Sponsorship· EducationCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Ranking Member, Energy and Commerce
NJ · District 6
Pallone supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, having voted against measures that would restrict immigration and in favor of legalizing DREAMer immigrants.
Pallone supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, having voted against measures that would restrict immigration and in favor of legalizing DREAMer immigrants.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Pallone supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, having voted for significant stimulus spending during economic downturns.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Pallone supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, having voted for significant stimulus spending during economic downturns.
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Frank Pallone supports legal access to abortion and has consistently voted against measures that would restrict abortion rights. He has a pro-choice voting record, including votes against banning federal health coverage that includes abortion and for expanding access to emergency contraception.
Frank Pallone supports legal access to abortion and has consistently voted against measures that would restrict abortion rights. He has a pro-choice voting record, including votes against banning federal health coverage that includes abortion and for expanding access to emergency contraception.
“Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.”
Pallone advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various measures aimed at addressing climate change, including enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution and investing in renewable energy.
Pallone advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various measures aimed at addressing climate change, including enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution and investing in renewable energy.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Pallone supports stricter firearms regulation, advocating for measures such as background checks for every firearm sale and transfer, and has a pro-gun control voting record.
Pallone supports stricter firearms regulation, advocating for measures such as background checks for every firearm sale and transfer, and has a pro-gun control voting record.
“Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record.”
Pallone supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for expanded access to healthcare services and has voted for measures to regulate drug pricing and expand health insurance programs.
Pallone supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for expanded access to healthcare services and has voted for measures to regulate drug pricing and expand health insurance programs.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Pallone supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for significant increases in education funding, including grants for Black and Hispanic colleges and green public schools.
Pallone supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for significant increases in education funding, including grants for Black and Hispanic colleges and green public schools.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Pallone supports expanding ballot access, having voted against measures that would impose restrictions such as photo ID requirements for voting.
Pallone supports expanding ballot access, having voted against measures that would impose restrictions such as photo ID requirements for voting.
“Voted NO on requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections.”
Pallone advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, including supporting legislation to prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation and reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.
Pallone advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, including supporting legislation to prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation and reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.
“Voted YES on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation.”
Pallone supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, advocating for public health initiatives and protections.
Pallone supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, advocating for public health initiatives and protections.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record. (Dec 2003)”
Pallone has a mixed record on drug policy, having voted against prohibiting needle exchange and medical marijuana in D.C. He has been rated 75% by NORML, indicating a pro-legalization stance, but also has a zero rating from them, indicating inconsistency.
Pallone has a mixed record on drug policy, having voted against prohibiting needle exchange and medical marijuana in D.C. He has been rated 75% by NORML, indicating a pro-legalization stance, but also has a zero rating from them, indicating inconsistency.
“Rated 75% by NORML, indicating a pro-legalization stance. (Jan 2014)”
Position extraction pending on 10 issues: Foreign Policy, National Security, Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Rebuild America’s Schools Act directly supports increased federal funding for public schools, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
Jul 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Voted YES on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act directly advances the stated position by promoting protections against discrimination and harassment, particularly benefiting LGBTQ individuals.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Arctic Refuge Protection Act directly supports federal action to cut emissions and protect the environment, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act aims to enhance conservation efforts, which directly supports the stated position of cutting emissions and addressing climate change.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Drain ICE Act, which aims to dismantle ICE and promote more humane immigration policies, directly advances the stated supportive stance on immigration.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly supports humane treatment standards for individuals in custody, aligning with the advocacy for pathways to legal status and opposing strict enforcement measures.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 374.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to designate Haiti for temporary protected status directly supports pathways to legal status for undocumented immigrants, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at lowering drug costs directly supports expanding access to healthcare, aligning with the stated position for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that relates to vaccine protection directly advances the stated position on government authority to mandate vaccines and public-health measures.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Sponsoring the COAST Anti-Drilling Act directly advances the stated position by promoting federal action to cut emissions and protect the environment from drilling activities.
