Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Jeffries supports maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly in relation to military and humanitarian assistance to allies like Ukraine and Israel.
Jeffries supports maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly in relation to military and humanitarian assistance to allies like Ukraine and Israel.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
“$500M and 3,000 troops to Africa to fight Ebola. (Aug 2014)”
Most frequent employers self-reported by individual donors (FEC, current cycle).
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Jeffries supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants through military service. He advocates for increasing both high-skill and family-based visa caps.
Jeffries supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants through military service. He advocates for increasing both high-skill and family-based visa caps.
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
“Increase both high-skill and family-based visa caps. (Apr 2019)”
Hakeem Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade, calling it an "assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans." He has also reintroduced the Women's Health Protection Act to legally protect access to abortion care nationwide.
Hakeem Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade, calling it an "assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans." He has also reintroduced the Women's Health Protection Act to legally protect access to abortion care nationwide.
“Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, calling it "an assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans".”
“I consider myself pro-choice. (Sep 2012)”
Jeffries supports federal action to cut emissions and has advocated for environmental projects funded through real estate transfer taxes. He has voted in favor of measures aimed at addressing climate change.
Jeffries supports federal action to cut emissions and has advocated for environmental projects funded through real estate transfer taxes. He has voted in favor of measures aimed at addressing climate change.
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
“Voted YES on banning offshore oil drilling in Gulf of Mexico. (Jul 2016)”
Jeffries supports increased background checks for potential gun owners and a ban on assault weapons. He has called for Congress to bring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act and an assault weapons ban to the House floor, emphasizing the need to prioritize children's safety over gun access.
Jeffries supports increased background checks for potential gun owners and a ban on assault weapons. He has called for Congress to bring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act and an assault weapons ban to the House floor, emphasizing the need to prioritize children's safety over gun access.
“Jeffries supports increased background checks for potential gun owners and a ban on assault weapons.”
“Require background check for every firearm sale and transfer. (Jan 2019)”
Jeffries advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and opposing efforts to repeal it. He believes in expanding access to healthcare for all.
Jeffries advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and opposing efforts to repeal it. He believes in expanding access to healthcare for all.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
“Rated GOP can't beat ObamaCare, so they pretend it's a "disaster". (Feb 2015)”
Jeffries supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that increase revenue for social programs and public services.
Jeffries supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that increase revenue for social programs and public services.
“Supports an income tax increase. (Sep 2012)”
“Raising estate tax to 1990s level means $448B in new revenue. (Apr 2015)”
Jeffries supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has opposed private and religious school voucher programs. He advocates for reforms that enhance educational access and quality.
Jeffries supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has opposed private and religious school voucher programs. He advocates for reforms that enhance educational access and quality.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
“Supports federal grants for education reforms. (Sep 2012)”
Jeffries has been a strong advocate for expanding ballot access, supporting measures such as automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that he believes suppress voting.
Jeffries has been a strong advocate for expanding ballot access, supporting measures such as automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that he believes suppress voting.
“No photo IDs to vote; they suppress the vote. (Jun 2014)”
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Jeffries has called for reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has been involved in efforts to reform policing practices. He supports alternative sentencing for non-violent offenders and has advocated for a federal ban on police chokeholds.
Jeffries has called for reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has been involved in efforts to reform policing practices. He supports alternative sentencing for non-violent offenders and has advocated for a federal ban on police chokeholds.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
“Alternative sentencing for non-violent offenders. (Nov 2008)”
Jeffries has supported legislation to protect privacy and regulate the tech industry, particularly in areas such as data security and consumer protections.
Jeffries has supported legislation to protect privacy and regulate the tech industry, particularly in areas such as data security and consumer protections.
Position extraction pending on 2 issues: School Curriculum, Trade.
Source: OpenFEC · FEC profile ↗ · Hakeem Jeffries on OpenSecrets (deeper breakdown) ↗
Jun 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, calling it "an assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans".”
Why: Cosponsoring the Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 directly advances the stated position of protecting abortion access nationwide.
Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Jeffries supports increased background checks for potential gun owners and a ban on assault weapons.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Bipartisan Background Checks Act directly advances the stated position on increasing background checks for gun owners.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“No photo IDs to vote; they suppress the vote. (Jun 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act directly advances the stated position of expanding voting rights and opposing voter ID laws.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H884)
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the American Dream and Promise Act directly supports the stated position of providing legal pathways for immigrants, particularly for DREAMers.
View source →Oct 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the American Dream and Promise Act directly supports the stated position of providing legal pathways for immigrants, particularly for DREAMers.
View source →Sep 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“No photo IDs to vote; they suppress the vote. (Jun 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act directly supports the stated position of enhancing voting access and protecting against voter suppression.
