Sponsorship· ClimateCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Cynthia Lummis supports strong border security measures and has expressed opposition to pathways for citizenship for illegal immigrants. She advocates for a wall on the southern border and has voted against measures that would benefit undocumented immigrants.
Cynthia Lummis supports strong border security measures and has expressed opposition to pathways for citizenship for illegal immigrants. She advocates for a wall on the southern border and has voted against measures that would benefit undocumented immigrants.
Cynthia Lummis advocates for maintaining a strong national defense and military capabilities. She supports increased defense spending and has expressed opposition to withdrawing troops from conflict zones without clear objectives.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Cynthia Lummis advocates for maintaining a strong national defense and military capabilities. She supports increased defense spending and has expressed opposition to withdrawing troops from conflict zones without clear objectives.
Cynthia Lummis has expressed strong opposition to legal access to abortion, stating that it is a sin against God and advocating for prohibitions on federal funding for abortion services. She has supported various measures to restrict abortion access, including a ban after 20 weeks and efforts to defund organizations like Planned Parenthood.
Cynthia Lummis has expressed strong opposition to legal access to abortion, stating that it is a sin against God and advocating for prohibitions on federal funding for abortion services. She has supported various measures to restrict abortion access, including a ban after 20 weeks and efforts to defund organizations like Planned Parenthood.
Cynthia Lummis has rejected the scientific consensus on climate change, claiming it is 'not settled science.' She supports the development of nuclear power and oil drilling in Alaska, indicating a preference for energy policies that do not prioritize federal action to cut emissions.
Cynthia Lummis has rejected the scientific consensus on climate change, claiming it is 'not settled science.' She supports the development of nuclear power and oil drilling in Alaska, indicating a preference for energy policies that do not prioritize federal action to cut emissions.
Cynthia Lummis has a strong pro-gun stance, receiving an 'A' rating from the NRA and supporting legislation that allows loaded guns in national parks. She has consistently voted in favor of gun rights, indicating her opposition to stricter firearms regulations.
Cynthia Lummis has consistently opposed a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and supporting private insurance solutions. She has emphasized the need for a free-market approach to healthcare.
Cynthia Lummis has consistently opposed a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and supporting private insurance solutions. She has emphasized the need for a free-market approach to healthcare.
Cynthia Lummis opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, pledging to oppose all federal tax increase proposals and advocating for tax cuts. She supports maintaining low tax rates and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.
Cynthia Lummis opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, pledging to oppose all federal tax increase proposals and advocating for tax cuts. She supports maintaining low tax rates and has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.
Cynthia Lummis has expressed strong support for maintaining the Electoral College and has opposed measures aimed at making voter registration easier. She emphasizes the importance of traditional voting mechanisms and has a strict constitutionalist approach to voting rights.
Cynthia Lummis has expressed strong support for maintaining the Electoral College and has opposed measures aimed at making voter registration easier. She emphasizes the importance of traditional voting mechanisms and has a strict constitutionalist approach to voting rights.
Cynthia Lummis supports free trade agreements and opposes tariffs. She advocates for policies that promote Wyoming exports and believes in reducing trade barriers to enhance economic growth.
Cynthia Lummis supports free trade agreements and opposes tariffs. She advocates for policies that promote Wyoming exports and believes in reducing trade barriers to enhance economic growth.
Lummis has expressed opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly regarding LGBTQ rights. She has voted against hate crime legislation and supports the idea that marriage should be defined at the state level, opposing federal recognition of same-sex marriage.
Lummis has expressed opposition to stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly regarding LGBTQ rights. She has voted against hate crime legislation and supports the idea that marriage should be defined at the state level, opposing federal recognition of same-sex marriage.
Cynthia Lummis has a mixed stance on drug policy, opposing the legalization of recreational marijuana at the federal level while indicating some support for drug reform. She has been rated as pro-drug-reform by NORML, suggesting a nuanced position rather than outright opposition to all forms of drug policy reform.
Cynthia Lummis has a mixed stance on drug policy, opposing the legalization of recreational marijuana at the federal level while indicating some support for drug reform. She has been rated as pro-drug-reform by NORML, suggesting a nuanced position rather than outright opposition to all forms of drug policy reform.
Position extraction pending on 10 issues: Foreign Policy, Economy & Jobs, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Public Health, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove an EPA rule on vehicle pollution standards directly aligns with the opposition to federal action aimed at cutting emissions.
Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove EPA regulations on vehicle pollution standards directly aligns with the stated position of opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove EPA's greenhouse gas emission standards directly supports the position against federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to disapprove EPA regulations on pollution control directly aligns with the position of opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 401.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting American Taxpayers Act aligns with the stated position by advocating for lower taxes, which directly supports the opposition to higher taxes on corporations and top earners.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-35.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that protects the Second Amendment rights of veterans directly aligns with the stated opposition to stricter firearms regulations.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that supports domestic oil and gas businesses aligns with the stated position of opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Sanctuary City Elimination Act directly supports her stated opposition to sanctuary cities, aligning clearly with her position on immigration.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly supports her stated opposition to abortion by seeking to restrict federal funding for abortion providers.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove an EPA rule on pollution control standards aligns with the stated position of opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The act likely supports energy infrastructure development, which aligns with the figure's opposition to prioritizing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill focused on assessing terrorism risks related to generative AI supports the broader goal of national security and military readiness.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S2759-2766)
Why: The Let America Build Act is likely to support energy development, which aligns with the figure's opposition to prioritizing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate, and Nuclear Innovation and Safety. Hearings held.
Why: Sponsoring a bill that promotes nuclear power aligns with the position of opposing federal action to cut emissions, as it supports energy development without prioritizing emission reductions.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1822-1823; text: CR S1823-1824)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to restrict licenses for illegal drivers aligns with the stated opposition to immigration policies that could be seen as lenient.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Mined in America Act suggests support for domestic mining, which aligns with a preference for traditional energy sources, even if it does not directly address climate change.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to strengthen nuclear energy aligns with the position of supporting energy development without prioritizing federal action to cut emissions, as it promotes an energy source that does not directly address emission reductions.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring the End EPA Abuse Act directly undermines the stated position by seeking to limit the EPA's regulatory authority, which contradicts the need for federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the POWER Up Act, which likely promotes renewable energy and federal action on emissions, directly contradicts the stated position of opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S2375-2377)
Why: Cosponsoring the CLOSE THE GAP Act, which likely includes measures to address climate issues, contradicts the stated opposition to climate change regulations and preference for traditional energy sources.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S2083)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill related to coal leases supports fossil fuel development, which contradicts the stated opposition to climate change regulations aimed at reducing emissions.
View source →Oct 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the COAL Act, which likely supports coal industry interests, directly contradicts the stated position opposing federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Mar 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the PARC Act, which likely involves federal action related to climate and emissions, directly contradicts the stated position of opposing such measures.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Essential Caregivers Act suggests support for a government role in healthcare, which contradicts the stated opposition to a larger government role.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at future interstate infrastructure development suggests support for regulatory measures that may conflict with the stated opposition to climate change initiatives.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The bill's content regarding the Clean Air Act is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on climate policy.
View source →Aug 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The bill pertains to uranium enrichment, which supports nuclear energy development, but does not directly address emissions or climate action, making the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 452.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on taxes.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a bill that bans birth tourism does not clearly advance or undermine the broader immigration policy focus on enforcement, as it does not directly address pathways for legal immigration or asylum.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action aims to expedite benefits for a specific group, which could align with compassionate healthcare access, but does not directly support or oppose the broader healthcare position.
Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget. (text: CR S1582-1583)
Why: The act aims for deficit reduction, which could imply fiscal responsibility, but does not directly align with a clear stance against federal tax increases or support for tax cuts.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on climate.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The act aims to improve water infrastructure, which could have environmental benefits, but does not directly align with the opposition to climate regulations or the stated preference for traditional energy sources.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text: CR S764)
Why: The action of cosponsoring the EDA Short Form Application Act does not clearly align with or oppose the stated position on climate, as the bill's specific environmental implications are unclear.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position.
View source →Oct 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position against federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jul 31, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated opposition to federal action on climate issues.
View source →Jun 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on taxes.
View source →May 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →May 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated opposition to federal action on climate.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it relates to the stated position on climate.
View source →Mar 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on climate policy.
View source →Feb 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated pro-free trade position.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Public Health, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S3206)
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2702)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2130-2131)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 483.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4274; text: CR S4269-4270)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 327.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 267.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 371.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1609; text: CR S1617-1618)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1523; text: CR S1517)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S1093-1094)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1011)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S7168)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8395)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 27, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-66.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.