Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Shaheen supports the provision of foreign aid, including humanitarian assistance, and has emphasized the importance of U.S. involvement in international issues, particularly in supporting women's rights and addressing humanitarian crises.
Shaheen supports the provision of foreign aid, including humanitarian assistance, and has emphasized the importance of U.S. involvement in international issues, particularly in supporting women's rights and addressing humanitarian crises.
Shaheen has expressed the need to fix the broken immigration system and has supported welcoming refugees. She voted for the Laken Riley Act, which indicates her support for immigration reform.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Shaheen has expressed the need to fix the broken immigration system and has supported welcoming refugees. She voted for the Laken Riley Act, which indicates her support for immigration reform.
Jeanne Shaheen supports legal access to abortion and has consistently advocated for reproductive rights. She has opposed amendments that would restrict access to birth control and has been endorsed by pro-choice organizations, emphasizing the need for safe and legal abortion services without restrictions.
Jeanne Shaheen supports legal access to abortion and has consistently advocated for reproductive rights. She has opposed amendments that would restrict access to birth control and has been endorsed by pro-choice organizations, emphasizing the need for safe and legal abortion services without restrictions.
Shaheen has advocated for federal action to cut emissions and has emphasized the importance of the U.S. leading in climate change agreements. She has supported legislation aimed at improving energy efficiency and addressing environmental hazards.
Shaheen has advocated for federal action to cut emissions and has emphasized the importance of the U.S. leading in climate change agreements. She has supported legislation aimed at improving energy efficiency and addressing environmental hazards.
Jeanne Shaheen supports stricter firearms regulations, including expanding background checks and making it illegal for individuals on the terrorist watchlist to purchase guns. She has actively participated in efforts to promote common-sense gun laws.
Jeanne Shaheen supports stricter firearms regulations, including expanding background checks and making it illegal for individuals on the terrorist watchlist to purchase guns. She has actively participated in efforts to promote common-sense gun laws.
Shaheen advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting universal health care and the Affordable Care Act. She has emphasized the need for affordable insurance and has opposed efforts to dismantle existing health care protections.
Shaheen advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting universal health care and the Affordable Care Act. She has emphasized the need for affordable insurance and has opposed efforts to dismantle existing health care protections.
Shaheen supports improving and investing in public education, including K-12 funding and access to higher education. She has advocated for tax-free college tuition savings plans and professional development for educators.
Shaheen supports improving and investing in public education, including K-12 funding and access to higher education. She has advocated for tax-free college tuition savings plans and professional development for educators.
Jeanne Shaheen has sponsored legislation to expand voter registration and access to voting. She has advocated for measures that make it easier for citizens to participate in elections, reflecting her support for voting rights.
Jeanne Shaheen has sponsored legislation to expand voter registration and access to voting. She has advocated for measures that make it easier for citizens to participate in elections, reflecting her support for voting rights.
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Professional Degree Access Restoration Act directly supports the stated position of improving access to higher education.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Elementary and Secondary School Counseling Act directly supports the stated position of improving public education and K-12 funding.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the ABC-ED Act directly supports the stated position of improving and investing in public education, aligning with goals for K-12 funding and access to higher education.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Sponsoring the Protecting Human Rights and Public Health in Foreign Assistance Act directly advances the stated position by promoting humanitarian assistance and supporting women's rights.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports the stated position of expanding voter registration and improving voting access.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Student Protection and Success Act directly supports the stated position of improving and investing in public education, aligning with efforts for K-12 funding and access to higher education.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the After-School STEM Educators Act directly supports the stated position of improving public education by enhancing educational opportunities and resources for K-12 students.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Moms Matter Act, which aims to improve maternal health care access, aligns with the broader goal of expanding healthcare access and affordability.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to strengthen transparency in foreign aid aligns with the stated support for foreign aid, as it emphasizes accountability in U.S. involvement in international issues.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving healthcare access for a specific condition aligns with the broader commitment to maintaining healthcare access and affordability.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to reassess the U.S.-Tanzania relationship suggests a focus on international engagement, which aligns with the support for foreign aid and humanitarian assistance.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports healthcare access and addresses specific health needs, aligning with the broader commitment to universal healthcare.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The act supports mental health, which aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and affordability, though it does not directly address universal coverage.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring the SPARC Act indicates support for healthcare access and affordability, aligning with the advocacy for a universal healthcare system.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at reauthorizing nursing workforce funding supports the broader goal of improving healthcare access and quality, aligning with the advocacy for universal healthcare.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports the broader goal of improving education by addressing mental health access for students, which aligns with the commitment to investing in public education.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Sponsoring the BLOCK PUTIN Act indicates support for U.S. involvement in international issues, aligning with the stated position on foreign aid and humanitarian assistance.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the INSULIN Act aims to improve access to affordable insulin, which aligns with the broader commitment to maintaining healthcare access and affordability.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Diabetes Act supports healthcare access and affordability, aligning with the broader goal of universal healthcare, even if it does not directly establish a universal system.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the commitment to maintaining healthcare access and affordability, as it opposes a measure that could improve service efficiency.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The act aims to ensure patient access to breakthrough products, which aligns with improving healthcare access, but does not directly advocate for a larger government role or universal coverage.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2448)
Why: The resolution supports a specific foreign policy regarding Taiwan, but does not directly address humanitarian assistance or women's rights, leading to unclear alignment with the broader stated position on foreign aid.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2444-2445)
Why: The bill focuses on crisis intervention and mental health services, which aligns with healthcare access but does not directly advance the goal of universal healthcare coverage.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The SAFE for Survivors Act addresses healthcare access for survivors but does not directly advance a universal healthcare system, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The BRAIN Act focuses on brain research and does not directly address universal healthcare or access, creating uncertainty about its alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: While the act may relate to foreign diplomacy, it does not clearly advance the specific humanitarian assistance or women's rights focus stated in the position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The action addresses a specific healthcare issue related to firefighters but does not directly advance the broader goal of universal healthcare access.
Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the NOPE Act does not provide clear information on its alignment with foreign aid support, as the bill's content and implications for humanitarian assistance are not specified.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Vision Lab Choice Act of 2025 may include elements related to education, but without specific details on its provisions, the alignment with the stated support for public education and K-12 funding is unclear.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses domestic violence, which is related to healthcare access, but does not directly advance the stated position of advocating for a universal healthcare system.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses a specific health issue (youth vaping) but does not directly advance the broader goal of universal healthcare access and affordability.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2702)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2174-2175)
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2176-2177)
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S3318)
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 416.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2447)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2351; text: CR S2379-2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2800-2801)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1049-1050)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 327.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-232.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.