Sponsorship· Gun PolicyCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Dan Sullivan supports strict immigration policies, including securing the border and opposing pathways to citizenship for illegal aliens. He has stated that he is against executive amnesty and supports funding for a border wall.
Dan Sullivan supports strict immigration policies, including securing the border and opposing pathways to citizenship for illegal aliens. He has stated that he is against executive amnesty and supports funding for a border wall.
“Sullivan has stated that he supports national emergency at the Southern border.”
“Secure the border, but no pledge against amnesty. (Aug 2014)”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Dan Sullivan opposes legal access to abortion, supporting restrictions such as a ban after 20 weeks, with exceptions only for cases of rape, incest, or threats to the mother's life. He has also voted to protect infant survivors of abortion and has expressed opposition to Planned Parenthood.
Dan Sullivan opposes legal access to abortion, supporting restrictions such as a ban after 20 weeks, with exceptions only for cases of rape, incest, or threats to the mother's life. He has also voted to protect infant survivors of abortion and has expressed opposition to Planned Parenthood.
“Sullivan opposes abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, or threat to the life of the mother.”
“Ban abortion after 20 weeks. (Oct 2020) Exception for abortion to protect life of mother. (Aug 2014) Voted YES to protect infant survivors of abortion. (Feb 2020) Anti-Planned Parenthood, according to CC survey. (Sep 2020)”
Dan Sullivan rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, arguing that the verdict is still out on the human contribution to it. He has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has lobbied for increased development in Alaska's natural resources.
Dan Sullivan rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, arguing that the verdict is still out on the human contribution to it. He has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has lobbied for increased development in Alaska's natural resources.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
“Climate change is both threat and benefit to Alaska. (Oct 2020) Against any ban on hydrocarbon production. (Oct 2020)”
Dan Sullivan supports the right to bear arms and opposes stricter firearms regulations. He has stated that the right to bear arms is an individual right and has opposed measures that would limit gun rights.
Dan Sullivan supports the right to bear arms and opposes stricter firearms regulations. He has stated that the right to bear arms is an individual right and has opposed measures that would limit gun rights.
“Sullivan has no voting record at the time.”
“Right to bear arms is an individual right: Strongly Favors topic 10 Prohibit state and local governments from denying gun rights.”
Dan Sullivan opposes a larger government role in health coverage, having voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act and expressed opposition to its individual mandate.
Dan Sullivan opposes a larger government role in health coverage, having voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act and expressed opposition to its individual mandate.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
“Supported repeal of ACA, individual mandate. (Oct 2020)”
Dan Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for reducing corporate tax rates. He believes that lowering taxes is essential for economic growth.
Dan Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for reducing corporate tax rates. He believes that lowering taxes is essential for economic growth.
“Cutting taxes will start to turn economy around. (Sep 2014) Lowering taxes is a major win for country. (Apr 2018)”
Dan Sullivan supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, promoting Alaska's resources and tourism to the U.S. and the world. He has also voted for reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank.
Dan Sullivan supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, promoting Alaska's resources and tourism to the U.S. and the world. He has also voted for reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank.
“Sullivan promotes Alaska resources & tourism to the US and the world.”
“Voted FOR reauthorizing Ex-Im Bank. (Oct 2015) Implement USMCA for improved North American trade. (Jan 2020)”
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Aid, Education, School Curriculum, Voting Rights, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
“Sullivan has no voting record at the time.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for gun rights and protections for veterans, aligning with the opposition to restrictions on gun ownership.
Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-86.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Veterans Health Care Freedom Act aligns with the stated opposition to the ACA by promoting alternative healthcare options for veterans, even if it does not directly repeal the ACA.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: Cosponsoring a veterans' care act aligns with the position against the ACA by supporting alternative healthcare solutions for veterans.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Cutting taxes will start to turn economy around. (Sep 2014) Lowering taxes is a major win for country. (Apr 2018)”
Why: Cosponsoring a tax benefit act aligns with the support for tax cuts, as it aims to provide financial relief, though it may not directly reduce overall tax rates.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: The MOMS Act focuses on maternal health, which could align with healthcare improvements, but does not directly address the opposition to the ACA or its repeal.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill focused on postpartum outcomes does not directly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, but it does not clearly contradict it either, as it may not involve ACA repeal.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: The cosponsorship of a value-based program act does not clearly align with the opposition to the ACA, as the specifics of the act's provisions are unclear and could potentially support or undermine the ACA.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: The ACCESS Act aims to expand healthcare access for veterans, which aligns with healthcare support, but it does not directly address the figure's opposition to the ACA.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a conservation act suggests some environmental consideration, but it does not align clearly with the stated opposition to climate change consensus.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Sullivan has stated that he supports national emergency at the Southern border.”
Why: The action addresses a specific immigration-related fee but does not clearly align with the broader stance on securing the border or DACA citizenship, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Cosponsoring the America the Beautiful Act suggests some support for environmental initiatives, but the figure's stated opposition to climate change consensus creates ambiguity about alignment.
Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: Cosponsoring the AADAPT Act does not clearly align with the opposition to the ACA, as the specifics of the act are not detailed, leaving its relationship to the stated position ambiguous.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: The cosponsorship of a medical facilities fund suggests some support for healthcare infrastructure, which contrasts with the opposition to the ACA, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Sullivan promotes Alaska resources & tourism to the US and the world.”
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 355.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2670; text: CR S2666)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2241; text: CR S2240-2241)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1381-1382)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1202; text: CR S1208-1209)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.