Vote· ClimateYea
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
While the sources do not provide explicit statements on foreign aid, Himes's broader support for international cooperation and humanitarian efforts suggests he is likely to support maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid.
While the sources do not provide explicit statements on foreign aid, Himes's broader support for international cooperation and humanitarian efforts suggests he is likely to support maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid.
Himes has not explicitly stated positions on immigration in the provided sources, but his general support for inclusive policies suggests he may favor expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Himes has not explicitly stated positions on immigration in the provided sources, but his general support for inclusive policies suggests he may favor expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
Jim Himes voted against the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, which aimed to restrict federal funds from covering abortion services. This indicates his support for legal access to abortion.
Jim Himes voted against the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, which aimed to restrict federal funds from covering abortion services. This indicates his support for legal access to abortion.
Himes believes in creating financial incentives and supporting research and development to address climate change, indicating his support for federal action to cut emissions.
Himes believes in creating financial incentives and supporting research and development to address climate change, indicating his support for federal action to cut emissions.
Himes has a strong record of supporting gun regulations, evidenced by his 100% lifetime score from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and his opposition to allowing loaded guns in national parks. This suggests he favors stricter firearms regulation.
Himes has a strong record of supporting gun regulations, evidenced by his 100% lifetime score from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and his opposition to allowing loaded guns in national parks. This suggests he favors stricter firearms regulation.
Himes supports the Affordable Care Act and emphasizes the need for equitable reforms to Medicare and Medicaid, indicating he favors a larger government role in health coverage.
Himes supports the Affordable Care Act and emphasizes the need for equitable reforms to Medicare and Medicaid, indicating he favors a larger government role in health coverage.
Himes advocates for early childhood education and has voted to double funding for the Early Head Start Program, suggesting he supports more federal funding for public schools.
Himes advocates for early childhood education and has voted to double funding for the Early Head Start Program, suggesting he supports more federal funding for public schools.
Himes has been an advocate for voting rights, supporting measures that aim to enhance access to the electoral process and protect against voter suppression.
Himes has been an advocate for voting rights, supporting measures that aim to enhance access to the electoral process and protect against voter suppression.
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting for the Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act directly supports climate initiatives by promoting conservation efforts, aligning closely with the stated position on addressing climate change.
Feb 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act directly advances the stated position by supporting measures aimed at preventing gun violence.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Women’s Right to Reproductive Freedom Act directly supports the stated position on reproductive rights, reinforcing the commitment to access to abortion coverage.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the GOSAFE Act, which aims to enhance gun safety measures, directly supports the figure's strong advocacy for gun regulations and efforts to reduce gun violence.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Keep Americans Safe Act, which aims to implement stricter gun regulations, directly advances the stated position of supporting gun policy reforms.
View source →Apr 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
Why: Sponsoring legislation to establish a Green Bank and issue Green Bonds directly supports the stated position of promoting energy solutions that address climate change.
View source →Jun 21, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
Why: Sponsoring the National Green Bank Act directly supports financial incentives for clean energy solutions, aligning closely with the stated position on addressing climate change.
View source →Feb 3, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education.
Why: Sponsoring the Early Learning Act directly supports early childhood education initiatives, aligning closely with the stated commitment to enhance funding and reform in this area.
View source →May 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the amendment to clarify organ donation surgery as a serious health condition supports equitable healthcare reforms and aligns with the commitment to preserve and enhance healthcare access.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring support for U.S. forces in Kosovo aligns with the stated position on foreign aid by promoting stability through military assistance.
View source →May 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Cosponsoring the anti-harassment act supports educational goals by promoting a safer environment for students, aligning with the figure's commitment to improving education.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Momnibus Act, which aims to improve maternal health and address healthcare disparities, aligns with the stated support for equitable reforms in healthcare.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the DISCLOSE Act, which aims to improve transparency in campaign finance, aligns with enhancing access to the electoral process and protecting against voter suppression.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The Homeowner Energy Freedom Act relates to energy solutions and promotes financial incentives, aligning with the stated support for addressing climate change.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: The Home Appliance Protection and Affordability Act relates to energy solutions and affordability, moving in the direction of addressing climate change, even if it is not as comprehensive as the American Clean Energy and Security Act.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Treat and Reduce Obesity Act supports healthcare reform aimed at addressing rising costs and improving access, aligning with the commitment to preserve and enhance existing healthcare programs.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Safe Step Act, which aims to improve access to healthcare treatments, aligns with the stated support for equitable reforms in healthcare.