View source →Feb 25, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Sponsoring the Excessive Use of Force Prevention Act directly advances the stated position on criminal justice reform by aiming to make chokeholds illegal under federal law.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Jeffries criticized the 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, calling it "an assault on freedom, the Constitution and the values shared by a majority of Americans".”
Why: Cosponsoring the Right to Contraception Act supports reproductive rights and aligns with the broader commitment to protecting access to healthcare, including abortion.
View source →Oct 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution supporting Israel's defense aligns with the broader commitment to U.S. assistance in conflict situations, reflecting support for allies in the context of foreign aid.
View source →Oct 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution supporting Israel's defense aligns with the stated position of supporting U.S. assistance, particularly in the context of military aid.
View source →May 25, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Sponsoring the First Step Implementation Act aligns with the call for criminal justice reform, as it aims to improve the federal prison system and reduce recidivism, moving in the same direction as the stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Sponsoring the EQUAL Act, which aims to eliminate mandatory minimums for certain non-violent offenses, aligns with the broader goal of criminal justice reform, even if it does not directly address excessive use of force.
View source →Oct 9, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Sponsoring the Begin Again Act, which addresses criminal justice reform, aligns with the stated support for reform efforts, even though the specific provisions are not detailed.
View source →Jan 13, 2020 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Sponsoring the Haiti Development Act supports the broader theme of U.S. foreign aid, aligning with the stated position on providing assistance to other countries.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Voting to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran contradicts the support for military aid and involvement in foreign conflicts, including Ukraine.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
Why: Voting against the appropriations act, which likely includes funding for immigration services, contradicts the stated support for providing legal pathways for immigrants.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Voting to remove U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities in Iran contradicts the support for military aid and involvement in foreign conflicts, including Ukraine.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for immigration enforcement, which could conflict with the support for legal pathways, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: While the action involves foreign aid, it does not directly relate to the stated support for military aid to Ukraine, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: The action addresses legal representation in the digital age, which relates to criminal justice, but does not directly advance the specific reform goals stated.
View source →Sep 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“No photo IDs to vote; they suppress the vote. (Jun 2014)”
Why: While the Equal Rights Amendment relates to civil rights, it does not directly address voting rights or the specific measures mentioned in the stated position.
View source →Mar 29, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: The sponsorship of the act addresses economic opportunities for formerly incarcerated individuals but does not directly relate to the stated focus on criminal justice reform and police accountability.
View source →Mar 21, 2022 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-301.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: The action addresses a specific criminal justice issue (human trafficking) but does not directly align with the broader calls for police reform and excessive use of force prevention.
View source →Jul 20, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“He defended the Biden administration's assistance to Ukraine throughout the crisis and voted to send relief.”
Why: Sponsoring the Turkey Human Rights Promotion Act indicates support for foreign aid related to human rights, but it does not directly align with the specific focus on military aid to Ukraine.
Apr 20, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: The sponsorship of the Criminal Judicial Administration Act does not clearly align with the specific calls for reform mentioned, leaving the relationship between the action and stated position ambiguous.
View source →Jan 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: The sponsorship of the act addresses a related issue of legal representation but does not directly advance the specific criminal justice reform measures mentioned in the stated position.
View source →Aug 28, 2020 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: The sponsorship of the Criminal Judicial Administration Act does not clearly align with the specific calls for reform mentioned, leaving the relationship between the action and stated position ambiguous.
View source →Mar 26, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: The sponsorship of the Emergency Community Supervision Act does not directly address the specific reforms called for, leaving the relationship between the action and stated position unclear.
View source →Jan 7, 2020 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: The sponsorship of the act addresses a related issue of legal representation but does not directly advance the specific criminal justice reform measures mentioned in the stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: No stated position has been extracted for this issue yet — judgement deferred.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Recorded Vote — Result: Passed
Why: No stated position has been extracted for this issue yet — judgement deferred.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: No stated position has been extracted for this issue yet — judgement deferred.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Recorded Vote — Result: Passed
Why: No stated position has been extracted for this issue yet — judgement deferred.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: No stated position has been extracted for this issue yet — judgement deferred.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Supports an income tax increase. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H625-626)
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“He called for a Department of Justice investigation into the circumstances of Eric Garner's death.”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 2, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
“Oppose private and religious school voucher programs. (Oct 2015)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 15, 2022 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
“Voted to legalize DREAMer immigrants via military service. (Jun 2016)”
Why: Tagged to Immigration, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2021 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended).
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2021 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 31 - 9.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 18, 2021 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 408.
“Fund environmental projects with real estate transfer tax. (May 2010)”
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 28, 2020 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Opposes repealing ObamaCare. (Sep 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Financial Services, House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Ways and Means, Agriculture, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, Armed Services, the Judiciary, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 8, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2023 · Congress.gov
Introduced in House
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 15, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 14, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 14, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 2, 2022 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-245.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-103.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 117-62.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 28 - 7.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 2, 2021 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 82.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 4, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 22, 2020 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2020 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2020 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 19, 2019 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.