Sponsorship· ClimateCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Sullivan supports a strong U.S. presence in international affairs and has backed military actions against perceived threats, particularly in the Middle East. He emphasizes the importance of national security in foreign policy decisions.
Sullivan supports a strong U.S. presence in international affairs and has backed military actions against perceived threats, particularly in the Middle East. He emphasizes the importance of national security in foreign policy decisions.
Dan Sullivan supports strict immigration policies, including securing the border and opposing pathways to citizenship for illegal aliens. He has stated that he is against executive amnesty and supports funding for a border wall.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Dan Sullivan supports strict immigration policies, including securing the border and opposing pathways to citizenship for illegal aliens. He has stated that he is against executive amnesty and supports funding for a border wall.
“Sullivan has stated that he supports national emergency at the Southern border.”
“Secure the border, but no pledge against amnesty. (Aug 2014)”
Dan Sullivan emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong national defense and has called for improvements to the U.S. missile defense system in response to threats from North Korea. He supports robust military funding and actions to ensure national security.
Dan Sullivan emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong national defense and has called for improvements to the U.S. missile defense system in response to threats from North Korea. He supports robust military funding and actions to ensure national security.
“Sullivan called for improvements to the U.S. missile defense system. (2017)”
“Ensure a strong national defense & stand up for our veterans: Strongly Favors topic 15”
Dan Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for measures aimed at reducing corporate tax rates. He believes that lowering taxes is essential for economic growth and stability.
Dan Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for measures aimed at reducing corporate tax rates. He believes that lowering taxes is essential for economic growth and stability.
“Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for measures aimed at reducing corporate tax rates.”
“Cutting taxes will start to turn economy around. (Sep 2014)”
Dan Sullivan opposes legal access to abortion, supporting restrictions such as a ban after 20 weeks, with exceptions only for cases of rape, incest, or threats to the mother's life. He has also voted to protect infant survivors of abortion and has expressed opposition to Planned Parenthood.
Dan Sullivan opposes legal access to abortion, supporting restrictions such as a ban after 20 weeks, with exceptions only for cases of rape, incest, or threats to the mother's life. He has also voted to protect infant survivors of abortion and has expressed opposition to Planned Parenthood.
“Sullivan opposes abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, or threat to the life of the mother.”
“Ban abortion after 20 weeks. (Oct 2020) Exception for abortion to protect life of mother. (Aug 2014) Voted YES to protect infant survivors of abortion. (Feb 2020) Anti-Planned Parenthood, according to CC survey. (Sep 2020)”
Dan Sullivan rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, arguing that the verdict is still out on the human contribution to it. He has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has lobbied for increased development in Alaska's natural resources.
Dan Sullivan rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, arguing that the verdict is still out on the human contribution to it. He has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has lobbied for increased development in Alaska's natural resources.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
“Climate change is both threat and benefit to Alaska. (Oct 2020) Against any ban on hydrocarbon production. (Oct 2020)”
Dan Sullivan supports the right to bear arms and opposes stricter firearms regulations. He has stated that the right to bear arms is an individual right and has opposed measures that would limit gun rights.
Dan Sullivan supports the right to bear arms and opposes stricter firearms regulations. He has stated that the right to bear arms is an individual right and has opposed measures that would limit gun rights.
“Sullivan has no voting record at the time.”
“Right to bear arms is an individual right: Strongly Favors topic 10 Prohibit state and local governments from denying gun rights.”
Dan Sullivan opposes a larger government role in health coverage, having voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act and expressed opposition to its individual mandate.
Dan Sullivan opposes a larger government role in health coverage, having voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act and expressed opposition to its individual mandate.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
“Supported repeal of ACA, individual mandate. (Oct 2020)”
Dan Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for reducing corporate tax rates. He believes that lowering taxes is essential for economic growth.
Dan Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for reducing corporate tax rates. He believes that lowering taxes is essential for economic growth.
“Cutting taxes will start to turn economy around. (Sep 2014) Lowering taxes is a major win for country. (Apr 2018)”
Dan Sullivan supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, promoting Alaska's resources and tourism to the U.S. and the world. He has also voted for reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank.
Dan Sullivan supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, promoting Alaska's resources and tourism to the U.S. and the world. He has also voted for reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank.
“Sullivan promotes Alaska resources & tourism to the US and the world.”
