Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Warren supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has been critical of current immigration policies and has called for comprehensive immigration reform that respects human rights.
Warren supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has been critical of current immigration policies and has called for comprehensive immigration reform that respects human rights.
Elizabeth Warren supports legal access to abortion and has called for national laws to protect a woman's right to choose. Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, she emphasized the need for federal action to ensure reproductive health services are accessible.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Elizabeth Warren supports legal access to abortion and has called for national laws to protect a woman's right to choose. Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, she emphasized the need for federal action to ensure reproductive health services are accessible.
Warren advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported the Green New Deal, emphasizing the need for significant investment in green infrastructure and renewable energy to combat climate change.
Warren advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported the Green New Deal, emphasizing the need for significant investment in green infrastructure and renewable energy to combat climate change.
Warren supports stricter firearms regulation and has called for measures such as universal background checks and an assault weapons ban. She views gun violence as a public health emergency that requires federal intervention.
Warren supports stricter firearms regulation and has called for measures such as universal background checks and an assault weapons ban. She views gun violence as a public health emergency that requires federal intervention.
Warren supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for a Medicare for All plan that would provide universal health insurance to all Americans. She believes healthcare is a right and should be accessible to everyone.
Warren supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for a Medicare for All plan that would provide universal health insurance to all Americans. She believes healthcare is a right and should be accessible to everyone.
Warren advocates for higher taxes on corporations and top earners, arguing that the wealthy should pay their fair share to support public services and reduce income inequality. She has proposed a wealth tax as part of her broader economic agenda.
Warren advocates for higher taxes on corporations and top earners, arguing that the wealthy should pay their fair share to support public services and reduce income inequality. She has proposed a wealth tax as part of her broader economic agenda.
Warren advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has proposed measures to wipe out student debt and make public college tuition-free. She emphasizes the importance of investing in education to ensure equitable access for all students.
Warren advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has proposed measures to wipe out student debt and make public college tuition-free. She emphasizes the importance of investing in education to ensure equitable access for all students.
Warren supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures such as automatic voter registration and making Election Day a holiday. She believes in protecting the right to vote for all citizens.
Warren supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures such as automatic voter registration and making Election Day a holiday. She believes in protecting the right to vote for all citizens.
Warren supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has called for reforms to address the racial disparities in the criminal justice system. She has advocated for decriminalizing marijuana and expunging records for those convicted of marijuana-related offenses.
Warren supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has called for reforms to address the racial disparities in the criminal justice system. She has advocated for decriminalizing marijuana and expunging records for those convicted of marijuana-related offenses.
Warren supports strong regulation of technology companies, advocating for antitrust measures to break up monopolies and ensure fair competition. She emphasizes the need for consumer protections in the tech industry.
Warren supports strong regulation of technology companies, advocating for antitrust measures to break up monopolies and ensure fair competition. She emphasizes the need for consumer protections in the tech industry.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
“We need to break up big tech platforms.”
Position extraction pending on 3 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Trade.
Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position of ensuring legal access to abortion.
