Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Jim Jordan has generally supported a strong national defense and has been critical of foreign aid, particularly to countries like Ukraine. He has voted against military assistance to Ukraine and has expressed skepticism about U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts.
Jim Jordan has generally supported a strong national defense and has been critical of foreign aid, particularly to countries like Ukraine. He has voted against military assistance to Ukraine and has expressed skepticism about U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts.
Jim Jordan opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border enforcement and immigration policies.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Jim Jordan opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border enforcement and immigration policies.
Jim Jordan supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for increased defense spending and a robust military presence.
Jim Jordan supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for increased defense spending and a robust military presence.
Jim Jordan has opposed government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating instead for free-market principles and limited government involvement in the economy.
Jim Jordan has opposed government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating instead for free-market principles and limited government involvement in the economy.
Jim Jordan opposes legal access to abortion and supports banning federal funding for organizations like Planned Parenthood. He has consistently voted for anti-abortion legislation and has expressed a commitment to protecting what he describes as the sanctity of human life.
Jim Jordan opposes legal access to abortion and supports banning federal funding for organizations like Planned Parenthood. He has consistently voted for anti-abortion legislation and has expressed a commitment to protecting what he describes as the sanctity of human life.
Jim Jordan has consistently opposed federal action to cut emissions and has voted against regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gases. He has signed pledges against climate taxes and has supported policies favoring fossil fuel production.
Jim Jordan has consistently opposed federal action to cut emissions and has voted against regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gases. He has signed pledges against climate taxes and has supported policies favoring fossil fuel production.
Jim Jordan supports the right to gun ownership and has voted against measures for stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for private transfers. He advocates for national standards for concealed carry and loosening restrictions on interstate gun purchases.
Jim Jordan supports the right to gun ownership and has voted against measures for stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for private transfers. He advocates for national standards for concealed carry and loosening restrictions on interstate gun purchases.
Jim Jordan opposes a larger government role in health coverage and has consistently voted against the Affordable Care Act. He advocates for repealing Obamacare and has opposed vaccine mandates, calling them 'un-American.'
Jim Jordan opposes a larger government role in health coverage and has consistently voted against the Affordable Care Act. He advocates for repealing Obamacare and has opposed vaccine mandates, calling them 'un-American.'
Jim Jordan opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and a balanced budget amendment. He has consistently voted against tax increases and supports the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.
Jim Jordan opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and a balanced budget amendment. He has consistently voted against tax increases and supports the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.
Jim Jordan opposes expanding ballot access, supporting measures that require voter ID and limit mail-in voting.
Jim Jordan opposes expanding ballot access, supporting measures that require voter ID and limit mail-in voting.
Jim Jordan has a mixed record on criminal justice, supporting some measures aimed at reducing recidivism and expanding services for offenders' re-entry into society, while also opposing stricter penalties for drug offenses.
Jim Jordan has a mixed record on criminal justice, supporting some measures aimed at reducing recidivism and expanding services for offenders' re-entry into society, while also opposing stricter penalties for drug offenses.
Jim Jordan has opposed stronger regulation of major tech companies, advocating for free-market principles and limited government intervention in the tech industry.
Jim Jordan has opposed stronger regulation of major tech companies, advocating for free-market principles and limited government intervention in the tech industry.
Jim Jordan has opposed stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. He has a history of supporting measures that limit the rights of same-sex couples and has opposed efforts to expand civil rights protections.
Jim Jordan has opposed stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. He has a history of supporting measures that limit the rights of same-sex couples and has opposed efforts to expand civil rights protections.
Jim Jordan opposes government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures, describing such mandates as un-American.
Jim Jordan opposes government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures, describing such mandates as un-American.
Jim Jordan opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has voted against measures to liberalize federal marijuana policy. He supports strict penalties for drug offenses, including fentanyl-related substances being classified as Schedule I drugs.
Jim Jordan opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has voted against measures to liberalize federal marijuana policy. He supports strict penalties for drug offenses, including fentanyl-related substances being classified as Schedule I drugs.
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Education, School Curriculum, Trade, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Life at Conception Act directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion, as it seeks to establish legal personhood from the moment of conception.
Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Yea on the Homeowner Energy Freedom Act supports policies that favor fossil fuel production and oppose federal regulations on energy, aligning directly with the stated position.
View source →Feb 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to repeal the estate tax directly supports the stated position of opposing higher taxes on corporations and top earners.
View source →Jan 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to repeal the estate tax directly aligns with the stated position of opposing higher taxes on corporations and top earners.
View source →Dec 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the SAVE Moms and Babies Act directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion, as it aims to restrict abortion services and funding.
