Sponsorship· Economy & JobsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Jerry Moran has a mixed record on foreign aid, having voted against significant funding for foreign operations in the past. However, he has also supported measures that align with U.S. interests abroad, indicating a nuanced approach to foreign aid.
Jerry Moran has a mixed record on foreign aid, having voted against significant funding for foreign operations in the past. However, he has also supported measures that align with U.S. interests abroad, indicating a nuanced approach to foreign aid.
“Voted NO on $15.2 billion for foreign operations. (Nov 1999)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Moran supports stricter immigration policies, including building a fence along the Mexican border and opposing benefits for undocumented immigrants. He has voted for measures that restrict immigration and has a strong stance against illegal immigration.
Moran supports stricter immigration policies, including building a fence along the Mexican border and opposing benefits for undocumented immigrants. He has voted for measures that restrict immigration and has a strong stance against illegal immigration.
Moran supports maintaining a strong national defense and has consistently voted for increased defense spending. He has opposed measures that would limit military engagement and has supported military actions abroad.
Moran supports maintaining a strong national defense and has consistently voted for increased defense spending. He has opposed measures that would limit military engagement and has supported military actions abroad.
Moran has generally opposed government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating instead for free-market principles. He has voted against stimulus packages and supports reducing federal spending.
Moran has generally opposed government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating instead for free-market principles. He has voted against stimulus packages and supports reducing federal spending.
Moran opposes abortion and has cosponsored legislation to ban abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. He has also supported making harming a fetus a crime and agreed with the 2022 Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, stating that the Constitution does not guarantee a right to abortion.
Moran opposes abortion and has cosponsored legislation to ban abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. He has also supported making harming a fetus a crime and agreed with the 2022 Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, stating that the Constitution does not guarantee a right to abortion.
Moran has consistently opposed federal action to cut emissions and has a low rating from environmental groups. He has voted against measures acknowledging human contributions to climate change and has supported fossil fuel projects like the Keystone XL pipeline.
Moran has consistently opposed federal action to cut emissions and has a low rating from environmental groups. He has voted against measures acknowledging human contributions to climate change and has supported fossil fuel projects like the Keystone XL pipeline.
Moran has a strong pro-gun rights stance, holding an 'A' grade from the NRA. He has consistently voted against gun control measures, including universal background checks and bans on high-capacity magazines. He supports legislation that would allow concealed carry across state lines.
Moran has a strong pro-gun rights stance, holding an 'A' grade from the NRA. He has consistently voted against gun control measures, including universal background checks and bans on high-capacity magazines. He supports legislation that would allow concealed carry across state lines.
Moran has opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted against various healthcare reforms that would expand government involvement. He has supported efforts to repeal the ACA and has advocated for a free-market approach to healthcare.
Moran has opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted against various healthcare reforms that would expand government involvement. He has supported efforts to repeal the ACA and has advocated for a free-market approach to healthcare.
Jerry Moran has consistently supported tax cuts and has opposed tax increases, advocating for lower corporate taxes and opposing progressive taxation measures. He has a strong pro-business voting record.
Jerry Moran has consistently supported tax cuts and has opposed tax increases, advocating for lower corporate taxes and opposing progressive taxation measures. He has a strong pro-business voting record.
“Rated 66% by NTU, indicating 'Satisfactory' on tax votes. (Dec 2003)”
Moran has opposed increased federal funding for public schools and has supported school choice initiatives. He believes that federal education policies should provide flexibility to states rather than impose strict requirements.
Moran has opposed increased federal funding for public schools and has supported school choice initiatives. He believes that federal education policies should provide flexibility to states rather than impose strict requirements.
Moran supports requiring photo identification for voting in federal elections, reflecting a stance that emphasizes voter verification measures.
Moran supports requiring photo identification for voting in federal elections, reflecting a stance that emphasizes voter verification measures.
“Voted YES on requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections. (Sep 2006)”
Moran supports free trade agreements and has voted in favor of various trade deals that promote lower tariffs and open markets. He believes in the benefits of trade for economic growth.
Moran supports free trade agreements and has voted in favor of various trade deals that promote lower tariffs and open markets. He believes in the benefits of trade for economic growth.
Moran has a record of opposing stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. He has voted against prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation and has supported constitutional amendments defining marriage as between one man and one woman.
Moran has a record of opposing stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to LGBTQ rights. He has voted against prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation and has supported constitutional amendments defining marriage as between one man and one woman.
Moran has a 'D-' grade from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) for his voting history on cannabis-related issues, indicating opposition to marijuana legalization at the federal level.
Moran has a 'D-' grade from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) for his voting history on cannabis-related issues, indicating opposition to marijuana legalization at the federal level.
Position extraction pending on 7 issues: School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to financing for development directly supports the stated position of promoting economic growth through government intervention.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that supports domestic oil and gas businesses directly aligns with the stated position of opposing climate measures and promoting fossil fuel development.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S1841-1842)
Why: Cosponsoring the America Grows Act, which promotes American manufacturing and economic growth, directly advances the stated position of supporting government intervention for economic stability.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The ABLE MATCH Act aims to promote economic stability and support individuals with disabilities, aligning with the figure's support for government intervention to foster economic growth.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: The act aims to protect gun owner registration information, which aligns with the stated pro-gun policies, even though it does not directly advance gun rights.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2435; text: CR S2445)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that supports renewable fuels contradicts the stated opposition to climate measures and acknowledges the role of renewable energy in reducing carbon impacts.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the AADAPT Act, which likely involves expanding healthcare access or reform, directly contradicts the stated opposition to government involvement in health coverage.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to amend the Public Health Service Act indicates support for government involvement in health coverage, which contradicts the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act and health care reform measures.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to cancer drugs suggests support for increased government involvement in healthcare, which contradicts the stated position of opposing such reforms.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated opposition to marijuana legalization.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position against government involvement in healthcare.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on national security.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on climate.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on national security.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.
Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated opposition to government involvement in health coverage.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text: CR S764)
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: The sponsorship of the NSF AI Education Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position, as the act's specifics regarding accountability and state flexibility are not detailed.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Voted NO on $15.2 billion for foreign operations. (Nov 1999)”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 66% by NTU, indicating 'Satisfactory' on tax votes. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S4523)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4274; text: CR S4269-4270)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3194; text: CR S3217-3218)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3194; text: CR S3218)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3194; text: CR S3218)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 433.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S1093-1094)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.