Sponsorship· ImmigrationCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Markey supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform and protections for vulnerable populations, including families of active-duty service members.
Markey supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He has advocated for comprehensive immigration reform and protections for vulnerable populations, including families of active-duty service members.
“Supports comprehensive immigration reform. (Oct 2014)”
Ed Markey supports legal access to abortion and has been a champion of women's reproductive rights. He has opposed restrictions on abortion and believes it should remain legal, emphasizing the importance of personal choice in reproductive health decisions.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Ed Markey supports legal access to abortion and has been a champion of women's reproductive rights. He has opposed restrictions on abortion and believes it should remain legal, emphasizing the importance of personal choice in reproductive health decisions.
“Endorsed by Planned Parenthood; supports abortion rights. (Jun 2013)”
Markey is a strong advocate for federal action to cut emissions and has been a key proponent of the Green New Deal, which aims to transition the U.S. to 100% renewable energy sources. He has consistently supported bold measures to address climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Markey is a strong advocate for federal action to cut emissions and has been a key proponent of the Green New Deal, which aims to transition the U.S. to 100% renewable energy sources. He has consistently supported bold measures to address climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Markey supports stricter firearms regulation, including expanded background checks and measures to close loopholes in gun sales. He has advocated for banning assault weapons and has been active in promoting gun control legislation.
Markey supports stricter firearms regulation, including expanded background checks and measures to close loopholes in gun sales. He has advocated for banning assault weapons and has been active in promoting gun control legislation.
“Expand background checks; ban assault weapons; fight NRA. (Jun 2013)”
Markey advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the establishment of a single-payer healthcare system. He has co-sponsored legislation aimed at expanding Medicare to cover all U.S. residents.
Markey advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the establishment of a single-payer healthcare system. He has co-sponsored legislation aimed at expanding Medicare to cover all U.S. residents.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Markey supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a fairer tax system that ensures wealthier individuals contribute their fair share. He has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
Markey supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a fairer tax system that ensures wealthier individuals contribute their fair share. He has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
“Higher-income people should pay their fair share of taxes. (Jun 2013)”
Markey supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to enhance voter registration and participation. He has been involved in efforts to protect voting rights and ensure fair electoral processes.
Markey supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to enhance voter registration and participation. He has been involved in efforts to protect voting rights and ensure fair electoral processes.
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Mar 2021)”
Markey has a strong record supporting civil rights, including LGBTQ rights. He has voted for measures to prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and has been rated highly by civil rights organizations, indicating his commitment to stronger federal protections against discrimination.
Markey has a strong record supporting civil rights, including LGBTQ rights. He has voted for measures to prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and has been rated highly by civil rights organizations, indicating his commitment to stronger federal protections against discrimination.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Markey supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of equitable access to healthcare and vaccination, particularly for underserved communities.
Markey supports government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of equitable access to healthcare and vaccination, particularly for underserved communities.
“COVID: Trump's response "criminally negligent". (Oct 2020)”
Markey supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has been involved in legislation aimed at addressing the opioid crisis, including expanding access to treatment.
Markey supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has been involved in legislation aimed at addressing the opioid crisis, including expanding access to treatment.
Position extraction pending on 11 issues: Foreign Policy, National Security, Economy & Jobs, Education, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports comprehensive immigration reform. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that establishes the right to counsel for those facing removal directly supports the stated position of expanding legal immigration and protections for vulnerable populations.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at green health care infrastructure directly supports the stated position of cutting emissions and promoting renewable energy.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports comprehensive immigration reform. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to prevent the use of federal funds for a rule that negatively impacts immigration aligns directly with the position of expanding legal immigration and protecting families.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that expands Medicaid services and supports the direct care workforce directly advances the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that expands benefits under government healthcare programs directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that codifies gender-neutral standards for the Armed Forces directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly related to gender.
