Sponsorship· Economy & JobsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Warren supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has been critical of current immigration policies and has called for comprehensive immigration reform that respects human rights.
Warren supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has been critical of current immigration policies and has called for comprehensive immigration reform that respects human rights.
Warren advocates for government intervention to support economic stability and growth, including measures like student debt cancellation and increased financial regulations to protect consumers and promote fair wages.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Warren advocates for government intervention to support economic stability and growth, including measures like student debt cancellation and increased financial regulations to protect consumers and promote fair wages.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Elizabeth Warren supports legal access to abortion and has called for national laws to protect a woman's right to choose. Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, she emphasized the need for federal action to ensure reproductive health services are accessible.
Elizabeth Warren supports legal access to abortion and has called for national laws to protect a woman's right to choose. Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, she emphasized the need for federal action to ensure reproductive health services are accessible.
Warren advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported the Green New Deal, emphasizing the need for significant investment in green infrastructure and renewable energy to combat climate change.
Warren advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported the Green New Deal, emphasizing the need for significant investment in green infrastructure and renewable energy to combat climate change.
Warren supports stricter firearms regulation and has called for measures such as universal background checks and an assault weapons ban. She views gun violence as a public health emergency that requires federal intervention.
Warren supports stricter firearms regulation and has called for measures such as universal background checks and an assault weapons ban. She views gun violence as a public health emergency that requires federal intervention.
Warren supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for a Medicare for All plan that would provide universal health insurance to all Americans. She believes healthcare is a right and should be accessible to everyone.
Warren supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for a Medicare for All plan that would provide universal health insurance to all Americans. She believes healthcare is a right and should be accessible to everyone.
Warren advocates for higher taxes on corporations and top earners, arguing that the wealthy should pay their fair share to support public services and reduce income inequality. She has proposed a wealth tax as part of her broader economic agenda.
Warren advocates for higher taxes on corporations and top earners, arguing that the wealthy should pay their fair share to support public services and reduce income inequality. She has proposed a wealth tax as part of her broader economic agenda.
Warren advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has proposed measures to wipe out student debt and make public college tuition-free. She emphasizes the importance of investing in education to ensure equitable access for all students.
Warren advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has proposed measures to wipe out student debt and make public college tuition-free. She emphasizes the importance of investing in education to ensure equitable access for all students.
Warren supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures such as automatic voter registration and making Election Day a holiday. She believes in protecting the right to vote for all citizens.
Warren supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures such as automatic voter registration and making Election Day a holiday. She believes in protecting the right to vote for all citizens.
Warren supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has called for reforms to address the racial disparities in the criminal justice system. She has advocated for decriminalizing marijuana and expunging records for those convicted of marijuana-related offenses.
Warren supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has called for reforms to address the racial disparities in the criminal justice system. She has advocated for decriminalizing marijuana and expunging records for those convicted of marijuana-related offenses.
Warren supports strong regulation of technology companies, advocating for antitrust measures to break up monopolies and ensure fair competition. She emphasizes the need for consumer protections in the tech industry.
Warren supports strong regulation of technology companies, advocating for antitrust measures to break up monopolies and ensure fair competition. She emphasizes the need for consumer protections in the tech industry.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
“We need to break up big tech platforms.”
Warren advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, including support for LGBTQ rights and the enforcement of equal pay for equal work. She has been vocal about the need to address systemic racism and promote equality in various aspects of society.
Warren advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, including support for LGBTQ rights and the enforcement of equal pay for equal work. She has been vocal about the need to address systemic racism and promote equality in various aspects of society.
“Every policy should be examined in terms of racial realities.”
Warren supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in managing disease outbreaks and protecting communities.
Warren supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in managing disease outbreaks and protecting communities.
Warren supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has co-sponsored legislation to decriminalize it. She believes that legalizing marijuana will help reduce opioid deaths and has advocated for expunging records for those previously convicted of marijuana-related offenses.
Warren supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has co-sponsored legislation to decriminalize it. She believes that legalizing marijuana will help reduce opioid deaths and has advocated for expunging records for those previously convicted of marijuana-related offenses.
Position extraction pending on 7 issues: Foreign Policy, National Security, School Curriculum, Trade, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4519-4520)
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that enhances labor protections directly supports economic stability and growth, aligning with the advocacy for policies that benefit working families.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that establishes the right to counsel for individuals facing removal directly supports the stated position of expanding legal protections and pathways in immigration.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to prevent the use of federal funds for a rule that negatively impacts immigration aligns directly with the position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Every policy should be examined in terms of racial realities.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that codifies gender-neutral standards for the Armed Forces directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The Restoring Justice for Workers Act aims to enhance workers' rights and support for working families, directly advancing the stated position on economic intervention and stability.
