Sponsorship· ClimateCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Ranking Member, Energy and Commerce
NJ · District 6
Pallone supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, having voted against measures that would restrict immigration and in favor of legalizing DREAMer immigrants.
Pallone supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, having voted against measures that would restrict immigration and in favor of legalizing DREAMer immigrants.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Frank Pallone supports legal access to abortion and has consistently voted against measures that would restrict abortion rights. He has a pro-choice voting record, including votes against banning federal health coverage that includes abortion and for expanding access to emergency contraception.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Frank Pallone supports legal access to abortion and has consistently voted against measures that would restrict abortion rights. He has a pro-choice voting record, including votes against banning federal health coverage that includes abortion and for expanding access to emergency contraception.
“Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.”
Pallone advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various measures aimed at addressing climate change, including enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution and investing in renewable energy.
Pallone advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various measures aimed at addressing climate change, including enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution and investing in renewable energy.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Pallone supports stricter firearms regulation, advocating for measures such as background checks for every firearm sale and transfer, and has a pro-gun control voting record.
Pallone supports stricter firearms regulation, advocating for measures such as background checks for every firearm sale and transfer, and has a pro-gun control voting record.
“Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record.”
Pallone supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for expanded access to healthcare services and has voted for measures to regulate drug pricing and expand health insurance programs.
Pallone supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for expanded access to healthcare services and has voted for measures to regulate drug pricing and expand health insurance programs.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Pallone supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for significant increases in education funding, including grants for Black and Hispanic colleges and green public schools.
Pallone supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for significant increases in education funding, including grants for Black and Hispanic colleges and green public schools.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Pallone supports expanding ballot access, having voted against measures that would impose restrictions such as photo ID requirements for voting.
Pallone supports expanding ballot access, having voted against measures that would impose restrictions such as photo ID requirements for voting.
“Voted NO on requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections.”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Aid, Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Arctic Refuge Protection Act directly supports strong climate policies by protecting a critical ecosystem from oil drilling, aligning with the commitment to emissions regulation and renewable energy investment.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Voting in favor of the Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act directly supports strong climate policies and aligns with the stated commitment to emissions regulation and renewable energy investments.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Drain ICE Act, which aims to dismantle ICE and promote more humane immigration policies, directly advances the stated supportive stance on immigration.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 374.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to designate Haiti for temporary protected status directly supports pathways to legal status for undocumented immigrants, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly supports humane treatment standards for individuals in custody, aligning with the advocacy for pathways to legal status and opposing strict enforcement measures.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring the Lowering Drug Costs for American Families Act directly advances the stated position of expanding access to healthcare and regulating drug prices.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring the Protecting Free Vaccines Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare by ensuring free vaccines, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Sponsoring the COAST Anti-Drilling Act directly supports the stated position by aiming to prevent increased oil drilling, aligning with strong climate change policies.
View source →Mar 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, the Budget, the Judiciary, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring the Lower Costs for Everyday Americans Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare and regulating drug prices, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jul 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring the act directly supports the stated position of expanding access to healthcare and regulating drug prices.
View source →Mar 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Sponsoring the COAST Anti-Drilling Act directly supports the stated position by promoting a ban on increased oil drilling, aligning with strong climate change policies.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Plastic Pellet Free Waters Act supports environmental protections and aligns with the broader goals of reducing pollution and promoting sustainability, which are consistent with strong climate change policies.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act suggests opposition to funding that may support strict enforcement measures, aligning with the supportive stance on immigration.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The vote on the Homeowner Energy Freedom Act aligns with the support for renewable energy, as it likely includes provisions that promote energy efficiency and alternatives, even though the bill ultimately failed.
View source →Jun 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring the Family Vaccine Protection Act aligns with expanding access to healthcare and public health initiatives, even though it focuses specifically on vaccines.
View source →Feb 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring improvements to federal programs for treatment aligns with the stated support for expanding access to healthcare, particularly in addressing specific health issues.
View source →Apr 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring the DOC Act indicates a commitment to healthcare access and regulation, aligning with the stated position of expanding healthcare access.
View source →May 6, 2022 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring the act aims to improve mental health services, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding access to healthcare.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy freedom and potentially renewable energy contradicts the stated support for strong climate change policies.
View source →Jun 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to remove Senate confirmation for the CDC Director undermines the stated support for public health oversight and access, suggesting a move away from accountability in health leadership.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for border enforcement measures, which could conflict with the support for pathways to legal status, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The vote on the appliance protection act does not directly address emissions regulations or renewable energy investments, making its alignment with the stated climate position unclear.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee Hearings Held
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: The action of cosponsoring the GUARD VA Benefits Act does not directly address expanding healthcare access or regulating drug prices, making the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record.”
Why: The action commemorates a mass shooting, which aligns with the figure's advocacy for stricter gun control, but it does not directly advance specific gun control measures.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for various immigration enforcement measures, which could conflict with the stated support for pathways to legal status and opposition to strict enforcement.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: The Healthy Families Act aims to provide paid sick leave, which supports public health but does not directly expand healthcare access or regulate drug prices as the stated position emphasizes.
View source →Aug 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The GRAS Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with strong climate policies, thus reflecting elements of both alignment and divergence.
Apr 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: The action relates to dietary supplements and does not directly address healthcare access or drug pricing, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.”
Why: The sponsorship of the Food Labeling Modernization Act is health-related but does not directly address expanding access to healthcare or regulating drug prices, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jan 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy, Climate and Grid Security.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The action's focus on energy and climate is relevant, but the specific provisions and overall impact of the Buy Low and Sell High Act are unclear, leading to uncertainty about its alignment with strong climate policies.
View source →Sep 26, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution.”
Why: The action's specifics are unclear, as it is referred to a subcommittee without details on its content, leaving the relationship to the stated position ambiguous.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Financial Services, Ways and Means, Oversight and Government Reform, Energy and Commerce, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 2.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 8, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 8, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 21, 2022 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 488.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Randall asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1522, a bill originally introduced by Representative Connolly, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 29, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-176.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 31, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 27.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.