View source →Oct 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to ban taxpayer funding for abortion directly advances the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →Oct 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Ending Chemical Abortions Act directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →May 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that prohibits federal funding for abortion services directly advances the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →May 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Social Security.
Why: Cosponsoring the Secure the Border Act directly supports stricter border enforcement and immigration policies, aligning with the stated opposition to expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Mar 26, 2015 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Sponsoring the Second Amendment Enforcement Act directly supports the stated position of opposing stricter firearms regulation and advancing Second Amendment rights.
View source →Dec 10, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to restore Second Amendment rights directly aligns with the stated position of opposing stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Mar 12, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution And Civil Justice.
Why: Sponsoring the Life at Conception Act directly advances the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion by seeking to establish personhood from the moment of conception.
View source →Jan 23, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring the Ultrasound Informed Consent Act directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion by promoting additional restrictions.
View source →Jan 25, 2011 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing and Community Opportunity.
Why: Sponsoring a repeal of government intervention measures aligns directly with the stated opposition to government involvement in the economy.
View source →Jan 24, 2011 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises.
Why: Sponsoring a spending reduction act directly aligns with opposing government intervention in the economy, as it seeks to limit government spending and promote free-market principles.
View source →Jan 22, 2009 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that mandates informed consent for ultrasounds prior to an abortion directly advances the stated opposition to legal access to abortion.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Voting Nay on a resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities aligns with the position of opposing foreign military involvement, even though the resolution aimed to limit such involvement.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Voting Nay on the resolution to remove U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities aligns with the position of supporting a strong national defense and skepticism about U.S. military involvement abroad.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution supporting Israel's defense aligns with the stated position of supporting a strong national defense, even if it does not directly address foreign aid.
View source →Oct 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution supporting Israel's defense aligns with the stated position of supporting a strong national defense, even if it does not directly address foreign aid.
View source →Apr 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Cosponsoring the DEI DOA Act, which likely aims to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, directly contradicts the stated opposition to stronger civil rights protections.
View source →Feb 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 386.
Why: Cosponsoring the Equal Representation Act, which likely aims to expand ballot access, directly contradicts the stated opposition to such measures.
View source →Dec 19, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at averting a fiscal crisis implies support for government intervention in the economy, which directly contradicts the stated opposition to such measures.
View source →Apr 15, 2010 · Congress.gov
Referred to House Appropriations
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at promoting economic freedom through government intervention contradicts the stated opposition to government involvement in the economy.
View source →May 21, 2009 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Post Office, and the District of Columbia.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that defines marriage as between one man and one woman directly contradicts the stated position opposing stronger protections for LGBTQ rights.
View source →Jan 13, 2009 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Organization, and Procurement.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at reviewing and potentially increasing federal agency efficiency contradicts the stated opposition to government intervention in the economy.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The act promotes government intervention in the economy to protect consumers, which contradicts the stated position advocating for limited government involvement.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: The motion reaffirms a stance on Iran's terrorism sponsorship, which aligns with a strong national defense perspective, but does not directly address foreign aid or military involvement, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 18.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on taxes.
View source →Aug 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jun 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on taxes.
View source →Mar 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a resolution to establish a committee on drug cartels does not directly advance or undermine the stated opposition to marijuana legalization, as it focuses on combating drug cartels rather than drug policy reform.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on foreign policy.
Mar 20, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the title does not clarify its relationship to civil rights protections.
View source →Dec 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 248.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Oct 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Jul 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 479.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as the summary does not provide enough information about its impact on taxes.
View source →May 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jun 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Oct 2, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Jun 8, 2017 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position against government intervention in the economy.
View source →May 26, 2016 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position against government intervention.
View source →May 22, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Training.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Mar 17, 2011 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Horticulture .
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Mar 16, 2011 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Horticulture .
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jul 29, 2008 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Organization, and Procurement.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 600.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 624.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 8, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to School Curriculum, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 29, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 1.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 916 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965 and H.R. 4305. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965, and H.R. 4305 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 609.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committees on Appropriations, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 439.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-10.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
UNANIMOUS CONSENT - Mr. Franklin, C. Scott asked unanimous consent that, notwithstanding section 1(a)(2)(A) of House Resolution 12 (as amended by section 1(c) of House Resolution 78), and the order of the House of today, the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government be composed of not more than 21 Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner appointed by the Speaker, of whom not more than 9 shall be appointed in consultation with the Minority Leader. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 8, 2017 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 2, 2014 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2010 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2009 · Congress.gov
Referred to House Rules
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 31, 2009 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 13, 2009 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Organization, and Procurement.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.