Sponsorship· Civil RightsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
While the sources do not provide explicit statements on foreign aid, Himes's broader support for international cooperation and humanitarian efforts suggests he is likely to support maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid.
While the sources do not provide explicit statements on foreign aid, Himes's broader support for international cooperation and humanitarian efforts suggests he is likely to support maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid.
Himes supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, reflecting a commitment to more inclusive immigration policies.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Himes supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, reflecting a commitment to more inclusive immigration policies.
Himes advocates for maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, emphasizing a focus on counterterrorism and a reduced military presence in conflict zones.
Himes advocates for maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, emphasizing a focus on counterterrorism and a reduced military presence in conflict zones.
Himes advocates for government intervention to support economic stability and growth, indicating a belief in active economic policy.
Himes advocates for government intervention to support economic stability and growth, indicating a belief in active economic policy.
Jim Himes voted against the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, which aimed to restrict federal funds from covering abortion services. This indicates his support for legal access to abortion.
Jim Himes voted against the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, which aimed to restrict federal funds from covering abortion services. This indicates his support for legal access to abortion.
Himes believes in creating financial incentives and supporting research and development to address climate change, indicating his support for federal action to cut emissions.
Himes believes in creating financial incentives and supporting research and development to address climate change, indicating his support for federal action to cut emissions.
Himes has a strong record of supporting gun regulations, evidenced by his 100% lifetime score from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and his opposition to allowing loaded guns in national parks. This suggests he favors stricter firearms regulation.
Himes has a strong record of supporting gun regulations, evidenced by his 100% lifetime score from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and his opposition to allowing loaded guns in national parks. This suggests he favors stricter firearms regulation.
Himes supports the Affordable Care Act and emphasizes the need for equitable reforms to Medicare and Medicaid, indicating he favors a larger government role in health coverage.
Himes supports the Affordable Care Act and emphasizes the need for equitable reforms to Medicare and Medicaid, indicating he favors a larger government role in health coverage.
Himes advocates for early childhood education and has voted to double funding for the Early Head Start Program, suggesting he supports more federal funding for public schools.
Himes advocates for early childhood education and has voted to double funding for the Early Head Start Program, suggesting he supports more federal funding for public schools.
Himes supports expanding ballot access, aligning with efforts to enhance voter participation and protect voting rights.
Himes supports expanding ballot access, aligning with efforts to enhance voter participation and protect voting rights.
Himes supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, as indicated by his advocacy for LGBTQ rights and his voting record on related legislation.
Himes supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, as indicated by his advocacy for LGBTQ rights and his voting record on related legislation.
Himes supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, indicating a proactive approach to public health issues.
Himes supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, indicating a proactive approach to public health issues.
Himes supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, reflecting a broader stance on drug policy reform.
Himes supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, reflecting a broader stance on drug policy reform.
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the John Lewis Every Child Deserves a Family Act directly supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in the context of LGBTQ rights.
Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the LGBTQ+ Youth Access Act directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ individuals.
View source →May 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in educational settings.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: The Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act aims to enhance conservation efforts, which directly supports federal action to cut emissions and address climate change.
View source →Feb 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act directly advances the stated position of supporting stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Feb 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at enhancing financial stability directly supports the stated position of advocating for government intervention to bolster economic stability and growth.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Women’s Right to Reproductive Freedom Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Pride In Mental Health Act directly supports stronger federal protections for LGBTQ rights, aligning clearly with the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Keep Americans Safe Act, which aims to implement stricter gun regulations, directly advances the stated position of supporting gun policy reforms.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the GOSAFE Act, which aims to enhance gun safety measures, directly supports the figure's strong advocacy for gun regulations and efforts to reduce gun violence.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act directly supports stricter firearms regulation, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Apr 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to establish a Green Bank and issue Green Bonds directly advances federal action to cut emissions, aligning closely with the stated position on climate.
View source →Jun 21, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
Why: Sponsoring the National Green Bank Act directly supports federal action to cut emissions by promoting clean energy financing, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jun 26, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving energy efficiency in multifamily housing directly supports federal action to cut emissions, aligning closely with the stated position on climate.
View source →Feb 3, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education.
Why: Sponsoring the Supporting Early Learning Act directly advances the stated position by promoting federal funding for early childhood education.
View source →Feb 3, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Sponsoring the Total Learning Act directly supports increased federal funding for public schools and emphasizes educational reform, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a domestic violence survivor protection act aligns with the broader goal of strengthening protections against discrimination, particularly for vulnerable populations.
View source →Jul 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Safe Schools Improvement Act aligns with the position of supporting federal funding for public schools and educational reform.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act, which funds border enforcement and detention, aligns with the position advocating for more inclusive immigration policies.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at modernizing housing loans supports economic stability and growth, aligning with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jan 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Voice Vote.
Why: The act aims to enhance access to pharmacist services, which aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and affordability, thus supporting the stated position.
View source →Jan 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that promotes access to diabetic shoes aligns with the broader goal of increasing government involvement in healthcare and addressing specific healthcare needs.
View source →Jan 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at improving postpartum healthcare outcomes aligns with the broader support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Find It Early Act, which aims to improve early detection and prevention in healthcare, aligns with the stated support for equitable reforms in healthcare.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act supports equitable healthcare reforms by addressing specific healthcare needs, aligning with the broader commitment to preserve and improve access to healthcare programs.
View source →May 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at reducing costs for middle market IPOs supports economic growth and stability, aligning with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Nov 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at protecting domestic violence survivors aligns with the broader goal of strengthening federal protections against discrimination, particularly for vulnerable populations.
View source →Apr 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at reducing costs for middle market IPOs supports economic growth and stability, aligning with the stated position on government intervention in the economy.
View source →Aug 4, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at protecting domestic violence survivors aligns with the broader goal of stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for vulnerable populations.
View source →May 7, 2019 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at prohibiting insider trading supports economic stability and growth by promoting fair market practices, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).
Why: Sponsoring a bill that enhances oversight of the intelligence community aligns with the position of maintaining strong national security and defense capabilities.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy efficiency and reducing emissions directly contradicts the stated support for federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on climate.
View source →Jul 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 466.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on marijuana legalization.
View source →Jun 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.
Why: The SAFE Banking Act primarily addresses banking access for cannabis businesses rather than directly legalizing marijuana, making the relationship between the action and the stated position unclear.
View source →May 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →May 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action clarifies health conditions under the Family and Medical Leave Act, which relates to healthcare but does not directly advance the stated position of a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The content of the Momnibus Act is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as it is only referred to a committee without details on its provisions or impact on government healthcare roles.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on immigration.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
Why: The act focuses on veterans' healthcare, which aligns with the broader support for healthcare access, but does not directly address the preservation of Medicare and Medicaid or equitable reforms for all.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The Global Respect Act may relate to foreign aid but its specific provisions and impact on military and humanitarian assistance are unclear, leading to ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: The action relates to food security, which can be part of foreign aid, but does not directly address military or humanitarian assistance as emphasized in the stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →May 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on national security.
View source →Apr 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on economic intervention.
View source →Mar 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on national security.
View source →May 9, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title alone, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Sep 19, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Training.
Why: The measure focuses on college affordability rather than directly advancing funding for public schools, making the relationship between the action and the stated position unclear.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 118-802, Part I.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 4, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 2, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 25, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 8, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 22, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2020 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 116-305.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 13, 2019 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 518.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.