View source →Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring the Green New Deal for Health Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for federal action to cut emissions and transition to renewable energy.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: Sponsoring the Health Over Wealth Act indicates a clear advancement of the stated position for a larger government role in health coverage, aligning directly with the support for Medicare for All.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports comprehensive immigration reform. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The Children's Safe Welcome Act aims to enhance protections for immigrant children and families, directly advancing the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing the significance of equal pay directly supports the stated position of advocating for stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act directly advances the stated position of supporting federal marijuana legalization.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Mar 2021)”
Why: The Protecting Our Democracy Act aims to enhance voting rights and access, directly advancing the stated position of expanding ballot access.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3219)
“Supports comprehensive immigration reform. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution that reaffirms commitment to immigrant communities directly advances the stated position of expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Endorsed by Planned Parenthood; supports abortion rights. (Jun 2013)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring legislation that modernizes opioid treatment access directly supports the stated position of addressing the opioid crisis and aligns with the broader goal of drug policy reform.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports comprehensive immigration reform. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to designate Haiti for temporary protected status directly supports expanding legal immigration and protections for vulnerable populations, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S2766-2768)
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that acknowledges discrimination against LGBTQ individuals and commits to equal rights directly advances the stated position of supporting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring the Natural Climate Solutions Research and Extension Act directly supports federal action to cut emissions and aligns with the goals of transitioning to renewable energy.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring the Artificial Intelligence Environmental Impacts Act directly supports the stated position by addressing environmental impacts, which aligns with the goal of cutting emissions and promoting renewable energy.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Endorsed by Planned Parenthood; supports abortion rights. (Jun 2013)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly supports the stated position on legal access to abortion.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Why: Sponsoring the Equal Remedies Act directly advances the stated position by promoting stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Why: Sponsoring the Elder Pride Act directly supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for LGBTQ individuals, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Endorsed by Planned Parenthood; supports abortion rights. (Jun 2013)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly advances the stated position by supporting access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2055)
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Mar 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring a constitutional amendment to protect the right to vote directly advances the stated position of expanding voter access and improving protections for voting rights.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports comprehensive immigration reform. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act aligns directly with the support for protections for undocumented immigrants, particularly those affected by family separation.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring the Youth Climate Leadership Act directly supports the stated position by promoting federal action to cut emissions and engage youth in climate initiatives.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access. (Mar 2021)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding voter access and aligns with the advocacy for automatic voter registration and protections.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring the Home Modifications for the Climate Crisis Act directly supports federal action to cut emissions and aligns with the goals of transitioning to renewable energy.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at addressing climate change directly supports the stated position of advocating for federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: Sponsoring the SAFE through Medicare Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage, aligning with the goals of expanding Medicare.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at preventing fossil fuel bailouts directly supports the stated position of cutting emissions and transitioning to renewable energy.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: The bill aims to improve maternal health outcomes, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding government involvement in healthcare, even if it does not directly propose a single-payer system.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Federal Mechanical Insulation Act supports energy efficiency improvements, which aligns with the broader goal of reducing emissions and promoting renewable energy.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Why: The resolution supports the rights of individuals with disabilities, which aligns with the broader commitment to stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: The Medicare Cost Cap Act aims to improve healthcare affordability, which aligns with the broader goal of increasing government involvement in health coverage, even if it is not as expansive as a single-payer system.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the broader goal of federal protections against discrimination for LGBTQ individuals, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to strengthen protections against child labor aligns with the broader commitment to civil rights and protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Expand background checks; ban assault weapons; fight NRA. (Jun 2013)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Gun Records Restoration and Preservation Act aligns with the goal of stricter firearms regulation by supporting measures that enhance accountability in gun sales.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring the act indicates support for addressing harmful chemicals, which aligns with broader climate action goals, even if it does not directly relate to renewable energy.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1859)
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring a program authorization act related to environmental initiatives aligns with the stated commitment to climate action, though it may not be as comprehensive as the Green New Deal.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: Sponsoring legislation that provides hazard pay for healthcare workers supports the broader goal of enhancing health coverage and support for the healthcare system, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1824-1825)
“Endorsed by Planned Parenthood; supports abortion rights. (Jun 2013)”
Why: The resolution addresses reproductive health issues, which aligns with the stated support for access to safe and legal abortion, even though it does not directly advocate for abortion rights.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: Sponsoring the Connect the Grid Act indicates support for renewable energy infrastructure, which aligns with the commitment to bold climate action and transitioning to renewable sources.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to the Affordable Care Act undermines the stated support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill focused on food safety does not advance the stated position on expanding healthcare coverage, indicating a divergence from the commitment to a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare-related rule moves against the support for expanding Medicare coverage, contradicting the commitment to a single-payer system.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the bill.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided summary, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate action.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S4425-4426; text: CR S4425-4426)
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 50. Record Vote Number: 199.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: The action involves disapproving a rule related to Medicare, which could have both positive and negative implications for government involvement in healthcare, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on civil rights.
Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: The action involves sponsoring a bill related to healthcare, but its specific focus on young adult cancers does not directly advance the broader goal of a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)”
Why: The action addresses a specific aspect of healthcare related to nutrition but does not directly advance the stated goal of establishing a single-payer system.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. (Oct 2020)”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4519-4520)
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4519)
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“COVID: Trump's response "criminally negligent". (Oct 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“COVID: Trump's response "criminally negligent". (Oct 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2937)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“COVID: Trump's response "criminally negligent". (Oct 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S2821)
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Higher-income people should pay their fair share of taxes. (Jun 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S3011-3012)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2055-2056)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Higher-income people should pay their fair share of taxes. (Jun 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1787)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Higher-income people should pay their fair share of taxes. (Jun 2013)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4519)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3216-3217)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 215.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3052; text: CR S3061-3062)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2177)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S2131-2132)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2134)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1902; text: CR S1938-1939)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 371.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2075)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.