Sponsorship· HealthcareCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Jack Reed supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for comprehensive immigration reform that provides a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. He has been rated 8% by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, indicating a more open-border stance.
Jack Reed supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for comprehensive immigration reform that provides a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. He has been rated 8% by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, indicating a more open-border stance.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Jack Reed emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities. He supports funding for military readiness and has been involved in defense policy discussions as a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Jack Reed emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities. He supports funding for military readiness and has been involved in defense policy discussions as a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Jack Reed supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as increased funding for public services and economic relief packages. He has voted for significant COVID relief measures.
Jack Reed supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as increased funding for public services and economic relief packages. He has voted for significant COVID relief measures.
Jack Reed has a strong pro-choice stance on abortion, advocating for legal access to abortion and supporting federal funding for family planning clinics. He has been rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.
Jack Reed has a strong pro-choice stance on abortion, advocating for legal access to abortion and supporting federal funding for family planning clinics. He has been rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.
Jack Reed advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has been rated 95% by the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a strong pro-environment voting record. He supports measures to address climate change and promote clean energy.
Jack Reed advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has been rated 95% by the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a strong pro-environment voting record. He supports measures to address climate change and promote clean energy.
Jack Reed supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales. He has been rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record.
Jack Reed supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales. He has been rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record.
Jack Reed advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting measures to expand access to healthcare and maintain protections under the Affordable Care Act. He has been rated 100% by the American Public Health Association.
Jack Reed advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting measures to expand access to healthcare and maintain protections under the Affordable Care Act. He has been rated 100% by the American Public Health Association.
Jack Reed supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for progressive taxation policies. He has been rated 100% by the Citizens for Tax Justice, indicating support for progressive taxation.
Jack Reed supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for progressive taxation policies. He has been rated 100% by the Citizens for Tax Justice, indicating support for progressive taxation.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Jack Reed supports more federal funding for public schools and has been rated 91% by the National Education Association, indicating a pro-public education voting record. He advocates for policies that enhance educational access and resources.
Jack Reed supports more federal funding for public schools and has been rated 91% by the National Education Association, indicating a pro-public education voting record. He advocates for policies that enhance educational access and resources.
Jack Reed supports expanding ballot access and has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter registration and access to the polls. He advocates for measures that enhance democratic participation.
Jack Reed supports expanding ballot access and has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter registration and access to the polls. He advocates for measures that enhance democratic participation.
Jack Reed supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, as evidenced by his pro-gay-rights voting record and his advocacy for prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. He has been rated 89% by the Human Rights Campaign.
Jack Reed supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, as evidenced by his pro-gay-rights voting record and his advocacy for prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. He has been rated 89% by the Human Rights Campaign.
Jack Reed supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, advocating for strong public health responses to disease outbreaks and health crises. He has been rated 100% by the American Public Health Association.
Jack Reed supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, advocating for strong public health responses to disease outbreaks and health crises. He has been rated 100% by the American Public Health Association.
Jack Reed has a mixed stance on drug policy, supporting some reforms while opposing full legalization of marijuana at the federal level. He has been rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance.
Jack Reed has a mixed stance on drug policy, supporting some reforms while opposing full legalization of marijuana at the federal level. He has been rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance.
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: Foreign Policy, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that expands Medicaid coverage and access to home and community-based services directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Restoring Justice for Workers Act aims to enhance workers' rights and protections, directly supporting economic stability and growth through job creation and addressing disparities.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act directly supports economic stability and growth by addressing wage theft, which aligns with the stated position on promoting job creation and economic equity.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Medicare Cost Cap Act directly supports the stated position by aiming to expand access and reduce costs in healthcare.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion and advocating for reproductive rights.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring the Investing in State Energy Act directly supports federal action to cut emissions and promote renewable energy, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S2786-2791; Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2786)
Why: Cosponsoring the Make More in America Act directly supports government intervention aimed at economic stability and growth, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act directly supports legal access to abortion by ensuring individuals can travel for reproductive health services, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2418-2419)
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at job creation within the defense industrial base directly advances the stated position of supporting government intervention for economic stability and growth.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly supports expanding healthcare access and aligns with the commitment to public health, particularly for mid-life women's health issues.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the Firearm Safety Act directly supports the stated pro-gun control stance by advocating for measures that enhance firearm safety and regulation.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding voter registration and access, aligning closely with the stated position on voting rights.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1859)
Why: S 4350 aims to authorize programs that support environmental protection and sustainability, directly advancing the stated position on climate action.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act directly supports progressive taxation by targeting tax breaks for the wealthy, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 529.
Why: Sponsoring the EMPOWER for Health Act indicates a direct advancement of the stated position by promoting expanded access to healthcare.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act aligns directly with the support for progressive taxation and higher taxes on the wealthy, as it targets excess profits from oil companies.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1048-1049)
Why: Sponsoring the ACTION for National Service Act directly supports job creation and economic stability, aligning closely with the stated position on government intervention for economic growth.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the PrEP Access and Coverage Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the commitment to preserve and enhance public health services.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The bill aims to address public health concerns related to youth e-cigarette use, which aligns with the support for government authority in public health initiatives.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to financing for development aligns with the position of supporting government intervention for economic stability and growth.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
Why: The resolution supports the rights of individuals with disabilities, which aligns with the broader goal of stronger federal protections against discrimination for marginalized communities.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Right to IVF Act aims to expand access to reproductive healthcare, which aligns with the broader goal of increasing government involvement in health coverage.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing wage disparities aligns with advocating for stronger protections against discrimination, particularly as it addresses economic inequality affecting marginalized communities.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the advocacy for stronger protections against discrimination for LGBTQ communities, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that supports caregivers and the direct care workforce aligns with the position advocating for expanded access to healthcare and reducing costs.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at enhancing firearms dealer licensing aligns with the broader goal of stricter firearms regulation, even if it does not directly address universal background checks or assault weapon restrictions.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The Small Farm Conservation Act likely promotes conservation practices that can contribute to emissions reduction and environmental protection, aligning with the stated position on climate action.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to designate Haiti for temporary protected status supports the position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways by providing protection to vulnerable populations.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S2821)
Why: The Stock Buyback Accountability Act aims to regulate stock buybacks, which can promote economic stability and growth by encouraging companies to invest in their workforce and operations, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at restoring and preserving gun records aligns with the broader goal of stricter firearms regulation, even if it does not directly address universal background checks or assault weapon restrictions.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act to expedite disability insurance payments aligns with the stated position of expanding access to healthcare for vulnerable populations.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the DISCLOSE Act, which aims to improve transparency in campaign finance, aligns with the broader goal of enhancing voting rights and access.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish a fund aimed at preventing weaponization directly contradicts the support for stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4520-4521)
Why: The measure addresses securities trading regulations, which could have economic implications, but it does not directly promote job creation or economic stability as outlined in the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on economic intervention.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2272)
Why: The action involves sponsoring a resolution disapproving a consumer protection rule, which could have mixed implications for economic stability and growth, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 443.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Apr 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-441.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on economic intervention.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 106.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4139-4140)
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2055-2056)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1902; text: CR S1938-1939)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-510.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4478)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1609; text: CR S1617-1618)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-80.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 362.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 52. Record Vote Number: 121. (consideration: CR S2264-2265)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.