Sponsorship· Civil RightsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Jeffries supports maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly in relation to military and humanitarian assistance to allies like Ukraine and Israel.
Jeffries supports maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly in relation to military and humanitarian assistance to allies like Ukraine and Israel.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
“$500M and 3,000 troops to Africa to fight Ebola. (Aug 2014)”
Most frequent employers self-reported by individual donors (FEC, current cycle).
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Jeffries supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He has advocated for legalizing DREAMer immigrants and increasing visa caps for both high-skill and family-based immigration.
Jeffries supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He has advocated for legalizing DREAMer immigrants and increasing visa caps for both high-skill and family-based immigration.
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
“Increase both high-skill and family-based visa caps. (Apr 2019)”
Jeffries supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth, including federal stimulus spending and tax incentives for job creation.
Jeffries supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth, including federal stimulus spending and tax incentives for job creation.
“In the 117th Congress, he voted with President Joe Biden's stated position 100% of the time according to a FiveThirtyEight analysis.”
“Supports federal stimulus spending. (Sep 2012)”
Hakeem Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade, calling it an "assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans." He has also reintroduced the Women's Health Protection Act to legally protect access to abortion care nationwide.
Hakeem Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade, calling it an "assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans." He has also reintroduced the Women's Health Protection Act to legally protect access to abortion care nationwide.
“Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, calling it "an assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans".”
“I consider myself pro-choice. (Sep 2012)”
Jeffries supports federal action to cut emissions and has advocated for environmental projects funded through real estate transfer taxes. He has voted in favor of measures aimed at addressing climate change.
Jeffries supports federal action to cut emissions and has advocated for environmental projects funded through real estate transfer taxes. He has voted in favor of measures aimed at addressing climate change.
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
“Voted YES on banning offshore oil drilling in Gulf of Mexico. (Jul 2016)”
Jeffries supports increased background checks for potential gun owners and a ban on assault weapons. He has called for Congress to bring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act and an assault weapons ban to the House floor, emphasizing the need to prioritize children's safety over gun access.
Jeffries supports increased background checks for potential gun owners and a ban on assault weapons. He has called for Congress to bring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act and an assault weapons ban to the House floor, emphasizing the need to prioritize children's safety over gun access.
“Jeffries supports increased background checks for potential gun owners and a ban on assault weapons.”
“Require background check for every firearm sale and transfer. (Jan 2019)”
Jeffries advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and opposing efforts to repeal it. He believes in expanding access to healthcare for all.
Jeffries advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and opposing efforts to repeal it. He believes in expanding access to healthcare for all.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
“Rated GOP can't beat ObamaCare, so they pretend it's a "disaster". (Feb 2015)”
Jeffries supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that increase revenue for social programs and public services.
Jeffries supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that increase revenue for social programs and public services.
“Supports an income tax increase. (Sep 2012)”
“Raising estate tax to 1990s level means $448B in new revenue. (Apr 2015)”
Jeffries advocates for increased federal funding for public schools and opposes private and religious school voucher programs. He supports reforms to improve education access and affordability.
Jeffries advocates for increased federal funding for public schools and opposes private and religious school voucher programs. He supports reforms to improve education access and affordability.
“Jeffries supports federal grants for education reforms.”
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Jeffries is a proponent of expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, such as automatic voter registration and eliminating photo ID requirements that can suppress voter turnout.
Jeffries is a proponent of expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, such as automatic voter registration and eliminating photo ID requirements that can suppress voter turnout.
“Jeffries has been actively involved in addressing voting rights issues.”
“No photo IDs to vote; they suppress the vote. (Jun 2014)”
Jeffries has called for reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has been involved in efforts to reform policing practices. He supports alternative sentencing for non-violent offenders and has advocated for a federal ban on police chokeholds.
Jeffries has called for reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has been involved in efforts to reform policing practices. He supports alternative sentencing for non-violent offenders and has advocated for a federal ban on police chokeholds.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
“Alternative sentencing for non-violent offenders. (Nov 2008)”
Jeffries has supported legislation to protect privacy and regulate the tech industry, particularly in areas such as data security and consumer protections.
Jeffries has supported legislation to protect privacy and regulate the tech industry, particularly in areas such as data security and consumer protections.
Jeffries supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including voting rights and LGBTQ rights. He voted in favor of the Equality Act, which aims to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Jeffries supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including voting rights and LGBTQ rights. He voted in favor of the Equality Act, which aims to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
“Jeffries supports banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”
“Supports affirmative action in state hiring & college. (Nov 2008)”
Jeffries supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has introduced legislation aimed at regulating cannabis following its prohibition. He has also advocated for reforms to address the impacts of the war on drugs.
