Sponsorship· Civil RightsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Jason Smith opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, supporting stricter border enforcement and limitations on immigration.
Jason Smith opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, supporting stricter border enforcement and limitations on immigration.
Jason Smith supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for increased defense spending and a robust military presence.
Jason Smith supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for increased defense spending and a robust military presence.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Jason Smith supports restricting access to abortion, advocating for states to have the authority to regulate abortion laws rather than the federal government. He has expressed opposition to federal mandates that would expand abortion access.
Jason Smith supports restricting access to abortion, advocating for states to have the authority to regulate abortion laws rather than the federal government. He has expressed opposition to federal mandates that would expand abortion access.
Jason Smith opposes federal action to cut emissions, advocating instead for policies that prioritize economic growth over environmental regulations. He has criticized climate change initiatives that he views as detrimental to the economy.
Jason Smith opposes federal action to cut emissions, advocating instead for policies that prioritize economic growth over environmental regulations. He has criticized climate change initiatives that he views as detrimental to the economy.
Jason Smith opposes stricter firearms regulations, advocating for the protection of Second Amendment rights. He has been critical of efforts to impose more regulations on gun ownership.
Jason Smith opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for free-market solutions and reduced government involvement in healthcare.
Jason Smith opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for free-market solutions and reduced government involvement in healthcare.
Jason Smith supports lower taxes on corporations and top earners, arguing that tax cuts stimulate economic growth and investment.
Jason Smith supports lower taxes on corporations and top earners, arguing that tax cuts stimulate economic growth and investment.
Jason Smith supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for trade policies that benefit American workers and the economy. He believes that protectionism does not serve the public interest and instead favors firms that lobby for it.
Jason Smith supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for trade policies that benefit American workers and the economy. He believes that protectionism does not serve the public interest and instead favors firms that lobby for it.
Jason Smith has shown opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, aligning with Republican efforts to dismantle demographic reporting systems that track workplace discrimination. He has supported measures that limit the scope of federal oversight in these areas.
Jason Smith has shown opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, aligning with Republican efforts to dismantle demographic reporting systems that track workplace discrimination. He has supported measures that limit the scope of federal oversight in these areas.
Jason Smith opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, supporting a more stringent approach to drug policy that emphasizes enforcement over legalization.
Jason Smith opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, supporting a more stringent approach to drug policy that emphasizes enforcement over legalization.
Position extraction pending on 11 issues: Foreign Policy, Economy & Jobs, Education, School Curriculum, Voting Rights, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Education and Workforce, Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Financial Services, Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Dismantle DEI Act directly aligns with the stated position of opposing stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly regarding LGBTQ rights.
Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Life at Conception Act directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion by advocating for restrictions on abortion rights.
View source →Feb 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that makes stricter border enforcement protocols mandatory directly supports the stated position of opposing expanded immigration pathways.
View source →Feb 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to repeal the estate tax directly aligns with the stated position of supporting lower taxes on corporations and top earners.
View source →Jan 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion by advocating for restrictions on abortion rights.
View source →Jan 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the REMAIN in Mexico Act directly supports stricter border enforcement and limitations on immigration, aligning clearly with the stated opposition to expanding legal immigration pathways.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly supports limiting protections for transgender athletes in sports, which aligns with the stated opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-13.
Why: Sponsoring a trade agreement implementation act directly advances the stated position of supporting free-trade agreements and lower tariffs.
View source →Jun 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 101.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to cut taxes for working families directly aligns with the stated position of supporting lower taxes, as it promotes tax reductions.
View source →Mar 9, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to repeal the estate tax directly aligns with the position advocating for lower taxes on corporations and top earners.
View source →Jan 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring the No Abortion Bonds Act directly supports the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion by promoting restrictions on abortion funding.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 15.
Why: The act aims to address healthcare pricing without expanding government involvement, aligning with the figure's opposition to a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The appropriations act funds border enforcement and aligns with the stated opposition to expanding immigration pathways, making the vote consistent with the position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The bill promotes energy freedom and deregulation, aligning with the position that prioritizes economic growth over federal emissions cuts.
View source →Jul 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 118-231, Part I.
Why: The act promotes price transparency in healthcare, which can align with free-market principles, thus moving in the same direction as the stated opposition to a larger government role.
View source →May 20, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that supports telehealth aligns with the position of advocating for healthcare solutions, even if it does not directly expand government coverage.
View source →Feb 25, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Sponsoring a tax relief act for working families aligns with the broader goal of tax cuts, even if it focuses on a different demographic than corporations and top earners.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at preventing abortion directly contradicts the stated position of opposing legal access to abortion.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the Restoring Equal Opportunity Act, which aims to limit anti-discrimination protections, directly contradicts the stated opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 8.
Why: Cosponsoring the Chloe Cole Act, which is likely to limit protections for transgender individuals, directly contradicts the stated position of opposing stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: The Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act aims to enhance conservation efforts, which directly contradicts the stated position of opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Feb 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that amends the Clean Air Act suggests support for regulatory measures related to emissions, which contradicts the stated opposition to federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content is unclear regarding its overall impact on taxes, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Sep 27, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →May 8, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on taxes.
View source →Jan 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure was not invoked (Record Vote No. 230) made in Senate.
Why: The action involves a procedural motion to reconsider a vote on a tax relief measure, but the specific content of the measure and its alignment with the stated position on taxes cannot be determined.
View source →Oct 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 249.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the action description alone, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on trade.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 81.
Why: The action involves extending taxes, which does not clearly advance or undermine the stated position on supporting lower taxes.
Jul 26, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action involves sponsoring a bill that could expand telehealth services, which may align with some healthcare access goals, but does not clearly indicate a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Dec 7, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as it is unclear how it relates to free-trade agreements and tariffs.
View source →Mar 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on national security.
View source →Feb 25, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on taxes.
View source →Dec 18, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content regarding telehealth could support access to healthcare without expanding government coverage, but the overall impact on government involvement is unclear.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 29.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 289.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Work and Welfare.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 99.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 100.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 20, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 25, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 29, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 18, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Oversight and Reform, the Budget, and Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 30, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 20, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 16, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 1, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee Hearings Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Yea-Nay Vote. 90 - 6. Record Vote Number: 228.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 330.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 286.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 609.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-53.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 9, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committees on Appropriations, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. (text: CR H4722)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 17.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-167.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2022 · Congress.gov
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 129.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 8, 2021 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 420.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 15, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.