Sponsorship· ClimateCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Crenshaw supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly in relation to Israel, and has voted to provide support following conflicts involving Israel.
Crenshaw supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly in relation to Israel, and has voted to provide support following conflicts involving Israel.
Crenshaw opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border enforcement and physical barriers. He has expressed that illegal immigrants are breaking the law but does not view them as 'bad people'.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Crenshaw opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border enforcement and physical barriers. He has expressed that illegal immigrants are breaking the law but does not view them as 'bad people'.
Crenshaw supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for a robust military presence and interventionist policies in foreign conflicts.
Crenshaw supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, advocating for a robust military presence and interventionist policies in foreign conflicts.
Crenshaw supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for a balanced budget and less burdensome regulations. He has voted for COVID relief packages, indicating a willingness to support economic measures during crises.
Crenshaw supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for a balanced budget and less burdensome regulations. He has voted for COVID relief packages, indicating a willingness to support economic measures during crises.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Crenshaw opposes legal access to abortion, stating that life begins at conception and that abortion rights should be determined by the states. He received a 0% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America and a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee.
Crenshaw opposes legal access to abortion, stating that life begins at conception and that abortion rights should be determined by the states. He received a 0% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America and a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee.
Crenshaw opposes federal action to cut emissions, describing climate change regulations as unnecessary government intervention. He has criticized renewable energy solutions like solar and wind, advocating instead for nuclear energy and carbon capture technology.
Crenshaw opposes federal action to cut emissions, describing climate change regulations as unnecessary government intervention. He has criticized renewable energy solutions like solar and wind, advocating instead for nuclear energy and carbon capture technology.
Crenshaw opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the protection of the right to bear arms. He has received an 'A+' rating from the NRA and has voted against measures such as background checks for firearm sales.
Crenshaw opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the protection of the right to bear arms. He has received an 'A+' rating from the NRA and has voted against measures such as background checks for firearm sales.
Crenshaw opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and promoting alternatives like Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). He has described the ACA as an 'unmitigated disaster'.
Crenshaw opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and promoting alternatives like Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). He has described the ACA as an 'unmitigated disaster'.
Crenshaw opposes the For the People Act, arguing that it would limit free speech and enable electoral fraud. He supports the American Civil Liberties Union's opposition to the bill over new campaign contribution revisions.
Crenshaw opposes the For the People Act, arguing that it would limit free speech and enable electoral fraud. He supports the American Civil Liberties Union's opposition to the bill over new campaign contribution revisions.
Crenshaw supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for the implementation of the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
Crenshaw supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for the implementation of the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
Crenshaw has mixed views on civil rights, opposing stronger federal protections against discrimination while also advocating for free speech rights. He has expressed concerns about social media censorship affecting conservative viewpoints.
Crenshaw has mixed views on civil rights, opposing stronger federal protections against discrimination while also advocating for free speech rights. He has expressed concerns about social media censorship affecting conservative viewpoints.
Crenshaw opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, viewing it as a gateway drug and supporting measures that restrict its use.
Crenshaw opposes the legalization of marijuana at the federal level, viewing it as a gateway drug and supporting measures that restrict its use.
Position extraction pending on 9 issues: Taxes, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Stop Climate Shakedowns Act aligns with the position opposing federal action to cut emissions, as it suggests a move against climate regulations that Crenshaw views as unnecessary.
Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that promotes firearm freedom directly supports the stated position of opposing stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that protects gun owner registration information aligns directly with the stated position of opposing stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Feb 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at regulatory budgeting to promote energy development aligns with the position opposing federal emissions cuts, as it seeks to reduce government intervention in energy markets.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the National Constitutional Carry Act directly supports the opposition to federal gun control measures by promoting state-level carry laws.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at returning undocumented immigrants directly aligns with the stated opposition to expanding legal immigration pathways and supports stricter border security measures.
View source →Jan 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at reforming Medicaid aligns with the position against a larger government role in health coverage, as it seeks to limit government involvement in healthcare.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill focused on border security reimbursement directly supports the stated position of opposing expanded immigration pathways and advocating for stricter border measures.
