Sponsorship· ImmigrationCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Vance opposes continued American military aid to Ukraine during the ongoing Russian invasion and prefers a negotiated peace. He has expressed support for Israel in its conflicts, particularly in the Gaza war.
J.D. Vance advocates for a reduction in legal immigration, arguing that a much lower rate would benefit the U.S. He has expressed skepticism about the current immigration policies and their impact on society.
J.D. Vance advocates for a reduction in legal immigration, arguing that a much lower rate would benefit the U.S. He has expressed skepticism about the current immigration policies and their impact on society.
J.D. Vance opposes legal access to abortion, advocating for restrictions without exceptions for rape or incest. He has expressed a belief that abortion should be criminalized at the federal level.
J.D. Vance opposes legal access to abortion, advocating for restrictions without exceptions for rape or incest. He has expressed a belief that abortion should be criminalized at the federal level.
J.D. Vance is against stricter firearms regulation, positioning himself as a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. He has criticized gun control measures and has been vocal about his belief in the right to bear arms.
J.D. Vance is against stricter firearms regulation, positioning himself as a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. He has criticized gun control measures and has been vocal about his belief in the right to bear arms.
Vance has taken a strong stance against Medicaid fraud and has announced significant actions to suspend Medicaid payments in California due to rampant fraud. He emphasizes the need for accountability in healthcare spending.
Vance has taken a strong stance against Medicaid fraud and has announced significant actions to suspend Medicaid payments in California due to rampant fraud. He emphasizes the need for accountability in healthcare spending.
Vance has expressed criticism of higher education institutions, labeling them as 'the enemy' and advocating for reforms in the education system that align with conservative values.
J.D. Vance has expressed skepticism about the integrity of voting processes, particularly in California, suggesting that recent election outcomes appear suspicious. He has joined calls for stricter measures to ensure election integrity.
J.D. Vance has expressed skepticism about the integrity of voting processes, particularly in California, suggesting that recent election outcomes appear suspicious. He has joined calls for stricter measures to ensure election integrity.
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Climate, Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to the Unaccompanied Children Program aligns with the advocacy for reducing legal immigration and reflects concerns about immigration's impact on society.
Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution disapproving a rule on firearms license requirements directly supports the stated position of opposing gun regulation.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a regulation on firearm dealers directly supports the stated position of opposing gun control measures.
View source →Jul 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the bill.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at protecting children aligns directly with the stated opposition to abortion, reinforcing the commitment to restrictive abortion laws.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S6461)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution supporting Israel aligns with the expressed support for Israel in conflicts, even as it does not directly address the stance on military aid to Ukraine.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act aims to improve access to care for seniors, which aligns with a broader commitment to accountability and effective healthcare spending.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Mandatory E-Verify Act aligns with the stated position by promoting stricter immigration enforcement, which is consistent with advocating for a reduction in legal immigration.
View source →Jun 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution disapproving a Department of Education rule aligns with the stated opposition to higher education institutions and reflects a push for conservative reforms in education.
View source →Mar 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the College Employment Accountability Act suggests a move towards reforming higher education, which aligns with the stated opposition to current higher education institutions.
View source →Dec 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to impose a fee on remittance transfers to fund border security aligns with the position of reducing immigration's impact by potentially discouraging it and enhancing border security.
View source →Dec 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the College Admissions Accountability Act suggests a focus on reforming higher education practices, which aligns with the stated position of advocating for changes in the education system.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Cosponsoring the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act aligns with the expressed support for Israel, even as it contrasts with the opposition to military aid for Ukraine.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-511.
Why: Cosponsoring the Affordable Insulin Now Act supports healthcare access by addressing insulin costs, aligning with the broader goal of improving healthcare affordability despite the focus on fraud in Medicaid.
View source →Sep 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at safeguarding education aligns with the stated position of advocating for reforms in the education system, even if the specifics of the bill are not detailed.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at clarifying citizenship could imply a restriction on immigration rights, which contradicts the stated support for immigration.
View source →Mar 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that targets funding for sanctuary cities directly contradicts the support for legal immigration, as it seeks to penalize localities that provide protections for immigrants.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action relates to healthcare regulation but does not directly address the stated support for healthcare access or accountability in spending, leading to ambiguity in alignment.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The cosponsorship of the Promising Pathway Act 2.0 does not clearly align with the stated position on supporting healthcare, as it focuses on accountability rather than expanding access or improving healthcare services.
View source →May 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action supports family growth through IVF, which relates to healthcare, but does not directly address the stated position on Medicaid accountability or fraud.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The act aims to reform detention practices, which could be seen as a humanitarian approach to immigration, but it does not align with the stated support for reducing legal immigration.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S3319-3320)
Why: The resolution condemns antisemitism on campuses, which aligns with a concern for education, but does not directly address the figure's opposition to higher education institutions themselves.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Focus on Learning Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated opposition to higher education institutions, as the specifics of the bill's provisions are not detailed.
View source →May 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The sponsorship of the law indicates a focus on healthcare accountability, but the specific provisions and overall impact on healthcare access or spending are unclear.
Apr 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The sponsorship of the act suggests a focus on quality improvement in healthcare, but the emphasis on suspending Medicaid payments for fraud indicates a tension between accountability measures and broader support for healthcare access.
View source →Mar 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 426.
Why: The sponsorship of the health monitoring act indicates a focus on healthcare, but it does not directly align with the stated position of supporting healthcare access or addressing Medicaid fraud specifically.
View source →Mar 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action focuses on monitoring foreign aid rather than directly opposing or supporting military aid to Ukraine or Israel, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Sponsoring the Ukraine Aid Transparency Act suggests a focus on oversight of aid rather than outright opposition, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position on military aid.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The PASTEUR Act aims to improve antibiotic development, which relates to healthcare, but does not directly address Medicaid or accountability in spending, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The cosponsorship of the Metastatic Breast Cancer Access to Care Act indicates support for healthcare access, but the focus on Medicaid fraud and suspending payments suggests a tension with broader healthcare support.
View source →Oct 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The sponsorship of the act does not directly address higher education issues, leaving the relationship between the stated opposition and the action unclear.
View source →Oct 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action does not directly address military aid or foreign conflicts, leaving its alignment with the stated position unclear.
View source →Sep 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The sponsorship of the Freedom to Breathe Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on healthcare, as it focuses on a specific aspect of health policy rather than overall healthcare access or spending.
View source →Jul 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The bill addresses technical aspects of foreign aid without directly aligning with or opposing the stated position on military aid to Ukraine or support for Israel.
View source →May 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The action relates to military benefits rather than direct foreign aid, making the alignment with the stated position on foreign aid unclear.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S76; text: CR S81)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-1.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6936-6937; text: CR S6915)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S6451-6452)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5836; text: CR S5789)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4337; text: CR S4346-4347)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2024 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-149.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3905; text: CR S3893)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-160.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1750)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.