Sponsorship· ClimateSponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Cynthia Lummis supports strong border security measures and has expressed opposition to pathways for citizenship for illegal immigrants. She advocates for a wall on the southern border and has voted against measures that would benefit undocumented immigrants.
Cynthia Lummis supports strong border security measures and has expressed opposition to pathways for citizenship for illegal immigrants. She advocates for a wall on the southern border and has voted against measures that would benefit undocumented immigrants.
Cynthia Lummis has expressed strong opposition to legal access to abortion, stating that it is a sin against God and advocating for prohibitions on federal funding for abortion services. She has supported various measures to restrict abortion access, including a ban after 20 weeks and efforts to defund organizations like Planned Parenthood.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Cynthia Lummis has expressed strong opposition to legal access to abortion, stating that it is a sin against God and advocating for prohibitions on federal funding for abortion services. She has supported various measures to restrict abortion access, including a ban after 20 weeks and efforts to defund organizations like Planned Parenthood.
Cynthia Lummis has rejected the scientific consensus on climate change, claiming it is 'not settled science.' She supports the development of nuclear power and oil drilling in Alaska, indicating a preference for energy policies that do not prioritize federal action to cut emissions.
Cynthia Lummis has rejected the scientific consensus on climate change, claiming it is 'not settled science.' She supports the development of nuclear power and oil drilling in Alaska, indicating a preference for energy policies that do not prioritize federal action to cut emissions.
Cynthia Lummis is a strong advocate for gun rights, emphasizing the fundamental right to own and carry firearms. She has received high ratings from the NRA and has supported legislation that loosens restrictions on gun ownership and transport.
Cynthia Lummis is a strong advocate for gun rights, emphasizing the fundamental right to own and carry firearms. She has received high ratings from the NRA and has supported legislation that loosens restrictions on gun ownership and transport.
Cynthia Lummis has consistently opposed a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and supporting private insurance solutions. She has emphasized the need for a free-market approach to healthcare.
Cynthia Lummis has consistently opposed a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and supporting private insurance solutions. She has emphasized the need for a free-market approach to healthcare.
Cynthia Lummis opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, pledging to oppose all federal tax increase proposals and advocating for tax cuts. She supports maintaining low tax rates and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.
Cynthia Lummis opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, pledging to oppose all federal tax increase proposals and advocating for tax cuts. She supports maintaining low tax rates and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.
Cynthia Lummis has expressed strong support for maintaining the Electoral College and has opposed measures aimed at making voter registration easier. She emphasizes the importance of traditional voting mechanisms and has a strict constitutionalist approach to voting rights.
Cynthia Lummis has expressed strong support for maintaining the Electoral College and has opposed measures aimed at making voter registration easier. She emphasizes the importance of traditional voting mechanisms and has a strict constitutionalist approach to voting rights.
Cynthia Lummis has a mixed record on trade, having expressed support for fair trade agreements that focus on Wyoming exports while also opposing Trade Promotion Authority. She emphasizes the importance of protecting American interests in trade negotiations.
Cynthia Lummis has a mixed record on trade, having expressed support for fair trade agreements that focus on Wyoming exports while also opposing Trade Promotion Authority. She emphasizes the importance of protecting American interests in trade negotiations.
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Aid, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that supports domestic oil and gas businesses directly aligns with the stated opposition to regulatory measures aimed at reducing emissions, reinforcing a preference for traditional energy sources.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Sanctuary City Elimination Act directly supports her stated opposition to sanctuary cities, aligning clearly with her position on immigration.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly supports her stated opposition to abortion by seeking to restrict federal funding for abortion providers.
View source →Oct 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring the Diesel Truck Liberation Act aligns with a preference for traditional energy sources and deregulation, as it aims to promote diesel trucks without stringent emissions regulations.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate, and Nuclear Innovation and Safety. Hearings held.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to promote nuclear power aligns with the preference for traditional energy sources, even though it does not directly address greenhouse gas emissions.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1822-1823; text: CR S1823-1824)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to restrict licenses for illegal drivers aligns with the stated opposition to immigration policies that could be seen as lenient.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring a nuclear energy act supports the development of traditional energy sources, aligning with the stated opposition to regulatory measures aimed at reducing emissions.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Mined in America Act suggests support for domestic mining, which aligns with a preference for traditional energy sources, even if it does not directly address climate change.
View source →May 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring the SPEED Act, which promotes energy development, aligns with the stated opposition to regulatory measures aimed at reducing emissions, favoring traditional energy sources.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S2375-2377)
Why: Cosponsoring the CLOSE THE GAP Act, which likely includes measures to address climate issues, contradicts the stated opposition to climate change regulations and preference for traditional energy sources.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S2083)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill related to coal leases supports fossil fuel development, which contradicts the stated opposition to climate change regulations aimed at reducing emissions.
View source →Oct 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the COAL Act, which promotes coal production, directly contradicts the stated opposition to regulatory measures aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
View source →Oct 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8395)
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to disapprove a resource management plan indicates a direct opposition to regulatory measures aimed at environmental protection, contradicting the stated position against climate action.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Essential Caregivers Act suggests support for a government role in healthcare, which contradicts the stated opposition to a larger government role.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at future interstate infrastructure development suggests support for regulatory measures that may conflict with the stated opposition to climate change initiatives.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action aims to expedite benefits for a specific group, which could align with compassionate healthcare access, but does not directly support or oppose the broader healthcare position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget. (text: CR S1582-1583)
Why: The act aims for deficit reduction, which could imply fiscal responsibility, but does not directly align with a clear stance against federal tax increases or support for tax cuts.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring a conservation act suggests some engagement with environmental issues, but it does not align with the opposition to climate change regulation and preference for traditional energy sources.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The act aims to improve water infrastructure, which could have environmental benefits, but does not directly align with the opposition to climate regulations or the stated preference for traditional energy sources.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text: CR S764)
Why: The action of cosponsoring the EDA Short Form Application Act does not clearly align with or oppose the stated position on climate, as the bill's specific environmental implications are unclear.
View source →Jul 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring the Endangered Species Recovery Act suggests some concern for environmental issues, but it does not align clearly with the opposition to climate change regulations and the preference for traditional energy sources.
View source →Jun 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The bill's focus on digital assets does not directly address tax increases or cuts, leaving the relationship to the stated position unclear.
Jun 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: The act aims to reduce federal debt, which could imply fiscal responsibility, but does not directly address tax cuts or increases, leaving the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →May 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring the act suggests some concern for environmental issues, but it does not align with the stated opposition to climate change regulations and preference for traditional energy sources.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The sponsorship of the Interactive Federal Review Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated opposition to climate regulations, as the specifics of the act's provisions are not detailed.
View source →Mar 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The act's focus on highway funding does not directly align with climate policy, but it may involve infrastructure that could impact emissions, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2702)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2130-2131)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 327.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 267.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 371.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1609; text: CR S1617-1618)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1523; text: CR S1517)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S1093-1094)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1011)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S7168)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-66.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.