Vote· ClimateYea
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
House Republican Conference Chair
NY · District 21
Elise Stefanik has a mixed record on immigration, supporting some pathways to legal status for certain undocumented immigrants, like those working in agriculture, while also advocating for deportation of illegal immigrants and opposing amnesty measures.
Elise Stefanik has a mixed record on immigration, supporting some pathways to legal status for certain undocumented immigrants, like those working in agriculture, while also advocating for deportation of illegal immigrants and opposing amnesty measures.
“Supports deportation of illlegals, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Elise Stefanik opposes legal access to abortion, supporting legislation that would ban abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape, incest, or to protect the pregnant woman's life. She also opposes taxpayer funding for abortion and has supported the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.
Elise Stefanik opposes legal access to abortion, supporting legislation that would ban abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape, incest, or to protect the pregnant woman's life. She also opposes taxpayer funding for abortion and has supported the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.
“Opposes abortion rights, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Elise Stefanik has criticized the decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, calling it misguided and harmful to efforts to combat climate change. She joined the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, indicating a moderate stance on climate issues.
Elise Stefanik has criticized the decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, calling it misguided and harmful to efforts to combat climate change. She joined the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, indicating a moderate stance on climate issues.
“Supports regulating CO2, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Elise Stefanik strongly opposes stricter firearms regulation, having voted against background checks for every firearm sale and opposing the New York SAFE Act.
Elise Stefanik strongly opposes stricter firearms regulation, having voted against background checks for every firearm sale and opposing the New York SAFE Act.
“Voted NO on background check for every firearm sale. (Jan 2019)”
Stefanik supports repealing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and has voted in favor of legislation aimed at its repeal. She has also expressed the need for common-sense solutions to replace it.
Stefanik supports repealing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and has voted in favor of legislation aimed at its repeal. She has also expressed the need for common-sense solutions to replace it.
Stefanik voted against the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, primarily due to concerns over changes to the state and local tax deduction, which she argued many in her district rely on. She has criticized high taxes in New York and the impact of federal tax policy on her constituents.
Stefanik voted against the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, primarily due to concerns over changes to the state and local tax deduction, which she argued many in her district rely on. She has criticized high taxes in New York and the impact of federal tax policy on her constituents.
Elise Stefanik opposes expanding ballot access, having opposed the For the People Act and made claims that it would prevent the removal of ineligible voters from registration rolls, which have been rated false by fact-checkers.
Elise Stefanik opposes expanding ballot access, having opposed the For the People Act and made claims that it would prevent the removal of ineligible voters from registration rolls, which have been rated false by fact-checkers.
“Rated No holiday on election day; no same-day registration.”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Aid, Education, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
“Supports regulating CO2, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Voting in favor of the Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act directly supports climate conservation efforts, aligning with the stated position on combating climate change.
Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Voted NO on background check for every firearm sale. (Jan 2019)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that protects gun owner registration information aligns with the stated support for gun ownership rights, even if it does not directly advance stricter gun policies.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Supports regulating CO2, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: The vote on the Home Appliance Protection and Affordability Act supports climate-related initiatives, aligning with the stated position of combating climate change.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Supports regulating CO2, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Grown in America Act indicates support for climate-related initiatives, aligning with the stated position of combating climate change, even if the specifics of the act are not detailed.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports deportation of illlegals, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring a measure that establishes grounds for inadmissibility for relatives of foreign terrorists moves against a more lenient approach to immigration, contradicting any support for providing legal status to certain undocumented immigrants.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Supports deportation of illlegals, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Voting against the appropriations act for the Department of Homeland Security undermines the stated support for deporting illegal immigrants, as it affects funding for immigration enforcement.
View source →Jul 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
“Supports deportation of illlegals, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring a condemnation of the Biden administration's border policies moves against the stated support for providing legal status to certain undocumented immigrants, indicating a focus on enforcement over reform.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Supports deportation of illlegals, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: The appropriations act may include funding for both enforcement and support for certain immigrant programs, reflecting elements of both support for deportation and legal status, leading to an unclear alignment with the stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Supports regulating CO2, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Not voting on the energy act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated support for climate action, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Supports regulating CO2, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: Not voting on the energy act does not clearly align or conflict with the stated support for climate action, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The Essential Caregivers Act may include provisions that align with healthcare access, but without specific details on its impact, the relationship to the stated opposition to the ACA is unclear.
View source →Jan 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring the CONNECT for Health Act does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but the specifics of the bill's provisions are unclear and may include elements that could be seen as a replacement or modification.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Supports regulating CO2, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: The action of sponsoring the Consistent Egg Labels Act does not directly address climate issues, making the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →Apr 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Supports deportation of illlegals, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: The sponsorship of the Border Airport Fairness Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position, as its specific provisions and impacts on immigration policy are not detailed.
Feb 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
“Supports regulating CO2, according to Faith2Action. (Jul 2014)”
Why: The action of sponsoring the Strengthening America’s Turning Point Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on climate, as the specific provisions of the act are not detailed.
View source →Jun 26, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: The action relates to nutrition policy rather than healthcare directly, making the alignment with the stated position on healthcare unclear.
View source →Feb 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The sponsorship of the maternal health act does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as it focuses on a specific healthcare issue rather than a broader repeal or replacement of existing healthcare laws.
View source →Jan 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The action of sponsoring the Consistent Egg Labels Act does not directly relate to healthcare policy or the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 554.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 276.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 8.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 13.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 48 - 0.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency Management and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 490.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Natural Resources, and Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 2, 2024 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 10, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 499.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 20, 2023 · Congress.gov
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.