Sponsorship· Economy & JobsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Jack Reed supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for comprehensive immigration reform that provides a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. He has been rated 8% by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, indicating a more open-border stance.
Jack Reed supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for comprehensive immigration reform that provides a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. He has been rated 8% by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, indicating a more open-border stance.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Jack Reed emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities. He supports funding for military readiness and has been involved in defense policy discussions as a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Jack Reed emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities. He supports funding for military readiness and has been involved in defense policy discussions as a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Jack Reed supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as increased funding for public services and economic relief packages. He has voted for significant COVID relief measures.
Jack Reed supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as increased funding for public services and economic relief packages. He has voted for significant COVID relief measures.
Jack Reed has a strong pro-choice stance on abortion, advocating for legal access to abortion and supporting federal funding for family planning clinics. He has been rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.
Jack Reed has a strong pro-choice stance on abortion, advocating for legal access to abortion and supporting federal funding for family planning clinics. He has been rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.
Jack Reed advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has been rated 95% by the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a strong pro-environment voting record. He supports measures to address climate change and promote clean energy.
Jack Reed advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has been rated 95% by the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a strong pro-environment voting record. He supports measures to address climate change and promote clean energy.
Jack Reed supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales. He has been rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record.
Jack Reed supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales. He has been rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record.
Jack Reed advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting measures to expand access to healthcare and maintain protections under the Affordable Care Act. He has been rated 100% by the American Public Health Association.
Jack Reed advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting measures to expand access to healthcare and maintain protections under the Affordable Care Act. He has been rated 100% by the American Public Health Association.
Jack Reed supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for progressive taxation policies. He has been rated 100% by the Citizens for Tax Justice, indicating support for progressive taxation.
Jack Reed supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for progressive taxation policies. He has been rated 100% by the Citizens for Tax Justice, indicating support for progressive taxation.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Jack Reed supports more federal funding for public schools and has been rated 91% by the National Education Association, indicating a pro-public education voting record. He advocates for policies that enhance educational access and resources.
Jack Reed supports more federal funding for public schools and has been rated 91% by the National Education Association, indicating a pro-public education voting record. He advocates for policies that enhance educational access and resources.
Jack Reed supports expanding ballot access and has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter registration and access to the polls. He advocates for measures that enhance democratic participation.
Jack Reed supports expanding ballot access and has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter registration and access to the polls. He advocates for measures that enhance democratic participation.
Jack Reed supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, as evidenced by his pro-gay-rights voting record and his advocacy for prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. He has been rated 89% by the Human Rights Campaign.
Jack Reed supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, as evidenced by his pro-gay-rights voting record and his advocacy for prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. He has been rated 89% by the Human Rights Campaign.
Jack Reed supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, advocating for strong public health responses to disease outbreaks and health crises. He has been rated 100% by the American Public Health Association.
Jack Reed supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, advocating for strong public health responses to disease outbreaks and health crises. He has been rated 100% by the American Public Health Association.
Jack Reed has a mixed stance on drug policy, supporting some reforms while opposing full legalization of marijuana at the federal level. He has been rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance.
Jack Reed has a mixed stance on drug policy, supporting some reforms while opposing full legalization of marijuana at the federal level. He has been rated B by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance.
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: Foreign Policy, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act directly supports economic stability by addressing wage theft, aligning closely with the stated position on government intervention for economic growth.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring the Investing in State Energy Act aligns directly with the goal of federal action to cut emissions and promote clean energy initiatives.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly supports the stated position of ensuring legal access to abortion and protecting reproductive rights.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position on legal access to abortion.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that targets taxation on oil company buybacks aligns directly with the stated support for progressive taxation and higher taxes on the wealthy.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly supports expanding healthcare access and aligns with the commitment to public health, particularly for mid-life women's health issues.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the Firearm Safety Act directly supports the stated pro-gun control stance by advocating for measures that enhance firearm safety and regulation.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding voter registration and access, aligning closely with the stated position on voting rights.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act directly supports progressive taxation by targeting tax breaks for the wealthy, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1093)
Why: Sponsoring the EMPOWER for Health Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare, aligning with the stated position on preserving Medicaid and ACA services.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act aligns directly with the support for progressive taxation and higher taxes on the wealthy, as it targets excess profits from oil companies.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the PrEP Access and Coverage Act directly supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the commitment to preserve and enhance public health services.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The bill aims to expand access to reproductive healthcare services, which aligns with the broader support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
Why: The resolution supports the rights of individuals with disabilities, which aligns with the broader commitment to civil rights and protections against discrimination.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing wage disparities aligns with the broader goal of stronger protections against discrimination, particularly in employment.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the stated position of advocating for stronger federal protections against discrimination for LGBTQ rights.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports the broader goal of enhancing healthcare services and workforce support, aligning with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Medicare Cost Cap Act indicates support for government involvement in healthcare, aligning with the advocacy for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the State Firearms Dealer Licensing Enhancement Act moves in the direction of stricter regulation by addressing licensing, which aligns with the stated support for background checks and closing loopholes.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act supports increased access to education funding, which aligns with the advocacy for more federal funding for public schools.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill for temporary protected status for Haiti aligns with the broader support for expanding legal immigration pathways, as it facilitates protection for individuals from Haiti.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S2821)
Why: Cosponsoring the Stock Buyback Accountability Act aims to regulate corporate practices that can impact economic stability, aligning with the support for government intervention in the economy.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S2786-2791; Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2786)
Why: Cosponsoring the Make More in America Act indicates support for government intervention in the economy, aligning with the stated position on economic stability and growth.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1859)
Why: Sponsoring the Southeast New England Program Authorization Act indicates support for environmental initiatives, aligning with the goal of advancing clean energy and environmental protection.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act to expedite disability insurance payments aligns with the stated position of expanding access to healthcare for vulnerable populations.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1093)
Why: Sponsoring a bill focused on stem cell research aligns with expanding healthcare access and advancing medical research, which supports the broader goals of improving public health.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the DISCLOSE Act, which aims to improve transparency in campaign finance, aligns with the broader goal of enhancing voting rights and access.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish a fund related to firearms regulation directly contradicts the stated support for stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The Investor Choice Act of 2026 may have elements that support economic growth, but without specific details on its provisions, it's unclear how it aligns with direct government intervention for economic stability.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a health-related bill indicates some support for healthcare initiatives, but without details on the bill's specific provisions, the alignment with the stated position is unclear.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The Small Farm Conservation Act may include elements related to conservation and sustainability, but it does not directly address federal action to cut emissions or clean energy initiatives.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The bill addresses child labor protections, which relates to civil rights, but does not specifically advance LGBTQ rights or broader anti-discrimination measures.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The act focuses on restoring and preserving gun records, which does not directly advance the stated support for stricter regulations and background checks.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4139-4140)
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2418-2419)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2055-2056)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1902; text: CR S1938-1939)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-510.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1609; text: CR S1617-1618)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-80.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 362.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 52. Record Vote Number: 121. (consideration: CR S2264-2265)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2272)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1048-1049)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 18, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-441.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.