Jeffries supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has introduced legislation aimed at regulating cannabis following its prohibition. He has also advocated for reforms to address the impacts of the war on drugs.
“Jeffries reintroduced bipartisan legislation... to create a transparent process for the federal government to establish effective regulations to be enacted upon the termination of the prohibition of cannabis.”
“Let doctors prescribe medical marijuana. (Nov 2008)”
Position extraction pending on 7 issues: National Security, School Curriculum, Trade, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Source: OpenFEC · FEC profile ↗ · Hakeem Jeffries on OpenSecrets (deeper breakdown) ↗
Sep 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Jeffries supports banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”
Why: Cosponsoring the resolution to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
Jun 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, calling it "an assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans".”
Why: Cosponsoring the Women's Health Protection Act directly advances the stated position of protecting legal access to abortion nationwide.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Jeffries supports increased background checks for potential gun owners and a ban on assault weapons.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act directly advances the stated position by promoting increased background checks, which is a key aspect of stricter gun control measures.
View source →Apr 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Financial Services, House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Jeffries supports banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Equality Act directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ rights.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Jeffries has been actively involved in addressing voting rights issues.”
Why: Cosponsoring the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act directly advances the stated position of expanding ballot access and protecting voting rights.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H884)
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the American Dream and Promise Act directly supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Jeffries supports banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”
Why: Cosponsoring the CROWN Act, which aims to ban discrimination based on hair texture and hairstyles, directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Apr 30, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Jeffries supports banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”
Why: Cosponsoring the CROWN Act, which seeks to ban discrimination based on hair texture and hairstyles, directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Oct 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the American Dream and Promise Act directly supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Jeffries has been actively involved in addressing voting rights issues.”
Why: Cosponsoring the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act directly advances the stated position of expanding ballot access and protecting voting rights.
View source →Feb 15, 2022 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at keeping refugee programs operational directly supports the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Apr 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 31 - 9.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to affordable medications directly advances the commitment to making healthcare more affordable and accessible.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act, which funds border enforcement and detention, aligns with the position advocating for a more humane immigration policy.
View source →Mar 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Jeffries supports banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”
Why: The Paycheck Fairness Act aims to strengthen protections against wage discrimination, which aligns with the support for stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“In the 117th Congress, he voted with President Joe Biden's stated position 100% of the time according to a FiveThirtyEight analysis.”
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports labor rights and organizing, which can contribute to lowering costs and improving economic conditions, aligning with the stated position on affordability.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, calling it "an assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans".”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that protects access to contraception aligns with the broader goal of safeguarding reproductive rights, even though it does not directly address abortion access.
View source →Mar 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“In the 117th Congress, he voted with President Joe Biden's stated position 100% of the time according to a FiveThirtyEight analysis.”
Why: Cosponsoring the resolution supports legislative priorities aimed at building wealth and addressing economic disparities, which aligns with the emphasis on affordability and lowering living costs.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: The content of the Momnibus Act is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →May 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
“In the 117th Congress, he voted with President Joe Biden's stated position 100% of the time according to a FiveThirtyEight analysis.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on affordability.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“In the 117th Congress, he voted with President Joe Biden's stated position 100% of the time according to a FiveThirtyEight analysis.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Oct 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Jeffries supports banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill to award a Congressional Gold Medal to the Freedom Riders does not directly advance or undermine the stated position on stronger federal protections against discrimination, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: No stated position has been extracted for this issue yet — judgement deferred.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: No stated position has been extracted for this issue yet — judgement deferred.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Recorded Vote — Result: Passed
Why: No stated position has been extracted for this issue yet — judgement deferred.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: No stated position has been extracted for this issue yet — judgement deferred.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H625-626)
“Supports an income tax increase. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 2, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Jeffries supports federal grants for education reforms.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 29, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 21, 2022 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-301.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 20, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended).
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 25, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 18, 2021 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 408.
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 9, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 28, 2020 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 28, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 13, 2020 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 7, 2020 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Ways and Means, Agriculture, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, Armed Services, the Judiciary, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 8, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 15, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 14, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 14, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 2, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-245.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-103.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-62.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 28 - 7.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 2, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 82.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 4, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 9, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 22, 2020 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2020 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2020 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 19, 2019 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.