View source →Jan 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that prohibits federal funding for abortion providers directly aligns with the stated opposition to legal access to abortion.
View source →Jan 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at preventing red flag laws directly supports the stated position of opposing stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Dec 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that cancels climate-related regulations directly aligns with the stated position of opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Feb 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a bill focused on border security reimbursement directly supports the stated position of opposing expanded immigration pathways and advocating for stricter border measures.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that supports domestic oil and gas businesses aligns with the position opposing federal action to cut emissions, as it promotes fossil fuel interests rather than renewable energy regulations.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting in favor of appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security supports border enforcement measures, aligning with the stated opposition to immigration.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 28 - 0.
Why: The act promotes recycling and sustainable practices, which can be seen as a step toward environmental responsibility, aligning with the figure's support for alternative energy solutions like nuclear and carbon capture.
View source →Mar 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The act supports funding for children's hospitals, which aligns with a focus on healthcare solutions, even if it does not directly advocate for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jan 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving border security aligns with the stated position of opposing expanded immigration and advocating for stricter border measures.
View source →Feb 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving Medicaid directly contradicts the stated position of opposing a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Feb 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at Medicaid expansion directly contradicts the stated opposition to a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving Medicaid directly contradicts the stated position of opposing a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →May 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that promotes psychedelic therapy contradicts the stated opposition to drug legalization, as it supports broader acceptance and use of controlled substances.
View source →Apr 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving Medicaid directly contradicts the stated position of opposing a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill related to Medicaid financing suggests support for a government role in health coverage, which contradicts the stated opposition to a larger government role.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that expands access to treatments for veterans suggests support for a larger government role in healthcare, which contradicts the stated position of opposing such involvement.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that modernizes hemp enforcement and protection moves in the direction of supporting cannabis-related legislation, which contradicts the stated opposition to marijuana legalization.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to immigration enforcement measures, as the bill may have included funding for border security initiatives.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
Why: The action of not voting does not clearly indicate support or opposition to the measure, leaving the relationship to the stated position ambiguous.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on marijuana legalization.
View source →Feb 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content is unclear based on the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position.
Jan 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on federal climate action.
View source →Jan 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill related to healthcare does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but it also does not directly contradict it, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Why: The action focuses on combating cartels, which aligns with a law enforcement perspective, but does not directly address the stated opposition to immigration enforcement measures.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position against federal action on emissions.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The cosponsorship of the Freedom to Heal Act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as the specific provisions of the act are not detailed, leaving its impact on healthcare unclear.
View source →Dec 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 12 - 11.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a veterans' healthcare bill does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but it also does not contradict it, as it focuses on veterans rather than broader healthcare policy.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action involves healthcare reimbursement but does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Nov 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill aimed at reducing regulatory barriers for biosimilars does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, as it could be seen as a step towards improving drug access without directly addressing ACA repeal.
View source →Mar 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: The action of sponsoring a committee to address drug cartels does not directly advance or undermine the opposition to marijuana legalization, as it focuses on combating drug trafficking rather than marijuana policy itself.
View source →Jan 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on gun policy.
View source →Jan 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jan 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided summary, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jun 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The action involves sponsoring a measure related to drug policy but does not directly advance or undermine the stated position on marijuana legalization, as it focuses on clinical trials for psychedelic therapy.
View source →Jun 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 629.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the summary provided, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position against a larger government role in healthcare.
View source →May 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment, Manufacturing, and Critical Materials.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on climate.
View source →Feb 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the title alone, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on marijuana legalization.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on gun policy.
View source →Sep 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 31, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Agreeing to the Resolution — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Passage — Result: Passed
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 1, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Concur in the Senate Amendments — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 31, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Recorded Vote — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Refer — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Recommit — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 544.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 536.
Why: Tagged to Voting Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 6.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 31, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 0.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 532.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 53 - 47. Record Vote Number: 253.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 330.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.