. 492 is considered passed House. (consideration: CR H2647; text: CR H2647)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-21.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 374.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-53.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.