Sponsorship· Gun PolicySponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Crenshaw supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly in relation to Israel, and has voted to provide support following conflicts involving Israel.
Crenshaw supports maintaining or expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly in relation to Israel, and has voted to provide support following conflicts involving Israel.
Crenshaw opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border enforcement and physical barriers. He has expressed that illegal immigrants are breaking the law but does not view them as 'bad people'.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Crenshaw opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for stricter border enforcement and physical barriers. He has expressed that illegal immigrants are breaking the law but does not view them as 'bad people'.
Crenshaw opposes legal access to abortion, stating that life begins at conception and that abortion rights should be determined by the states. He received a 0% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America and a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee.
Crenshaw opposes legal access to abortion, stating that life begins at conception and that abortion rights should be determined by the states. He received a 0% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America and a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee.
Crenshaw opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the protection of the right to bear arms. He has received an 'A+' rating from the NRA and has voted against measures such as background checks for firearm sales.
Crenshaw opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the protection of the right to bear arms. He has received an 'A+' rating from the NRA and has voted against measures such as background checks for firearm sales.
Crenshaw opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and promoting alternatives like Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). He has described the ACA as an 'unmitigated disaster'.
Crenshaw opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and promoting alternatives like Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). He has described the ACA as an 'unmitigated disaster'.
Crenshaw opposes the For the People Act, arguing that it would limit free speech and enable electoral fraud. He supports the American Civil Liberties Union's opposition to the bill over new campaign contribution revisions.
Crenshaw opposes the For the People Act, arguing that it would limit free speech and enable electoral fraud. He supports the American Civil Liberties Union's opposition to the bill over new campaign contribution revisions.
Crenshaw supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for the implementation of the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
Crenshaw supports free trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for the implementation of the USMCA to improve North American trade relations.
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Climate, Taxes, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Sponsoring the District of Columbia Firearm Freedom Act aligns with the opposition to federal gun control measures by promoting state-level firearm regulations.
Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Gun Owner Registration Information Protection Act aligns with the opposition to gun control measures by protecting gun owners' information from federal registration.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the National Constitutional Carry Act directly supports the opposition to federal gun control measures by promoting state-level carry laws.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring a border security reimbursement act directly supports the enforcement of physical barriers and aligns with the stated opposition to illegal immigration.
View source →Jan 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the Preventing Unjust Red Flag Laws Act directly aligns with the opposition to red flag laws, reinforcing the stated position against federal gun control measures.
View source →Feb 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the State Border Security Reimbursement Act directly supports the enforcement of physical barriers and border security, aligning closely with the stated opposition to illegal immigration.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Voting in favor of appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security supports border enforcement measures, aligning with the stated opposition to immigration.
View source →Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the act suggests a focus on addressing illegal immigration, which aligns with the stated position of enforcing border policies.
View source →Jan 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the ATF Accountability Act suggests a focus on oversight of federal gun enforcement, which aligns with the position of advocating for state-level discussions rather than federal control.
View source →Jan 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the ATF Accountability Act suggests a focus on oversight of federal gun enforcement, which aligns with the position of advocating for state-level discussions rather than federal control.
View source →Feb 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring a Medicaid-related act contradicts the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act and suggests support for expanding government healthcare programs.
View source →Jun 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving Medicaid primary care contradicts the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act and suggests support for government involvement in healthcare.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Voting Nay on the appropriations act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to immigration enforcement measures, as the bill may have included funding for border security initiatives.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action relates to Medicaid financing, which could align with healthcare reform efforts, but does not directly advance the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The cosponsorship of the act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, as it focuses on patient access rather than broader healthcare reform.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action relates to drug pricing transparency, which could align with healthcare reform, but does not directly support or oppose the stated position on the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill expanding veterans' access to treatments does not directly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, but it also does not contradict it, creating ambiguity in the relationship.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill related to healthcare does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but it also does not directly contradict it, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Dec 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Why: The action focuses on combating cartels, which aligns with a law enforcement perspective, but does not directly address the stated opposition to immigration enforcement measures.
Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The cosponsorship of the Freedom to Heal Act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as the specific provisions of the act are not detailed, leaving its impact on healthcare unclear.
View source →Dec 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 12 - 11.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a veterans' healthcare bill does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but it also does not contradict it, as it focuses on veterans rather than broader healthcare policy.
View source →Nov 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: The action involves healthcare reimbursement but does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Nov 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill aimed at reducing regulatory barriers for biosimilars does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the ACA, as it could be seen as a step towards improving drug access without directly addressing ACA repeal.
View source →Jun 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action focuses on public health strategies without directly addressing the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, creating ambiguity in alignment with the healthcare position.
View source →May 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action to sponsor the Protect DSH Act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as the specifics of the bill's impact on healthcare policy are unclear.
View source →Mar 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring a bill related to children's hospitals does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but it does not contradict it either, as it focuses on a specific aspect of healthcare funding.
View source →Feb 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving Medicaid care suggests some support for healthcare access, but it conflicts with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act and the retreat from supporting Medicare drug price negotiations.
View source →Jan 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The sponsorship of the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as the act's implications for Medicaid may not directly support or oppose the ACA.
View source →Jan 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action to sponsor a Medicaid-related bill does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as it could be seen as an administrative reform rather than a direct repeal or support for broader healthcare access.
View source →Jan 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action of sponsoring the HCT/P Modernization Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as the specifics of the bill's impact on healthcare access and costs are unclear.
View source →May 6, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The sponsorship of the HCT/P Modernization Act does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but the specifics of the bill's impact on healthcare policy are unclear.
View source →Jul 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The action focuses on public health strategy without directly addressing the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, creating ambiguity in alignment with the healthcare position.
View source →Jun 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The action relates to healthcare but does not directly align with or oppose the stated position on the Affordable Care Act; it focuses on a specific aspect of healthcare rather than a comprehensive stance.
View source →Jun 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 629.
Why: Sponsoring a bill related to children's hospitals does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but it also does not contradict it, as it focuses on a specific aspect of healthcare funding.
View source →May 25, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The action involves sponsoring a bill related to mental health treatment, which does not directly align with or contradict the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, creating ambiguity in its relationship to the healthcare position.
View source →Apr 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving Medicaid primary care suggests some support for healthcare access, but it does not align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Apr 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: The action to sponsor a public health trust act does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but it also does not clearly contradict it, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Apr 10, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Why: The action focuses on health-related issues but does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act or indicate a clear stance on broader healthcare policy.
View source →Jan 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Why: The sponsorship of the Anti-Border Corruption Improvement Act does not directly align with the stated opposition to immigration enforcement measures, as it focuses on improving border security without clear implications on illegal immigration.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 544.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 22, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment, Manufacturing, and Critical Materials.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 1, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 12, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 532.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 409.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 330.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 6.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.