May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
Why: Cosponsoring the Federal Death Penalty Prohibition Act directly supports the stated position of reforming the criminal justice system and reducing punitive measures, aligning with the goals of addressing systemic racism and mass incarceration.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position of protecting access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the Firearm Safety Act directly supports comprehensive gun control measures, aligning with the advocacy for federal regulation and background checks.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: Cosponsoring the AI OVERWATCH Act aligns directly with the position on tech regulation by advocating for oversight and consumer protections in the technology sector.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2055)
Why: Cosponsoring a constitutional amendment to protect the right to vote directly advances the stated position of expanding voting rights and access.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act directly supports a more humane immigration system by addressing the needs of separated families, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports the stated position of expanding voting rights and access.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly targets a tax loophole that benefits the wealthy, aligning with the stated position of advocating for higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act directly supports the stated position of investing in public education and making higher education more accessible.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act directly advances the stated position by proposing higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy, aligning perfectly with the advocacy for tax reform to address economic inequality.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The bill focuses on natural climate solutions, which aligns with the broader goal of cutting emissions and investing in climate initiatives, though it is more specific and narrower in scope than the Green New Deal.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the All Students Count Act aligns with the emphasis on supporting education and making it more accessible, even if it does not directly address tuition-free college or student debt cancellation.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Maternal Health Pandemic Response Act aims to improve health care access for mothers, which aligns with the broader goal of universal health care coverage.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: Cosponsoring the MATCH Act indicates support for regulating technology, aligning with the stated position on antitrust measures and consumer protections.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Strength in Diversity Act aims to promote equitable access to quality education, which aligns with the advocacy for making higher education more accessible.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Cosponsoring the Universal School Meals Program Act supports the broader goal of investing in public education and accessibility, even though it specifically addresses nutrition rather than tuition or debt cancellation.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting America’s Workers Act indicates support for labor and education reforms, aligning with the emphasis on investing in public education and supporting teachers.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1859)
Why: Cosponsoring the Southeast New England Program Authorization Act supports environmental initiatives, aligning with the commitment to aggressive climate action, though it may not fully encompass the broader goals of the Green New Deal.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Drug Deal Disclosure Act aligns with the position on affordable access to healthcare by addressing drug pricing transparency, even if it does not directly implement universal coverage.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1824-1825)
Why: The resolution addresses reproductive health issues, which aligns with the stated support for access to safe and legal abortion, although it does not directly advance abortion rights.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1787)
Why: The resolution supports equal educational opportunity and civil rights protections in schools, aligning with the broader goal of making education more accessible and equitable.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Educational Equity Challenge Grant Act supports the goal of making education more accessible, aligning with the advocacy for investment in public education.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring the Patients Deserve Price Tags Act aligns with the emphasis on affordable access to healthcare by addressing drug pricing transparency, though it does not directly implement universal coverage.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act aims to eliminate subsidies for fossil fuel production, which aligns with the goal of transitioning to renewable energy and reducing pollution.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Sponsoring the Stop Militarizing Our Streets Act aligns with the stated position by addressing issues related to policing and systemic racism, although it may not encompass the full scope of comprehensive reform.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a resolution disapproving climate-related financial risk management principles undermines the stated support for aggressive climate action and renewable energy transition.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action involves tax credits for conservation, which aligns with environmental goals but does not directly address the broader federal action to cut emissions or significant investment in green infrastructure.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action involves disapproving a Medicare-related rule, which could be seen as both an attempt to influence Medicare policy and a potential hindrance to expanding access, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated support for universal coverage.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action relates to labor rights and overtime pay, which does not directly align with the stated focus on education reform and accessibility.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The cosponsorship of the Hazard Pay for Health Care Heroes Act supports healthcare workers but does not directly advance the goal of universal healthcare coverage.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: The action focuses on climate change education, which is relevant but does not directly advance the stated position on universal tuition-free college or student debt cancellation.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The Essential Caregivers Act focuses on caregiver support, which relates to healthcare access but does not directly advance the goal of universal coverage or address drug pricing.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action addresses taxpayer funds but does not directly align with advocating for higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy; it is unclear how it relates to her broader tax reform goals.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The action focuses on nutrition and hunger prevention rather than directly addressing healthcare access or drug pricing, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The action relates to consumer protection and discrimination rather than directly addressing criminal justice reform, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: The action involves disapproving a rule related to federal student loans, which could have implications for accessibility, but does not directly advance the stated support for tuition-free college or debt cancellation.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Vision Lab Choice Act of 2025 may relate to education but does not directly advance the specific goals of universal tuition-free college or student debt cancellation.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: The action relates to regulatory measures but focuses on foreign corruption rather than directly addressing antitrust or consumer protections in the tech industry.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action focuses on restoring benefits for low-income individuals, which aligns with the broader goal of affordable healthcare access, but does not directly advance the specific Medicare for All plan.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The action does not directly address tax policy or the stated support for higher taxes on the wealthy, making its alignment with the position unclear.
View source →Mar 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: The clawback act aims to hold bank executives accountable, which aligns with addressing economic inequality, but it does not directly advocate for higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 403.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2452; text: CR S2446)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2177)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2134)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text: CR S1380-1381)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.