“Voted FOR reauthorizing Ex-Im Bank. (Oct 2015) Implement USMCA for improved North American trade. (Jan 2020)”
Dan Sullivan has expressed opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly regarding LGBTQ rights. He has previously supported a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.
Dan Sullivan has expressed opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly regarding LGBTQ rights. He has previously supported a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.
“In 2014, Sullivan supported "a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage".”
“Opposes gay marriage. (Apr 2014) Would allow LGBTQ discrimination for religious reasons. (Oct 2020)”
Sullivan has a mixed record on drug policy. He has supported the STATES Act, which would exempt individuals and businesses complying with state cannabis laws from federal enforcement, indicating some support for state-level legalization, but he has also expressed opposition to marijuana legalization at the federal level.
Sullivan has a mixed record on drug policy. He has supported the STATES Act, which would exempt individuals and businesses complying with state cannabis laws from federal enforcement, indicating some support for state-level legalization, but he has also expressed opposition to marijuana legalization at the federal level.
Position extraction pending on 9 issues: Education, School Curriculum, Voting Rights, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove EPA's greenhouse gas emission standards directly aligns with the opposition to federal action to cut emissions.
Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove an EPA rule on vehicle pollution standards directly aligns with the opposition to federal action aimed at cutting emissions.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to disapprove an EPA rule on pollution control standards directly aligns with the position of opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring the Sanctioning Russia Act directly supports the stated position of strengthening U.S. national security interests through sanctions, aligning with the figure's support for the administration's foreign policy initiatives.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
“Sullivan has no voting record at the time.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for gun rights and protections for veterans, aligning with the opposition to restrictions on gun ownership.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring the STAND with Taiwan Act directly supports U.S. national security interests and strengthens alliances, aligning closely with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Feb 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Sponsoring the Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act directly supports the stated position of backing military actions and sanctions against Iran, aligning with the emphasis on U.S. national security interests.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring the North Korean Human Rights Reauthorization Act aligns with the stated position of supporting U.S. foreign policy initiatives that emphasize national security and strengthening alliances.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: Cosponsoring a veterans' care act aligns with the position against the ACA by supporting alternative healthcare solutions for veterans.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Cutting taxes will start to turn economy around. (Sep 2014) Lowering taxes is a major win for country. (Apr 2018)”
Why: Cosponsoring a tax benefit act aligns with the support for tax cuts, as it aims to provide financial relief, though it may not directly reduce overall tax rates.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: The bill's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on climate.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 517.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on foreign policy.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on climate.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on climate.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a conservation act suggests some environmental consideration, but it does not align clearly with the stated opposition to climate change consensus.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Sullivan has stated that he supports national emergency at the Southern border.”
Why: The action addresses a specific immigration-related fee but does not clearly align with the broader stance on securing the border or DACA citizenship, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: Cosponsoring the AADAPT Act does not clearly align with the opposition to the ACA, as the specifics of the act are not detailed, leaving its relationship to the stated position ambiguous.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Sullivan rejects that there is a scientific consensus on climate change.”
Why: Cosponsoring the America the Beautiful Act suggests some support for environmental initiatives, but the figure's stated opposition to climate change consensus creates ambiguity about alignment.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: The cosponsorship of a medical facilities fund suggests some support for healthcare infrastructure, which contrasts with the opposition to the ACA, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 46. Record Vote Number: 231.
Why: Tagged to Voting Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Drug & Addiction Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Cutting taxes will start to turn economy around. (Sep 2014) Lowering taxes is a major win for country. (Apr 2018)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S3206)
“Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for measures aimed at reducing corporate tax rates.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“Sullivan promotes Alaska resources & tourism to the US and the world.”
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2241; text: CR S2240-2241)
“In 2014, Sullivan supported "a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage".”
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Sullivan opposed the Affordable Care Act and has voted to repeal it.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for measures aimed at reducing corporate tax rates.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Sullivan supports tax cuts and has voted for measures aimed at reducing corporate tax rates.”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Drug & Addiction Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 355.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4365; text: CR S4391-4392)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 424.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3194; text: CR S3218)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 317.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2886; text: CR S2899)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S2667)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1937)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2670; text: CR S2666)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-35.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-86.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1381-1382)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1202; text: CR S1208-1209)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.