Sponsorship· ImmigrationCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Vance has been characterized as an isolationist and has expressed skepticism towards continued military aid to Ukraine, advocating instead for a focus on diplomatic engagement and prioritizing U.S. interests in East Asia.
Vance has been characterized as an isolationist and has expressed skepticism towards continued military aid to Ukraine, advocating instead for a focus on diplomatic engagement and prioritizing U.S. interests in East Asia.
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
J.D. Vance advocates for a reduction in legal immigration, arguing that a much lower rate would benefit the U.S. He has expressed skepticism about the current immigration policies and their impact on society.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
J.D. Vance advocates for a reduction in legal immigration, arguing that a much lower rate would benefit the U.S. He has expressed skepticism about the current immigration policies and their impact on society.
Vance has expressed a need for maintaining strong national defense and has been critical of U.S. military aid to Ukraine, preferring a focus on diplomatic engagement and a shift in U.S. foreign policy priorities towards East Asia.
Vance has expressed a need for maintaining strong national defense and has been critical of U.S. military aid to Ukraine, preferring a focus on diplomatic engagement and a shift in U.S. foreign policy priorities towards East Asia.
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
J.D. Vance opposes legal access to abortion, advocating for restrictions without exceptions for rape or incest. He has expressed a belief that abortion should be criminalized at the federal level.
J.D. Vance opposes legal access to abortion, advocating for restrictions without exceptions for rape or incest. He has expressed a belief that abortion should be criminalized at the federal level.
J.D. Vance is against stricter firearms regulation, positioning himself as a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. He has criticized gun control measures and has been vocal about his belief in the right to bear arms.
J.D. Vance is against stricter firearms regulation, positioning himself as a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. He has criticized gun control measures and has been vocal about his belief in the right to bear arms.
Vance has taken a strong stance against Medicaid fraud and has announced significant actions to suspend Medicaid payments in California due to rampant fraud. He emphasizes the need for accountability in healthcare spending.
Vance has taken a strong stance against Medicaid fraud and has announced significant actions to suspend Medicaid payments in California due to rampant fraud. He emphasizes the need for accountability in healthcare spending.
Vance has expressed criticism of higher education institutions, labeling them as 'the enemy' and advocating for reforms in the education system that align with conservative values.
J.D. Vance has expressed skepticism about the integrity of voting processes, particularly in California, suggesting that recent election outcomes appear suspicious. He has joined calls for stricter measures to ensure election integrity.
J.D. Vance has expressed skepticism about the integrity of voting processes, particularly in California, suggesting that recent election outcomes appear suspicious. He has joined calls for stricter measures to ensure election integrity.
J.D. Vance has expressed support for tariffs and has been critical of free trade agreements, indicating a preference for policies that protect American jobs and industries.
J.D. Vance has expressed support for tariffs and has been critical of free trade agreements, indicating a preference for policies that protect American jobs and industries.
“Vance has been critical of free trade agreements and has expressed support for tariffs to protect American jobs.”
Vance has opposed federal legislation to codify marriage equality and has expressed conservative views on LGBTQ issues, indicating a preference for traditional definitions of marriage.
Vance has opposed federal legislation to codify marriage equality and has expressed conservative views on LGBTQ issues, indicating a preference for traditional definitions of marriage.
Position extraction pending on 11 issues: Economy & Jobs, Climate, Taxes, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Mandatory E-Verify Act directly supports the stated position of reducing legal immigration and enforcing immigration laws.
Jun 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at dismantling DEI initiatives aligns with the stated opposition to federal legislation supporting marriage equality and broader LGBTQ protections.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule that likely imposes stricter firearms license requirements directly aligns with the stated opposition to gun control measures.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule that could impose additional regulations on firearm dealers directly aligns with the stated opposition to stricter gun laws.
View source →Mar 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that denies funding to sanctuary cities directly supports the stated position of reducing legal immigration and enforcing federal immigration laws.
View source →Dec 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that imposes a fee on remittance transfers to fund border security directly supports the stated position of reducing legal immigration and enhancing enforcement measures.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S6461)
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
Why: The resolution supports U.S. interests in Israel's security and stability, aligning with a realist approach to foreign policy, despite the potential for military implications.
View source →Mar 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
Why: Sponsoring a defense remobilization act directly contradicts the stated position of opposing military involvement and interventionist policies.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a disapproval resolution could potentially align with opposing immigration measures, but the specific content of the proposed rule and its impact on immigration policy is unclear.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on immigration.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S3319-3320)
Why: The resolution addresses antisemitism, which is a civil rights issue, but does not directly relate to the figure's stated opposition to federal marriage equality legislation.
View source →Mar 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Mar 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on foreign policy.
Oct 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jul 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear regarding its impact on U.S. foreign policy interests, making it difficult to determine alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Vance prefers a negotiated peace regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and has argued for a shift in U.S. focus to East Asia.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on national security.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to School Curriculum, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Vance has been critical of free trade agreements and has expressed support for tariffs to protect American jobs.”
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Vance has been critical of free trade agreements and has expressed support for tariffs to protect American jobs.”
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 426.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Vance has been critical of free trade agreements and has expressed support for tariffs to protect American jobs.”
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-511.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the bill.
Why: Tagged to School Curriculum, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S76; text: CR S81)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-1.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6936-6937; text: CR S6915)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S6451-6452)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5836; text: CR S5789)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4337; text: CR S4346-4347)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2024 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-149.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3905; text: CR S3893)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-160.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1750)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.