View source →Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Green New Deal for Health Act directly supports federal action to cut emissions and advance environmental protections, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The Health Over Wealth Act aligns directly with the stated position by advocating for expanded government involvement in health coverage, consistent with the Medicare for All plan.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The Children's Safe Welcome Act aims to improve protections for immigrant children and expand pathways for legal immigration, directly advancing the stated position.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at enhancing public health security and preparedness directly advances the stated position on government authority in public health measures.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
“Every policy should be examined in terms of racial realities.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing the significance of equal pay directly advances the commitment to stronger federal protections against discrimination in the workplace.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act directly advances the stated position of supporting federal legalization of marijuana.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: Cosponsoring the CEO Act directly supports the stated position by addressing wealth inequality through measures aimed at curtailing excessive executive compensation.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for federal protections for reproductive health services.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act directly supports economic stability and growth by addressing wage theft, which aligns with the stated position on government intervention for working families.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act directly supports increased federal funding for education, aligning closely with the stated position on public school funding and access.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position of ensuring legal access to abortion.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
Why: Cosponsoring the Federal Death Penalty Prohibition Act directly supports the stated position of reforming the criminal justice system and reducing punitive measures, aligning with the goals of addressing systemic racism and mass incarceration.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position of protecting access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: Cosponsoring the AI OVERWATCH Act aligns directly with the position on tech regulation by advocating for oversight and consumer protections in the technology sector.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the Firearm Safety Act directly supports comprehensive gun control measures, aligning with the advocacy for federal regulation and background checks.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2055)
Why: Cosponsoring a constitutional amendment to protect the right to vote directly advances the stated position of expanding voting rights and access.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act directly supports a more humane immigration system by addressing the needs of separated families, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports the stated position of expanding voting rights and access.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act directly targets a tax loophole that benefits the wealthy, aligning with the stated position of advocating for higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act directly supports the stated position of investing in public education and making higher education more accessible.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Every policy should be examined in terms of racial realities.”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule that withdraws protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity directly supports the stated position of advocating for stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act directly advances the stated position of advocating for higher taxes on corporations and top earners.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The bill aims to expand access to Medicaid services and support caregivers, which aligns with the broader goal of increasing government involvement in healthcare.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The bill aims to expand healthcare benefits for individuals in custody, which aligns with the broader goal of increasing access to health coverage.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
“Every policy should be examined in terms of racial realities.”
Why: The resolution supports the rights of individuals with disabilities, which aligns with the broader goal of stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The act aims to support small-scale farmers and ranchers, which aligns with the broader goal of government intervention to support economic stability and growth for working families.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The act aims to create jobs and improve infrastructure, which aligns with the position advocating for government intervention to support economic stability and growth.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3219)
Why: The resolution reaffirms commitment to immigrant communities, which aligns with the support for expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
“Every policy should be examined in terms of racial realities.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the broader commitment to LGBTQ rights and equality, aligning with the advocacy for stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Training Act supports the broader goal of ensuring access to reproductive health services, aligning with the stated position on abortion rights.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Medicare Cost Cap Act indicates support for government involvement in healthcare, aligning with the broader goal of expanding health coverage, though it does not directly advocate for universal insurance.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: Cosponsoring the act indicates support for financial regulations and consumer protection, which aligns with the advocacy for government intervention to promote economic stability.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Every policy should be examined in terms of racial realities.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Spying Bosses Act aligns with the commitment to protect workers' rights and promote equality, although it primarily addresses workplace surveillance rather than broader discrimination protections.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Every policy should be examined in terms of racial realities.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to strengthen protections against child labor violations aligns with the broader commitment to civil rights and protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill for temporary protected status for Haiti aligns with the support for expanding legal immigration pathways and providing humanitarian relief.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S2821)
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Stock Buyback Accountability Act suggests a move toward increased financial regulations, which aligns with the stated position of supporting government intervention for economic stability.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S2786-2791; Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2786)
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Make More in America Act suggests support for government intervention in the economy, aligning with the advocacy for measures that promote economic stability and growth.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The bill focuses on natural climate solutions, which aligns with the broader goal of cutting emissions and investing in climate initiatives, though it is more specific and narrower in scope than the Green New Deal.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the All Students Count Act aligns with the emphasis on supporting education and making it more accessible, even if it does not directly address tuition-free college or student debt cancellation.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a maternal health response act supports the broader goal of expanding health coverage, aligning with the advocacy for a larger government role in healthcare.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: Cosponsoring the MATCH Act indicates support for regulating technology, aligning with the stated position on antitrust measures and consumer protections.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Strength in Diversity Act aims to promote equitable access to quality education, which aligns with the advocacy for making higher education more accessible.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Cosponsoring the Universal School Meals Program Act supports the broader goal of investing in public education and accessibility, even though it specifically addresses nutrition rather than tuition or debt cancellation.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting America’s Workers Act indicates support for labor and education reforms, aligning with the emphasis on investing in public education and supporting teachers.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Drug Deal Disclosure Act aligns with the position on affordable access to healthcare by addressing drug pricing transparency, even if it does not directly implement universal coverage.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1859)
Why: Cosponsoring the Southeast New England Program Authorization Act supports environmental initiatives, aligning with the commitment to aggressive climate action, though it may not fully encompass the broader goals of the Green New Deal.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1824-1825)
Why: The resolution addresses reproductive health issues, which aligns with the stated support for access to safe and legal abortion, although it does not directly advance abortion rights.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1787)
Why: The resolution supports equal educational opportunity and civil rights protections in schools, aligning with the broader goal of making education more accessible and equitable.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring the Patients Deserve Price Tags Act aligns with the emphasis on affordable access to healthcare by addressing drug pricing transparency, though it does not directly implement universal coverage.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the act aims to eliminate subsidies for fossil fuel production, which aligns with the goal of transitioning to renewable energy and reducing pollution.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Sponsoring the Stop Militarizing Our Streets Act aligns with the stated position by addressing issues related to policing and systemic racism, although it may not encompass the full scope of comprehensive reform.