View source →Jul 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at lowering drug costs directly supports the position of expanding access to healthcare by making medications more affordable for Americans.
View source →Mar 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Sponsoring the COAST Anti-Drilling Act directly supports the stated position by promoting federal action to cut emissions and combat environmental issues.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at preserving and expanding Pell Grants supports the stated position of increasing federal funding for education, as it directly impacts financial resources available to students.
View source →Jun 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The Great American Outdoors Act includes provisions for conservation and funding that can contribute to broader climate goals, making the cosponsorship a supportive action toward the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Roadless Area Conservation Act supports federal action to protect natural areas, which aligns with the stated position on cutting emissions and addressing climate change.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: The act aims to enhance transparency and lower healthcare costs, which aligns with the position advocating for expanded access to healthcare.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that promotes gun safety and secure storage aligns with the stated position of supporting stricter firearms regulation.
View source →May 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
“Voted YES on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that recognizes and celebrates the heritage of a marginalized group aligns with the broader commitment to stronger protections against discrimination.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Universal School Meals Program Act supports the stated position by promoting resources for students, which aligns with the advocacy for more federal funding for public schools.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Plastic Pellet Free Waters Act supports environmental protections and aligns with the broader goals of reducing pollution and promoting sustainability, which are consistent with strong climate change policies.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act, which funds border enforcement and detention, aligns with the position advocating for a more inclusive immigration policy.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Voted YES on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation.”
Why: The resolution supports eliminating race-based logos and mascots, which aligns with the broader goal of stronger protections against discrimination.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at protecting free vaccines supports the stated position on government authority to mandate vaccines and public health initiatives.
View source →Aug 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that supports aquaculture and seafood can be seen as a form of government intervention aimed at economic growth, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, the Budget, the Judiciary, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at lowering costs for everyday Americans aligns with the position of supporting government intervention to strengthen the economy and assist the middle class.
View source →Feb 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that aims to improve federal health programs aligns with the support for government authority in public health initiatives, even though it focuses on traumatic brain injuries.
View source →Jul 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Voted YES on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation.”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to eliminate race-based logos and mascots aligns with the broader commitment to stronger protections against discrimination, including for marginalized groups.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy efficiency and reducing emissions directly contradicts the stated support for federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record. (Dec 2003)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that removes Senate confirmation for the CDC Director undermines the stated support for government authority in public health, as it could weaken accountability and oversight in public health measures.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on immigration.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on climate action.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
“Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on federal funding for public schools.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Voted YES on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation.”
Why: The resolution commemorates a tragic event and denounces hate, which aligns with broader civil rights advocacy, but it does not directly advance federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for various immigration enforcement measures, which could conflict with the stated support for pathways to legal status and opposition to strict enforcement.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: The Healthy Families Act aims to provide paid sick leave, which supports public health but does not directly expand healthcare access or regulate drug prices as the stated position emphasizes.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record. (Dec 2003)”
Why: The action's content is unclear from the provided summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on public health.
View source →Aug 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on climate action.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as it is only referred to a subcommittee without details on its provisions or effects on healthcare access.
View source →Apr 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record. (Dec 2003)”
Why: The measure's content regarding public health initiatives is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on vaccine mandates and public health measures.
View source →Apr 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: The action is a sponsorship of a bill related to food labeling, which does not directly address healthcare access or government involvement in health coverage, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jan 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy, Climate and Grid Security.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on climate action.
View source →Sep 26, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the title and summary, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate action.
View source →May 6, 2022 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record. (Dec 2003)”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on public health.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Financial Services, Ways and Means, Oversight and Government Reform, Energy and Commerce, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 2.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Rated 75% by NORML, indicating a pro-legalization stance. (Jan 2014)”
Why: Tagged to Drug & Addiction Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 8, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 21, 2022 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 488.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee Hearings Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Randall asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1522, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-176.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 27.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.