View source →Jan 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Voice Vote.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports access to healthcare services, aligning with the emphasis on equitable reforms and preservation of existing programs.
View source →Jan 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports healthcare improvements relevant to maternal health, aligning with the broader goal of preserving and reforming healthcare access.
View source →Jan 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the act promotes access to healthcare resources for diabetics, aligning with the broader goal of preserving and improving healthcare access and affordability.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring the Pride In Mental Health Act aligns with the support for equitable healthcare reforms and the preservation of existing programs, as it addresses mental health access and equity.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Essential Caregivers Act aligns with the support for equitable reforms in healthcare, as it aims to improve access and support for caregivers, which is consistent with preserving and enhancing healthcare programs.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Veteran Suicide Prevention Act aligns with the commitment to healthcare reform and the preservation of programs like Medicare and Medicaid, as it addresses critical health issues for veterans.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring the Find It Early Act, which aims to improve early detection and prevention in healthcare, aligns with the stated support for equitable reforms in healthcare.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act supports equitable healthcare reforms by addressing specific healthcare needs, aligning with the broader commitment to preserve and improve access to healthcare programs.
View source →Sep 19, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Training.
Why: Sponsoring the College Affordability and Innovation Act supports educational goals by addressing college affordability, which aligns with the broader commitment to improving education.
View source →Jun 26, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Sponsoring the Multifamily Housing Energy Efficiency Improvement Act promotes energy efficiency, which aligns with the stated support for policies addressing climate change.
View source →Feb 3, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Sponsoring the Total Learning Act indicates support for educational initiatives, aligning with the figure's commitment to improving education, although specific details of the act's provisions are not provided.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to restrict funding for military actions contradicts the stated support for U.S. military assistance to other countries.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities contradicts the stated support for military aid and involvement in international conflicts.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Voting to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities contradicts the stated support for military assistance to other countries, particularly in conflict situations.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Voting to remove U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities contradicts the stated support for military assistance to other countries, particularly in conflict situations.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy freedom and efficiency contradicts the stated support for policies addressing climate change.
View source →Dec 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to prohibit military force against Venezuela contradicts the stated support for U.S. military assistance as a strategy for international stability.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
May 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The Living Donor Protection Act relates to healthcare but does not directly address the preservation of Medicare and Medicaid or rising healthcare costs, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The Healthy Families Act relates to family leave and workplace policies rather than directly addressing early childhood education or reforming K-12 education, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated educational goals.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: The action relates to foreign affairs but does not directly advance military or humanitarian aid, leaving the relationship between the stated position and the action unclear.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Health Care Providers Safety Act does not directly address the stated support for the ACA or Medicare and Medicaid, leaving its alignment with the healthcare position unclear.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
Why: The act focuses on veterans' healthcare, which aligns with the broader support for healthcare access, but does not directly address the preservation of Medicare and Medicaid or equitable reforms for all.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The Global Respect Act may relate to foreign aid but its specific provisions and impact on military and humanitarian assistance are unclear, leading to ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: The action relates to food security, which can be part of foreign aid, but does not directly address military or humanitarian assistance as emphasized in the stated position.
Sep 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action pertains to foreign policy but focuses on sanctions against spyware rather than direct military or humanitarian aid, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated support for foreign assistance.
View source →May 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action involves a legislative proposal related to war powers, which may indirectly affect foreign aid dynamics, but does not directly advance the stated support for U.S. assistance.
View source →Mar 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action involves sponsoring a war powers act, which could relate to military aid but does not directly advance the stated support for foreign aid, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Dec 2, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.
Why: The Cure for AIDS Act addresses a specific health issue but does not directly relate to the broader support for the ACA, Medicare, or Medicaid, leading to unclear alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jul 25, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.
Why: The Cure for AIDS Act addresses a specific health issue but does not directly relate to the broader support for the ACA, Medicare, or Medicaid, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated healthcare position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 118-802, Part I.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 22, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 4, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 4, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 13, 2019 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 518.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 8, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2012 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade .
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2020 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 116-305.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 9, 2019 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2019 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2014 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2013 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.