View source →Mar 29, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The act aims to hold failed bank executives accountable, which aligns with the position of supporting economic stability and addressing wealth inequality.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a resolution disapproving climate-related financial risk management principles undermines the stated support for aggressive climate action and renewable energy transition.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: The Safe Step Act focuses on prescription drug coverage and step therapy protocols, which does not directly advance the broader Medicare for All proposal, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on taxes.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on climate action.
Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, as it is a procedural action without specific details on how it relates to expanding government health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 50. Record Vote Number: 199.
Why: The action involves disapproving a rule related to Medicare, which could have elements both for and against a larger government role in health coverage, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses opioid treatment access, which is related to healthcare, but does not directly advance the stated position of universal health insurance.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a health-related bill does not clearly advance or contradict the stated position on expanding government health coverage, as the specific provisions of the bill are not detailed.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Child Safety and Well-Being Act may address education indirectly but does not specifically advance the stated position of increasing federal funding for public schools or tuition-free college.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action involves tax credits for conservation, which aligns with environmental goals but does not directly address the broader federal action to cut emissions or significant investment in green infrastructure.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action involves disapproving a Medicare-related rule, which could be seen as both an attempt to influence Medicare policy and a potential hindrance to expanding access, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated support for universal coverage.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action relates to labor rights and overtime pay, which does not directly align with the stated focus on education reform and accessibility.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The cosponsorship of the Hazard Pay for Health Care Heroes Act supports healthcare workers but does not directly advance the goal of universal healthcare coverage.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: The action focuses on climate change education, which is relevant but does not directly advance the stated position on universal tuition-free college or student debt cancellation.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The Essential Caregivers Act focuses on caregiver support, which relates to healthcare access but does not directly advance the goal of universal coverage or address drug pricing.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The action focuses on nutrition and hunger prevention rather than directly addressing healthcare access or drug pricing, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The action involves disapproving a consumer protection rule, which could have mixed implications for economic stability and support for working families, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The action involves disapproving a consumer protection rule, which could have both positive and negative implications for economic stability and support for working families, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: The action involves disapproving a rule related to federal student loans, which could have implications for accessibility, but does not directly advance the stated support for tuition-free college or debt cancellation.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The action involves disapproving a rule related to consumer financial protection, which could have both positive and negative implications for economic stability and growth, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its impact on economic stability and growth, leading to a mixed rating.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The action involves disapproving a consumer protection rule, which could have both positive and negative implications for economic stability and support for working families, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The action involves disapproving a consumer protection rule, which could have mixed implications for economic stability and support for working families, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The action's content is unclear, as it pertains to a procedural disapproval of a consumer protection rule, which could have both positive and negative implications for economic stability and growth.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Student debt cancellation would be a huge boost to economy.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear, as it pertains to disapproving a rule related to consumer complaint data, which could have varying implications for economic stability and consumer protection.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Vision Lab Choice Act of 2025 may relate to education but does not directly advance the specific goals of universal tuition-free college or student debt cancellation.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: The action relates to regulatory measures but focuses on foreign corruption rather than directly addressing antitrust or consumer protections in the tech industry.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action focuses on restoring benefits for low-income individuals, which aligns with the broader goal of affordable healthcare access, but does not directly advance the specific Medicare for All plan.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The action does not directly address tax policy or the stated support for higher taxes on the wealthy, making its alignment with the position unclear.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Gun Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Tagged to Elections & Campaigns, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Warren supports breaking up monopolies and regulating big tech.”
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 403.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4519)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4519)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3216-3217)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 215.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3052; text: CR S3061-3062)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2452; text: CR S2446)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2177)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2134)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text: CR S1380-1381)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.