Sponsorship· ClimateCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Jerry Moran has a mixed record on foreign aid, having voted against significant funding for foreign operations in the past. However, he has also supported measures that align with U.S. interests abroad, indicating a nuanced approach to foreign aid.
Jerry Moran has a mixed record on foreign aid, having voted against significant funding for foreign operations in the past. However, he has also supported measures that align with U.S. interests abroad, indicating a nuanced approach to foreign aid.
“Voted NO on $15.2 billion for foreign operations. (Nov 1999)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Jerry Moran supports stricter immigration controls, including building a fence along the Mexican border and opposing benefits for undocumented immigrants. He has voted for measures that enhance border security and limit immigration pathways.
Jerry Moran supports stricter immigration controls, including building a fence along the Mexican border and opposing benefits for undocumented immigrants. He has voted for measures that enhance border security and limit immigration pathways.
“Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance. (Dec 2006)”
Jerry Moran opposes abortion and has cosponsored legislation to ban abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. He has also supported making harming a fetus a crime and agreed with the 2022 Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, stating that the Constitution does not guarantee a right to abortion.
Jerry Moran opposes abortion and has cosponsored legislation to ban abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. He has also supported making harming a fetus a crime and agreed with the 2022 Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, stating that the Constitution does not guarantee a right to abortion.
“Life from conception is sacred and must be defended. (Nov 2016)”
Jerry Moran has consistently opposed federal action to cut emissions and has voted against measures aimed at addressing climate change, including cap-and-trade legislation. He has a low rating from environmental groups, indicating a lack of support for climate initiatives.
Jerry Moran has consistently opposed federal action to cut emissions and has voted against measures aimed at addressing climate change, including cap-and-trade legislation. He has a low rating from environmental groups, indicating a lack of support for climate initiatives.
“Rated 10% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes. (Dec 2003)”
Jerry Moran has a strong pro-gun rights stance, consistently opposing stricter gun regulations. He has received an 'A' rating from the NRA and has voted against measures such as universal background checks and bans on high-capacity magazines.
Jerry Moran has a strong pro-gun rights stance, consistently opposing stricter gun regulations. He has received an 'A' rating from the NRA and has voted against measures such as universal background checks and bans on high-capacity magazines.
“Rated A by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun rights voting record. (Dec 2003)”
Moran has opposed the Affordable Care Act and voted against the Senate health care bill in 2017, criticizing the process and the failure to repeal the entire ACA. He supports repealing federal health care takeovers and has advocated for free market solutions in health care.
Moran has opposed the Affordable Care Act and voted against the Senate health care bill in 2017, criticizing the process and the failure to repeal the entire ACA. He supports repealing federal health care takeovers and has advocated for free market solutions in health care.
“Supports defunding, repealing, & replacing federal care with free market. (Jul 2010)”
Jerry Moran has consistently supported tax cuts and has opposed tax increases, advocating for lower corporate taxes and opposing progressive taxation measures. He has a strong pro-business voting record.
Jerry Moran has consistently supported tax cuts and has opposed tax increases, advocating for lower corporate taxes and opposing progressive taxation measures. He has a strong pro-business voting record.
“Rated 66% by NTU, indicating 'Satisfactory' on tax votes. (Dec 2003)”
Jerry Moran supports accountability metrics for public schools but believes that federal initiatives should provide flexibility to states. He has voted against significant federal funding for education initiatives, indicating a preference for state control over federal mandates.
Jerry Moran supports accountability metrics for public schools but believes that federal initiatives should provide flexibility to states. He has voted against significant federal funding for education initiatives, indicating a preference for state control over federal mandates.
“Rated 33% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes. (Dec 2003)”
Moran supports requiring photo identification for voting in federal elections, reflecting a stance that emphasizes voter verification measures.
Moran supports requiring photo identification for voting in federal elections, reflecting a stance that emphasizes voter verification measures.
“Voted YES on requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections. (Sep 2006)”
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Rated 10% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that supports domestic oil and gas businesses aligns with the stated opposition to climate change measures and promotes fossil fuel development.
Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Rated A by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun rights voting record. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Gun Owner Registration Information Protection Act aligns with the stated support for pro-gun policies by protecting gun owners' information from government registration.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Supports defunding, repealing, & replacing federal care with free market. (Jul 2010)”
Why: Cosponsoring the AADAPT Act, which likely promotes market-based health care solutions, aligns with the stated opposition to federal health care takeovers.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 10% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at protecting oil and gas producers directly contradicts the stated opposition to climate change measures.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2435; text: CR S2445)
“Rated 10% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing Renewable Fuels Month contradicts the stated opposition to climate measures, as it acknowledges the role of renewable fuels in reducing carbon impacts.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Supports defunding, repealing, & replacing federal care with free market. (Jul 2010)”
Why: The ABLE MATCH Act does not directly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, but it also does not represent a clear advancement of free market solutions, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Supports defunding, repealing, & replacing federal care with free market. (Jul 2010)”
Why: The cosponsorship of a bill aimed at revitalizing rural hospitals may align with improving healthcare access, but it does not directly support or oppose the stated position against federal health care involvement.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text: CR S764)
“Rated 10% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes. (Dec 2003)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring the EDA Short Form Application Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated opposition to climate measures, as the specific content and implications of the act are not detailed.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Rated 33% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes. (Dec 2003)”
Why: The sponsorship of the NSF AI Education Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position, as the act's specifics regarding accountability and state flexibility are not detailed.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S1841-1842)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S1093-1094)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.