Sponsorship· HealthcareSponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Debbie Stabenow supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has received high ratings from immigration advocacy groups and has opposed restrictive immigration policies.
Debbie Stabenow supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. She has received high ratings from immigration advocacy groups and has opposed restrictive immigration policies.
Debbie Stabenow supports legal access to abortion and opposes any criminalization of the procedure. She has consistently voted against measures that would restrict abortion access and has advocated for maintaining federal funding for family planning clinics.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Debbie Stabenow supports legal access to abortion and opposes any criminalization of the procedure. She has consistently voted against measures that would restrict abortion access and has advocated for maintaining federal funding for family planning clinics.
Debbie Stabenow acknowledges the reality of climate change and has expressed the need for federal action to address it. However, she has opposed certain regulations aimed at cutting emissions, indicating a mixed approach to climate policy.
Debbie Stabenow acknowledges the reality of climate change and has expressed the need for federal action to address it. However, she has opposed certain regulations aimed at cutting emissions, indicating a mixed approach to climate policy.
Debbie Stabenow supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales and a national assault weapons ban. She has actively participated in legislative efforts to enhance gun control measures.
Debbie Stabenow supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales and a national assault weapons ban. She has actively participated in legislative efforts to enhance gun control measures.
Debbie Stabenow advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and efforts to lower prescription drug prices. She believes health coverage should be a right for all Americans.
Debbie Stabenow advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the Affordable Care Act and efforts to lower prescription drug prices. She believes health coverage should be a right for all Americans.
Debbie Stabenow advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has opposed school vouchers. She has supported various initiatives aimed at reducing student debt and increasing access to education.
Debbie Stabenow advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has opposed school vouchers. She has supported various initiatives aimed at reducing student debt and increasing access to education.
Debbie Stabenow supports expanding ballot access and has opposed voter ID laws that she believes create undue burdens on voters. She has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter registration and access to the polls.
Debbie Stabenow supports expanding ballot access and has opposed voter ID laws that she believes create undue burdens on voters. She has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter registration and access to the polls.
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Aid, Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Oct 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Expand the Behavioral Health Workforce Now Act directly supports the stated position of expanding access to healthcare services, particularly in mental health care.
Oct 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the More Behavioral Health Providers Act directly supports the stated position of expanding access to healthcare services, particularly in mental health care.
View source →Sep 28, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Ensuring Excellence in Mental Health Act directly supports the stated position of expanding access to healthcare services, particularly mental health care.
View source →Mar 16, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Improving Access to Mental Health Act directly advances the stated position of expanding access to healthcare services, particularly in mental health.
View source →Dec 1, 2022 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The Great Lakes Authority Act aims to address environmental issues related to the Great Lakes, which aligns with the acknowledgment of climate change's impact, despite her opposition to some regulations.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jul 13, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: The VET PFAS Act focuses on addressing environmental health issues related to PFAS exposure for veterans, which aligns with healthcare access but does not directly advance the broader healthcare access goals stated.
View source →May 18, 2022 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2590-2591)
Why: The Access to Baby Formula Act addresses a specific aspect of healthcare access for infants but does not directly advance the broader goals of expanding healthcare services or lowering drug prices.
View source →May 21, 2015 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 114-344.
Why: Sponsoring the Building Better Trucks Act suggests a focus on improving vehicle emissions, which aligns with climate action, but the lack of clarity on its overall impact and Stabenow's opposition to some regulations creates tension.
View source →Mar 14, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 3, 2022 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
Apr 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 11, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2722)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 5, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-217.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.